Enhancing policy on higher education accessibility in Myanmar: Sustainable impact of technology effectiveness, opportunities, and social development
Vol 8, Issue 12, 2024
VIEWS - 12 (Abstract) 5 (PDF)
Abstract
This study explores the impact of technology effectiveness, social development, and opportunities on higher education accessibility in Myanmar, focusing on private higher education institutions. Utilizing a sample of 199 respondents, with an average age of X (SD = Y), the research employs standardized questionnaires and descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis to examine the relationships between these variables. The findings indicate that technology effectiveness significantly enhances higher education accessibility, with strong positive correlations (r = 0.752, p < 0.001) and substantial impacts on educational outcomes (β = 0.334, p = 0.001). Social development also plays a crucial role, demonstrating that supportive social norms and community engagement significantly improve accessibility (β = 0.405, p < 0.001). Opportunities provided by technological advancements further contribute to enhanced accessibility (β = 0.356, p < 0.001), although socio-political and economic challenges pose significant barriers. The study highlights the interconnectedness of these factors and their collective influence on educational accessibility. Practical implications include the need for strategic investments in technological infrastructure, promotion of supportive social environments, and innovative solutions to leverage opportunities. Future research directions suggest longitudinal studies, broader demographic scopes, and in-depth analyses of specific technological and infrastructural challenges. By addressing these areas, stakeholders can develop effective strategies to improve higher education accessibility, ultimately contributing to the socio-economic development of Myanmar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allifya, S. A. N., Aknuranda, I., & Amiruddin, L. (2022). Designing an Accessibility Portal for a Higher Education Institution. IJDS Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(02), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2022.009.02.05
Bachmann, M., Subramaniam, A., Born, J., et al. (2023). Virtual reality public speaking training: effectiveness and user technology acceptance. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1242544
Barbon, W. J., Myae, C., Vidallo, R., et al. (2021). Applying Participatory Action Research Methods in Community-Based Adaptation With Smallholders in Myanmar. Frontiers in Climate, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.734053
Beer, P., & Mulder, R. H. (2020). The Effects of Technological Developments on Work and Their Implications for Continuous Vocational Education and Training: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00918
Bhatta, T., & Katwal, D. (2022). Regional differences in technology access and use in Myanmar. Asian Education Studies, 203–217.
Bugakova, N., & Prakhov, I. (2022). University admission systems and higher education accessibility. Higher Education, 407–426.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
Fan, J., & Ye, J. (2022). Enhancing learning through technology-based project design courses. Journal of Educational Technology, 101–120.
Fennelly, L., & LaPrairie, K. (2023). Investigating accessibility in online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 21–37.
Gelfand, M., Gavrilets, S., & Nunn, C. (2023). Development dynamics and school improvement in Myanmar: An interdisciplinary approach. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100873
Gustafsson-Wright, E., Hadani, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., et al. (2022). Global education trends and research to follow in 2022. Available online: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/global-education-trends-and-research-to-follow-in-2022/ (accessed on 27 September 2024).
Hendayani, R., & Febrianta, D. (2020). Technology integration in supply chain efficiency for family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 89–103.
Hendayani, R., & Febrianta, M. Y. (2020). Technology as a driver to achieve the performance of family businesses supply chain. Journal of Family Business Management, 10(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-10-2019-0070
Klein, M. (2010). Mechanisms for the Effect of Field of Study on the Transition from Higher Education to Work. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research. Available online: https://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/3429/ (accessed on 18 August 2024).
Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An Explication of Social Norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
Legros, S., & Cislaghi, B. (2019). Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866455
Lewthwaite, S., Horton, S., & Coverdale, A. (2023). Workplace approaches to teaching digital accessibility: Establishing a common foundation of awareness and understanding. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, Article 1155864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1155864
Liu, J., & Gao, F. (2023). Socio-economic influences on higher education accessibility in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 120–140.
Lowenthal, P., & Lomellini, A. (2023). Educational technologists’ knowledge in accessible online learning. Online Learning Journal, 45–60.
Mateus, C., & Acosta, R. (2022). Institutional reputation’s influence on higher education accessibility. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 102–120.
McAlvage, K., & Rice, M. (2018). Access and accessibility in online learning: Issues in higher education and K-12 contexts. OLC Research Center for Digital Learning & Leadership, 245–264.
McGinty, S. (2016). Faculty perceptions on accessibility in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 65–79.
Nadine, A., Samira, K., Christin, S., et al. (2023). How to measure the accessibility maturity of organizations—A survey on accessibility maturity models for higher education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1134320
Popkova, E., & Sergi, B. (2023). The economic aspect of higher education accessibility. Economics of Education Review.
Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2020). The influence of education on health: An empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Preventive Medicine Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101017
Rui, J., & Liu, C. (2021). Social media and workout intentions: Examining the role of social development in educational practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 445–460.
Sparkman, G., & Weber, E. (2023). Development networks and behavior: The role of social development in Myanmar’s diverse culture. Developmental Psychology, 123–135.
Sun, H. (2023). Management strategies in higher education accessibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 580–600.
Trevisan, M., & De Rossi, M. (2023). Quality and accessibility in blended learning. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 30–45.
Weeden, E. (2023). A model of an accessibility curriculum in higher education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1139350
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.7078
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Naing Soe Aye, Manual Selvaraj Bexci, Sandeep Poddar, Amiya Bhaumik
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.