Innovation management in the defense sector: A systematic literature review focusing on developing countries

Romullo Girardi

Article ID: 6065
Vol 8, Issue 11, 2024

VIEWS - 26 (Abstract) 18 (PDF)

Abstract


Innovation management is an organizational iterative process of seeking and selecting new opportunities and ideas, implementing them, and capturing value from the results obtained. In the defense sector, due to the increasing interdependence between military capabilities and technology, countries have adopted innovation management approaches to drive the modernization of their defense industrial bases, promoting the development and integration of advanced technologies. This study presents an original systematic literature review on innovation management approaches applied to defense in developing countries. After the phases of identification and screening, 62 documents both from academic and gray literature were analyzed and categorized into 22 distinct approaches. The advantages, disadvantages, contexts, and potential applications of each approach were discussed. The findings show that the appropriate use of these approaches can strengthen the innovation capacity and technological independence of late-industrializing countries, consolidating their position in the global defense landscape and ensuring their sovereignty and continuous technological progress.


Keywords


innovation; innovation management; defense; developing countries

Full Text:

PDF


References


Abdallah, A. B., Alkhaldi, R. Z., & Aljuaid, M. M. (2021). Impact of social and technical lean management on operational performance in manufacturing SMEs: the roles of process and management innovations. Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 1418–1444. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2020-0252

Abdallah, Y. O., Shehab, E., & Al-Ashaab, A. (2022). Developing a digital transformation process in the manufacturing sector: Egyptian case study. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 20(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-022-00558-3

Allahar, H. (2019). Innovation management and Value Chain Design: Case of a Small Professional Services Firm. International Journal of Innovation, 7(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.380

Allen, D. N. (1988). Business Incubator Life Cycles. Economic Development Quarterly, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124248800200103

Altuntas, S., Dereli, T., & Kusiak, A. (2015). Forecasting technology success based on patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.011

Alves, E. O., Fernandes, L. L., Pereira, R. B., & Silva, T. F. (2018). Framework for implementing knowledge management in large organizations: the case of the Brazilian army’s technological innovation and management agency (Portuguese). Final project for the Knowledge Management and Business Intelligence course (Portuguese). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Amann, E. (2002). Globalisation, industrial efficiency and technological sovereignty: Evidence from Brazil. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00144-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00144-8

Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6

Baierle, I. C., Benitez, G. B., Nara, E. O. B., et al. (2020). Influence of Open Innovation Variables on the Competitive Edge of Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040179

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bataev, A. V. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Cloud Computing Application in Russian and Foreign Financial Institutions. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies” (ITandQMandIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/itmqis.2018.8525077

Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., et al. (2001). The agile manifesto. The Agile Alliance.

Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (1981). Systems engineering and analysis, 1st ed. Prentice-Hall.

Blanchard, B., & Fabrycky, W. (2011). Systems Engineering and Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall.

Blanco, C., Lozada, N. E., & Arias, J. E. (2018). Technologies Capabilities and Innovative Performance: Mediating Effect of the Absorptive Capacity. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16(11), 2775–2781. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2018.8795119

Brasil. (2020). MD40-M-01-Manual of good practices for life cycle management of defense systems (Portuguese). Ministério da Defesa. p. 177.

Briones-Peñalver, A. J., Bernal-Conesa, J. A., & de Nieves Nieto, C. (2019). Knowledge and innovation management model. Its influence on technology transfer and performance in Spanish Defence industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(2), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00577-6

Brites, I. F. (2022). The development of innovations in the defense sector in Brazil: a study of the fx-2/gripen ng program (Portuguese). Universidade federal de santa maria.

Cepeda, J., & Arias-Pérez, J. (2019). Information technology capabilities and organizational agility. Multinational Business Review, 27(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-11-2017-0088

Chang, Y. C., Chen, P. H., & Teng, M. J. (2021). How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric networks in Taiwan? The Triple Helix model of innovation view. Science and Public Policy, 48(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa076

Chege, S. M., & Wang, D. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurs’ environmental analysis strategy on organizational performance. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.008

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.

Christensen, J., Søndergaard, K., Serwanski, L., et al. (2018). A risk management framework for implementation of emerging technologies. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE; September 2018; pp. 199–207.

Coates, J. F. (1985). Foresight in federal government policy making. Futures Research Quarterly, 1(2), 29–53.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Cooper, R. G. (1993). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch, 2nd ed. Basic Books.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper and Row.

