Schematic risk management in solicited and unsolicited project

Mustafa Nahdi, Naniek Widayati, Mochamad Agung Wibowo, Endah Murtiana Sari, Rizal Zainuddin Tamin, Najid Najid

Article ID: 5472
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024

VIEWS - 998 (Abstract)

Abstract


The Indonesian government is currently carrying out massive infrastructure development, with a budget exceeding 10. Risk mapping based on good risk management is crucial for stakeholders in organizing construction projects. Projects financed by government, whether solicited or unsolicited schemes, should also include risk mapping to add value and foster partnerships. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a risk management model for solicited and unsolicited projects, focusing on the collaborative management system among stakeholders in government-financed projects. Risk review was conducted from various stakeholders’ perspectives, examining the impacts and potential losses to manage uncertainty and reduce losses for relevant parties. Furthermore, qualitative analysis was conducted using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interviews. The results showed that partnering-based risk management with risk sharing in solicited and unsolicited projects had similarities with Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). This approach provided benefits and value by developing various innovations in the project life cycle.


Keywords


project risk management; project partnering; project risk sharing; solicited; unsolicited; project sustainability; integrated project delivery

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abednego, M. P., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2006). Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.010
  2. Adnan, H., Shamsuddin, S. M., Supardi, A., et al. (2012). Conflict Prevention in Partnering Projects. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 772–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.148
  3. Andi, A., & Darmawan, A. (2006). Identifying and managing important risks in building and infrastructure projects: Contractor’s perspective. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43801116 (accessed on 26 July 2024)
  4. Andi. (2006). The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 24(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500310338
  5. Ashcraft, H. (2022). Transforming project delivery: integrated project delivery. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 38(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac001
  6. Ashcraft, H. W., & Bridgett, H. (2011). IPD Teams: Creation, Organization and Management. Hanson Bridgett LPP.
  7. Ashcraft, H. W., & Hanson Bridgett, J. (2010). Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement. Hanson Bridgett LPP.
  8. Asmar, M. El, Asce, M., Hanna, A. S., et al. (2013). Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11). https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000744
  9. Azhar, S., Hein, M., & Sketo, B. (2000). Building information modeling (BIM): Benefits, risks and challenges. McWhorter School of Building Science.
  10. Bahamid, R. A., Doh, S. I., & Al-Sharaf, M. A. (2019). Risk factors affecting the construction projects in the developing countries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 244, 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/244/1/012040
  11. Baiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2006). The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001
  12. Bellini, A., Aarseth, W., & Hosseini, A. (2016). Effective Knowledge Transfer in Successful Partnering Projects. Energy Procedia, 96, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.127
  13. Calahorra-Jimenez, M., Molenaar, K., Torres-Machi, C., et al. (2020). Structured Approach for Best-Value Evaluation Criteria: US Design-Build Highway Procurement. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000857
  14. Castelblanco, G., & Guevara, J. (2020). Risk Allocation in PPP Unsolicited and Solicited Proposals in Latin America: Pilot Study in Colombia. Construction Research Congress 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482889.141
  15. Chan, A. P. C., Yung, E. H. K., Lam, P. T. I., et al. (2001). Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110066128
  16. Cheng, M. Y., Su, W., & You, H. Y. (2003). Optimal Project Organizational Structure for Construction Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(70)
  17. Crane, T. G., Felder, J. P., Thompson, P. J., et al. (1999). Partnering Measures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37–42.
  18. Crowley, L. G., & Karim, M. A. (1995). Conceptual Model of Partnering. Journal of Management in Engineering, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1995)11:5(33)
  19. Dossick, C. S., Azari, R., Kim, Y. W., et al. (2013). IPD in Practice: Sustaining Collaboration in Healthcare Design and Construction. AEI 2013. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412909.036
