The SMARTER model, an innovative educational framework, is designed for blended learning environments, seamlessly integrating both online and face-to-face instructional components. Employing a flipped classroom methodology, this model ensures an equitable division between online and traditional classroom interactions, aiming to cultivate a dynamic and collaborative learning atmosphere. This research focused on developing and rigorously evaluating the SMARTER model’s validity, practicality, and effectiveness. Adopting a research and development (R&D) approach informed by the methodologies of Borg, Gall, and Gall, this study utilized a mixed-methods strategy. This encompassed a robust validation process by experts in design, content, and media, alongside an empirical analysis of the model’s application in actual educational settings. The aim was to comprehensively assess its effectiveness and practicality. The findings from this study affirm the SMARTER model’s validity, practicality, and effectiveness in improving students’ information literacy skills. Comparative analysis between a control group, taught using a traditional expository approach, and an experimental group, educated under the SMARTER model, highlighted significant improvements in the latter group. This effectiveness underscores the model’s capacity not only to efficiently deliver content but also to actively engage students in a collaborative learning process. The results advocate for the model’s potential broader adoption and adaptation across similar educational contexts. They also establish a foundation for future research aimed at exploring the SMARTER model’s scalability and adaptability across diverse instructional environments.

1. Addae, D. (2021). Adults who learn: Evaluating the social impact of an adult literacy project in rural South Africa. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100115
2. Albers, M. (Marjolein), Reitsma, M. (Margreet), Benning, K. (Kelsey), et al. (2024). Developing a theory of change model for a learning and innovation network: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 77, 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103954
3. Ananda Kumar, A. (2023). Meaningful Learning among Under Graduate Student-Teachers. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i2.5828
4. Arnold, J. C., Mühling, A., & Kremer, K. (2021). Exploring core ideas of procedural understanding in scientific inquiry using educational data mining. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909552
5. Asad Ali, M., & Masih, A. (2021). Enhancing the Quality of Learning through Changes in Students’ Approach to Learning. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i3.242
6. Association of College and Research Library. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Available online: http://www.ala.org/acrl/files/issues/infolit/framework.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2024).
7. Association of College and Research Library. (2019). ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Toolkit. Available online: https://acrl.libguides.com/framework/toolkit (accessed on 28 January 2024).
8. Aziz, M. N. A., Harun, S. N., Baharom, M. K., & Kamaruddin, N. (2020). Preferred Learning Styles for Digital Native and Digital Immigrant Visitors in The Malaysian Music Museum. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11085
9. Bell, D. L. (2021). A qualitative investigation of the digital literacy practices of doctoral students. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(3), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.11645/15.3.2829
10. Biswas, P., Priyanka, P., & Banerjee, T. (2020). Importance of Collaborative Learning. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226442807 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
11. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longmans.
12. Busch, M., Berg, J., & Zwaal, W. (2021). From on-site to online collaborative learning. Research in Hospitality Management, 11(3), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2021.2006916
13. Buselic, V. (2023). Teaching Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills in Chat GPT Time. 2023 International Conference on Computing, Networking, Telecommunications & Engineering Sciences Applications (CoNTESA), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoNTESA61248.2023.10384921
14. Capone, R., Caterina, P., & Mazza, G. (2017). Blended Learning, Flipped Classroom, and Virtual Environment: Challenges and Opportunities for the 21st Century Students. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117510517 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
15. Carlozzi, M. (2018). Teaching in Libraries: Not an Elective Part of the Job. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158927186 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
16. Chang, N. (2020). A comparison of the learning outcomes for a PBL-based information literacy course in three different innovative teaching environments. Libri, 70(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2018-0132
17. Chen, L. C., Huang, T. W., & Chen, Y. H. (2017). The effects of inquiry-based information literacy instruction on memory and comprehension: A longitudinal study. Library and Information Science Research, 39(4), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.003
18. Chigwada, J. P. (2019). Supporting Information Literacy Skills of Students for a Successful Transition to Higher Education. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158092812 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
19. CILIP. (2018). CILIP Definition of Information Literacy 2018. Available online: https://infolit.org.uk/ILdefinitionCILIP2018.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2024).
