Supplier performance assessment: Empirical evidence in Indonesian freight forwarding companies

Sonya Sidjabat, Prasadja Ricardianto, Muhammad Wisanggeni Ariohadi, Endri Endri, Tateki Yoga Tursilarini, Trilaksmi Udiati, Soetji Andari, Endro Winarno, Achmad Nururochman Hidayatulloh, Muhammad Ainur Rofiq

Article ID: 6296
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024

VIEWS - 99 (Abstract) 71 (PDF)

Abstract


This research aimed to assess the results of two vendors used by the company in the shipping process of export goods. Two leading suppliers for one similar activity had caused more difficulties in the monitoring and controlling activities of DHL Global Forwarding Indonesia. This research used qualitative and quantitative methods, with the Analytic Hierarchy Process decision-making method using 36 internal staff members as the sample. Through a qualitative calculation method by distributing questionnaires to the existing suppliers, namely Monang Sianipar Kargo and Andima Transportindo, it was found that the weighted score for Monang Sianipar Kargo was 22.84 and for Andima Transportindo was 10.66. Subcriteria and indicators should be prioritized in the criteria of Price and service, significantly to improve the performance of problematic suppliers. This research recommended using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for assessment since it facilitated the research development by the opinion of the company’s experts. Such a finding implied that a policy from the management was needed in the assessment of suppliers. As an implication, it was necessary to assess all suppliers cooperating with DHL Global Forwarding Indonesia by using actual data from the current month.


Keywords


export cargo delivery; performance assessment; freight forwarding company; priority suppliers

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aini, N. N., Frisalma, A., Agusinta, L., & Rochmadi, B. N. (2022). The Role of Freight Forwarders in The Process of Exporting Goods Through Air Transportation of PT. Kintetsu World Express Indonesia. Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, 5, 128-143.

Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2022). Prioritization of Supply Chain Digital Transformation Strategies Using Multi-Expert Fermatean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Informatica, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.15388/22-infor493

Alvarez Gallo, S., & Maheut, J. (2023). Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Logistics Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics, 11(19), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11194089

Andalib Ardakani, D., Soltanmohammadi, A., & Seuring, S. (2022). The impact of customer and supplier collaboration on green supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2248–2274. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2020-0655

Angelova, B., & Zekiri, J. (2011). Measuring Customer Satisfaction with Service Quality Using American Customer Satisfaction Model (ACSI Model). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss.v1i2.35

Anindita, T., & Siregar, M. T. (2019). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for selecting freight forwarder services to get minimum shipping cost for export goods. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(4), 270-284.

Avenhaus, R., & Huber, R. K. (1984). Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6

Barata, F. A., Ricardianto, P., Haq, L. E., et al. (2024). Safety risk and operational efficiency on logistic service providers’ sustainable coal supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.006

Boujelbene, Y., & Derbel, A. (2015). The Performance Analysis of Public Transport Operators in Tunisia Using AHP Method. Procedia Computer Science, 73, 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.039

Burkhart, D., & Bode, C. (2024). On supplier resilience: How supplier performance, disruption frequency, and disruption duration are interrelated. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(3), 100921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100921

Cabrita, M. D. R., & Frade, R. (2016). Supplier selection approach: integrating analytic hierarchy process and supplier risk analysis. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 10(2/3/4), 238. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbsr.2016.075743

Çalık, A. (2020). A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Computing, 25(3), 2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9

Carvalho Fagundes, M. V., Cheles Keler, Á., Oliveira Teles, E., et al. (2021). Multicriteria Decision-Making System for Supplier Selection Considering Risk: A Computational Fuzzy AHP-Based Approach. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 19(9), 1564–1572. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2021.9468610

Chao, S. L., Yu, M. M., & Sun, Y.H. (2023). Ascertaining the effects of service quality on customer loyalty in the context of ocean freight forwarders: An integration of structural equation modeling and network data envelopment analysis. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 47, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.100955

Chen, C. H. (2020). A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS. Entropy, 22(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22020259

Chen, Y., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Goldstein, S. M. (2019). Historical Supplier Performance and Strategic Relationship Dissolution: Unintentional but Serious Supplier Error as a Moderator. Decision Sciences, 50(6), 1224–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12373

Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M. (2023). An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155

Digalwar, A. K., Borade, A., & Metri, B. (2014). A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0170107

Durakbasa, N. M. and Gençyılmaz, M. G. (2021). Digital Conversion on the Way to Industry 4.0. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62784-3

Dožić, S., Babić, D., Kalić, M., et al. (2023). An AHP approach to airport choice by freight forwarder. Sustainable Futures, 5, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100106

Dožić, S., Lutovac, T., & Kalić, M. (2018). Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.08.003

Durakbasa, N. M., & Gençyılmaz, M. G. (2020). Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2

Durga Prasad, K. G., Venkata Subbaiah, K., & Prasad, M. V. (2017). Supplier evaluation and selection through DEA-AHP-GRA integrated approach—A case study. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 369–382. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2017.4.001

