The digitalization of the construction industry is deemed a crucial element in Construction 4.0’s vision, attainable through the implementation of digital twinning. It is perceived as a virtual strategy to surmount the constraints linked with traditional construction projects, thereby augmenting their productivity and effectiveness. However, the neglect to investigate the causal relationship between implementation and construction project management performance has resulted from a lack of understanding and awareness regarding the consequences of digital twinning implementation, combined with a shortage of expertise among construction professionals. Consequently, this paper extensively explores the relationship between digital twinning implementation and construction project management performance. The Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) is employed to investigate this relationship, utilizing a quantitative research approach through document analysis and questionnaire surveys. Additionally, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS software is employed to deduce the relationship. The results underscore that digital twinning implementation significantly improves construction project management performance. Despite recognizing various challenges in digital twinning implementation, when regarded as moderating factors, these challenges do not significantly impact the established causal relationship. Therefore, this investigation aligns with the national push toward the digitalization of the construction sector, highlighting the positive impacts of digital twinning implementation on construction project management performance. Moreover, this study details the impacts of implementing digital twinning from the construction industry’s perspective, including positive and negative impacts. Afterwards, this paper addresses the existing research gap, providing a more precise understanding and awareness among construction industry participants, particularly in developing nations.

1. Adeleke, A. Q., Bamgbade, J. A., Gbadebo Salimon, M., et al. (2019). Project Management Performance and Its Influence on Malaysian Building Projects. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5058
2. Al-Ageeli, H. K., & Alzobaee, A. S. J. A. (2016). Critical Success Factors in Construction Projects (Governmental Projects as a Case Study). Journal of Engineering, 22(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2016.03.09
3. Albtoush, A. M. F., Doh, S. I., Rahman, R. A., et al. (2022). Critical success factors of construction projects in Jordan: an empirical investigation. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(7), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00470-8
4. Aljohani, A. (2017). Construction Projects Cost Overrun: What Does the Literature Tell Us? International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.2.717
5. Alzahrani, J. I., & Emsley, M. W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006
6. Ammar, A., Nassereddine, H., AbdulBaky, N., et al. (2022). Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Perspective of Practitioners and Building Authority. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.834671
7. Andrić, J. M., Mahamadu, A. M., Wang, J., et al. (2019). The cost performance and causes of overruns in infrastructure development projects in Asia. Journal Of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.8646
8. Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023). Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165
9. Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
10. Bertoni, M., & Bertoni, A. (2022). Designing solutions with the product-service systems digital twin: What is now and what is next? Computers in Industry, 138, 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103629
11. Besklubova, S., Skibniewski, M. J., & Zhang, X. (2021). Factors Affecting 3D Printing Technology Adaptation in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002034
12. Bi, D., & Huo, Y. (2021). Application analysis of digital twin model in horizontal directional drilling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2030(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2030/1/012066
13. Bin Seddeeq, A., Assaf, S., Abdallah, A., et al. (2019). Time and Cost Overrun in the Saudi Arabian Oil and Gas Construction Industry. Buildings, 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9020041
14. Cakmak, E., & Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An Analysis of Causes of Disputes in the Construction Industry Using Analytical Network Process. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441
15. Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. H., & Cheung, K. K. W. (2004). PPMS: a Web-based construction Project Performance Monitoring System. Automation in Construction, 13(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.12.001
16. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Adabre, M. A., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: Scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities. Automation in Construction, 112, 103081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103081
17. Demirkesen, S., & Ozorhon, B. (2017). Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1639–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.008
18. Douglass, B. P. (2014). High-Fidelity Modeling. Real-Time UML Workshop for Embedded Systems, 179–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407781-2.00007-6
19. Edirisinghe, R. (2018). Digital skin of the construction site. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(2), 184–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2017-0066
20. Famiyeh, S., Amoatey, C. T., Adaku, E., et al. (2017). Major causes of construction time and cost overruns. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-11-2015-0075
21. Fathi, E., & Stevovic, S. (2016). Measurement the efficiency of building project management. Ekonomika, 62(4), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1604129e
22. Forcael, E., Ferrari, I., Opazo-Vega, A., et al. (2020). Construction 4.0: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(22), 9755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229755
23. Francis, A., & Thomas, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between lean construction and environmental sustainability: A review of existing literature to decipher broader dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119913
24. Gil, J. (2020). City Information Modelling: A Conceptual Framework for Research and Practice in Digital Urban Planning. Built Environment, 46(4), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.4.501
25. Gledson, B. J., Williams, D. N., & Littlemore, M. (2018). Construction Planning Efficiency and Delivery Time Performance: Analysing Failure in Task-Level ‘Hit Rates’. In: Proceedings of the ARCOM 2018: 34th Annual Conference—A Productive Relationship: Balancing Fragmentation and Integration; Belfast, UK.
