While the notion of the smart city has grown in popularity, the backlash against smart urban infrastructure in the context of changing state-public relations has seldom been examined. This article draws on the case of Hong Kong’s smart lampposts to analyse the emergence of networked dissent against smart urban infrastructure during a period of unrest. Deriving insights from critical data studies, dissentworks theory, and relevant work on networked activism, the article illustrates how a smart urban infrastructure was turned into both a source and a target of popular dissent through digital mediation and politicisation. Drawing on an interpretive analysis of qualitative data collected from multiple digital platforms, the analysis explicates the citizen curation of socio-technic counter-imaginaries that constituted a consent of dissent in the digital realm, and the creation and diffusion of networked action repertoires in response to a changing political opportunity structure. In addition to explicating the words and deeds employed in this networked dissent, this article also discusses the technopolitical repercussions of this dissent for the city’s later attempts at data-based urban governance, which have unfolded at the intersections of urban techno-politics and local contentious politics. Moving beyond the common focus on neoliberal governmentality and its limits, this article reveals the underexplored pitfalls of smart urban infrastructure vis-à-vis the shifting socio-political landscape of Hong Kong, particularly in the digital age.

1. Andrejevic, M. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance: To pre-empt a thief. International Journal of Communication, 11, 879-896.
2. Arku, R. N., Buttazzoni, A., Agyapon-Ntra, K., et al. (2022). Highlighting smart city mirages in public perceptions: A Twitter sentiment analysis of four African smart city projects. Cities, 130, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103857
3. Barns, S. (2020). Platform Urbanism. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8
4. Belk, R. W., Kozinets, R., & Fischer, E. (2012). Qualitative consumer and marketing research. Sage.
5. Bunders, D. J., & Varró, K. (2019). Problematizing data-driven urban practices: Insights from five Dutch ‘smart cities. Cities, 93, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.004
6. Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231124410
7. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
8. Chan, K. G. (2019). Surveillance fears over new HKID cards RFID technology may enable remote tracking of a cardholder by police or even a lamppost. Asia Times.
9. Chen, W. F., & Ting, T. Y. (2019). Contesting Shopping Tourism: Neoliberal Consumptionscapes and Conflicts in Host Societies. Tourism Culture & Communication, 19(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830419x15536971539434
10. Cheng, E. W., Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., et al. (2022). Total Mobilization from Below: Hong Kong’s Freedom Summer. The China Quarterly, 251, 629–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741022000236
11. Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945
12. Cook, M., & Karvonen, A. (2023). Urban planning and the knowledge politics of the smart city. Urban Studies, 61(2), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231177688
13. Coopman, T. M. (2010). Networks of Dissent: Emergent Forms in Media Based Collective Action. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2010.514934
14. Cordes, V. F. (2017). City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered. Urban Science, 1(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030022
15. Fussell, S. (2019). Why Hong Kongers are toppling lampposts. The Atlantic.
16. Innovation, Technology, and Industry Bureau. (2022). Hong Kong smart city blueprint. Available online: https://www.smartcity.gov.hk/ (accessed on 3 May 2024).
17. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
18. Kitchin, R. (2013). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
19. Kozinets, R. V. (2012). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
20. Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454
21. Latonero, M., & Kift, P. (2018). On Digital Passages and Borders: Refugees and the New Infrastructure for Movement and Control. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876443. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764432
22. Lee, F. L. F., Cheng, E. W., Liang, H., et al. (2021). Dynamics of Tactical Radicalisation and Public Receptiveness in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill Movement. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 52(3), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.1910330
23. Legislative Council. (2021). Report of the panel on information technology and broadcasting for submission to the Legislative Council. Available online: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr20-21/english/panels/itb/reports/itb20211013cb1-1392-e.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
24. Leitheiser, S., & Follmann, A. (2019). The social innovation-(re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany. Urban Studies, 57(4), 894–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019869820
25. Leszczynski, A. (2019). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721
26. Leung, K. Y. K., & Lee, H. Y. (2021). Implementing the smart city: who has a say? Some insights from Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1997634
27. Li, Y. T., & Whitworth, K. (2022). Data as a Weapon: The Evolution of Hong Kong Protesters’ Doxing Strategies. Social Science Computer Review, 41(5), 1650–1670. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221111240
28. Liang, H., & Lee, F. L. F. (2021). Opinion leadership in a leaderless movement: discussion of the anti-extradition bill movement in the ‘LIHKG’ web forum. Social Movement Studies, 22(5–6), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1989294
29. Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2020). Urban Operating Systems. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10869.001.0001
30. Mattern, S. (2021). A City Is Not a Computer. Available online: https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1515%2F9780691226750 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
31. McAdam, D. (1999). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226555553.001.0001
32. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. Public Affairs.
33. Panagia, D., & Ranciére, J. (2000). Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière. Diacritics, 30(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2000.0016
34. Pedersen, S., & Burnett, S. (2017). “Citizen Curation” in Online Discussions of Donald Trump’s Presidency. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1399806
35. Rekhviashvili, L., Kębłowski, W., Sopranzetti, C., et al. (2022). Informalities in urban transport: Mobilities at the heart of contestations over (in)formalisation processes. Geoforum, 136, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.008
36. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
37. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.1086/209413
38. Stone, T. (2022). The streetlights are watching you: A historical perspective on value change and public lighting. Prometheus, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0045
39. Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and mass politics in the modern state. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830419X15536971539434
40. Tilly, C. (1977). Repertoires of contention in America and Britain 1750-1830. In: Zald, N. & McCarthy, J. D. (editors). The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilization, social control and tactics. Winthrop Publishers. pp. 242-257.
41. Ting, T. Y. (2017). Struggling for tomorrow: the future orientations of youth activism in a democratic crisis. Contemporary Social Science, 12(3–4), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1385827
42. Ting, T. Y. (2019). Everyday networked activism in Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement: expanding on contemporary practice theory to understand activist digital media usages. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3250-3269.
43. Ting, T. Y. (2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736
44. Ting, T. Y. (2022a). Mundane citizenship on the move: A counter-public response to inbound shopping tourism via mobile social media applications use. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221090409
45. Ting, T. Y. (2022b). Opposing otherness in motion: Mobile activism as transient heterotopia of resistance in Hong Kong’s networked mall protests. Geoforum, 136, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.08.007
46. Ting, T. Y. (2024). Networking Mobility as Urban Counter Power 1. The Mobile Media Debate, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312963-11
47. Ting, T. Y., & Chen, W. F. (2021). Embattled consumption scape of tourism: Networked urban contention against inbound tourist shoppers in Hong Kong. In: Ba, C., Frank, S., Müller, C., et al. (editors). The Power of New Urban Tourism: Spaces, Representations and Contestations. Routledge. pp. 118-130.
48. Urman, A., Ho, J. C., & Katz, S. (2021). Analyzing protest mobilization on Telegram: The case of 2019 Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0256675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256675
49. Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003628307
50. Wachter, S. M. (2019). What’s fueling the smart city backlash. Available online: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/whats-behind-backlash-smart-cities/#:~:text=Fears%20over%20privacy%20intrusions%20and,move%20things%20forward%2C%20experts%20say (accessed on 3 May 2024).
51. Wiig, A. (2015). The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 37(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686
52. Willis, K. S., & Aurigi, A. (2020). The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178387