Teachers are instrumental in advancing the cognitive and motor skills of children with autism. Despite their importance, the incorporation of both educators and robotic aids in the educational frameworks of specialized schools and centers is infrequent. Extensive research has been conducted to evaluate the impact of robotic assistance on the learning outcomes for children with autism. This study investigates the effects of the Furhat robot on the educational experiences of autistic children in schools, analyzing its utility both with and without the presence of teachers. Interviews with educators were carried out to gauge the effectiveness of implementing Furhat robots in these settings. Data collected from sessions with autistic children were analyzed using ANOVA tests, offering insights into the Furhat Social Robot’s potential as a significant tool for fostering engagement and interaction. The findings highlight the robot’s effectiveness in enhancing social interaction and engagement, thereby contributing to the ongoing discussion on how social robots can improve the developmental progress and well-being of children with autism. Moreover, this paper underlines the innovative aspects of our proposed model and its wider implications. By presenting specific quantitative outcomes, our aim is to extend the reach of our findings to a broader audience. Ultimately, this research delineates significant contributions to the understanding of social robots, such as Furhat, in improving the overall well-being and developmental trajectories of children with autism.

Abualkishik, A., Alzyadat, W., Al Share, M., et al. (2023). Intelligent gesture recognition system for deaf people by using CNN and IoT. International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing & Its Applications, 15(1).

Albazar, H., Abdel-Wahab, A., Alshar’e, M., et al. (2023). An adaptive two-factor authentication scheme based on the usage of Schnorr Signcryption algorithm. Informatica, 47(5).

Amirova, A., Rakhymbayeva, N., Zhanatkyzy, A., et al. (2023). Effects of parental involvement in robot-assisted autism therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(1), 438–455.

Anagnostopoulou, D., Efthymiou, N., Papailiou, C., et al. (2021). Engagement estimation during child robot interaction using deep convolutional networks focusing on ASD children. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 30 May 2021. pp. 3641–3647.

Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., et al. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21).

Benus, S., Sabo, R., & Trnka, M. (2019). Teaching L1 and L2 communication skills with a robotic head. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Emerging E-Learning Technologies and Applications (ICETA); 1 November 2019. pp. 69–75.

David, D. O., Costescu, C. A., Matu, S., et al. (2020). Effects of a Robot-Enhanced Intervention for Children with ASD on Teaching Turn-Taking Skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830344

Emad, V., Estaki, M., & Koochak Entezar, R. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of sensory integration therapy with and without an assistive robot on social interaction of children with autism spectrum disorder. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 11(2), 222–237.

Gillet, S., Cumbal, R., Pereira, A., et al. (2021). Robot gaze can mediate participation imbalance in groups with different skill levels. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 8–11 March, 2021; New York, USA. pp. 303–311.

Haefflinger, L., Elisei, F., Gerber, S., et al. (2023). On the benefit of independent control of head and eye movements of a social robot for multiparty human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 23–28 July 2023. pp. 450–466.

Hull, L., Petrides, K. V., Allison, C., et al. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2519–2534.

Kewalramani, S., Allen, K. A., Leif, E., et al. (2023). A scoping review of the use of robotics technologies for supporting social-emotional learning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–15.

Liu, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., et al. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the 21st century. IEEE Access. pp. 34403–34421.

Masli, A. A., Ahmed, F. Y., & Mansoor, A. M. (2022). QoS-aware scheduling algorithm enabling video services in LTE networks. Computers, 11(5), 77.

Nugraha, D., Ahmed, F. Y., Johar, M. G. M., et al. (2023, May). ESp-ark: A hybrid method for smart parking application. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2536(1).

Paetzel-Prüsmann, M., Perugia, G., & Castellano, G. (2021). The influence of robot personality on the development of uncanny feelings. Computers in Human Behavior, 106756.

Perugia, G., Paetzel-Prüsmann, M., Hupont, I., et al. (2021). Does the goal matter? Emotion recognition tasks can change the social value of facial mimicry towards artificial agents. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8.

Ramachandran, A., Huang, C. M., Gartland, E., et al. (2018). Thinking aloud with a tutoring robot to enhance learning. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 26 February 2018; New York, USA. pp. 59–68.

Rawal, N., Koert, D., Turan, C., et al. (2022). ExGenNet: Learning to generate robotic facial expression using facial expression recognition. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8.

Ringwald, M., Theben, P., Gerlinger, K., et al. (2023). How should your assistive robot look like? A scoping review on embodiment for assistive robots. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, 107(1).

Robaczewski, A., Bouchard, J., Bouchard, K., et al. (2021). Socially assistive robots: The specific case of the NAO. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 795–831.

Sabo, R., Beňuš, Š., Kevická, V., et al. (2024). Towards the use of social robot Furhat and generative AI in testing cognitive abilities. Human Affairs, 0.

Salem, A., & Sumi, K. (2024). Retro-projected virtual Furhat: A simple yet advanced social robot. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computation: Theory and Practice (WCTP 2023). pp. 82–97.

Scassellati, B., Boccanfuso, L., Huang, C. M., et al. (2018). Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, 3(21).

Sharma, R., Kim, M., & Gupta, A. (2022). Motor imagery classification in brain-machine interface with machine learning algorithms: Classical approach to multi-layer perceptron model. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 71, 103101.

Singh, A., Raj, K., Kumar, T., et al. (2023). Deep learning-based cost-effective and responsive robot for autism treatment. Drones, 7(2), 1–18.

Skantze, G., Johansson, M., & Beskow, J. (2015). Exploring turn-taking cues in multi-party human-robot discussions about objects. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction; 9–13 November 2015; Seattle Washington, USA. pp. 67–74.

Tapus, A., Peca, A., Aly, A., et al. (2012). Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 13(3), 315–347.

Türker, B. B., Buçinca, Z., Erzin, E., et al. (2017). Analysis of engagement and user experience with a laughter responsive social robot. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association; August 2017. pp. 844–848.

Wilcock, G., & Jokinen, K. (2022). Conversational AI and knowledge graphs for social robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 7–10 March 2022; Sapporo, Japan. pp. 1090–1094.

Wood, L. J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., et al. (2021). Developing Kaspar: A humanoid robot for children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(3), 491–508.