Erbay, H., & Yıldırım, N. (2022). Combined Technology Selection Model for Digital Transformation in Manufacturing: A Case Study from the Automotive Supplier Industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19(07). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877022500237

Erena, O. T., Kalko, M. M., & Debele, S. A. (2022). Organizational factors, knowledge management and innovation: empirical evidence from medium- and large-scale manufacturing firms in Ethiopia. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 1165–1207. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-11-2021-0861

Esquia, J. P. de V. (2021). National defense industry: opportunities from maintenance and procurement during the life cycle of military systems and materials (Portuguese). Universidade federal do rio grande do sul.

Ettlie, J., Muammer, O., & Murthy, R. (2023). R&D Dynamic Capabilities in a Changing Regulatory Context. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2020.3045650

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge.

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). Triple helix: innovation and entrepreneurship university-industry-government (Portuguese). Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190003

Fakhreddin, F., & Foroudi, P. (2022). The impact of market orientation on new product performance through product launch quality: A resource-based view. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2108220

Fakhreddin, F., Foroudi, P., & Rasouli Ghahroudi, M. (2021). The bidirectional complementarity between market orientation and launch proficiency affecting new product performance. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 30(6), 916–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-03-2020-2824

Ferreira, J. J. P., Mention, A.L., & Torkkeli, M. (2020). Phrasing the giant: on the importance of rigour in literature search process. Journal of Innovation Management. 8(2): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.002_0001

Ferreira, C. V., Biesek, F. L., & Scalice, R. K. (2021). Product innovation management model based on manufacturing readiness level (MRL), design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) and technology readiness level (TRL). Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03080-8

Figueiredo, P. N. (2009). Technological Learning and Industrial Innovation in Emerging Economies: a Brief Contribution to the Design and Implementation of Empirical Studies and Strategies in Brazil (Portuguese). Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 3(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v3i2.8648901

França Junior, J. A., & Galdino, J. F. (2022). Acquisition of defense systems and products: reconciling short-and long-term objectives (Portuguese). In: Azevedo C. E. F., & Ramos C. E. D. F. (editors). Defense studies: innovation, strategy and industrial development (Portuguese). FGV. pp. 42–71.

Galdino, J. F. (2022). Machiavelli and the importance of national military power (Portuguese). Coleção Meira Mattos: revista das ciências militares, 16(56). https://doi.org/10.52781/cmm.a077

Girardi, R. (2024). Innovation management: a bibliometric review. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 15(3), e3589. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v15i3.3589

Girardi, R., & dos Santos, M. (2023). Evaluation of Technologies to the Brazilian Army from the Application of the AHP-TOPSIS-2N Method with Patent Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). https://doi.org/10.1109/iceccme57830.2023.10252404

Girardi, R., & Passos, A. C. (2022). Analysis of the IME in the light of the concepts of entrepreneurial university and world-class university (Portuguese). In: Coletânea de artigos do Curso Executivo de Gestão da Inovação da AGITEC, 1st ed. BIBLIEx. pp. 57–76.

Girardi, R., Ferreira Galdino, J., & César Pellanda, P. (2024). The Front End of Innovation in Defense: A Comprehensive Literature Review. National Security in the Digital and Information Age. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005191

Girardi, R., França Junior, J. A., & Galdino, J. F. (2022). Customizing technology readiness assessment processes based on the TRL scale: developing a methodology for the Brazilian Army (Portuguese). Coleção Meira Mattos: revista das ciências militares, 16(57). https://doi.org/10.52781/cmm.a084

Girardi, R., França Junior, J. A., & Galdino, J. F. (2024). Defense technology criticality in developing countries: concepts and criteria (Portuguese). Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 15(4), e3618. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v15i4.3618

Girardi, R., Galdino, J. F., Pellanda, P. C., et al. (2022). Bibliometric study on multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to life cycle management of defense systems. Procedia Computer Science, 214, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.171

Goulart, L. C. (2022). Sources of funding for the Brazilian navy’s strategic projects (Portuguese). Universidade de brasília.

Granstrand, O., & Sjölander, S. (1990). Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations. Research Policy, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90033-3

Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., Di Giovanni, M., et al. (2015). The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.013

Gu, S. (1999). Implications of National Innovation Systems for Developing Countries: managing change and complexity in economic development. UNU/INTECH Discussion Papers.

