Exploring public charging infrastructure development strategies with BBWM-mV integrated multi-viewpoint perspective

Sun-Weng Huang, Yu-Hsuan Liao, Ju-Min Liao, James J. H. Liou

Article ID: 6495
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024

VIEWS - 1076 (Abstract)

Abstract


To achieve the electrification of private vehicles, it is urgent to develop public charging infrastructure. However, choosing the most beneficial type of public charging infrastructure for the development of a country or region remains challenging. The municipal decision’s implementation requires considering various perspectives. An important aspect of energy development involves effectively integrating and evaluating public charging infrastructure. While car charging facilities have been thoroughly studied, motorcycle charging facilities have been neglected despite motorcycles being a vital mode of transportation in many countries. The study created a hybrid decision-making model to evaluate electric motorcycle charging infrastructure. Firstly, a framework for evaluating electric motorcycle charging infrastructure was effectively constructed through a literature survey and expert experience. Secondly, decision-makers’ opinions were gathered and integrated using Bayesian BWM to reach a group consensus. Thirdly, the performance of the alternative solutions was evaluated by exploring the gaps between them and the aspiration level through modified VIKOR. An empirical analysis was conducted using examples of regions/countries with very high rates of motorcycle ownership worldwide. Finally, comparative and sensitivity analyses were conducted to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed model. The study’s findings will aid in addressing municipal issues and achieving low-carbon development objectives in the area.


Keywords


private vehicles; electrification; public charging infrastructure; electric motorcycles; Bayesian BWM; modified VIKOR

