Food security presents a complex challenge that spans multiple sectors and levels, involving diverse stakeholders. Such a challenge necessitates collaborative efforts and the creation of shared value among participants. Through the lens of service-dominant logic (S-D logic), food security can be redefined to achieve a more comprehensive understanding and sheds light on the dynamic interplay among stakeholders, enabling the realization of potential value co-creation. As a theoretical contribution, this research addresses the gap in explaining stakeholder interactions. This aspect is crucial for fostering collaboration, and the study accomplishes this by leveraging Social Network Analysis to identify clusters and assign them roles as sub-orchestrators to support the National Food Agency as the main orchestrator who responsible to implement co-creation management strategy (involvement, curation, and empowerment). The study also proposes stakeholder roles in the context of food security: regulator, operator, dominator, niche player, and supporter. Moreover, the practical significance of this research is highly relevant to the early stages of the National Food Agency (NFA) since its establishment in 2021. As the NFA seeks optimal structure, networks, and resources to enhance Indonesia’s existing food system, the study offers valuable insights. This comprehensive study highlights key issues in developing food security in Indonesia and provides recommendations for overcoming future challenges.

Adam, S., & Kriesi, H. (2019). The network approach. In: Sabatier, P. A. (editor). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press. pp. 129–154. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-5

Amiri, A., Mehrjerdi, Y. Z., Jalalimanesh, A., et al. (2020). Food system sustainability investigation using system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 124040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124040

Andoko, E., & Doretha, A. C. (2020). Analysis of Indonesian government strategies to food security: Harnessing the potential of natural and human resources. Food & Fertilizer Technology Center Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP).

Barile, S., Lusch, R., Reynoso, J., et al. (2016). Systems, networks, and ecosystems in service research. Journal of Service Management, 27(4), 652–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-09-2015-0268

Braun, J. von, Afsana, K., Fresco, L., et al. (2020). Food systemsDefinition, concept and application for the UN Food Systems Summit. Scientific Group of the UN Food Systems Summit.

Cameron, G., & Connell, D. (2021). Food sovereignty and farmland protection in the Municipal County of Antigonish, Nova Scotia. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.104.005

Chen, X., Wong, C. Un. I., & Zhang, H. (2023). Building a sustainable food security evaluation system for the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Analysis based on entropy weight TOPSIS model method. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2547

Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2013). Deliberation and Decision in Collaborative Governance: A Simulation of Approaches to Mitigate Power Imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut003

FAO. (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security and Plan of Action. FAO.

Feo, E., Spanoghe, P., Berckmoes, E., et al. (2022). The multi-actor approach in thematic networks for agriculture and forestry innovation. Agricultural and Food Economics, 10, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100‐021‐00209‐0

Han, L., Li, H., & Shen, H. (2024). Measurement, regional differences, and driving factors of high-quality development level of crop seed industry in China. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(4), 3475. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i4.3475

Handayati, Y., Simatupang, T. M., & Perdana, T. (2015). Value Co-creation in Agri-chains Network: An Agent-Based Simulation. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.058

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Review Press.

Kijima, K., & Arai, Y. (2016). Value co-creation process and value orchestration platform. In: Kwan, S. K., Spohrer, J. C., & Sawatani, Y. (editors). Global perspectives on service science: Japan. Springer. pp. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3594-9_10

Limenta, M. E., & Chandra, S. (2017). Indonesian Food Security Policy. Indonesia Law Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v7n2.198

Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043120

Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0058-9

Mamoriska, S. (2021). Repositioning of BULOG in The Formation Plan of National Food Agency (Indonesian). Jurnal Pangan, 29(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v29i3.528

National Food Agency. (2022a). National Food Agency Action Plan For 2022. National Food Agency.

National Food Agency. (2022b). Regulation of the National Food Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2022 regarding the Strategic Plan of the National Food Agency for the Year 2022-2024. National Food Agency.

National Food Agency. (2022c). Visi-Misi Badan Pangan Nasional. National Food Agency.

President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 66 of 2021 Regarding the National Food Agency. Available online: https://jdih.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/176486/Salinan_Perpres_Nomor_66_Tahun_2021.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2024).

Putro, U. S. (2016). Value co-creation platform as part of an integrative group model-building process in policy development in Indonesia. In: Mangkusubroto, K., Putro, U. S., Novani, S., & Kijima, K. (editors). Systems science for complex policy making: A study of Indonesia. Springer Tokyo. pp. 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55273-4_2

Ruankaew, N., Le Page, C., Dumrongrojwattana, P., et al. (2010). Companion modelling for integrated renewable resource management: a new collaborative approach to create common values for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 17(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500903481474

Saunders, M., & Lewis, P. (2017). Doing research in business and management. Pearson.

Schupp, J., Martin, K., MacLaughlin, D., et al. (2021). What do farmers bring to market? Exploring good types, number of vendors, and founding dates by SES and race/ethnicity. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.104.002

Sitaker, M., McCall, M., Wang, W., et al. (2021). Models for cost-offset community supported agriculture (CO-CSA) programs. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.104.003

Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2009). Service science and S-D logic. The 2009 Naples forum on servicePapers.

Ulibarri, N. (2015). Collaboration in Federal Hydropower Licensing: Impacts on Process, Outputs, and Outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 578–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031004

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3

Vargo, S. L., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vink, J. (2020). Service-dominant logic: Foundations and applications. In: Bridges, E., & Fowler, K. (editors). The Routledge handbook of service research insights and ideas. Routledge. pp. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351245234-1

Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470355

World Food Programme. (2020). Evaluation of Indonesia WFP Country Strategic Plan 2017-2020. World Food Programme.