Infrastructure collaboration along China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for corporate social responsibility and political activity

Xinya Guan, David Ahlstrom, Junying Liu

Article ID: 4705
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024

VIEWS - 120 (Abstract) 91 (PDF)

Abstract


Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) have increasingly engaged in outward foreign direct investment in recent years, and particularly into the infrastructure sector of developing economies. This has been prompted by the infrastructure-led economic integration plan of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. However, such collaboration faces many challenges. Infrastructure projects are often undertaken in industries, countries, and regions posing particular and difficult challenges, and with divergent, often conflicting interests, with the ensuing conclusion that the MNE is simply exploiting the project and not delivering value to the host country. Overall, not only does the infrastructure project have to be well-functioning with expected returns (or savings) realized, but these projects face close scrutiny from local communities, labor, opposition parties, neighboring countries, and various international bodies and nonprofits, requiring delicate handling of the principals involved. The unfolding of these issues and their management by the multinational are examined through an in-depth longitudinal case study. The data are drawn from major participants and stakeholders around a leading Chinese MNE and the mega project of the construction of a major hydropower plant in Pakistan.


Keywords


infrastructure collaborations; institutional logics; CSR-CPA configuration; belt and road initiative; China; Pakistan

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(4), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5897661

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2010). Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co–evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00373.x

Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.001

Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Nair, A., et al. (2003). Managing the institutional environment: Challenges for foreign firms in post WTO China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(2), 41–49.

Akst, D. (2023). Why do large projects go over budget? Available online: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/Why-do-large-projects-go-over-budget (accessed on 2 June 2024).

Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A., et al. (2014). Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy, 69, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.069

Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011938

Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry—Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.

Buckley, P. J. (2020). China’s belt and road initiative: Changing the rules of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(2), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00283-z

Cheung, Z., Aalto, E., & Nevalainen, P. (2020). Institutional Logics and the Internationalization of a State-Owned Enterprise: Evaluation of International Venture Opportunities by Telecom Finland 1987–1998. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101140

Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Influence, new and expanded: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Business.

Ciravegna, L., Ahlstrom, D., Michailova, S., et al. (2023). Exogenous shocks and MNEs: Learning from pandemics, conflicts, and other major disruptions. Journal of World Business, 58(6), 101487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101487

den Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., de Bakker, F. G. A., et al. (2013). Playing on Two Chessboards: Reputation Effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 790–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12063

Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research: Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0041

Du, J., Bai, T., & Chen, S. (2019). Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China. Journal of Business Research, 98, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.014

Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? China Economic Review, 47, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.010

Dunbar, R. L. M., & Ahlstrom, D. (1995). Seeking the Institutional Balance of Power: Avoiding the Power of a Balanced View. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.2307/258891

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

Eisenman, J., & Heginbotham, E. (2023). China’s relations with the Global South. In: Kironska, K. & Turscanyi, R. Q. (editors). Contemporary China: A New Superpower? Routledge.

Estache, A., & Wodon, Q. (2014). Infrastructure and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.

Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Introduction. In: Eysenck, H. J. (editor). Case studies in behaviour therapy: 1–16. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107050891

Flyvbjerg, B., & Gardner, D. (2023). How big things get done: The surprising factors that determine the fate of every project, from home renovations to space exploration and everything in between. Crown Currency.

Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Reviewing Theories and Setting New Agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12049

Gil, N., & Fu, Y. (2022). Megaproject Performance, Value Creation, and Value Distribution: An Organizational Governance Perspective. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(2), 224–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0029

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues & discussion. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.

Gond, J., Barin Cruz, L., Raufflet, E., et al. (2016). To Frack or Not to Frack? The Interaction of Justification and Power in a Sustainability Controversy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 330–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12166

Hermes, J., & Mainela, T. (2022). Actor legitimation in emerging markets: A network-embedded process. Journal of World Business, 57(4), 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101315

Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825. https://doi.org/10.2307/259357

Hoffman, B. & Dimbleby, M. (2023). How big things get done with Prof. Bent Flyvbjerg. Available online: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yUEycqrCuIY (accessed on 2 June 2024).

