Determinants of internal audit methodology during the COVID-19 era: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 122 (Abstract) 60 (PDF)
Abstract
Purpose: The paper aims to study the methodology and functional of Internal Audit (IA) during the transition to remote working methods necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic crisis period. Design/methodology/approach: Data are collected over a sample of 352 internal audit departments in retail SMEs distributed in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. The six variables are measured using a reflective model. An exploratory factor analysis is applied to gauge the measurement model’s validity and reliability. Findings: The research findings revealed that internal auditing within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the Qatari retail sector is not sufficiently advanced. The focus of internal auditing primarily revolves around compliance audits rather than performance audits, thereby limiting their degree of agility and strategy which negatively affects the IA methodology. Conversely, for the United Arab Emirates (UAE) retail companies the research hypotheses were validated showing an IA functions evolution, an IA reassurance and IA agility that are conducted throughout a remote working and a strategic design that affect positively IA working methodology. Originality: The originality impregnates by the fact that reviews of traditional audit working methods were updated and shaped according to the deficiencies that couldn’t be identified during a pre COVID-19 period. A traditional audit plan may not work in this situation. The originality of the study consists of estimating IA methodological review through an agile approach that provides internal reassurance and risk attenuation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Aghghaleh, S. F., Mohamed Z. M. (2014). Fraud Risk Factors of Fraud Triangle and the Likelihood of Fraud Occurrence: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1095
Albitar, K., Gerged, A. M., Kikhia, H., et al. (2020). Auditing in times of social distancing: the effect of COVID-19 on auditing quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-08-2020-0128
Al-Taee, S. H. H. (2021). Effects of the remote auditing in Iraq during COVD-19. Economic Annals-ХХI, 187(1–2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v187-19
Aprisma, R., Sudaryati, E. (2020). The Changing Role of Audit Committee Responsibilities in the Light of COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(10), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.10.2020.p10672
Bantleon, U., d’Arcy, A., Eulerich, M., et al. (2021). Coordination challenges in implementing the three lines of defense model. International Journal of Auditing, 25(1), 59–74. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12201
Barretto, C. R., Drumond, G. M., Méxas, M. P. (2022). Remote audit in the times of COVID-19: A successful process safety initiative. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2021.048
Betti, N., Sarens, G. (2021). Understanding the internal audit function in a digitalised business environment. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2019-0114
Bright, E., Vine, S., Wilson, M. R., et al. (2012). Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality turp simulator. International Journal of Surgery, 10(3), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.012
Çağlayan, T., & Kıral, H. (2022). Internal audit in times of crisis: The case of COVID-19. In Pandemnomics: The Pandemic's Lasting Economic Effects (pp. 65-81). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Clampitt, P. G., Downs, C. W. (1993). Employee Perceptions of the Relationship Between Communication and Productivity: A Field Study. Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369303000101
Davidson, P. (1991). The Great Communicators. The Internal Auditor, 48(6), 26–31.
Endaya, K. A., Hanefah, M. M. (2013). Internal audit effectiveness: An approach proposition to develop the theoretical framework. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(10), 92–102.
Erasmus, L., Coetzee, P. (2018). Drivers of stakeholders’ view of internal audit effectiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-05-2017-1558
Eulerich, M., Wagener, M., & Wood, D. A. (2022). Evidence on internal audit quality from transitioning to remote audits because of COVID-19. Journal of Information Systems, 36(3), 219–234.
Eulerich, M., Wagener, M., Wood, D. A. (2021). Evidence on Internal Audit Effectiveness from Transitioning to Remote Audits Because of COVID-19. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3774050.
Farcane, N., Bunget, O. C., Blidisel, R., Dumitrescu, A. C., Deliu, D., Bogdan, O., & Burca, V. (2023). Auditors’ perceptions on work adaptability in remote audit: a COVID-19 perspective. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 422–459.
Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the Performance of Varimax and Promax Rotations: Factor Structure Recovery for Dichotomous Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(1), 39–52. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00003.x
Golen, S. (2008). Communication Barriers between Internal and External Auditors. ABEA Journal, 27(1), 35–36.