20. Courtney, A. M., & King, F. B. (2009). Online Dialog: A Tool to Support Preservice Teacher Candidates’ Understanding of Literacy Teaching and Practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Journal, 9, 226–256.
21. Diamond, K. (2020). Problem—Based Learning and Information. In: Teaching Information Literacy and Writing Studies. Purdue University Press. pp. 157–168.
22. Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. National Key Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Curtin University of Technology. EDMEDIA.
23. Durnali, M. (2022). ‘Destroying barriers to critical thinking’ to surge the effect of self-leadership skills on electronic learning styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101130
24. Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1992). Information Problem-Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 8(5), 27–29.
25. Elgün Gündüz, Z. (2023). Teaching Writing with Wiki-based Collaborative Writing Tasks in an EFL Context at Higher education. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature, and Culture, 8(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v8i1.280
26. Feekery, A., Chisholm, K., Jeffrey, C. J., & Diesch, F. (2021). Enhancing students’ professional information literacy. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237391717 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
27. Ferreira, F. M., & Vasconcelos, C. (2020). The impact of multisensory instruction on geosciences learning and students’ motivation. Geosciences (Switzerland), 10(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10110467
28. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121583
29. Ghavifekr, S. (2020). Collaborative Learning: A Key to Enhance Students Social Interaction. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8, 9–21.
30. Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163
31. Gu, P., Zhang, Y., & Gu, H. (2020). Creating a technology-enhanced constructivist learning environment for research ability development in a BA Thesis Writing course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1576735
32. Hammons, J. (2020). Teaching the teachers to teach information literacy: A literature review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102196
33. Han, S. J., Lim, D. H., & Jung, E. (2021). A Collaborative Active Learning Model as a Vehicle for Online Team Learning in Higher Education. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:69440934 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
34. Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (2008). Theories of Learning (Teori Belajar). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
35. Herrera-Pavo, M. Á. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100437.
36. Hutchens, T., & Hynd, G. W. (2018). Neurological Basis of Learning. In: School Psychology International. SAGE Publications, Inc. pp. 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/014303438700800408
37. Igere, M. A. (2021). E-Learning Amongst Library Science Students, Case of Delta State University, Nigeria during COVID-19 Pandemic Lock down:Pros and Cons. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021, 1–21.
38. Kim, M. H. (2021). Effects of Collaborative Learning in a Virtual Environment on Students’ Academic Achievement and Satisfaction. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19, 1–8.
39. Koler-Povh, T., & Turk, Ž. (2020). Information literacy of doctoral students in engineering and the librarian’s role. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618767726
40. Lamichhane, C. D. (2018). Understanding the Education Philosophy and Its Implications. NCC Journal, 3(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.3126/nccj.v3i1.20245
41. Lance, K. C. (2020). Linking librarians, inquiry learning, and information literacy? Phi Delta Kappan, 101(7), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720917542
42. Lawless, B. (2021). Can you spot a troll? Teaching information literacy through conversations about social media attacks. Communication Teacher, 35(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2020.1769849
43. Lokse, M. (2017). Teaching Information Literacy in Higher Education: Effective Teaching and Active Learning. Available online: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85040637738 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
44. Lopes, A. L. S., & Vieira, M. M. S. (2018). Meaningful Learning and Effectiveness in Virtual Learning Spaces. European Journal of Education, 1(3), 96. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i3.p96-103
45. MacDonald, H. (2019). First-year student essays shed light on their experience of ACRL framework threshold concepts. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 168–170. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29614
46. Maia, C. M., & Furnival, A. C. M. (2021). Information Literacy Practices Using Active Teaching-Learning Methodologies in Higher Education. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:229393333 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
47. Marshall, D. (2022). Teaching information literacy to online learners: challenges, advantages, and tools to consider in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Services Quarterly, 18(1), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.2013389
48. Masko, M. K., Thormodson, K., & Borysewicz, K. (2020). Using Case-Based Learning to Teach Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Music Therapy Education: A Cohort Study. Music Therapy Perspectives, 38(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miz025
49. Maslo, E. (2022). Creating spaces for engagement in meaningful activities. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 12(4), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2021.00097
50. Mbandje, D. C., & Loureiro, M. J. (2023). Digital competence and information literacy: clarifying concepts based on a literature review. Educational Media International, 60(3–4), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2023.2324584
51. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass Inc.