Gupta, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819

Hafezi, R., Malekifar, S., & Akhavan, A. (2018). Analyzing Iran’s science and technology foresight programs: recommendations for further practices. Foresight, 20(3), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/fs-10-2017-0064

Henao-Garcia, E. A., & Cardona Montoya, R. A. (2023). Management Innovation in an Emerging Economy: An Analysis of Its Moderating Effect on the Technological Innovation-Performance Relationship. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3052746

Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00044-9

Huang, Y., Li, S., Xiang, X., et al. (2022). How can the combination of entrepreneurship policies activate regional innovation capability? A comparative study of Chinese provinces based on fsQCA. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(3), 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100227

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

IEDI. (2021). China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: transforming China into an industrial and technological powerhouse (Portuguese). Carta Do Instituto de Estudos Para o Desenvolvimento Industrial - Edição 1094.

INCOSE. (2023). INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE).

ISO. (2023). ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288-Systems and software engineering-System life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

Kalko, M. M., Erena, O. T., & Debele, S. A. (2022). Technology management practices and innovation: Empirical evidence from medium- and large-scale manufacturing firms in Ethiopia. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 15(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2022.2040828

Kayabay, K., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., et al. (2022). Data science roadmapping: An architectural framework for facilitating transformation towards a data-driven organization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121264

Kleiner-Schaefer, T., & Schaefer, K. J. (2022). Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(3), 872–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09919-z

Kuo, T.-K., Lim, S. S., & Sonko, L. K. (2018). Catch-up strategy of latecomer firms in Asia: a case study of innovation ambidexterity in PC industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(12), 1483–1497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1475642

Lakemond, N., & Holmberg, G. (2022). The quest for combined generativity and criticality in digital-physical complex systems. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 65, 101701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101701

Lermen, F. H., de Moura, P. K., Bertoni, V. B., et al. (2023). Does maturity level influence the use of Agile UX methods by digital startups? Evaluating design thinking, lean startup, and lean user experience. Information and Software Technology, 154, 107107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107107

Letaba, P. T., & Pretorius, M. W. (2022). Toward Sociotechnical Transition Technology Roadmaps: A Proposed Framework for Large-Scale Projects in Developing Countries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3050812

Lezama-Nicolás, R., Rodríguez-Salvador, M., Río-Belver, R., et al. (2018). A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: the case of additive manufacturing. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1425–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2941-1

Longo, W. P., & Moreira, W. de S. (2009). Access to “sensitive technologies” (Portuguese). Tensões Mundiais, 5(9), 73–122. https://doi.org/10.33956/tensoesmundiais.v5i9%20jul/dez.669

Madeu, F. C. B. (2019). Technology foresight using multicriteria analysis and bibliometric techniques: case studies for the defense sector (Portuguese). Instituto militar de engenharia-ime.

Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2020). Searching for the right application: A technology development review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119879

Mamphiswana, R., & Sinha, S. (2019). Management of technological innovation in emerging economies: A conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of the Managing Technology for Inclusive and Sustainable Growth-28th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology, IAMOT 2019. pp. 20–31.

Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology readiness levels—A White Paper. NASA.

Mankins, J. C. (2002). Approaches to strategic research and technology (RandT) analysis and road mapping. Acta Astronautica, 51(1–9). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00083-8

Mankins, J. C. (2009). Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective. Acta Astronautica, 65(9–10), 1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.058

Mathiyazhagan, K., Agarwal, V., Appolloni, A., et al. (2021). Integrating lean and agile practices for achieving global sustainability goals in Indian manufacturing industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120982

McQuivey, J. (2013). Digital disruption: Unleashing the next wave of innovation. Forrester Research.

Midler, C. (2019). Projectification. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-07-2018-0126

Ministry of Defence. (2020). Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020. Ministry of Defence. p. 681.

Moreira, W. de S. (2013). Science and Power: Technological Curtailment and the Implications for National Defense (Portuguese). Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF).

Nagar, A. K., Jat, D. S., Marín-Raventós, G., & Mishra, D. K. (2022). Intelligent Sustainable Systems. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6369-7

Nguyen, H. T., Hoang, T. G., Nguyen, L. Q. T., et al. (2021). Green technology transfer in a developing country: mainstream practitioner views. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-11-2019-1941

Niosi, J., & Zhegu, M. (2010). Multinational Corporations, Value Chains and Knowledge Spillovers in the Global Aircraft Industry. International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 2(2), 109–141.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, (71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pandit, D., Joshi, M. P., Sahay, A., et al. (2018). Disruptive innovation and dynamic capabilities in emerging economies: Evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.035

Pereira, A. L. (2022). The role of military organizations in innovation ecosystems: an analysis in the Brazilian context (Portuguese). Universidade do vale do rio dos sinos-unisinos.

