The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of multidimensional (fuzzy) inequalities and marginal changes on the Gini coefficients of various factors. This allows a range of social policies to be specifically targeted to reduce broader inequalities, but these policies are focused primarily on health, education, housing, sanitation, energy and drinking water. It is necessary to target policy areas that are unequally distributed, such as those with access to unevenly distributed drinking water policies. The data are from the Household and Consumption Survey of 6695 households in 2003 and 9259 households in 2011. This paper uses Lerman and Yitzhaki’s method. The results revealed that the main contributors to inequalities over the two periods were health and education. These sources have a potentially significant effect on total inequality. Health increases overall inequalities, but sources such as housing, sanitation and energy reduce them. This article provides resources to disadvantaged and vulnerable target groups. Multiple inequalities are analyzed for different subgroups of households, such as place of residence and the gender of the head of household. Analyzing fuzzy poverty inequalities makes it possible to develop targeted measures to combat poverty and inequality. This study is the first to investigate the sources of Gini’s fuzzy inequality in Chad via data analysis techniques, and in general, it is one of the few studies in Saharan Africa to be interested in this subject. Some development policies in sub-Saharan Africa should therefore focus on different sources (negative effect), sources (positive effect) and the equalization effect.

Aaberge, R., & Langorgen, A. (2006). Measuring the benefits from public services: the effects of local government spending on the distribution of income in norway. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00176.x

African Development Bank Group. (n.d.). African Development Bank Group. Available online: https://www.afdb.org/en (accessed on 22 July 2024).

Amarante, V. (2016). Income Inequality in Latin America: A Factor Component Analysis. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(S1). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12236

Beegle, K., Christiaensen, L., Dabalen, A., et al. (2015). Poverty in a Rising Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0723-7

Cheli, B., & Lemmi, A. (1995). A’totally’fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty https://arpi.unipi.it/handle/11568/24877.

Cheli, B., Ghellini, G., Lemmi, A., & et al. (1994). Measuring Poverty in the countries in transition via TFR method: The case study of Poland in 1990-91. Statistics in Transition, 1(5), 585-636.

Clert, C., & Wodon, Q. (2001). The targeting of government programs in Chile: A quantitative and qualitative assessment. World Bank.

Dagum, C., &Ferrari, G. (2004). Household Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. In: Contributions to Statistics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2681-4

Dagum, C., & Zenga, M. (1990). Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. In: Studies in Contemporary Economics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84250-4

Demsou, T. (2022). Gini Multi-Decomposition by Subpopulation in Fuzzy Poverty: Evidence of Chad. Theoretical Economics Letters, 12(06), 1566–1576. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2022.126086

Demsou, T. (2023). Gini index decomposition by deprivation in multidimensional poverty: evidence from Chad. Gaceta Sanitaria, 37, 102299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102299

Deutsch, J., Pi Alperin, M. N., & Silber, J. (2017). Using the Shapley Decomposition to Disentangle the Impact of Circumstances and Efforts on Health Inequality. Social Indicators Research, 138(2), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1690-5

Dirksen, J., Pinilla-Roncancio, M., Wehrmeister, F. C., et al. (2022). Exploring the potential for a new measure of socioeconomic deprivation status to monitor health inequality. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01661-0

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statistical Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013815

Eichhorn, W. (1994). Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9

Elbers, C., & Lanjouw, P. (2001). Intersectoral transfer, growth, and inequality in rural Ecuador. World Development, 29(3), 481-496.

Ferrarini, T., & Nelson, K. (2003). Taxation of social insurance and redistribution: a comparative analysis of ten welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928703013001037

García‐Sánchez, I. M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Rodríguez‐Domínguez, L., et al. (2014). Rotation of Auditing Firms and Political Costs: Evidence from Spanish Listed Companies. International Journal of Auditing, 18(3), 223–232. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12027

Garner, T. I. (1993). Consumer Expenditures and Inequality: An Analysis Based on Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109636

Guio, A.-C. (2005). Material deprivation in the EU. Available online: https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/dienstleistung/daten/amtl_mikrodaten/europ_microdata/Presentations_2015/guio_4th_UC.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2024).

Guio, A.-C. (2009). What can be learned from deprivation indicators in Europe. Indicator Subgroup of the Social Protection Committee, 10.

Keifman, S., & Maurizio, R. (2012). Changes in labour market conditions and policies. ONU-WIDER Working Paper

Kimhi, A. (2007). Regression-based inequality decomposition: A critical review and application to farm-household income data. Available online: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290001/ (accessed on 2 June 2024).

Kumar Mishra, A., Satapathy, S., Patra, B., et al. (2019). Distributional change, income mobility and pro-poor growth: evidence from India. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 24(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1576492

Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (2006). Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. In: Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34251-1

Lerman, R. I., & Yitzhaki, S. (1985). Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928447

López-Feldman, A. (2006). Decomposing Inequality and Obtaining Marginal Effects. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 6(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0600600107

Mills, J. A., & Zandvakili, S. (1997). Statistical inference via bootstrapping for measures of inequality. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199703)12:23.0.CO;2-H

Mookodi, L. (2021). Decomposition analysis of the Gini coefficient of consumer expenditures in Botswana. Development Southern Africa, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2021.1912587

Novignon, J. (2017). Household income inequality in Ghana: a decomposition analysis. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 8(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-03-2017-0045

Paul, S. (2004). Income sources effects on inequality. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.02.004

Podder, N. (1993). The disaggregation of the gin1 coefficient by factor components and its applications to australia. Review of Income and Wealth, 39(1), 51–61. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1993.tb00437.x

Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components. Econometrica, 50(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912537

Stark, O., Taylor, J. E., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and Inequality. The Economic Journal, 96(383), 722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232987

Taylor, J. E., Mora, J., Adams, R., & Lopez-Feldman, A. (2008). Remittances, inequality and poverty: Evidence from rural Mexico. Migration and Development within and across Borders: Research and Policy Perspectives on Internal and International Migration. Available online: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5368343&publisher=FZP755#page=103 (accessed on 2 June 2024).

World Bank. (2021). Chad Poverty Assessment: Investing in Rural Income Growth, Human Capital, and Resilience to Support Sustainable Poverty Reduction. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/36443

World Bank. (2024). CEMAC Economic Barometer: Vol. 6 (English). Available online: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099413506112410546/IDU18afcb1f21205d1409f1a2b6155eb4236add5 (accessed on 2 June 2024).

World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank Gender Data Portal. Available online: https://liveprod.worldbank.org/en/economies/chad (accessed on 2 June 2024).

Yitzhaki, S. (1990). On the effect of subsidies to basic food commodities in egypt. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(4), 772–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041978

Yitzhaki, S., & Thirsk, W. (1990). Welfare dominance and the design of excise taxation in the Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Economics, 33(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(90)90002-S