Understanding the factors that influence early science achievement is crucial for developing effective educational policies and ensuring equity within the education system. Despite its importance, research on the patterns of young children achieving science learning milestones and the factors that can reduce disparities between students with and without disabilities remains limited. This study analyzes data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study of Kindergarten Cohort 2011 (ECLS-K: 2011), which includes 18,174 children from 1328 schools across the United States, selected through a complex sampling process and spanning kindergarten to 5th grade. Utilizing survival analysis, the study finds that children with disabilities achieve science milestones later than their peers without disabilities, with these disparities persisting from early grades. The research highlights the effectiveness of center-based programs in enhancing science learning, particularly in narrowing the achievement gap between children with and without disabilities. These findings contribute to the broader discourse on equity in the education system and policy by introducing novel methodologies for assessing the frequency and duration of science learning milestones, and by providing insights into effective strategies that support equitable science education.

1. Almalky, H. A. (2020). Employment outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A literature review. Children and Youth Services Review, 109, 104656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104656
2. Basham, J. D., Blackorby, J., & Marino, M. T. (2020). Opportunity in crisis: The role of universal design for learning in educational redesign. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 71–91.
3. Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., et al. (2007). Are there long‐term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01021.x
4. Betancur, L., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Schunn, C. (2018). Socioeconomic gaps in science achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0132-5
5. Beyer, S., Brown, T., Akandi, R., et al. (2010). A comparison of quality of life outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities in supported employment, day services and employment enterprises. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(3), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00534.x
6. Booth-LaForce, C., & Kelly, J. F. (2004). Childcare patterns and issues for families of preschool children with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 17(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200401000-00004
7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In: Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (editors). Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
8. Clark, T. G., Bradburn, M. J., Love, S. B., et al. (2003). Survival analysis Part I: Basic concepts and first analyses. British Journal of Cancer, 89(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601118
9. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). The importance of the early years. In: Slavin, R. E. (editor). Science, Technology & Mathematics (STEM). Corwin.
10. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Germeroth, C. (2016). Learning executive function and early mathematics: Directions of causal relations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36(3), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.009
11. Clements, D. H., Vinh, M., Lim, C.-I., et al. (2020). STEM for inclusive excellence and equity. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1755776
12. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 34(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Third annual brown lecture in education research—The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x07308253
14. Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
15. Griffiths, A. J., Brady, J., Riley, N., et al. (2021). STEM for everyone: A mixed methods approach to the conception and implementation of an evaluation process for STEM education programs for students with disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 5, 545701. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.545701
16. Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., et al. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595441
17. Guo, S. (2010). Survival analysis. Oxford University Press.
18. Guss, S. S., Lim, C.-I., Clements, D. H., et al. (2023). Building learning trajectories for intentional, inclusive, and individualized instructional experiences in STEM. Education Sciences, 14(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010008
19. Halle, T. G., Hair, E. C., Burchinal, M., et al. (n.d.). In the running for successful outcomes: Exploring the evidence for thresholds of school readiness technical report. Available online: https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/running-successful-outcomes-exploring-evidence-thresholds-school-readiness-technical-report-0 (accessed on 24 June 2024).
20. Henly, J., & Adams, G. (2018). Insights on access to quality child care for children with disabilities and special needs. Available online: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99146/insights_on_access_to_quality_child_care_for_children_with_disabilities_and_special_needs_2.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2024).
21. Jang, W., Francisco, J., Ranganathan, N., McCarroll, K. M., & Ryoo, K. (2020). Using machine learning to understand students’ learning patterns in simulations. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity Society of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 5 (pp. 2593-2596). Nashville, TN: International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2020.2593
22. Jang, W., Kwon, K. A., & Horm, D. (2024). The role of language and literacy skills in science learning from kindergarten to 5th grade: Mitigating gender, racial/ethnic, and socio-economic disparities. Education Sciences, 14(9), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090994
23. Jang, W., & Leech, K. (2023). Contextual modulation of adult–child language interaction: Semantic network connectivity and children’s vocabulary development. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111084
24. Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
25. Knoche, L., Peterson, C. A., Edwards, C. P., et al. (2006). Child care for children with and without disabilities: The provider, observer, and parent perspectives. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.001
26. Lee, O., Llosa, L., Grapin, S., et al. (2019). Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development. Science Education, 103(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21498
27. Li, W., Farkas, G., Duncan, G. J., et al. (2013). Timing of high-quality child care and cognitive, language, and preacademic development. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030613
28. Lougheed, J. P., Benson, L., Cole, P. M., et al. (2019). Multilevel survival analysis: Studying the timing of children’s recurring behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 55(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000619
29. Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., et al. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x16633182
30. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
31. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
32. Pew Research Center. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep57656.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false (accessed on 24 June 2024).
33. Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x15598539
34. Reed, D. K., Petscher, Y., & Truckenmiller, A. J. (2017). The contribution of general reading ability to science achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.158
35. Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10391657
36. Scammacca, N., Fall, A.-M., Capin, P., et al. (2020). Examining factors affecting reading and math growth and achievement gaps in grades 1–5: A cohort-sequential longitudinal approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 718–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000400
37. Scarborough, A. A., Hebbeler, K. M., Spiker, D., et al. (2011). Using survival analysis to describe developmental achievements of early intervention recipients at kindergarten. Infants & Young Children, 24(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0b013e3182104a7e
38. Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., et al. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8
39. Sullivan, A. L., Farnsworth, E. M., & Susman-Stillman, A. (2018). Childcare type and quality among subsidy recipients with and without special needs. Infants & Young Children, 31(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000116
40. Taylor, J. L., & Seltzer, M. M. (2010). Employment and post-secondary educational activities for young adults with autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(5), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1070-3
41. Therneau, T. (2024). Mixed effects Cox models [R package coxme version 2.2-18.1]. Available online: https://cran.hafro.is/web/packages/coxme/coxme.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2024).
42. Tourangeau, K., Nord, C., Le, T., et al. (2015). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 (ECLS-K:2011), user’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 Kindergarten-First Grade data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2015-078). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
43. U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Part B state performance plan/annual performance report 2017 indicator analyses. Available online: https://osep.grads360.org/#communities/pdc/documents/14725 (accessed on 24 June 2024).
44. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics news release. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.htm (accessed on 24 June 2024).
45. Vandell, D. L., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., et al. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development, 81(3), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01431.x
46. Weglarz-Ward, J. M., & Santos, R. M. (2018). Parent and professional perceptions of inclusion in childcare. Infants & Young Children, 31(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000115
47. Welsh, J. A., Nix, R. L., Blair, C., et al. (2010). The development of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low-income families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016738
48. Yazejian, N., Bryant, D., Freel, K., et al. (2015). High-quality early education: Age of entry and time in care differences in student outcomes for English-only and dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.02.002
49. Zikic, J., & Hall, D. T. (2009). Toward a more complex view of career exploration. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2009.tb00055.x