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping-A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6

Pisano, G. (2006). Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35(8), 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008

Porter, M. E. (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.

Reddy, N. M., & Zhao, L. (1990). International technology transfer: A review. Research Policy, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90015-X

Reed, F. M., & Walsh, K. (2002). Enhancing technological capability through supplier development: a study of the UK aerospace industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2002.803379

Robles, M. G. (2018). Management Control Systems: The use of the Stage-Gate Process in an environment of innovation. Contabilidad y Negocios, 13(25). https://doi.org/10.18800/contabilidad.201701005

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe.

Saaty, T. L. (1979). Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada214804

Saksupapchon, P., & Willoughby, K. W. (2019). Contextual Factors Affecting Decisions About Intellectual Property Licensing Provisions in Collaboration Agreements for Open Innovation Projects of Complex Technological Organizations. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/tems-isie46312.2019.9074359

Santos, G., Félix, M. J., Doiro, M., et al. (2020). On the concept of an integrated and lean model of product development proposed for intellectual property creation and competitive economies. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 10(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2020.112412

Sauser, B., Gove, R., Forbes, E., et al. (2010). Integration maturity metrics: Development of an integration readiness level. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 9(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/iks-2010-0133

Schilling, M. A. (2013). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill.

Shahrbabaki, A. A., Sakkaki, S., Parsa, P., et al. (2020). Strategic reactions to information content of dividend change: applying BCG growth share matrix when signalling hypothesis identified. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2

Shuguang, L., Xingxing, Z., Wuyang, C., et al. (2021). The Path of University Collaborative Innovation Mechanism Based on the Triple-Helix Model. In: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/iceit51700.2021.9375561

Silva Queiroz, G. L., de Oliveira Paula, F., & da Silva, J. F. (2021). The role of alliance portfolio diversity on firm innovation and performance: the case of Colombia. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 35(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1975036

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Teh, P. L., Adebanjo, D., & Kong, D. L. Y. (2021). Key enablers and barriers of solar paver technologies for the advancement of environmental sustainability. Heliyon, 7(10), e08189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08189

Thomé, A. M. T., Scavarda, L. F., & Scavarda, A. J. (2016). Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning and Control, 27(5), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 7th ed. Wiley.

Ul Haq, I., Ali, S. M., & Nawaz, M. T. (2019). An Analysis of the Critical Success Factors in ICT Sector of Pakistan. In: Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). https://doi.org/10.1109/infoman.2019.8714666

United Kingdom. (2022). The Defence Capability Framework. Ministry of Defence (MoD). p. 51.

United States. (2016). Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook. In: OSD Manufacturing Technology Program. Department of Defense (DoD). p. 71.

United States. (2018). CJCSI 5123.01H-Charter of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) and Implementation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS). Department of Defense (DoD).

United States. (2020a). Defense Space Strategy Summary. Department of Defense (DoD).

United States. (2020b). Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects. Available online: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-48g (accessed on 2 April 2024).

United States. (2022). Critical and Emerging Technologies List Update. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).

Valdez-Juárez, L. E., Ramos-Escobar, E. A., & Borboa-Álvarez, E. P. (2023). Reconfiguration of Technological and Innovation Capabilities in Mexican SMEs: Effective Strategies for Corporate Performance in Emerging Economies. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010015

Voltan, J. L. N., Girardi, R., Galdino, J. F., & Goldschmidt, R. R. (2024). A review and classification of technology readiness assessment techniques based on the TRL scale (Portuguese). Coleção Meira Mattos: revista das ciências militares, 18(61), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.52781/cmm.a121

Wu, A., & Li, T. (2019). Gaining sustainable development by green supply chain innovation: Perspectives of specific investments and stakeholder engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 962–975. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2410

Xavier Jr, A., Veloso, A., Souza, J., et al. (2020). AEB Online Calculator for Assessing Technology Maturity: IMATEC. Volume 12, 12. Internet Archive. https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.v12.1098

Zhang, J., Tian, J., Alcaide, A. M., et al. (2023). Lifetime Extension Approach Based on the Levenberg-Marquardt Neural Network and Power Routing of DC–DC Converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38(8), 10280–10291. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2023.3275791

Zhang, J., Tian, J., Yan, P., et al. (2024). Multi-hop graph pooling adversarial network for cross-domain remaining useful life prediction: A distributed federated learning perspective. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 244, 109950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.109950




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i11.6065

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Romullo Girardi

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.