26. Greif, T., Stein, N., & Flath, C. M. (2020). Peeking into the void: Digital twins for construction site logistics. Computers in Industry, 121, 103264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103264
27. Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems (Excerpt). In: Kahlen, J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A. (editors). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. Springer. pp. 85-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
28. Gudienė, N., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., et al. (2013). Development of a Conceptual Critical Success Factors Model for Construction Projects: A Case of Lithuania. Procedia Engineering, 57, 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.051
29. Gunduz, M., & Almuajebh, M. (2020). Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Construction Project Management. Sustainability, 12(5), 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051990
30. Gurevich, U., & Sacks, R. (2020). Longitudinal Study of BIM Adoption by Public Construction Clients. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000797
31. Gurgun, A. P., & Koc, K. (2022). The role of contract incompleteness factors in project disputes: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), 3895–3926. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2021-1020
32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Annabel Ainscow.
33. Ham, Y., Lee, S. J., & Chowdhury, A. G. (2017). Imaging-to-Simulation Framework for Improving Disaster Preparedness of Construction Projects and Neighboring Communities. Computing in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480830.029
34. Han, S. H., Kim, D. Y., Kim, H., et al. (2006). Fully Integrated Web-Based Risk Management Systems for Highly Uncertain Global Projects. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2006/0052
35. Hassani, H., Huang, X., & MacFeely, S. (2022). Impactful Digital Twin in the Healthcare Revolution. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6030083
36. Hussain, C. M., Paulraj, M. S., & Nuzhat, S. (2022). Source reduction and waste minimization in construction industry. Source Reduction and Waste Minimization, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-824320-6.00005-8
37. Hwang, B. G., Ngo, J., & Her, P. W. Y. (2020). Integrated Digital Delivery: Implementation status and project performance in the Singapore construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121396
38. Jazzar, M. E., Piskernik, M., & Nassereddine, H. (2020). Digital Twin in Construction: An Empirical Analysis, EG-ICE 2020 Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.
39. Jiang, F., Ma, L., Broyd, T., et al. (2021). Digital twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Automation in Construction, 130, 103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103838
40. Jiang, Y., Li, M., Guo, D., et al. (2022). Digital twin-enabled smart modular integrated construction system for on-site assembly. Computers in Industry, 136, 103594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103594
41. Kamari, M., & Ham, Y. (2022). AI-based risk assessment for construction site disaster preparedness through deep learning-based digital twinning. Automation in Construction, 134, 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104091
42. Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
43. Larsen, J. K., Shen, G. Q., Lindhard, S. M., & Brunoe, T. D. (2015). Factors Affecting Schedule Delay, Cost Overrun, and Quality Level in Public Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 04015032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000391
44. Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., et al. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005
45. Lei, B., Janssen, P., Stoter, J., et al. (2023). Challenges of urban digital twins: A systematic review and a Delphi expert survey. Automation in Construction, 147, 104716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104716
46. Lim, K. Y. H., Zheng, P., Chen, C. H., et al. (2020). A digital twin-enhanced system for engineering product family design and optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 57, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.011
47. Ling, F. Y. Y., Chan, S. L., Chong, E., & Ee, L. P. (2004). Predicting Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(75)
48. Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., et al. (2021). Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017
49. Liyanage, C., & Villalba-Romero, F. (2015). Measuring Success of PPP Transport Projects: A Cross-Case Analysis of Toll Roads. Transport Reviews, 35(2), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.994583
50. Lu, Q., Parlikad, A. K., Woodall, P., et al. (2020). Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(3), 05020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763
51. Mahamid, I. (2016). Factors contributing to poor performance in construction projects: studies of Saudi Arabia. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering, 12(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488388.2016.1243034
52. Matthews, J., Love, P. E. D., Heinemann, S., et al. (2015). Real time progress management: Re-engineering processes for cloud-based BIM in construction. Automation in Construction, 58, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.004
53. Nabi, M. A., & El-adaway, I. H. (2021). Understanding the Key Risks Affecting Cost and Schedule Performance of Modular Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(4), 04021023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000917
54. Neyestani, B. (2016). Effectiveness of Quality Management System (QMS) on Construction Projects. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2947712
55. Nnaji, C., & Karakhan, A. A. (2020). Technologies for safety and health management in construction: Current use, implementation benefits and limitations, and adoption barriers. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101212
56. Nolling, K. (2016). THINK ACT—Digitization in the Construction Industry (Building Europe’s Road to “Construction 4.0”: A comprehensive guide to reinventing companies). Available online: https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Media/Digitization-in-the-construction-sector.html (accessed on 3 March 2023).
57. Oke, A., Aigbavboa, C., & Dlamini, E. (2017). Factors Affecting Quality of Construction Projects in Swazilland. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-9); Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
58. Olsson, N. O. E., Arica, E., Woods, R., et al. (2021). Industry 4.0 in a project context: Introducing 3D printing in construction projects. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100033
59. Olsson, N. O. E., Shafqat, A., Arica, E., et al. (2019). 3D-Printing Technology in Construction: Results from a Survey. Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2516-285320190000002044
60. Opoku, D. G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., et al. (2021). Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 40, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726
61. Oraee, M., Hosseini, M. R., Edwards, D. J., et al. (2019). Collaboration barriers in BIM-based construction networks: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 37(6), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.004
62. Paz, D. H. F., Lafayette, K. P. V., & Sobral, M. C. M. (2020). Management of construction and demolition waste using GIS tools. Advances in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling. Woodhead Publishing. pp. 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819055-5.00008-5
63. Pereira, A. P., Buzzo, M., Zimermann, I., et al. (2021). A Descriptive 3D City Information Model Built from Infrastructure BIM. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(4), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.20211001.oa9
64. Puan, Z. A. (2019). Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for the Proposed Development of Solid Waste Transfer Station, on 12.474 Acres of Land on Lots 1336 & 1337, Pekan Nenas, Mukim Jeram Batu, Daerah Pontian, Johor Darul Takzim for Jabatan Pengurusan Sisa Pepejal Negara (JPSPN). IKTISAS ENVIRONMENT SDN BHD.