52. Mieg, H. A. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning—Undergraduate Research: The German Multidisciplinary Experience. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030142230
53. Moore, P. (2021). Revealing Thinking: Teachers Working Together on Information Literacy. IASL Annual Conference Proceedings, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl8141
54. Morris, D. (2020). A review of information literacy programmes in higher education. Journal of Information Literacy, 14(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.11645/14.1.2668
55. Normawati, A. (2021). The Implementation of Blended Learning in Teaching Reading. English Language and Education Spectrum, 1(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.53416/electrum.v1i2.26
56. Naveed, R. T., Jantan, A. H., Saidu, M. B., & Bhatti, S. M. (2017). The validation of the organizational change construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1338330
57. Nierenberg, E., & Dahl, T. I. (2023). Is information literacy ability, and metacognition of that ability, related to interest, gender, or education level? A cross-sectional study of higher education students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211058907
58. Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In: Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht. p. 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0937-9
59. Ó Ceallaigh, T. J. (2021). Blended Learning Immersion Teacher Education: Evidence-Based Practices and Data-Driven Instruction. Development of Innovative Pedagogical Practices for a Modern Learning Experience, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.46679/978819484836301
60. Odede, I. R., & Nsibirwa, Z. (2018). Information Literacy Skills in using Electronic Information Resources. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–17.
61. Patmanthara, S., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Improving Vocational High School Students Digital Literacy Skill through Blended Learning Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028.
62. Perry, H. B. (2017). Information Literacy in the Sciences: Faculty Perception of Undergraduate Student Skill. Coll. Res. Libr., 78, 964–977.
63. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
64. Racelis, J. V. (2021). Collaboration as Locus for Information Literacy Teacher Knowledge Development. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232286371 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
65. Ramirez-Sanchez, M. Y., Gutierrez-Pallares, E., Pereira, V. A., & Florencio da Silva, R. (2022). Evaluation of the Main Components for Learning with Materials in Educational Platforms. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i2.2954
66. Richey, R. C. (1994). Developmental Research: The Definition and Scope. In: Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
67. Riedling, A. M. (2007). An educator’s guide to information literacy: What every high school senior needs to know. In: Teacher Librarian. Libraries Unlimited.
68. Rohim, S., Surip, M., Lubis, M. J., & Fardian Gafari, M. O. (2023). Leadership contribution and organizational commitment on the work achievement of the school principals and teachers in high schools in Medan. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2239595
69. Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689
70. Smith, C. (2021). A Comprehensive First Year Engagement Theory. Journal of Access, Retention, and Inclusion in Higher Education, 1(1), 1.
71. Spector, J. M. (2009). Adventures and Advance in Instructional Design Theory and Practice. In: Learning and Instructional Technologies for the 21st Century. Springer.
72. Stein, S. J., Goodchild, A., Moskal, A., et al. (2020). Student perceptions of student evaluations: enabling student voice and meaningful engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1824266
73. Sula, G., & Sulstarova, A. (2022). Using Wikis as a Teaching Tool for Novice Teachers—Pedagogical Implications. Journal of Learning for Development, 9(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.638
74. Tiruwa, A., Yadav, R., & Suri, P. K. (2018). Modelling Facebook usage for collaborative learning in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2017-0088
75. Toprani, D., AlQahtani, M., & Borge, M. (2019). Children’s Interactive Strategies Around Digital Technology in Collaborative Learning Environments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
76. Valero, M. D. R., Reid, T., Dell, G., Stacey, D., et al. (2020). Embedding employability and transferable skills in the curriculum: a practical, multidisciplinary approach. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816846
77. Volpe, G., & Gori, M. (2019). Multisensory interactive technologies for primary education: From science to technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01076
78. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational Psychology. St. Lucie Press.
79. Warrick, A. (2021). Strategies for Reducing Cognitive Overload in the Online Language Learning Classroom. International Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijsfle.v1i2.124
80. Zheng, L., Zhang, X., & Gyasi, J. F. (2019). A literature review of features and trends of technology-supported collaborative learning in informal learning settings from 2007 to 2018. Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 529–561.