  20. Elizar, Suripin, & Wibowo, M. A. (2017). Model of Construction Waste Management Using AMOS-SEM for Indonesian Infrastructure Projects. MATEC Web of Conferences, 138, 05005. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713805005
  21. Eriksson, P. E. (2015). Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2014.08.003
  22. Fulghieri, P., Strobl, G., & Xia, H. (2014). The Economics of Solicited and Unsolicited Credit Ratings. Review of Financial Studies, 27(2), 484–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht072
  23. Gadde, L. E., & Dubois, A. (2010). Partnering in the construction industry—Problems and opportunities. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(4), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.09.002
  24. Gao, H., Chen, T., & Lam, J. (2008). A new delay system approach to network-based control. Automatica, 44(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.04.020
  25. Ghassemi, R., & Gerber-Becerik. (2011). Transitioning to IPD: Potential Barriers & Lessons Learned. Available online: https://www.leanconstructionjournal.org (accessed on 26 July 2024).
  26. Glick, S., & Guggemos, A. A. (2009). IPD and BIM: Benefits and Opportunities for Regulatory Agencies. In: Proceedings of 45th Associated Schools of Construction National Conference.
  27. Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi method. Washington, DC: American Council for the United Nations.
  28. Guan, J. (2018). Exploration on the Methods of Forming an IPD Project Team and the Responsibility of Team Members. ICCREM 2018. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481752.032
  29. Hallowell, M., Gambatese J. (2010). Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137
  30. Huemann, M., Keegan, A., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Human resource management in the project-oriented company: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.10.001
  31. Humphrey-Murto, S., Wood, T. J., Gonsalves, C., et al. (2020). The Delphi Method. Academic Medicine, 95(1), 168–168. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002887
  32. Ilin, I. V, Kalinina, O. V, Levina, A. I., et al. (2016). Approach to Organizational Structure Modelling in Construction Companies. MATEC Web of Conferences, 86, 05028. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20168605028
  33. Jin, X. H. (2010). Determinants of Efficient Risk Allocation in Privately Financed Public Infrastructure Projects in Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000118
  34. Katar, I. M. (2019). Enhancing the project delivery quality; lean construction concepts of design-build & design-bid-build methods. International Journal of Management, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.34218/ijm.10.6.2019.031
  35. Kim, S. C., Yoon, J. S., Kwon, O. C., et al. (2005). Feasibility Analysis Simulation Model for Managing Construction Risk Factors. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 4(1), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.4.193
  36. Klemetti, A. (2006). Risk Management in Construction Project Networks. Available online: http://www.tuta.hut.fi (accessed on 26 July 2024)
  37. Lahdenperä, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
  38. Lam, J., Gao, H., & Wang, C. (2007). Stability analysis for continuous systems with two additive time-varying delay components. Systems & Control Letters, 56(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2006.07.005
  39. Larsson, J., & Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management. Sustainability, 12(2), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020585
  40. Lehtiranta, L. (2011). Relational Risk Management in Construction Projects: Modeling the Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000114
  41. Leicht, R., & Harty, C. (2017). Influence of Multiparty IPD Contracts on Construction Innovation. In: Proceedings of 33rd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference; 4–6 September 2017; Cambridge, United Kingdom. pp. 164–173.
  42. Lui, S., Abdelzaher, T., Rze, K. E. A. Ê., et al. (2004). Real Time Scheduling Theory: A Historical Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TIME.0000045315.61234.1e
  43. Ma, Q., Li, S., & Cheung, S. O. (2022). Unveiling Embedded Risks in Integrated Project Delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002212
  44. Mesa, H. A., Molenaar, K. R., & Alarcón, L. F. (2020). Modeling Supply Chain Integration in an Integrated Project Delivery System. Sustainability, 12(12), 5092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125092
  45. Mhetre, K., Konnur, B. A., & Landage, A. B. (2016). Risk Management in Construction Industry. International Journal of Engineering Research, 1(5), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.17950/ijer/v5i1/035
  46. Nahdi, M., Widayati, N., & Wibowo, M. A., et al. (2024) Examining Solicited Projects of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in the Initiative of Indonesian Government. Buildings, 14(6), 1870. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/buildings14061870
