This quasi-experimental study examined the effect of a mechanics course delivered through a Learning Management System (LMS) on the creativity of prospective physics teachers at a teacher training college in Mataram, Indonesia. The study was conducted in the post-pandemic era. Using a pretest-posttest one-group design, the researchers evaluated changes in creativity across three domains: figural, numeric, and verbal. The results showed significant improvements in overall creativity, with the most critical gains observed in the figural domain. Further analysis revealed that fluency was the creative indicator with the most enhancement. In contrast, other indicators displayed varying degrees of improvement. These findings highlight the potential of LMS-based instruction in fostering creativity among future physics educators, particularly in the figural, numeric, and verbal domains. This study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting technology integration into teacher education, especially during times of crisis. Future research should explore more targeted instructional strategies within LMS environments and utilize comprehensive creativity assessment methods further to enhance creative learning experiences for prospective physics teachers.

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021

Assmus, D., & Fritzlar, T. (2022). Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness in the primary school age range: an interview study on creating figural patterns. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01328-8

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas for Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73

Blieck, Y., Kauwenberghs, K., Zhu, C., et al. (2019). Investigating the relationship between success factors and student participation in online and blended learning in adult education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 476–490. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12351

Cassels, A. M. (2024). Leveraging LMS Technology to Deliver Formative Assessment in the Post-Pandemic Era. Exploring Technology-Infused Education in the Post-Pandemic Era, 335–352. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2885-9.ch011

Cheng, K. K., Thacker, B. A., Cardenas, R. L., et al. (2004). Using an online homework system enhances students’ learning of physics concepts in an introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1447–1453. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1768555

Chiang, T H., Yang, S J., Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. JSTOR, 17(4), 352-365.

Cioca, L.-I., & Nerișanu, R. A. (2020). Enhancing Creativity: Using Visual Mnemonic Devices in the Teaching Process in Order to Develop Creativity in Students. Sustainability, 12(5), 1985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051985

Creswell, J W., Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th ed. Sage Publications.

Dău-Gaşpar, O., Marinca, A. (2016). Secondary-school pupils' creativity in relation with school performance. In: Proceedings of Theoretical and Applied in Psychology SICAP23. p. 39.

Duit, R., Schecker, H., Höttecke, D., Niedderer, H. (2014). Teaching physics. In: Handbook of Research on Science Education (Volume II). Routledge.

Duncan, K. J. (2020). Examining the Effects of Immersive Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and the Development of Collaboration, Communication, Creativity and Critical Thinking. TechTrends, 64(3), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00500-9

Fink, A., Reim, T., Benedek, M., et al. (2019). The Effects of a Verbal and a Figural Creativity Training on Different Facets of Creative Potential. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 676–685. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.402

Furqon, M., Sinaga, P., Liliasari, L., et al. (2023). The Impact of Learning Management System (LMS) Usage on Students. TEM Journal, 1082–1089. Portico. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem122-54

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., et al. (2019). Problem-Based Learning Approach with Supported Interactive Multimedia in Physics Course: Its Effects on Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075–1089. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.627162

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., et al. (2019). Project-based learning on media development course to improve creativity of prospective physics teacher. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on science, mathematics, environment, and education. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139764

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Suranti, N. M. Y., et al. (2021). The impact of learning management system implementation on students’ understanding of mechanics concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012020

Gunawan, G., Sahidu, H., Harjono, A., et al. (2017). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Model Assisted by Virtual Media on Physics Creativity of Students (Indonesian). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13514

Gunawan, M., Suranti, N., Nisrina, N., et al. (2017). Investigating Students Creativity Based on Gender by Applying Virtual Laboratory to Physics Instruction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.54

Gunawan, Suranti, N. M. Y., & Harjono, A. (2023). Students’ creativity based on achievement motivation in learning mechanics with blended model. AIP Conf. Proc., 2619, 090006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123136

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Handhika, J. (2012). Learning physics through guided inquiry with experimental and demonstration methods in terms of student activity and attention (Indonesian). Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v1i1/april.104

Harjono, A., Gunawan, G., Adawiyah, R., et al. (2020). An Interactive e-Book for Physics to Improve Students’ Conceptual Mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(05), 40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.10967

