The Ecuadorian electricity sector encompasses generation, transmission, distribution and sales. Since the change of the Constitution in Ecuador in 2008, the sector has opted to employ a centralized model. The present research aims to measure the efficiency level of the Ecuadorian electricity sector during the period 2012–2021, using a DEA-NETWORK methodology, which allows examining and integrating each of the phases defined above through intermediate inputs, which are inputs in subsequent phases and outputs of some other phases. These intermediate inputs are essential for analyzing efficiency from a global view of the system. For research purposes, the Ecuadorian electricity sector was divided into 9 planning zones. The results revealed that the efficiency of zones 6 and 8 had the greatest impact on the overall efficiency of the Ecuadorian electricity sector during the period 2012–2015. On the other hand, the distribution phase is the most efficient with an index of 0.9605, followed by sales with an index of 0.6251. It is also concluded that the most inefficient phases are generation and transmission, thus verifying the problems caused by the use of a centralized model.

1. Agencia de Regulación y Control de Energía y Recursos Naturales No Renovables. (2021). Annual and Multiannual Statistics of the Ecuadorian Electricity Sector 2021. Agencia de Regulación y Control de Energía y Recursos Naturales No Renovables.

2. Aldieri, L., Gatto, A., & Vinci, C. P. (2021). Evaluation of energy resilience and adaptation policies: An energy efficiency analysis. Energy Policy, 157, 112505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112505

3. Alizadeh, R., Gharizadeh Beiragh, R., Soltanisehat, L., et al. (2020). Performance evaluation of complex electricity generation systems: A dynamic network-based data envelopment analysis approach. Energy Economics, 91, 104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104894

4. Almeida Neves, S., Cardoso Marques, A., & Moutinho, V. (2020). Two-stage DEA model to evaluate technical efficiency on deployment of battery electric vehicles in the EU countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102489

5. Babatunde, K. A., Said, F. F., Md Nor, N. G., et al. (2021). Coherent or conflicting? Assessing natural gas subsidy and energy efficiency policy interactions amid CO₂ emissions reduction in Malaysia electricity sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123374

6. Bai-Chen, X., Ying, F., & Qian-Qian, Q. (2012). Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China’s power system. Applied Energy, 96, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.011

7. Barrero, F. (2004). Sistemas de energía eléctrica. Editorial Paraninfo.

8. Beiragh, R. G., Alizadeh, R., Beiragh, M. G., et al. (2021). Energy production efficiency assessment using network data envelopment analysis. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-173973/v1

9. BID. (2022). The importance of aligning energy planning and long-term strategies to decarbonize the sector. BID.

10. CAF. (2013). 5 challenges and challenges to energy efficiency in the region. CAF Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina.

11. Cardoso de Mendonça, M. J., Pereira, A. O., Medrano, L. A., et al. (2021). Analysis of electric distribution utilities efficiency levels by stochastic frontier in Brazilian power sector. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 76, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100973

12. Cong, D., Liang, L., Jing, S., et al. (2021). Energy supply efficiency evaluation of integrated energy systems using novel SBM-DEA integrating Monte Carlo. Energy, 231, 120834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120834

13. Díaz, A. (2018). Efficiency of the Mexican electricity sector 2008-2015: an application of the DEA Network model [PhD thesis]. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.

14. Dolšak, J., Hrovatin, N., & Zorić, J. (2022). Estimating the efficiency in overall energy consumption: Evidence from Slovenian household-level data. Energy Economics, 114, 106241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106241

15. Halkos, G. E., & Polemis, M. L. (2018). The impact of economic growth on environmental efficiency of the electricity sector: A hybrid window DEA methodology for the USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 211, 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.067

16. IEA. (2022). 75 million people are likely to lose Access to electricity as prices rise. IEA.

17. Jamasb, T., Nepal, R., & Tmilsina, G. R. (2017). A Quarter Century Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries. The Energy Journal, 38(3), 195–234. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.3.tjam

18. Lan, X., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. (2022). An investigation of the innovation efficacy of Chinese photovoltaic enterprises employing three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA). Energy Reports, 8, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.093

19. Liu, Y., & Wang, K. (2015). Energy efficiency of China’s industry sector: An adjusted network DEA (data envelopment analysis)-based decomposition analysis. Energy, 93, 1328–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.072

20. Maradin, D., Cerović, L., & Šegota, A. (2021). The efficiency of wind power companies in electricity generation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 37, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100708

21. Medeiros, G. O. S., Marangon-Lima, L. M., de Queiroz, A. R., et al. (2022). Efficiency analysis for performance evaluation of electric distribution companies. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 134, 107430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107430

22. Mohsin, M., Hanif, I., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., et al. (2021). Nexus between energy efficiency and electricity reforms: A DEA-Based way forward for clean power development. Energy Policy, 149, 112052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112052

23. Mousavizadeh, R., Navabakhsh, M., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2020). Cost-efficiency measurement for two-stage DEA network using game approach: an application to electrical network in Iran. Sādhanā, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01480-5

24. Ouyang, W., & Yang, J. (2020). The network energy and environment efficiency analysis of 27 OECD countries: A multiplicative network DEA model. Energy, 197, 117161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117161

25. Petridis, K., Ünsal, M. G., Dey, P. K., et al. (2019). A novel network data envelopment analysis model for performance measurement of Turkish electric distribution companies. Energy, 174, 985–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.051

26. Poupeau, F.-M. (2020). Everything must change in order to stay as it is. The impossible decentralization of the electricity sector in France. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109597

27. Sun, S., & Huang, C. (2021). Energy structure evaluation and optimization in BRICS: A dynamic analysis based on a slack based measurement DEA with undesirable outputs. Energy, 216, 119251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119251

28. Susanty, A., Purwanggono, B., & Faruq, C. A. (2022). Electricity Distribution Efficiency Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Soft System Methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 203, 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.043

29. Tavassoli, M., Ketabi, S., & Ghandehari, M. (2020). Developing a network DEA model for sustainability analysis of Iran’s electricity distribution network. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 122, 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106187

30. Tiep, N. C., Wang, M., Mohsin, M., et al. (2021). An assessment of power sector reforms and utility performance to strengthen consumer self-confidence towards private investment. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 676-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.005

31. Wang, R., Wang, Q., & Yao, S. (2021). Evaluation and difference analysis of regional energy efficiency in China under the carbon neutrality targets: Insights from DEA and Theil models. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112958

32. Wei, W., Han, Y., Abedin, M. Z., et al. (2022). Energy Technical Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of China’s Power Industry Based on DEA Model. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4105002

33. Wu, J., Li, M., Zhu, Q., et al. (2019). Energy and environmental efficiency measurement of China’s industrial sectors: A DEA model with non-homogeneous inputs and outputs. Energy Economics, 78, 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.036

34. Zhang, Y.-J., Sun, Y.-F., & Huang, J. (2018). Energy efficiency, carbon emission performance, and technology gaps: Evidence from CDM project investment. Energy Policy, 115, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.056

35. Zhao, P., Zeng, L., Li, P., et al. (2022). China’s transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model. Energy, 238, 121934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121934