Indah, V. F., Rusli, B., Myrna, R., et al. (2023). How are companies involved in the construction of the trans Sumatra toll road, in Indonesia? Role analysis and development policy. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2588

Javadian, G., Nair, A., Ahlstrom, D., et al. (2023). Transitional entrepreneurship: unleashing entrepreneurial potential across numerous challenging contexts. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/neje-12-2023-103

Kamasak, R., James, S. R., & Yavuz, M. (2019). The interplay of corporate social responsibility and corporate political activity in emerging markets: The role of strategic flexibility in non‐market strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12223

Khan, Z., Zeng, J., Knight, G., et al. (2023). Non-market strategies and disruptive innovation in the platform economy. Journal of International Management, 29(5), 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101047

Ko, G., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Appiah, G., et al. (2022). Non-market strategies and building digital trust in sharing economy platforms. Journal of International Management, 28(1), 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100909

Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.2307/259037

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349

Li, J., Liu, B., & Qian, G. (2019). The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.004

Li, J., Newenham‐Kahindi, A., Shapiro, D. M., et al. (2013). The Two‐Tier Bargaining Model Revisited: Theory and Evidence from China’s Natural Resource Investments in Africa. Global Strategy Journal, 3(4), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2013.01062.x

Li, J., Qian, G., Zhou, K. Z., et al. (2022). Belt and Road Initiative, globalization and institutional changes: implications for firms in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(3), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09770-0

Li, J., Van Assche, A., Fu, X., et al. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative and international business policy: A kaleidoscopic perspective. Journal of International Business Policy, 5(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-022-00136-x

Li, J., Van Assche, A., Li, L., et al. (2022). Foreign direct investment along the Belt and Road: A political economy perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5), 902–919. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00435-0

Liu, B., Ahlstrom, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The schizophrenic board secretary: An embedded agent between multiple stakeholders and financial misconduct. The British Accounting Review, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101323

Liu, Y., Zhang, C., & Jing, R. (2016). Coping with Multiple Institutional Logics: Temporal Process of Institutional Work during the Emergence of the One Foundation in China. Management and Organization Review, 12(2), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.49

Lounsbury, M., Steele, C. W. J., Wang, M. S., et al. (2021). New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734

Lovallo, D., Cristofaro, M., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2023). Governing Large Projects: A Three-Stage Process to Get It Right. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0129

Luise, C., Buckley, P. J., Voss, H., et al. (2022). A bargaining and property rights perspective on the Belt and Road Initiative: Cases from the Italian port system. Journal of International Business Policy, 5(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-021-00122-9

Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2015). Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12124

Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., et al. (2016). A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617241

Miska, C., Witt, M. A., & Stahl, G. K. (2016). Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.13

Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405

Palmer, E. (2023). Roads and Rules: What Does Infrastructure Reveal about International Law? Asian Journal of International Law, 14(1), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251323000413

Ragin, C. C. & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.

Rehbein, K., & Schuler, D. A. (2015). Linking Corporate Community Programs and Political Strategies. Business & Society, 54(6), 794–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313478024

Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2021). Political CSR at the Coalface—The Roles and Contradictions of Multinational Corporations in Developing Workplace Dialogue. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12585

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations, 4th ed. Sage.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101

Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., et al. (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818–1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x

Sutherland, D., Anderson, J., Bailey, N., et al. (2020). Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00056-8

Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361

Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G., et al. (2020). Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09648-2

Uzunca, B., Rigtering, J. P. C., & Ozcan, P. (2018). Sharing and Shaping: A Cross-Country Comparison of How Sharing Economy Firms Shape Their Institutional Environment to Gain Legitimacy. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(3), 248–272. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2016.0153

Valverde, M., Johns, F., & Raso, J. (2018). Governing Infrastructure in the Age of the “Art of the Deal”: Logics of Governance and Scales of Visibility. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41(S1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12257

Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., et al. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.55

Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., et al. (2005). Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x

Xu, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2013). Linking Theory and Context: ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies’ after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1322–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01051.x

Yan, S., Almandoz, J. (John), & Ferraro, F. (2021). The Impact of Logic (In)Compatibility: Green Investing, State Policy, and Corporate Environmental Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 903–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211005756

Yin, J., & Jamali, D. (2021). Collide or Collaborate: The Interplay of Competing Logics and Institutional Work in Cross-Sector Social Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04548-8

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Zhang, J., Deephouse, D. L., van Gorp, D., et al. (2022). Individuals’ Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Emerging Market Multinationals: Ethical Foundations and Construct Validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(4), 801–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04599-x




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4705

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Xinya Guan, David Ahlstrom, Junying Liu

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.