The utilization of digital tools in agricultural extension has facilitated information delivery through non-face-to-face interactions. Therefore, this study aimed to map the variation in digital tools used by agricultural extension workers to access and deliver information and analyse the outcomes of farmers’ adoption. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with agricultural extension workers at 11 Agricultural Extension Centers. The data were processed using the N-Vivo qualitative data analysis software. The results showed that extension workers combined various digital tools as sources of extension materials and channels for delivering information to farmers. Although social interaction between agricultural extension workers and farmers occurred non-face-to-face, messages could be adopted by farmers and yield tangible outcomes. This was reflected in the asynchronous communication, allowing extension workers sufficient time to improve the quality of the delivered messages. Farmers also had sufficient time to review the received information content in this context repeatedly. These results implied that although extension content is delivered through non-face-to-face interaction, it can still drive adoption with significant outcomes.

1. Arham, A., Salman, D., Kaimuddin, K., et al. (2023). Coffee farmers’ knowledge construction about climate change. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i1.2818
2. Berry, G. R. (2011). A cross-disciplinary literature review: Examining trust on virtual teams. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(3), 9–28. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20116
3. CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics). (2023). Maros Regency in Figures, 2023rd ed. BPS-Statistics of Maros Regency.
4. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
5. Cheng, C., Gao, Q., Ju, K., et al. (2024). How digital skills affect farmers’ agricultural entrepreneurship? An explanation from factor availability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), 100477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100477
6. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (n.d.). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition., 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006
7. Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58(2), 332–373. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0042
8. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite Knowledge and Mutual Knowledge. Available online: https://philarchive.org/rec/CLADKA (accessed on 16 March 2024).
9. Coggins, S., McCampbell, M., Sharma, A., et al. (2022). How have smallholder farmers used digital extension tools? Developer and user voices from Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia. Global Food Security, 32, 100577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100577
10. Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Rosson, M. B., et al. (2008). Articulating common ground in cooperative work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357310
11. Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Rosson, M. B., et al. (2009). Supporting content and process common ground in computer-supported teamwork. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519059
12. Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Slavkovic, A., et al. (2011). Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063231.2063236
13. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
14. Davis, K., Swanson, B., & Amudavi, D. (2010). In-Depth Assessment of the Public Agricultural Extension System of Ethiopia and Recommendations for Improvement. Available online: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/7610 (accessed on 8 March 2024).
15. Engås, K. G., Raja, J. Z., & Neufang, I. F. (2023). Decoding technological frames: An exploratory study of access to and meaningful engagement with digital technologies in agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122405
16. Fabregas, R., Harigaya, T., Kremer, M., & Ramrattan, R. (2023). Digital Agricultural Extension for Development. In: Madon T., Gadgil A. J., Anderson R., et al. (editors). Introduction to Development Engineering: A Framework with Applications from the Field. Springer International Publishing. pp. 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86065-3_8
17. Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., et al. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
18. Guntoro, B., Qui, N. H., & Triatmojo, A. (2022). Challenges and Roles of Extension Workers on Cyber Extension as Information Media. KnE Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v0i0.11843
19. Kabir, K. H., Rahman, S., Hasan, M. M., et al. (2023). Facebook for digital agricultural extension services: The case of rooftop gardeners in Bangladesh. Smart Agricultural Technology, 6, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100338
20. Karubanga, G., Agea, J. G., Okry, F., et al. (2019). Factors Effecting Change in Rice Production Practices and Technologies among Smallholder Farmers in Kamwenge District, Uganda. Available online: https://repository.ruforum.org/sites/default/files/Karubanga%20et%20al%202019.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2024).
21. Kirui, V. C., Ombati, J. M., & Nkurumwa, A. O. (2022). Sources, Nature and Characteristics of Agricultural Digital Content Accessed by Smallholder Farmers in Nakuru County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i1031113
22. Krivý, M. (2023). Digital ecosystem: The journey of a metaphor. Digital Geography and Society, 5, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100057
23. Lewis, K. (2024). Digital networks: Elements of a theoretical framework. Social Networks, 77, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.12.002
24. Liu, Y., Peng, C. (2017). Learn to farm APP helps promote agricultural technology services. Agriculture Network Information Center, 9, 72-76.
25. Materia, V. C., Giarè, F., & Klerkx, L. (2014). Increasing Knowledge Flows between the Agricultural Research and Advisory System in Italy: Combining Virtual and Non-virtual Interaction in Communities of Practice. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2014.928226
26. McCampbell, M., Adewopo, J., Klerkx, L., et al. (2021). Are farmers ready to use phone-based digital tools for agronomic advice? Ex-ante user readiness assessment using the case of Rwandan banana farmers. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2021.1984955
27. Oyinbo, O., Chamberlin, J., Abdoulaye, T., et al. (2021). Digital extension, price risk, and farm performance: experimental evidence from Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(2), 831–852. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12242
28. Panteli, N., Yalabik, Z. Y., & Rapti, A. (2019). Fostering work engagement in geographically-dispersed and asynchronous virtual teams. Information Technology & People, 32(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2017-0133
29. Peterson, A. T. (2023). Asynchrony and promotive interaction in online cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100300
30. Porat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students’ perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education, 126, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030
31. Qian, Y., Zhu, H., & Wu, J. (2023). Understanding the determinants of where and what kind of home accommodation to build. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110803
32. Qu, Y., Cieślik, A., Fang, S., et al. (2023). The role of online interaction in user stickiness of social commerce: The shopping value perspective. Digital Business, 3(2), 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100061
33. Rajkhowa, P., & Qaim, M. (2021). Personalized digital extension services and agricultural performance: Evidence from smallholder farmers in India. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0259319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259319
34. Rizkiansyah, M., Ariestyani, A., & Yunus, U. (2022). The comparison between cyber extension and traditional interaction in the farmers environment during pandemic. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 951(1), 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/951/1/012058
35. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.): The Art of Hearing Data. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651
36. Sifullah, Md. K., Sohel, Md. S., Hossain Sarker, Md. F., et al. (2023). Mapping out the vulnerabilities of migrant women in the informal sector: A qualitative investigation in Dhaka city. Heliyon, 9(10), e20950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20950
37. Singh, R., Slotznick, W., & Stein, D. (2023). Digital tools for rural agriculture extension: Impacts of mobile‐based advisories on agricultural practices in Southern India. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2(1), 4–19. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.42
38. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. Sage Publications.
39. Thummala, V., & Hiremath, R. B. (2022). Green aviation in India: Airline’s implementation for achieving sustainability. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 7, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100082
40. Utomo, B. N., Dharmayanti, N. I., Sukmayandi, T., & Widjaja, E. (2022). The Contribution of ICT in Agricultural Development in Kostratani of BPP Bojonggambir, Tasikmalaya. https://doi.org/10.59889/ijembis.v2i1.51
41. Veinott, E. S., Olson, J., Olson, G. M., et al. (1999). Video helps remote work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems the CHI Is the Limit - CHI ’99. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303067
42. Verduyn, P., Schulte-Strathaus, J. C. C., Kross, E., et al. (2021). When do smartphones displace face-to-face interactions and what to do about it? Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106550
43. Wahid, W., Salman, D., & Demmallino, E. B. (2024). Bonding, bridging, and linking social capital combinations in maize agribusiness system. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i2.2817
44. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003