Effect of ownership attributes on environmental reporting in the emerging economy
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024
VIEWS - 55 (Abstract) 31 (PDF)
Abstract
Nowadays investors are measuring the performances of a business organization not only based on their operating efficiency but also fulfilling their social responsibility. At least the investors need to know whether the activities of the business have any adverse impact on the society and environment. This study explores the accountability of the business from the social and environmental context. This empirical study tends to investigate the nature of the ownership structure that influences the environmental disclosure of a business entity. Based on the sample of fifty-five DSE-listed textile companies, this study used multiple regression to assess the causal relationship between the ownership structure and corporate environmental disclosure. Moreover, this cross-sectional study also considers the agency theory and stakeholder theory to explain the relationship between the ownership structure and environmental disclosure. The findings indicate that corporate environmental disclosure is positively influenced by foreign ownership and institutional ownership whereas director ownership and public ownership have no significant association with the environmental disclosure. These insightful results challenge conventional assumptions and highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of the factors that drive environmental reporting practices in the context of an emerging economy. The main contribution of this article lies in its provision of empirical evidence from an emerging economy, Bangladesh, which helps in understanding sustainable practices in a global context. Additionally, it aids in developing effective corporate governance policies and strategies tailored to similar emerging economies by recognizing the role of ownership structures in influencing environmental accountability. These findings further assist policymakers, managers, and other sustainability advocates in understanding how different ownership structures affect corporate environmental disclosure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223-250.
Ahmed, H., Uddin, M. M., Masum, M. H., & Uddin, M. H. (2021). The inclination of corporate voluntary environmental disclosure in Bangladesh: Effect of size, Industry, and operating performance. Academy of Strategic Management Journal.
Akrout, M. M., & Othman, H. B. (2013). A study of the determinants of corporate environmental disclosure in MENA emerging markets. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 46.
Bhuiyan, N.U. and Masum, M.H. (2010) “Balanced Scorecard: A multi-stream performance measurement tool for public sector companies in Bangladesh-A synopsis”; Journal of the Institute of Cost and Management Accountants of Bangladesh; Volume XXXVIII, September-October; pp 19-23.
Chang, K., & Zhang, L. (2015). The Effects of Corporate Ownership Structure on Environmental Information Disclosure—Empirical Evidence from Unbalanced Penal Data in Heavy-pollution Industries in China.
Chau, G., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247-265.
Chen, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, M. (2023). Sustainable innovation and corporate environmental disclosure: The moderating role of corporate governance. Sustainability, 15(5), 2789.
Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299-317.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327.
Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312-343.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
Djankov, S., & Murrell, P. (2002). Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 739-792.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
G., E., & Kabra, K.C. (2017). The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10, 24 - 43.
Gao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2018). Ownership structure and corporate environmental disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 357-372.
Gerged, A. M. (2021). Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 609-629.
Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301–327.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159-175.
Hassan, N, Masum, M.H., Sarker, J.B., (2022), Ownership Structure and Corporate tax Avoidance: Evidence from the Listed Companies in Bangladesh. Polish Journal of Management Studies; 25 (1), Page: 147-161. 10.17512/pjms.2022.25.1.09
He, W., Zhang, K., Kong, Y., Yuan, L., Peng, Q., Mulugeta Degefu, D., Stephen Ramsey, T., & Meng, X. (2023). Reduction pathways identification of agricultural water pollution in Hubei Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110464
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
Ho, S. S., & Wong, K. W. (2004). Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure of environmental information in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 12(1), 133-155.
Iatridis, G.E. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, 14, 55-75.
Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850-874.
Islam, M. S., & Rahman, A. (2017). Ownership structure and corporate environmental disclosure: Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability, 9(1), 100.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jiang, B., & Raza, M. Y. (2023). Research on China’s renewable energy policies under the dual carbon goals: A political discourse analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 48, 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101118
Lin, B., Zhu, R., & Raza, M. Y. (2022). Fuel substitution and environmental sustainability in India: Perspectives of technical progress. Energy, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125309
Liu, Z., Xie, X., & Wei, Y. (2023). The role of digital technologies in enhancing corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374, 134899.