Gray, G. L., Alles, M. G. (2021). Measuring a Business’s Grit and Survivability when Faced with “Black Swan” Events Like the Coronavirus Pandemic. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 18(1), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2020-060
Haag, C., Bulliqi, D. (2022). Development of a Framework for Auditing the Transformability of Companies. In: The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). pp. 1–12
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harymawan, I., Putri, F. V. (2023). Internal audit function, audit report lag and audit fee: evidence from the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(4), 784–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-10-2021-0318
Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., et al. (2005). The Quality of Factor Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: The Influence of Sample Size, Communality, and Overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404267287
Hummel, K., Schlick, C., Fifka, M. (2019). The Role of Sustainability Performance and Accounting Assurors in Sustainability Assurance Engagements. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3410-5
Jarva, H., Zeitler, T. (2023). Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on internal auditing: a field study. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-12-2021-0333
Jin, S., Moustaki, I., Yang-Wallentin, F. (2018). Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case. Psychometrika, 83(3), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9623-z
Jin, Y., TIAN, G., Wu, D., et al. (2022). Remote Auditing and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Field. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4076612
Kaawaase, T. K. (2022). Anchoring on dynamic auditing capabilities to manage small and medium audit practices in a COVID-19-induced turbulent business environment. Management Matters, 19(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/manm-01-2022-0003
Kljajić, M., Mizdraković, V., & Hadrović, Z. B. (2022). Internal audit in the COVID-19 environment: Key aspects and perspectives of remote auditing. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 19(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.5937/EJAE19-35881
Litzenberg, R., Ramirez, C. F. (2020). Remote Auditing for COVID-19 and beyond. The Institute of Internal Auditors, 1–10.
Lois, P., Drogalas, G., Karagiorgos, A., et al. (2020). Internal audits in the digital era: opportunities risks and challenges. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-07-2019-0097
Martinelli, M., Friedman, A. E., Lanz, J. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on internal audit. The CPA Journal, 90(6), 60–63.
Morton, F. B., Altschul, D. (2019). Data reduction analyses of animal behaviour: avoiding Kaiser’s criterion and adopting more robust automated methods. Animal Behaviour, 149, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.01.003
Newmark, R. I., Dickey, G., Wilcox, W. E. (2018). Agility in Audit: Could Scrum Improve the Audit Process? Current Issues in Auditing, 12(1), A18–A28. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-52148
Nugrahanti, T. P., Pratiwi, A. S. (2023). The Remote Auditing and Information Technology. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 8(1), 15–39.
Owolabi, S. A., & Dada, S. O. (2011). Audit committee: An instrument of effective corporate governance. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 35(35), 174–183.
Quinn, D., Hargie, O. (2004). Internal communication audits: a case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280410534348
Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
Smith, G. (2005). Communication skills are critical for internal auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(5), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510598858
Sumiyana, S., Susanto, E. A. A., Rahajeng, D. K. K., et al. (2024). Indonesia’s local government internal auditors (LGIAs): reflecting on low motivation in enhancing their dynamic capabilities while being the spearhead of responsible auditing. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-10-2022-0159
Taherdoost, H. A., Sahibuddin, S. H., Jalaliyoon, N. E. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Advances in applied and pure mathematics, 27, 375–382.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Teeter, R. A., Alles, M. G., Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2010). The Remote Audit. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 7(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta.2010.7.1.73
Teoh, A. P., Lee, K. Y., Muthuveloo, R. (2017). The impact of enterprise risk management, strategic agility, and quality of internal audit function on firm performance. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 222–229.
Trizano-Hermosilla, I., Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best Alternatives to Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
Wang, I. Z., Fargher, N. (2017). The effects of tone at the top and coordination with external auditors on internal auditors’ fraud risk assessments. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 1177–1202s. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12191
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., et al. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.12.001
Willy, S. (2021). The Effect of Remote Audit and Agility on the Performance of the Internal Audit (SPI) During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Realize Good Corporate Governance (GCG). Asian Journal of Law and Governance, 3(3), 19–24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6846
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghida Georges Khalil, Mario Edmond Sassine, Mohammed Bajaher, Fekri Ali Shawtari
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.