The aim of this study was to analyze the perceived self and collective efficacy, individual and social norms and feelings related to environmental health concern among a sample of Pakistanis who are (or are not) engage in pro- environment behaviors in their daily lives. An ad hoc questionnaire with scales on pro-environmental behavior, self and collective efficacy, individual and social norms, and environmental health concerns was administered to adults in Lahore, Pakistan, and 833 respondents (62% males and 38% females) responded. Analysis of our research data shows that among those who engaged in daily pro-environmental behaviors, perceptions of individual and social norms and individual and collective efficacy were positively associated with concern for the environment and health. This study offers some interesting ideas that could be useful in developing federal, regional, local and community policies to promote daily pro-environmental behaviors. For example, in addition to advocating for environmental health and reducing one’s ecological footprint, social communication could explain that caring about environmental health (and thus adopting daily pro-environmental behaviors) is a way to manage one’s mental health. In this way, circular behavior is encouraged, which not only benefits the environment and the community, but also brings personal benefits.

Acerbi M, Ambrosi P. Toward a clean and green Pakistan published on March 25, 2019 Dawn newspaper. https://www.dawn.com/news/1471707

Ágoston C, Csaba B, Nagy B, Kőváry Z, Dúll A, Rácz J, Demetrovics Z. Identifying types of eco-anxiety, eco-guilt, eco-grief, and eco-coping in a climate-sensitive population: a qualitative study. International journal of environmental research and public health 2022; 19(4), 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042461

Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Arshad MZ, waqas Kamran H, Scholz M, Han H. Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2021; 27, 1138-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034

Ajzen I. Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2012; 640(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211423363

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 1991; 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Albrecht G. Chronic Environmental Change: Emerging ‘Psychoterratic’ Syndromes. In Climate Change and Human Well-Being; Weissbecker, I., Ed.; International and Cultural Psychology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 43–56. ISBN 978-1-4419-9741-8.

Ashwell DY. Values, pro-environmental behaviour and stress appraisals of anthropogenic environmental degradation. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, 2020. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/13128

Ashwell DY. Young adults in New Zealand: the experience of pro-environmental behaviour in relation to mental health and wellbeing, Honours Dissertation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, 2018.

Bain PG, Bongiorno R. It's not too late to do the right thing: Moral motivations for climate change action. Climate Change 2020, 11(1), e615. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.615

Ballew MT, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Rosenthal SA, Kotcher JE, Marlon JR, ... & Maibach EW. Climate change in the American mind: Data, tools, and trends. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 2019; 61(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300

Bandura A. The psychology of chance encounters and life paths. American psychologist 1982; 37(7), 747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.7.747

Barth M, Masson T, Fritsche I, Fielding K, Smith JR. Collective responses to global challenges: The social psychology of pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2021; 74, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101562

Clayton S, Karazsia BT. Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2020; 69, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434

Clayton S. Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of anxiety disorders 2020, 74, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263

Coelho F, Pereira MC, Cruz L, Simões P, Barata E. Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2017; 54, 127-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008

Dewantara JA, Azahra SD, Budimansyah D, Pramulya M, Casmana AR. Community-based environmental conservation (ecological citizenship): Real practice an environmentally eco-village in the middle of the city. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2023 (Vol. 2798, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154492

Dietz T, Shwom RL, Whitley CT. Climate change and society. Annual Review of Sociology 2020; 46, 135-158.

Doran R, Hanss D, Larsen S. Attitudes, efficacy beliefs, and willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling. Tourism and Hospitality Research 2015; 15(4), 281-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415580360

Doran R, Hanss D, Larsen S. Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2017; 17(3), 223-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2016.1179129

Doran R, Larsen S. The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose eco‐friendly travel options. International Journal of Tourism Research 2016; 18(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2042

Environmental Performance Index (2022). Available online: https://epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2022/component/epi (accessed October 1, 2023)

Faraz NA, Ahmed F, Ying M, Mehmood SA. The interplay of green servant leadership, self‐efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro‐environmental behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2021; 28(4), 1171-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2115

Geng L, Cheng X, Tang Z, Zhou K, Ye L. Can previous pro-environmental behaviours influence subsequent environmental behaviours? The licensing effect of pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 2016; 10, e9. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2016.6

González-Hernández DL, Aguirre-Gamboa RA, Meijles EW (2022). The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022; 1-23, 1853-1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02093-6

Government of Pakistan Ministry Of Environment. National Environmental Policy, 2005. Available online https://pbit.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/National%20Environmental%20Policy%202005.pdf (accessed on February 1, 2024)

Grilli G, Curtis J. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: A review of methods and approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 135, 110039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110039

Gul A, Chandio AA, Siyal SA, Rehman A, Xiumin W. How climate change is impacting the major yield crops of Pakistan? an exploration from long-and short-run estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29(18), 26660-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17579-z

Hamann KR, Reese G. My influence on the world (of others): Goal efficacy beliefs and efficacy affect predict private, public, and activist pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2020; 76(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12369