Masum, M. H., Alam, M. F., Alam, M. S., (2024). Effect of board and ownership attributes on corporate performance in transition economy. Cogent Business & Management 11(1): 2369708.
Masum, M. H., Latiff, A. R. A., & Osman, M. N. H. (2020). Ownership Structure and Corporate Voluntary Disclosures in Transition Economy. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 7(10), 601-611.
Masum, M. H., Latiff, A. R. A., Osman, M. N. H., Sarkar, J. B., Rahman, M. M., & Khan, S. (2023). Impact of corporate characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A Managerial insight. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(1). doi: 10.17512/pjms.2023.28.1.12
Masum, M. H., Uddin, M. M., Ahmed, H., & Uddin, M. H. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosures and corporate performance: evidence from the listed companies in Bangladesh. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(2), 1-16.
Plumlee, M. (2003). The influence of firm characteristics and differential costs of disclosure on management’s reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 1-36.
Rahman, A., & Post, C. (2012). Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): Toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 307-319.
Rahman, M.M. & Masum, M. H. (2021). Extent of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Bangladesh. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 8(4).
Raza, M. Y. (2023). Fuels substitution possibilities, environment and the technological progress in Bangladesh’s transport sector. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13300
Raza, M. Y., & Lin, B. (2023). Future outlook and influencing factors analysis of natural gas consumption in Bangladesh: An economic and policy perspectives. Energy Policy, 173, 113379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113379
Raza, M. Y., & Tang, S. (2022). Inter-Fuel Substitution, Technical Change, and Carbon Mitigation Potential in Pakistan: Perspectives of Environmental Analysis. Energies, 15(22), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228758
Rustam, A., Wang, Y., & Zameer, H. (2019). Does foreign ownership affect corporate sustainability disclosure in Pakistan? A sequential mixed methods approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 31178-31197.
Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591-613.
Shah, S. G. M., & Ivascu, L. (2024). Accentuating the moderating influence of green innovation, environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and innovation output between vigorous board and Romanian manufacturing firms’ performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 10569-10589.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Sun, S., Zhang, X., Dong, L., Fan, L., & Liu, X. (2023). Research on the Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Enterprise Financial Information Management Based on Compound Neural Network. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 35(3), 1-13.
Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4), 686-714.
Walden, W. D., & Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125-154.
Wang, C. Y., Weng, Y. C., & Wang, L. (2021). Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: The moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21, S1-S12.
Wicaksono, A.P., Kusuma, H., Cahaya, F.R., Rosjidi, A., Rahman, A., & Rahayu, I. (2023). Impact of institutional ownership on environmental disclosure in Indonesian companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
Xiuhui, J., & Raza, M. Y. (2022). Delving into Pakistan’s industrial economy and carbon mitigation: An effort toward sustainable development goals. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100839
Yang, H., Gou, X., Xue, B., Xu, J., Wei, Y., & Ma, W. (2023). Measuring the cross-border spillover effects and telecoupling processes of ecosystem services in Western China. Environmental Research, 239, 117291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117291
Yin, J., & Wang, S. (2018). The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives. Applied Economics, 50(8), 905–919.
Yousaf Raza, M., Hasan, M. M., & Chen, Y. (2023). Role of economic growth, urbanization and energy consumption on climate change in Bangladesh. Energy Strategy Reviews,47, 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101088
Yuan, L., Qi, Y., He, W., Wu, X., Kong, Y., Ramsey, T. S., & Degefu, D. M. (2024). A differential game of water pollution management in the trans-jurisdictional river basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 438, 140823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140823
Zhang, Z., & Chen, J. (2022). The Enterprise’s Willingness to Use Remote Monitoring Technology Under the Background of Green Operation and Service-Oriented Manufacturing. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 35(2), 1-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8542
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tanseer Ahamed, Mofijul Hoq Masum
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.