Rural sustainable development planning under the rural re-vitalization strategy: A comparative perspective between China and Europe

Zhaoyang Liu, Samuel Esteban Rodríguez

Article ID: 7769
Vol 9, Issue 2, 2025


Abstract


In the context of globalization and urbanization, rural development faces many challenges, such as population loss and uneven distribution of resources. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences in sustainable rural development strategies between China and Europe through a comparative perspective. China has optimized land use by relying on land policy innovations, such as the household contract responsibility system and the “separation of three rights”, as well as the construction of small towns; while Europe focuses on private ownership and market mechanisms, and supports agricultural and rural development through the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Using literature review, comparative research and policy analysis, the study shows that the policy innovations in China and Europe, each with its own focus, have been effective in promoting agricultural output and rural social development. Particularly noteworthy is that the “three rights” policy has increased agricultural productivity through the liberalization of management rights, while the European CAP has contributed to the diversification of the rural economy and environmental protection through continuous reforms. This study emphasizes that through policy innovation and international cooperation, combining the strengths of China and Europe, it is possible to provide a new model of sustainable development for the global countryside. Specifically, through the establishment of Sino-European R&D centers for agricultural science and technology, exchange of talents, and cooperation in green infrastructure development, technology transfer and application can be accelerated, cultural exchange and understanding can be promoted, and the sustainable development agenda for global rural areas can be jointly advanced.


Keywords


rural revitalization strategy; sustainable rural; development, innovation in land policy; common agricultural policy (CAP); labor mobility and industrial structure adjustment; international cooperation and policy innovation

Full Text:

PDF


References


Alina, Mădălina, Stancu., Radu, Gheorghe, Antohe., Nicolae, Suvorov., Lăcrămioara, Alina, VASILE, (DRĂCEA). (2022). Study on the role of land leasing in increasing the size of agricultural holdings. https://doi.org/10.24818/cafee/2019/8/15

Beckert, J. (2005). Political and social interests in the transfer of property. European Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975605000123

Chen, Kai., Fahad, Asmi. (2023). Research on Ecologicultural Environment Under the Background of Rural Revitalisation. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, doi: 10.2478/eces-2023-0031

Drakic M. (2007). Privatization in economic theory. Panoeconomicus, 54(1): 103-118. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN0701103D

Dudás A. (2022). The rules on foreigners’ right to acquire ownership of agricultural land in Slovenian, Croatian and Serbian law. J. Agric. Env't L., 17: 20. https://doi.org/10.21029/jael.2022.33.20

Dwyer, J. C., Micha, E., Kubinakova, K., Van Bunnen, P., Schuh, B., Maucorps, A., & Mantino, F. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of the CAP on generational renewal, local development and jobs in rural areas.

Florian, Ahlmeyer., Kati, Volgmann. (2023). What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe? —Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration. Sustainability, 15(6):5485-5485. doi: 10.3390/su15065485

Heather, A., Fox. (2023). Key Stakeholders in the Common Agricultural Policy: Farmers' Economic Well-Being, Attitudes, and Environmental Behavior. https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-9693

Huang, B., Huang, Z., Gu, Y., & Wang, L. (2012). A study on the path of innovation in China's current rural land system from the perspective of property rights. The Economist, 3, 66-73.

Huang, G.S., Li, T.S., Wang, W.K., & Duan, Jingjing. (2009). Discussion on new rural construction based on urban-rural integration development model. Human Geography, 24(4), 16-19.

Isoni, A. (2015). The Common Agriculture Policy (CAP): achievements and future prospects. Law and Agroecology: A Transdisciplinary Dialogue, 185-206.

Larysa, Oliinyk. (2022). Peculiarities, and directions of implementation of common agricultural policy in eu. Ukraïnsʹkij žurnal prikladnoï ekonomìki, https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2022-3-30

Li GP, Li Xun, Feng Changchun, Wang YL, Lu J, Zhao PJ, ... & Ling, Yunfei. (2018). Review and Prospect of Research on Sustainable Transformation and Development of Small Towns in China. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 32(6), 32-49.

Li, Z. (2014). Achievements and challenges of China's rural development. China's New Model of Economic Growth and Development, 128.

Ma, X., & Minami, R. (2022). Growth Mechanisms and Sustainable Development of the Chinese Economy: Comparison with Japanese Experiences. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 249-277.

Marco, P., Fabio, B., Davide, V. (2012). Simulation of Land Use and Investment Behaviour under Different Policy Scenarios. Factor Markets, 27.

Meng, G. (2019). The household responsibility system, Karl Marx’s theory of property and Antony M. Honoré’s concept of ownership. Science & Society, 83(3): 300-326. https://doi.org/10.1521/SISO.2019.83.3.300

Poltavets, A., Hnatkivskyi, B., & Havrylchenko, O. (2022). Managing Change In Land Resource Use: The European Experience. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(5), 158-164.

Prabhakar, Singh. (2023). The institution of private property in the U.S. political and legal system of environmental protection. Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo, https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.4

Schneider, N. (2022). Internalizing Environmental Externalities and the Coase Theorem. World Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.22440/wjae.8.2.4

Schneider, O. (2022). Labour migration in the European Union: The case of Central and Eastern Europe. Ekonomski Anali, 67(233):7-38. doi: 10.2298/eka2233007s

Shi, C. (2024). Impacts of land transfer on high-quality agricultural development: A green total factor productivity perspective. Journal of Natural Resources, 39(6), 1418-1433.

Soto, I., Barnes, A., Balafoutis, A., Beck, B., Sánchez, B., Vangeyte, J., ... & Gómez-Barbero, M. (2019). The contribution of precision agriculture technologies to farm productivity and the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Stanisław, Bielski. (2023). Towards Green Agriculture and Sustainable Development: Pro-Environmental Activity of Farms under the Common Agricultural Policy. Energies, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041770

Swinnen, J. F. (Ed.). (2015). The political economy of the 2014-2020 Common Agricultural Policy: An imperfect storm. Rowman & Littlefield.

Tan, Q. (2022). Coase Theorem and its implication for environmental policy. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm. v29i.2320

Wang, Guiqin, & Huan Huang. (2023). Planning-driven rural tourism integration strategies. Economic Geography, 43(12), 231-239.

Wen, Tijun, & Yang, Shuai. (2012). Rural governance and rural development in the context of structural changes in Chinese rural society. Theoretical Discussion, 6, 76-80.

Wen, Z., Zheng, M. (2022). How the Marketization of Land Transfer Affects High-Quality Economic Development: Empirical Evidence from 284 Prefecture-Level Cities in China. Sustainability, 14(19), 12639-12639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912639

Xia, Xianli, Chen Zhe, Zhang Huili, & Zhao Minjuan. (2019). High-quality development of agriculture: digital empowerment and realization path. China Rural Economy, 12(2), r15.

Ye, Jingzhong, & He, Congzhi. (2009). A study on the impact of rural labor force going out to work on the economic support of the left-behind elderly. Population Studies, 4, 44-53.

Yuji, Liu., Ziyi, Li., Yiming, Wang. (2023). Research on the Dilemma and Development Path of Rural Industry Revitalization under the Background of Rural Revitalization. BCP business & management, doi: 10.54691/bcpbm. v44i.4821




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd7769

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.