He, L., Kenett, Y. N., Zhuang, K., et al. (2020). The relation between semantic memory structure, associative abilities, and verbal and figural creativity. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 268–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1819415

Hockicko, P., Krišt′ák, L., & Němec, M. (2014). Development of students’ conceptual thinking by means of video analysis and interactive simulations at technical universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.941337

Kao, C.-Y. (2020). How Figurativity of Analogy Affects Creativity: The Application of Four-Term Analogies to Teaching for Creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100653

Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in Education: Teaching for Creativity Development. Psychology, 10(02), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012

Kerimbayev, N., Nurym, N., Akramova, А., et al. (2019). Virtual educational environment: interactive communication using LMS Moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1965–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10067-5

Ketsman, O. (2019). Perspectives of Pre-Service Teachers About Blended Learning in Technology Integration Courses. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 11(4), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2019100102

Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., et al. (2018). Children’s Creativity: A Theoretical Framework and Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707

Liu, H.-Y., & Chang, C.-C. (2017). Effectiveness of 4Ps Creativity Teaching for College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Creative Education, 08(06), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.86062

Ouadoud, M., Nejjari, A., Chkouri, M. Y., & El-Kadiri, K. E. (2018). Learning Management System and the Underlying Learning Theories. Springer. pp. 732–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74500-8_67

Papadakis, S. (2023). MOOCs 2012-2022: An overview. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 682–693. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.01.017

Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., et al. (2019). The Effect of Flipped-Problem Based Learning Model Integrated With LMS-Google Classroom for Senior High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350

Ramdani, Z., Hadiana, D., Amri, A., et al. (2022). The Mediating Role of Attitude in the Correlation between Creativity and Curiosity regarding the Performance of Outstanding Science Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.37272

Ratnawati, N., Purnomo, A., Wahyuningtyas, N., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of Team-Based Project Integrated E-books in Improving Student Self-Directed Learning and Creativity. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(24), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i24.45955

Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., et al. (2020). Students’ Perception of Learning Management System Supported Smartphone: Satisfaction Analysis in Online Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25363

Rosana, D., Jumadi, J., Pujianto, P. (2014). Development of soft skills of international class program students through context-based learning to improve the quality of the process and learning outcomes of mechanics (Indonesian). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 12-21.

Saleh, R., & Brem, A. (2023). Creativity for sustainability: An integrative literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, 135848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135848

Sanabria, J. C., & Arámburo-Lizárraga, J. (2017). Enhancing 21st Century Skills with AR: Using the Gradual Immersion Method to develop Collaborative Creativity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00627a

Saputro, B., Tortop, H. S., Zuhri, M., et al. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Learning Management System of Saqural Learning Application on the Scientific Interpretation Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27677

Segundo Marcos, R. I., López Fernández, V., Daza González, M. T., et al. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663

Studente, S., Seppala, N., & Sadowska, N. (2016). Facilitating creative thinking in the classroom: Investigating the effects of plants and the colour green on visual and verbal creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.09.001

Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, S., et al. (2020). Development of Ubiquitous Learning Environment Based on Moodle Learning Management System. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(14), 182. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i14.11775

Sun, J., Liu, Z., Rolls, E. T., et al. (2018). Verbal Creativity Correlates with the Temporal Variability of Brain Networks During the Resting State. Cerebral Cortex, 29(3), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy010

Triswidrananta, O. D., Pramudhita, A. N., & Wijaya, I. D. (2022). Learning Management System Based on Assessment for Learning to Improve Computational Thinking. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(04), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i04.28979

Ward, W. B., & Younis, M. Z. (2013). Steps Toward a Planning Framework for Elder Care in the Arab World. In: SpringerBriefs in Aging. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5978-1

Wechsler, S. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian Culture. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_3

Widodo, W., Mahdiannur, M. A., Suryanti, S., et al. (2023). Mobile Interactive Multimedia to Assist Prospective Science Teachers Holding Conceptual Understanding in Problem-Solving Electrical Circuits. TEM Journal, 2251–2263. Portico. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem124-36

Wu, Y. (2016). Factors impacting students’ online learning experience in a learner‐centred course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 416–429. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12142

Zourmpakis, A.-I., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2023). Adaptive Gamification in Science Education: An Analysis of the Impact of Implementation and Adapted Game Elements on Students’ Motivation. Computers, 12(7), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12070143