This study investigates the application and effectiveness of modern teaching techniques in improving reading literacy among elementary school students in Kazakhstan. In the rapidly evolving educational landscape, the integration of innovative pedagogical strategies is essential to foster student reading skills and general literacy. This study aims to explore how these modern teaching techniques can be applied to improve reading literacy among elementary school students in Kazakhstan. The study sample includes 64 respondents to the research. The key modern teaching techniques explored in this study include the use of digital learning tools, interactive reading sessions, differentiated instruction, and collaborative learning activities. The findings reveal significant improvements in reading literacy among students exposed to these techniques, highlighting the potential of modern pedagogy to bridge literacy gaps and promote educational equity. Furthermore, the study discusses the challenges and opportunities to implement these techniques within the Kazakhstani educational system. The results provide valuable information for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders aiming to improve reading literacy through innovative teaching practices.

1. Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., et al. (2022). Structure Altering Effects of a Multicomponent Reading Intervention: An Application of the Direct and Inferential Mediation (DIME) Model of Reading Comprehension in Upper Elementary Grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219421995904
2. Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-02-2017-0009
3. Amanzhol, N., Amanova, A., Kerimbekova, B., et al. (2024). “My expectation did not meet reality”: challenges of undergraduate students in English-medium instruction in Kazakhstan. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-06-2023-0062
4. Andrianatos, K. (2019). Barriers to reading in higher education: Rethinking reading support. Reading & Writing, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v10i1.241
5. Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., De Haro-Rodríguez, R., Caballero, C. M., et al. (2023). Barriers to Educational Inclusion in Initial Teacher Training. Societies, 13(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020031
6. Bal, A. P., & Or, M. B. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between problem-solving achievement and perceptions of students. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), em0151. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12745
7. Bankar, M. N., Bankar, N. J., Singh, B. R., et al. (2023). The Role of E-Content Development in Medical Teaching: How Far Have We Come? Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43208
8. Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How Reading Motivation and Engagement Enable Reading Achievement: Policy Implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219893385
9. Chu, L., Li, P. H., & Yu, M. N. (2020). The longitudinal effect of children’s self-regulated learning on reading habits and well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101673
10. Chiva-Bartoll, O., Moliner, M. L., & Salvador-García, C. (2020). Can service-learning promote social well-being in primary education students? A mixed method approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104841
11. Cook, D. A., Bikkani, A., & Poterucha Carter, M. J. (2023). Evaluating education innovations rapidly with build-measure-learn: Applying lean startup to health professions education. Medical Teacher, 45(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2022.2118038
12. Cummins, J. (2015). Intercultural education and academic achievement: a framework for school-based policies in multilingual schools. Intercultural Education, 26(6), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.1103539
13. Damaianti, V. S., Abidin, Y., & Rahma, R. (2020). Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28600
14. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
15. Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., et al. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 934–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
16. Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading Comprehension Research: Implications for Practice and Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
17. Evenddy, S. S., & Nurlely, L. (2021). Reading Comprehension Test and Its Challenges in Students’ Perspective. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 14(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v14i1.2734
18. Farkas, W. A., & Jang, B. G. (2019). Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating a School-Based Literacy Program for Adolescent Learners with Reading Difficulties: A Mixed-Methods Study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1541770
19. Filderman, M. J., Austin, C. R., Boucher, A. N., et al. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Reading Comprehension Interventions on the Reading Comprehension Outcomes of Struggling Readers in Third Through 12th Grades. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860
20. Feldman, H. M. (2019). How Young Children Learn Language and Speech. Pediatrics In Review, 40(8), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0325
21. Froehlich, D. E., Van Waes, S., & Schäfer, H. (2020). Linking Quantitative and Qualitative Network Approaches: A Review of Mixed Methods Social Network Analysis in Education Research. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903311
22. Gillon, G., & Macfarlane, A. H. (2017). A culturally responsive framework for enhancing phonological awareness development in children with speech and language impairment. Speech, Language and Hearing, 20(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2016.1265738
23. Hotaman, D. (2020). The Effect of Formative Assessment on the Academic Achievement Levels of Prospective Teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(3), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n3p33
24. Hwang, H., Cabell, S. Q., & Joyner, R. E. (2023). Does Cultivating Content Knowledge during Literacy Instruction Support Vocabulary and Comprehension in the Elementary School Years? A Systematic Review. Reading Psychology, 44(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2141397
25. Kaefer, T. (2020). When did you learn it? How background knowledge impacts attention and comprehension in read‐aloud activities. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S173–S183. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.344
26. Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International journal of STEM education, 5, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
27. Kulshayeva, A., Amirova, A., Abildina, S., et al. (2023). Psychological and Pedagogical Foundations of the Development of Speech Skills of Primary School Students in English Lessons. International Journal of Early Childhood, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00354-1
28. Li, X., & Chu, S. K. W. (2021). Exploring the effects of gamification pedagogy on children’s reading: A mixed‐method study on academic performance, reading‐related mentality and behaviors, and sustainability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13057
29. Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022). Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080
30. Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & de Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis: A Design Research Approach to Coding Combining NVivo With Traditional Material Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362
31. Mosher, D. M., & Kim, J. S. (2023). Improving Elementary School Students’ Reading Comprehension through Content-Rich Literacy Curriculum: The Effect of Structured Read-Aloud Supplements on Measures of Reading Comprehension Transfer. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
32. Nagima, B., Saniya, N., Gulden, Y., et al. (2022). Influence of Special Learning Technology on the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Ethics Formation in Future Teachers. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 1–6.
33. Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272
34. Nguyen, T. L. P. (2022). Teachers’ strategies in teaching reading comprehension. International Journal of Language Instruction, 1(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.22113
35. Norman, A. (2023). Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 11(3), e3423. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3423
36. Özenç, M., & Çarkıt, C. (2021). The relationship between functional literacy and problem-solving skills: A study on 4th-grade students. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(3), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.71.8.3
37. Öztürk, M., Sarikaya, İ., & Ada Yıldız, K. (2023). Middle School Students’ Problem Solving Performance: Identifying the Factors that Influence It. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10423-5
38. Psyridou, M., Tolvanen, A., de Jong, P. F., et al. (2021). Developmental profiles of reading fluency and reading comprehension from grades 1 to 9 and their early identification. Developmental Psychology, 57(11), 1840–1854. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000976
39. Pulimeno, M., Piscitelli, P., & Colazzo, S. (2020). Children’s literature to promote students’ global development and wellbeing. Health Promotion Perspectives, 10(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2020.05
40. Raffone, A. (2022). Gamifying English Language Learning through Interactive Storytelling and MALL Technologies. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221110206
41. Ritonga, M., Tazik, K., Omar, A., & Saberi Dehkordi, E. (2022). Assessment and language improvement: the effect of peer assessment (PA) on reading comprehension, reading motivation, and vocabulary learning among EFL learners. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00188-z
42. Roth, M. A., & Price, J. K. (2016). The critical role of leadership for education transformation with successful technology implementation. In: ICT in education in global context: Comparative reports of innovations in K-12 education. Springer.
43. Ruotsalainen, J., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2022). Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12384
44. Sarmurzin, Y., Amanzhol, N., Toleubayeva, K., et al. (2021). The impact of OECD research on the education system of Kazakhstan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09715-8
45. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., et al. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner—instructor interaction in online learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
46. Siliņa-Jasjukeviča, G., Lastovska, A., Surikova, S., et al. (2023). Education Policy Institutions’ Comprehension of the School as a Learning Organisation Approach: A Case Study of Latvia. Education Sciences, 13(9), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090907
47. Schmid, R., & Petko, D. (2019). Does the use of educational technology in personalized learning environments correlate with self-reported digital skills and beliefs of secondary-school students? Computers & Education, 136, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006
48. Sönmez, M., & Cetinkaya, F. C. (2022). The Effect of formative assessment on reading comprehension. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9, 88–108. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1104868
49. Sutiyatno, S. (2019). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Achievement. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 9(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0904.11
50. Szili, K., Kiss, R., Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2022). Computer-Based Development of Reading Skills to Reduce Dropout in Uncertain Times. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040089
51. Thaçi, L. & Sopi, X. (2022). The differences in formative assessment evaluation between teachers and students – a non- parametric analysis. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 17(5), 1631–1646 https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7256
52. Torppa, M., Vasalampi, K., Eklund, K., et al. (2020). Reading comprehension difficulty is often distinct from difficulty in reading fluency and accompanied with problems in motivation and school well-being. Educational Psychology, 40(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1670334
53. Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2061683. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
54. Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., et al. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
55. Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
56. Zhakupova, A., Маnkesh, A., Kyakbaeva, U., et al. (2022). Opportunities for the development of ecological competence of the future preschool teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 17(1), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6703