Ecer, F. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer. Operational Research, 22(1), 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00552-y

Ergu, D., Kou, G., Peng, Y., et al. (2011). A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.014

Fagundes, M. V. C., Hellingrath, B., & Freires, F. G. M. (2021). Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP. Logistics, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5010013

Farisyi, S., Ricardianto, P., Purnaningratri, I., et al. (2024). Seafarer work stress and performance: Empirical evidence of shipping safety of Indonesia national shipping companies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 1297–1306. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.11.007

Gergin, R. E., Peker, İ., & Kısa, A. C. G. (2022). Supplier selection by integrated IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS Method: A case study of automotive supply industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(1), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame211221075g

Güldeş, M., Gürcan, Ö. F., Atici, U., et al. (2022). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for selection of criteria for an e-learning platform. European Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1041281

Gupta, S. K., Ilinich, S., & Noah, V. (2023). An assessment of Chennai port customs clearance operations. Economics, Finance and Management Review, 2, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2023-2-31-50

Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Cenk, Z., Erdebilli, B., et al. (2023). Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Green Supplier Selection in the Food Industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 224, 120036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120036

Han, J., Lu, J., & Zhang, G. (2017). Tri-level decision-making for decentralized vendor-managed inventory. Information Sciences, 421, 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.089

Hosseini, Z. S., Flapper, S. D., & Pirayesh, M. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under demand, supplier availability and supplier grading uncertainties. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 165, 107811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107811

Khoshfetrat, S., Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., & Almasi, M. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a fuzzy approach. Engineering Optimization, 52(9), 1494–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2019.1663185

Kotler, P. (2018). Marketing Management. New York: Pearson Education International.

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing, 17th ed. Pearson Education Limited.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management, 15th eds. Upper Saddle River, N. J: Prentice Hall International.

Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2005). A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(04)00120-X

Lee, P. T.W., & Yang, Z. (2018). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Maritime Studies and Logistics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62338-2

Liu, S., Wang, L., & Huang, W. (2017). Effects of process and outcome controls on business process outsourcing performance: Moderating roles of vendor and client capability risks. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(3), 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.020

Lovanda, S., Purwanegara, M. S., & Wibowo, S. A. (2023). Proposed Business Strategy for International Freight Forwarding Company (Case: PT Jahermosa). International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(1), 777–789.

Maier, D., Maier, A., Așchilean, I., et al. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 4083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104083

Mandagie, W. C., Susanto, K. P., Endri, E., et al. (2024). Oil Price and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD): Evidence from Indonesian Energy Companies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 694–701. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15937

Mizrak, F., & Akkartal, G. R. (2023). Determining and Evaluating the Strategies of Air Cargo Freight Forwarders to Increase Business Volume with AHP Method. Journal of Aviation, 7(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1262860

Mohsen, B. M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision System for the Selection of A Freight Forwarder Using AHP. Procedia Computer Science, 220, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.020

Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., et al. (2023). A Systematic Review of Analytic Hierarchy Process Applications to Solve Transportation Problems: From 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11, 11973–11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3234298

Ouyang, L., & Bu, H. (2024). Unraveling the Dynamics of Network Embeddedness and Innovation Performance: Insights from China’s International Freight Forwarding Industry. Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 3174-3187.

Parimala, K. (2013). Exporters choice of freight forwarder in moving their international cargo. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 1(12), 1-8.

Peng, J. (2012). Selection of Logistics Outsourcing Service Suppliers Based on AHP. Energy Procedia, 17, 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.141

Pradeep, V. (2023). An Investigation of the Challenges That Freight Forwarders Face When Working with Import and Export. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science (CAJOTAS), 4(10), 56-80.

Purwaningsih, E., Muslikh, M., Suhaeri, S., et al. (2024). Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance, and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.007

Rahmanita, M., Ricardianto, P., Wijayanti, R., et al. (2023). The impact of the safety of passenger ship services on the development of water recreation: evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(3), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.4.010

Rahmasari, L., Farisyi, S., Nabila, P. A., et al. (2024). Customer relationship management and brand image: Empirical evidence from marine export company in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.10.021

Ricardianto, P., Christy, E., Pahala, Y., et al. (2023). Digitalization and logistics service quality: Evidence from Indonesia national shipping companies. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(2), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.1.011

Ricardianto, P., Yanto, T. A., Wardhono, D. T., et al. (2023). The impact of service quality, ticket price policy and passenger trust on airport train passenger loyalty. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.9.012

Rizaldy, W., Suparman, A., Octaviani, R. D., et al. (2024). Integrated safety for sea and air transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 8(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv8i2p2

Romule, K., Bak, O., Colicchia, C., et al. (2019). Supplier performance assessment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(2), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-10-2018-0305

Roslan, N. A. A., Wahab, E., & Abdullah, N. H. (2015). Service Quality: A Case Study of Logistics Sector in Iskandar Malaysia Using SERVQUAL Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.380

Sładkowski, A. (2020). Modelling of the Interaction of the Different Vehicles and Various Transport Modes. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11512-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6296

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Authors

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.