  47. Nurdiana, A., Wibowo, M. A., & Hatmoko, J. U. D. (2015). Sensitivity Analysis of Risk from Stakeholders’ Perception Case Study: Semarang-solo Highway Project Section I (Tembalang-Gedawang). Procedia Engineering, 125, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.003
  48. O’ Connor, P. J. (2009). Integrated Project Delivery: Collaboration Through New Contract Forms. Available online: https://www.faegredrinker.com/webfiles/AGC-IPD%20Paper.pdf (accessed on 26 July 2024).
  49. Patil, S. S., & Molenaar, K. R. (2011). Risks associated with performance specifications in highway infrastructure procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 11(4), 482–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-11-04-2011-b002
  50. Perera, B. A. K. S., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., et al. (2014). Enhancing the effectiveness of risk management practices in Sri Lankan road construction projects: A Delphi approach. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2013.875271
  51. Poon, W. P. H., & Chan, K. C. (2010). ADBI Working Paper Series Solicited and Unsolicited Credit Ratings: A Global Perspective. Asian Development Bank Institute.
  52. Prajogo, D., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2016). Supply chain processes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-03-2014-0129
  53. Qazi, A., Quigley, J., Dickson, A., et al. (2016). Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1183–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008
  54. Rached, F., Hraoui, Y., Karam, A., et al. (2014). Implementation of IPD in the Middle East and its Challenges. Unpublished work. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3348.6724/1
  55. Rafindadi, A. D., Mikić, M., Kovačić, I., et al. (2014). Global Perception of Sustainable Construction Project Risks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.051
  56. Ramanathan, C., Narayanan, S. P., & Idrus, A. B. (2012). Construction delays causing risks on time and cost - a critical review. Construction Economics and Building, 12(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v12i1.2330
  57. Rehacek, P. (2017). Risk management 2. Journals of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(20), 5347–5352.
  58. Sari, E. M., Irawan, A. P., Wibowo, M. A., et al. (2023a). Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects. Sustainability, 15(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010086
  59. Sari, E. M., Irawan, A. P., Wibowo, M. A., et al. (2023b). Challenge and Awareness for Implemented Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in Indonesian Projects. Buildings, 13(1), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010262
  60. Sari, E. M., Purna Irawan, A., & Agung Wibowo, M. (2021). Role of Technical Education in Partnering Construction Project: A Geographical Study on Indonesia. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(1), 636-644. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.1.49
  61. Spang, K., & Riemann, S. (2014). Partnering in Infrastructure Projects in Germany. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.026
  62. Tepeli, E., Taillandier, F., & Breysse, D. (2019). Multidimensional modelling of complex and strategic construction projects for a more effective risk management. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(12), 1218–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1606493
  63. Thangaratinam, S., & Redman, C. W. (2005). The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 7(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.7.2.120.27071
  64. Thompson, P. J., Sanders, S. R., & Member, A. (1998). Parlnering Continuum. Journal of Management in Engineering, 14(5), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1998)14:5(73)
  65. Uher, T. E., & Toakley, A. R. (1999). Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00024-6
  66. Wiguna, I. P. A., & Scott, S. (2006). Relating risk to project performance in Indonesian building contracts. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600799760
  67. Xiang, P., Zhou, J., Zhou, X., et al. (2012). Construction Project Risk Management Based on the View of Asymmetric Information. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000548
  68. Xu, Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Yeung, J. F. Y. (2010). Developing a Fuzzy Risk Allocation Model for PPP Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000189
  69. Yun, S., Jung, W., Heon Han, S., et al. (2015). Critical Organizational Success Factors for Public Private Partnership Projects – A Comparison of Solicited and Unsolicited Proposals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802715


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.5472

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mustafa Nahdi, Naniek Widayati, Mochamad Agung Wibowo, Endah Murtiana Sari, Rizal Zainuddin Tamin, Najid

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.