65. Qi, Q., Tao, F., Hu, T., et al. (2021). Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001
66. Qiang, M., Wen, Q., Jiang, H., et al. (2015). Factors governing construction project delivery selection: A content analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1780–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.001
67. Ramu, S. P., Boopalan, P., Pham, Q. V., et al. (2022). Federated learning enabled digital twins for smart cities: Concepts, recent advances, and future directions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79, 103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103663
68. Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers from a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2970143
69. Redmond, A., Hore, A., Alshawi, M., et al. (2012). Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM. Automation in Construction, 24, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003
70. Riaz, H., Iqbal Ahmad Khan, K., Ullah, F., et al. (2023). Key factors for implementation of total quality management in construction Sector: A system dynamics approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(3), 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101903
71. Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., et al. (2020). Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Engineering, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2020.16
72. Sai, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, X., & Ding, C. (2020). Analysis of Digital Twins and Application Value of Power Engineering Based on BIM. In: Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City (BDCPS 2019). Springer, Singapore.
73. Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., et al. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040
74. Semeraro, C., Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., et al. (2021). Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 130, 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469
75. Shahat, E., Hyun, C. T., & Yeom, C. (2021). City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13(6), 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063386
76. Shanbari, H. A., Blinn, N. M., & Issa, R. R. (2016). Laser scanning technology and BIM in construction management education. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 21, 204-217.
77. Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Digital twin for smart manufacturing, A review. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2023.100017
78. Sun, K., & Liu, R. (2014). Inheritance and Innovation of Engineering Management Informatization. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2014014
79. Tan, Y., Yang, W., Yoshida, K., et al. (2019). Application of IoT-Aided Simulation to Manufacturing Systems in Cyber-Physical System. Machines, 7(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines7010002
80. Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., et al. (2017). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9–12), 3563–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1
81. Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., et al. (2018). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935–3953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229
82. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., et al. (2019). Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2873186
83. Tao, F., Zhang, M., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital Twin Driven Smart Manufacturing. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-02206-9
84. Thomas, S. N., Palaneeswaran, E., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). A dynamic e-Reporting system for contractor’s performance appraisal. Advances in Engineering Software, 33(6), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(02)00042-X
85. Tiew, S. Y. (2022). Factors affecting performance of graduate architects in contract implementation management: a case study on housing projects in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(5), 1789–1806. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2021-1010
86. Tsiga, Z., Emes, M., & Smith, A. (2016). Critical Success Factors for the Construction Industry. PM World Journal, 5(8).
87. Venkateswaran, C. B., & Murugasan, R. (2017). Time Delay and Cost Overrun of Road over Bridge (ROB) Construction Projects in India. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(suppl. 1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2017.22.supp1.5
88. Wang, Z., Jiang, H., Zhang, W., et al. (2020). The Problem Analysis and Solution Suggestion in the Process of City Information Model Construction. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsgsc50906.2020.9248544
89. Wawak, S., Ljevo, Ž., & Vukomanović, M. (2020). Understanding the Key Quality Factors in Construction Projects—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410376
90. Wu, G., Liu, C., Zhao, X., et al. (2017). Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1466–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.006
91. Xu, Z., Zhang, L., Li, H., et al. (2020). Combining IFC and 3D tiles to create 3D visualization for building information modeling. Automation in Construction, 109, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102995
92. Yu, T., Man, Q., Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Evaluating different stakeholder impacts on the occurrence of quality defects in offsite construction projects: A Bayesian-network-based model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118390
93. Zaccaria, V., Stenfelt, M., Aslanidou, I., et al. (2018). Fleet Monitoring and Diagnostics Framework Based on Digital Twin of Aero-Engines. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2018-76414
94. Zhai, Y., Chen, K., Zhou, J. X., et al. (2019). An Internet of Things-enabled BIM platform for modular integrated construction: A case study in Hong Kong. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 42, 100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100997
95. Zheng, P., Lin, T. J., Chen, C. H., et al. (2018). A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.101
96. Zhuang, C., Miao, T., Liu, J., et al. (2021). The connotation of digital twin, and the construction and application method of shop-floor digital twin. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 68, 102075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102075
97. Zuhairi, A. H., Razuki, B. I., & Rohaizi, M. J. (2020). Construction 4.0 Strategic Plan (2021-2025)—Next Revolution of the Malaysian Construction Industry. Malaysia: Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB).