Optimization of corporate governance structures in ESG Practice: Corporate social responsibility synergies with the environment

Jiuhua Jiang

Article ID: 7570
Vol 8, Issue 14, 2024


Abstract


Introduction: The growing global focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards necessitates that companies optimize their corporate governance to balance economic, social, and ecological responsibilities. This study examines how the synergistic effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Responsibility (ER) can promote sustainable corporate development. Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the critical elements of corporate governance structure optimization and to explore how companies can enhance their governance to achieve sustainable development through strengthened social and environmental management practices. Methods: The study uses case analysis and literature review to assess high-performing enterprises in CSR and ER integration, examining their governance, policy, and environmental strategies to uncover the factors behind their success in economic, social, and environmental spheres. Results: The research shows that optimizing governance structures markedly improves operational effectiveness. Companies need to create strong internal controls for equitable and transparent decisions, embedding CSR and ER into their strategies. CSR fulfillment builds public trust and environmental support, whereas ER improves brand reputation and competitiveness, driving sustainable and mutually advantageous development. Conclusion: The key to sustainable development in ESG practice lies in optimizing corporate governance and strengthening the synergy between social and environmental responsibilities. It is imperative for companies to build a governance structure that complies with ESG standards and to incorporate social and environmental considerations into their corporate strategies to effectively manage the triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental performance.


Keywords


corporate governance; structural optimization; social responsibility; synergies

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aldowaish, A., Kokuryo, J., Almazyad, O., et al. (2024). How to Manage Conflicts in the Process of ESG Integration? A Case of a Japanese Firm. Sustainability, 16(8), 3391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083391

Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., et al. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423

Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967

Budsaratragoon, P., & Jitmaneeroj, B. (2021). Corporate Sustainability and Stock Value in Asian–Pacific Emerging Markets: Synergies or Tradeoffs among ESG Factors? Sustainability, 13(11), 6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116458

Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1535–1560. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2446

Csedő, Z., Magyari, J., & Zavarkó, M. (2022). Dynamic Corporate Governance, Innovation, and Sustainability: Post-COVID Period. Sustainability, 14(6), 3189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063189

Kenneth David, L., Wang, J., Angel, V., et al. (2024). Environmental commitments and Innovation in China’s corporate landscape: An analysis of ESG governance strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119529

Hu, A., Yuan, X., Fan, S., et al. (2023). The Impact and Mechanism of Corporate ESG Construction on the Efficiency of Regional Green Economy: An Empirical Analysis Based on Signal Transmission Theory and Stakeholder Theory. Sustainability, 15(17), 13236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713236

Huang, R., Zhu, Z., Ruan, R., et al. (2024). Linking low-carbon practices with ESG performances: Exploration evidence from the configurational perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140532

Liu, B., Qiu, Z., Hu, L., et al. (2024). How digital transformation facilitate synergy for pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China. Environmental Research, 251, 118639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118639

Ma, D., Li, L., Song, Y., et al. (2023). Corporate Sustainability: The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Corporate Development and Innovation. Sustainability, 15(19), 14086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914086

Maali, K., Rakia, R., & Khaireddine, M. (2021). How corporate social responsibility mediates the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability performance in UK: a multiple mediator analysis. Society and Business Review, 16(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-12-2020-0143

Neves, M. E., Proença, C., & Cancela, B. (2022). Governance and social responsibility: what factors impact corporate performance in a small banking-oriented country? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-08-2022-0166

Niu, D., & Wang, Z. (2024). Environmental, social and governance performance and green transformation strategies for enterprises: Improving technical efficiency or expanding technological boundaries. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0299767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299767

Qi, Y., Han, M., & Zhang, C. (2024). The Synergistic Effects of Digital Technology Application and ESG Performance on Corporate Performance. Finance Research Letters, 61, 105007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105007

Radu, C., & Smaili, N. (2021). Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3344–3359. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2806

Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767

Sancha, C., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., Tamayo-Torres, I., et al. (2022). From corporate governance to sustainability outcomes: the key role of operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(13), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-01-2022-0043

Yang, Z., Na, J., & Dong, X. (2024). Corporate governance for sustainable development: A study on mechanism configuration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 458, 142509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142509

Zaporowska, Z., & Szczepański, M. (2024). The Application of Environmental, Social and Governance Standards in Operational Risk Management in SSC in Poland. Sustainability, 16(6), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062413

Zeng, H., Zhou, Z., Xiu, Z., et al. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Resource Governance. Sustainability, 15(21), 15350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115350




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd7570

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2024 Jiuhua Jiang

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.