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Agency, I. E. (2009). World energy outlook. OECD/IEA Paris.
  2. Ahmad, A., Khan, Z. A., Saad Alam, M., et al. (2017). A Review of the Electric Vehicle Charging Techniques, Standards, Progression and Evolution of EV Technologies in Germany. Smart Science, 6(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/23080477.2017.1420132
  3. Akbari, M., Brenna, M., & Longo, M. (2018). Optimal Locating of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations by Application of Genetic Algorithm. Sustainability, 10(4), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041076
  4. Allegre, A. L., Bouscayrol, A., & Trigui, R. (2009). Influence of control strategies on battery/supercapacitor hybrid Energy Storage Systems for traction applications. 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/vppc.2009.5289849
  5. Amiri, S. S., Jadid, S., & Saboori, H. (2018). Multi-objective optimum charging management of electric vehicles through battery swapping stations. Energy, 165, 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.167
  6. Aqidawati, E. F., Ramadhan, R. A., & Sutopo, W. (2021). Charging Station Network Design for E-Motorcycle: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore; 7–11 March 2021.
  7. Barisa, A., Rosa, M., & Kisele, A. (2016). Introducing Electric Mobility in Latvian Municipalities: Results of a Survey. Energy Procedia, 95, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.015
  8. Campaña, M., & Inga, E. (2023). Optimal deployment of fast-charging stations for electric vehicles considering the sizing of the electrical distribution network and traffic condition. Energy Reports, 9, 5246–5268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.355
  9. Chen, C., & Hua, G. (2014). A New Model for Optimal Deployment of Electric Vehicle Charging and Battery Swapping Stations. International Journal of Control and Automation, 7(5), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2014.7.5.27
  10. Chiou, Y.-C., Wen, C.-H., Tsai, S.-H., et al. (2009). Integrated modeling of car/motorcycle ownership, type and usage for estimating energy consumption and emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(7), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.06.002
  11. Chiu, Y.-C., & Tzeng, G.-H. (1999). The market acceptance of electric motorcycles in Taiwan experience through a stated preference analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 4(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00001-2
  12. Christoforou, Z., de Bortoli, A., Gioldasis, C., et al. (2021). Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102708
  13. Communications, M. O. T. A. (2022). Motor vehicle registration number. Available online: https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301 (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  14. Cong, X., Wang, L., Ma, L., et al. (2020). Exploring critical influencing factors for the site selection failure of waste-to-energy projects in China caused by the “not in my back yard” effect. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(6), 1561–1592. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2019-0709
  15. Das, H. S., Rahman, M. M., Li, S., et al. (2020). Electric vehicles standards, charging infrastructure, and impact on grid integration: A technological review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109618
  16. Deveci, M., Erdogan, N., Pamucar, D., et al. (2023). A rough Dombi Bonferroni based approach for public charging station type selection. Applied Energy, 345, 121258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121258
  17. Dong, H., & Yang, K. (2021). Application of the entropy-DEMATEL-VIKOR multicriteria decision-making method in public charging infrastructure. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258209
  18. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C.-C. (2019). Powered two-wheelers for sustainable mobility: A review of consumer adoption of electric motorcycles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1540735
  19. Feng, J., Xu, S. X., & Li, M. (2021). A novel multi-criteria decision-making method for selecting the site of an electric-vehicle charging station from a sustainable perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65, 102623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102623
  20. Funke, S. Á., Sprei, F., Gnann, T., et al. (2019). How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.024
  21. Gnann, T., Funke, S., Jakobsson, N., et al. (2018). Fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles: Today’s situation and future needs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.03.004
  22. Goussian, A., LeBel, F.-A., Trovão, J. P., et al. (2019). Passive hybrid energy storage system based on lithium-ion capacitor for an electric motorcycle. Journal of Energy Storage, 25, 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100884
  23. Greenstone, M., Nilekani, J., Pande, R., et al. (2015). Lower pollution, longer lives: life expectancy gains if India reduced particulate matter pollution. Economic and Political Weekly, 40–46.
  24. Guerra, E. (2019). Electric vehicles, air pollution, and the motorcycle city: A stated preference survey of consumers’ willingness to adopt electric motorcycles in Solo, Indonesia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 68, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.027
  25. Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., et al. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
  26. Huang, S.-W., Liou, J. J. H., Chuang, H.-H., et al. (2021). Using a Modified VIKOR Technique for Evaluating and Improving the National Healthcare System Quality. Mathematics, 9(12), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121349
  27. Huang, S.-W., Liou, J. J. H., Tang, W., et al. (2020). Location Selection of a Manufacturing Facility from the Perspective of Supply Chain Sustainability. Symmetry, 12(9), 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091418
  28. Huang, S. K., Kuo, L., & Chou, K.-L. (2018). The impacts of government policies on green utilization diffusion and social benefits – A case study of electric motorcycles in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 119, 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.061
  29. Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
  30. Ibanez, F. M., Beizama Florez, A. M., Gutierrez, S., et al. (2019). Extending the Autonomy of a Battery for Electric Motorcycles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(4), 3294–3305. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2019.2896901
  31. Jones, L. R., Cherry, C. R., Vu, T. A., et al. (2013). The effect of incentives and technology on the adoption of electric motorcycles: A stated choice experiment in Vietnam. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 57, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.003
  32. Kabli, M., Quddus, M. A., Nurre, S. G., et al. (2020). A stochastic programming approach for electric vehicle charging station expansion plans. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.034
  33. Kannan, A. S. K., Balamurugan, S. A. A., & Sasikala, S. (2021). A Customized Metaheuristic Approaches for Improving Supplier Selection in Intelligent Decision Making. IEEE Access, 9, 56228–56239. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3071454
  34. Kim, S., Na, D., Choi, Y., & Jung, H. (2021). Trends on Postal Vehicles in World-wide 10 Postal Agencies. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 36(3), 145–160.
  35. Liu, H.-C., Yang, M., Zhou, M., et al. (2019). An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Location Planning of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(1), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2018.2815680
  36. Lo, H.-W., Liou, J. J. H., Huang, C.-N., et al. (2019). A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 183, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018
  37. Luo, M., Du, B., Klemmer, K., et al. (2022). Deployment Optimization for Shared e-Mobility Systems with Multi-Agent Deep Neural Search. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(3), 2549–2560. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2021.3125745
  38. Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E., Govindan, K., et al. (2016). VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications. Sustainability, 8(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010037
  39. Mehar, S., & Senouci, S. M. (2013). An optimization location scheme for electric charging stations. 2013 International Conference on Smart Communications in Network Technologies (SaCoNeT). https://doi.org/10.1109/saconet.2013.6654565
  40. Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 102075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.001
  41. Mouli, G. R. C., Venugopal, P., & Bauer, P. (2017). Future of electric vehicle charging. 2017 International Symposium on Power Electronics (Ee). https://doi.org/10.1109/pee.2017.8171657
  42. Quayson, M., Bai, C., Sun, L., et al. (2023). Building blockchain‐driven dynamic capabilities for developing circular supply chain: Rethinking the role of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4821–4840. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3395
  43. Rao, R., Zhang, X., Xie, J., et al. (2015). Optimizing electric vehicle users’ charging behavior in battery swapping mode. Applied Energy, 155, 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.125
  44. Raqabi, Er. M., & Li, W. (2023). An Electric Vehicle Transitioning Framework for Public Fleet Planning. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 118, 103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103732
  45. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
  46. Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001
  47. Rezaei, J., Kothadiya, O., Tavasszy, L., et al. (2018). Quality assessment of airline baggage handling systems using SERVQUAL and BWM. Tourism Management, 66, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.009
  48. Ribeiro, R. G., Junior, J. R. C., Cota, L. P., et al. (2020). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Location Routing Problem with Charging Stations for Belt Conveyor Inspection System in the Mining Industry. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(10), 4186–4195. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2939094
  49. Risso, C., Cintrano, C., Toutouh, J., & Nesmachnow, S. (2021). Exact approach for electric vehicle charging infrastructure location: a real case study in málaga, spain. Ibero-American Congress of Smart Cities.
  50. Sadrani, M., Najafi, A., Mirqasemi, R., et al. (2023). Charging strategy selection for electric bus systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach. Applied Energy, 347, 121415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121415
  51. Sandhya, P., & Nisha, G. (2022). Review of Battery Charging Methods for Electric Vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES).
  52. Schroeder, A., & Traber, T. (2012). The economics of fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 43, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.041
  53. Sonar, H. C., & Kulkarni, S. D. (2021). An Integrated AHP-MABAC Approach for Electric Vehicle Selection. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 41, 100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100665
  54. Sun, B., Sun, X., Tsang, D. H. K., et al. (2019). Optimal battery purchasing and charging strategy at electric vehicle battery swap stations. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(2), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.019
  55. Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C., Hsiao, C. T., et al. (2012). An evaluation model for low carbon island policy: The case of Taiwan’s green transportation policy. Energy Policy, 45, 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.063
  56. Yeung, J. S., Wong, Y. D., & Secadiningrat, J. R. (2015). Lane-harmonised passenger car equivalents for heterogeneous expressway traffic. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.001
  57. Yogesh, A., & Radhakrishna, K. (2021). A review on fast wireless charging methods for Electric Vehicles. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 1821-1826.
  58. Zhu, H., Liu, G., Zhou, M., et al. (2019). Dandelion Algorithm with Probability-Based Mutation. IEEE Access, 7, 97974–97985. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2927846
  59. Zhu, L., Song, Q., Sheng, N., et al. (2019). Exploring the determinants of consumers’ WTB and WTP for electric motorcycles using CVM method in Macau. Energy Policy, 127, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.004


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6495

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sun-Weng Huang, Yu-Hsuan Liao, Ju-Min Liao, James J. H. Liou

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.