Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and company performance: Evidence from telecommunication sector

Arman Maralov, Nurlan Kurmanov, Oxana Kirichok, Altyn Amerkhanova, Yerkezhan Moldakenova, Sharafat Shayakhmetova, Gulzhan Karimbayeva

Article ID: 7519
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024

VIEWS - 149 (Abstract) 131 (PDF)

Abstract


The sustainable development of the global economy and society necessitates the integration of environmental and socially responsible management, known as ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance). Despite growing recognition of ESG’s importance, the strategic management of ESG factors in Kazakhstan’s telecommunications industry remains underexplored. This study bridges this gap by analyzing Kazakh telecom’s ESG strategies from 2019 to 2021 through a cross-sectional design and semi-structured interviews with 12 industry experts. Utilizing the National Rating Agency (NRA) methodology, the research evaluates environmental, social, and governance variables. Key findings reveal that Kazakh telecom excels in “Climate Change” and “Human Capital Management” but needs significant improvements in “Environmental Impact” and “Society.” The study offers specific recommendations such as enhancing corporate volunteering, responsible marketing, service quality, and integrating sustainable practices. The primary contributions of this research include actionable insights for improving ESG strategies in telecommunications companies and advocating for more systematic and standardized ESG assessment approaches. This study expands the understanding of how ESG principles can enhance competitiveness and sustainable development in the telecommunications industry, providing valuable guidance for industry practitioners and policymakers. It offers insights into effective ESG implementation practices and highlights critical areas requiring attention to drive sustainable development in telecommunications.


Keywords


ESG; environmental; social responsibility; corporate governance; sustainable development; telecommunications; Kazakh telecom; Kazakhstan

Full Text:

PDF


References


Acar, G., & Coskun, A. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance scores and earnings management in telecommunication companies: An international perspective. Financial Internet Quarterly, 19(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/fiqf-2023-0010

Becchetti, L., Bobbio, E., Prizia, F., et al. (2022). Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 14(15), 9668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159668

Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829

Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L. (2022). Improving ESG Scores with Sustainability Concepts. Sustainability, 14(20), 13154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013154

Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L. (2023). The use of ESG scores in academic literature: a systematic literature review. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-10-2022-0147

Eccles, R. G., Lee, L. E., & Stroehle, J. C. (2019). The Social Origins of ESG: An Analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619888994

Edmans, A. (2023). The end of ESG. Financial Management, 52(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12413

Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? Economic Modelling, 118, 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101

Grishunin, S., Naumova, E., Burova, E., et al. (2022). The Impact of Sustainability Disclosures on Value of Companies Following Digital Transformation Strategies. International Journal of Technology, 13(7), 1432. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i7.6194

Grishunin, S., Suloeva, S., Nekrasova, T., & Erorova, A. (2021). Study of relationship between the corporate governance factors and ESG ratings of ICT companies from the developed markets. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Next Generation Wired/Wireless Networking; Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97777-1_13

Gyönyörová, L., Stachoň, M., & Stašek, D. (2021). ESG ratings: relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1075–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062

Jasni, N. S., Yusoff, H., Zain, M. M., et al. (2019). Business strategy for environmental social governance practices: evidence from telecommunication companies in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-03-2017-0047

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Unlocking Sustainable Value through Digital Transformation: An Examination of ESG Performance. Information, 14(8), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080444

Li, C., Ba, S., Ma, K., et al. (2023). ESG Rating Events, Financial Investment Behavior and Corporate Innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.013

Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., et al. (2021). ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663

MacNeil, I., & Esser, I. (2022). From a Financial to an Entity Model of ESG. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00234-y

Oh, H. J., Lee, B., Ma, H. H., et al. (2024). A preliminary study for developing perceived ESG scale to measure public perception toward organizations’ ESG performance. Public Relations Review, 50(1), 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102398

Senadheera, S. S., Gregory, R., Rinklebe, J., et al. (2022). The development of research on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Environment, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2022.2125869

Sheehan, N. T., Vaidyanathan, G., Fox, K. A., et al. (2023). Making the invisible, visible: Overcoming barriers to ESG performance with an ESG mindset. Business Horizons, 66(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.003

Thieu, T. T. T. (2023). ESG Trend—The History of ESG Concept Formation and the Current Trends in the Goal of Business Sustainable Development. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4385

Vetrova, M., Solovey, T., Arenkov, I., & Ivanova, D. (2022). The impact of digitalization on the telecommunications sector ESG transformation. In: Proceedings of the International scientific conference on Digital Transformation in Industry: Trends, Management, Strategies; Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30351-7_15

Wang, H., Jiao, S., Ge, C., et al. (2024). Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns. Energy Economics, 129, 107276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107276

Zhang, X., Zhang, J., & Feng, Y. (2023). Can companies get more government subsidies through improving their ESG performance? Empirical evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0292355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292355

Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG Importance for Long-Term Shareholder Value Creation: Literature vs. Practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.7519

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Arman Maralov, Nurlan Kurmanov, Oxana Kirichok, Altyn Amerkhanova, Yerkezhan Moldakenova, Sharafat Shayakhmetova, Gulzhan Karimbayeva

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.