Heeren A, Mouguiama-Daouda C, Contreras A. On Climate Anxiety and the Threat It May Pose to Daily Life Functioning and Adaptation: A Study among European and African French-Speaking Participants. Clim. Chang. 2022, 173, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03402-2

Huang H. Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research 2016; 69(6), 2206-2212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.031

Innocenti M, Perilli A, Santarelli G, Carluccio N, Zjalic D, Acquadro Maran D, ... Cadeddu C. (2023). How does climate change worry influence the relationship between climate change anxiety and eco-paralysis? a moderation study. Climate 2023; 11(9), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11090190

Innocenti M, Santarelli G, Lombardi GS, Ciabini L, Zjalic D, Di Russo M, Cadeddu C. How Can Climate Change Anxiety Induce Both Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Eco-Paralysis? The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(4), 3085.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004308

Jain N, Jain P. Eco-Anxiety and Environmental Concern as Predictors of Eco-Activism. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022, 1084, 1, p. 012007. IOP Publishing.

Keizer K, Schultz PW. Social norms and pro‐environmental behaviour. Environmental psychology: An introduction 2018; 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch18

Klotz AC, Swider BW, Kwon SH. Back-translation practices in organizational research: Avoiding loss in translation. Journal of Applied Psychology 2023; 108(5), 699. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001050

Lamm AE, McCann RG, Howe PD. I could but I don't: What does it take to adopt pro-environmental behaviors in the United States?. Energy Research & Social Science 2022; 93, 102845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102845

Lange F, Dewitte S. Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2019, 63, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009

Latif B, Ong TS, Meero A, Abdul Rahman AA, Ali M. Employee-perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee pro-environmental behavior (PEB): The moderating role of CSR skepticism and CSR authenticity. Sustainability 2022; 14(3), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031380

Lauren N, Fielding KS, Smith L, Louis WR. You did, so you can and you will: Self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2016; 48, 191-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.004

Maqsoom A, Arif U, Ejaz A, Musarat MA, Aslam I, Zubair S. Factors influencing the pro-environmental behavior of construction workers. In2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs (51154) 2020 Nov 11 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Nisar S, Khan NR, Khan MR. Determinant analysis of employee attitudes toward pro-environmental behavior in textile firms of Pakistan: a serial mediation approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 2021; 32(5), 1064-1094. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0270

Ogunbode CA, Doran R, Hanss D, Ojala M, Salmela-Aro K, van den Broek KL, Bhullar N, Aquino SD, Marot T, Schermer JA, Wlodarczyk A. Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: Correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2022; 84, 101887.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887

Ojala M, Cunsolo A, Ogunbode CA, Middleton J. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual review of environment and resources 2021; 46, 35-58.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716

Pakmehr S, Yazdanpanah M, Baradaran M. How collective efficacy makes a difference in responses to water shortage due to climate change in southwest Iran. Land Use Policy 2020; 99, 104798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104798

Perera CR, Kalantari H, Johnson LW. Climate change beliefs, personal environmental norms and environmentally conscious behaviour intention. Sustainability 2022; 14(3), 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031824

Pihkala P. Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability 2020; 12(19), 7836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197836

Prasetiyo WH, Kamarudin KR, Dewantara JA. (2019). Surabaya green and clean: Protecting urban environment through civic engagement community. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 2019; 29(8), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22317-0

Rocque RJ, Beaudoin C, Ndjaboue R, Cameron L, Poirier-Bergeron L, Poulin-Rheault RA, ... Witteman HO. Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ open 2021; 11(6), e046333. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333

Romanello M, McGushin A, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Hughes N, Jamart L, ... Hamilton I. The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. The Lancet 2021; 398(10311), 1619-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6.

Silvi M, Padilla E. Pro‐environmental behavior: Social norms, intrinsic motivation and external conditions. Environmental Policy and Governance 2021; 31(6), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1960

Stern PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues 2000, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Sumaira Siddique HM. Industrialization, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: evidence from South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023; 30(2), 4094-102. doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22317-0

Testa S, Civilotti C, Di Fini G, Rossetto C, Boncinelli V, Veglia F. Development of two equivalent short forms of the Psychological General Well-Being Index: PGWBI-A and PGWBI-B. TPM 2016; 23(2), 149-166.

Usher K, Durkin J, Bhullar N. Eco-anxiety: How Thinking about Climate Change-related Environmental Decline Is Affecting Our Mental Health. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2019; 28, 1233–1234. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27908

van Valkengoed AM, Abrahamse W, Steg L. To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour. Nature human behaviour 2022; 6(11), 1482-92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01473-w

Vesely S, Klöckner CA. Social desirability in environmental psychology research: Three meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11, 1395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395

Vicente-Molina MA, Fernández-Sainz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J. Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 176, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079

Wang X, Van der Werff E, Bouman T, Harder MK, Steg L. I am vs. we are: how biospheric values and environmental identity of individuals and groups can influence pro-environmental behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12, 618956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956

World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama 2013; 310, 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Wut TM, Ng P, Kan HKM, Fong CS. Does gender matter? Attitude towards waste charging policy and pro-environmental behaviours. Social Responsibility Journal 2021; 17(8), 1100-1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2020-0102