Strategic decision-making in project management: Applying FAHP to select research agendas
Vol 8, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 151 (Abstract) 62 (PDF)
Abstract
This study proposes a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method to support strategic decision-makers in choosing a project management research agenda. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) model is the basic tool used in this study. It is a mathematical tool for evaluating decisions with multiple alternatives by decomposing them into successive levels according to their degree of importance. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) oriented theme of project management was chosen from among four themes that emerged from a strategic monitoring study. The FAHP method is an effective decision-making tool for multiple aspects of project management. It eliminates subjectivity and produces decisions based on consistent judgment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdelmasseh, R., Bassioni, H., & Gaid, E. (2022). Project manager skills affecting construction projects in Egypt. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1056(1), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1056/1/012038
Afolayan, A., Ojokoh, B., & Adetunmbi, A. (2020). Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection. Scientific African, 9, e00471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00471
Arikumar, K., Prathiba, S., Alazab, M., et al. (2022). Fl-PMI: federated learning-based person movement identification through wearable devices in smart healthcare systems. Sensors, 22(4), 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041377
Al Qubaisi, A., Badri, M., Mohaidat, J., et al. (2016). An analytic hierarchy process for school quality and inspection: Model development and application. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(3), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2014-0123
Angarita, A., & Nieto, C. (2019). XVIII Latin American Congress of Technological Management ALTEC 2019 Medellin (Spanish). Debates Sobre La Innovación, 3(2), 1–13.
Benítez, N., & Benavides. C. (2012). A Bibliomeric Study of European Journal of Management and Business Economics (Spanish). Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de La Empresa, 21(2), 157–168.
Biedenbach, T., & Müller, R. (2011). Paradigms in project management research: examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111096908
Boden, R., Cox, D., & Nedeva, M. (2006). The appliance of science? New public management and strategic change. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600623941
Bredillet, C. (2008). Project Portfolio Control and Portfolio. Project Management Journal, 39(3), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj
Caggy, A., & de Almeida, E. (2020). AHP & fuzzy logic hybrid method for decision making in project management in a forestry industry. Gestao e Producao, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4225-20
Chen, F., Wang, W., & Zhu, J. (2022). How do firms upgrade innovation capabilities through the coevolution of post-merger integration and network reconstruction? A multiple-case study of Chinese companies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(3), 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-06-2021-0185
Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., Malik, M. N., et al. (2019). The imperative and research directions of sustainable project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117810
Cicmil, S., Gough, G., & Hills, S. (2017). Insights into responsible education for sustainable development: The case of UWE, Bristol. International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.002
Crawford, L., & Pollack, J. (2004). PROJECT Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(2004), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.004
Demirtas, N., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Seker, S. (2014). Project Management Methodology Selection using swot-Fuzzy AHP. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2, 1–5.
Erturan-Ogut, E., & Kula, U. (2022). Selecting the right location for sports facilities using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(5), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-09-2021-0103
Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017
Faisal, M. N., Al Subaie, A. A., Sabir, L. B., & Sharif, K. J. (2023). PMBOK, IPMA and fuzzy-AHP based novel framework for leadership competencies development in megaprojects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(9), 2993–3020.
Fudzin, A., Mokhtar, A., & Muhammad, M. (2022). Supply chain management of outsourcing module components decision-making using analytical hierarchy process and visual basic application in automotive body-in-white welding assembly line. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 9909–9920. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.3.2022.03.0763
García, F., Batres, J., Rojano, R., et al. (2011). Lines of research proposed by the Community Nursing Association of Andalusia (Spanish). Enfermeria Clinica, 21(3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.02.007
Ghorbani, M. K., Hamidifar, H., Skoulikaris, C., & Nones, M. (2022). Concept-based integration of project management and strategic management of rubber dam projects using the SWOT—AHP method. Sustainability, 14(5), 2541.
Hirschi, A. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Issues and Implications for Career Research and Practice. Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12142
Isenmann, R., Landwehr-Zloch, S., & Zinn, S. (2020). Morphological box for ESD—landmark for universities implementing education for sustainable development (ESD). International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100360
Jarlsberg, K. (2023). Proposing a novel combination of earned value management and requirements management. Incose International Symposium, 33(1), 1384–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.13088
Javaid, M., Sajid, M., Masood, K., & Khan, Z. (2022). Examining the impact of project management methodology on construction project success. using risk management as a mediator and organizational culture as a moderator. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i1.2193
Kadenic, M., & Tambo, T. (2023). Resilience of operating models: exploring the potential of agile project management as enabler. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(3), 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-05-2022-0122
Losiewicz, P., Oard, D. W., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Textual data mining to support science and technology management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 15(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008777222412
Lukianov, D., Mazhei, K., & Gogunskii, V. (2019). Transformation of the International Project Management Association Project Managers Individual Competencies Model. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory, ATIT 2019—Proceedings. pp. 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030486
Marcelino, S., González, L., & Pérez, A. (2015). Using project management as a way to sustainability. from a comprehensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020
Michán, L., & Muñoz, I. (2013). Scientometrics for medical sciences: definitions, applications and perspectives (Spanish). Investigación En Educación Médica, 2(6), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2007-5057(13)72694-2
Müller, R., Drouin, N., & Sankaran, S. (2019). Modeling Organizational Project Management. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819847876
Nguyen, T., Huynh, M., Ho, N., et al. (2022). An Assessment of How University Students Approach to Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Study from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no4.0333
Olabanji, O., & Mpofu, K. (2020). Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept. Heliyon, 6(1), e03182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03182
Ortega, E. (2010). Research in marketing through Spanish doctoral theses (Spanish). Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de La Empresa, 16(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60006-9
Prascevic, N. & Prascevic, Z. (2017). Application of Fuzzy AHP for Ranking and Selection of Alternatives on CP Management. Journal of civil engineering and management, 23(8), 1123–1135.
Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00018-Q
PMI. (2015). Capturing the Value of Project Management. PMI Pulse of the Profession.
PMI. (2021). Beyond Agility. Available online: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pmi_pulse_2021.pdf?v=b5c9abc1-e9ff-4ac5-bb0d-010ea8f664da&sc_lang_temp=en (accessed on 12 June 2022).
Prieto, O. (2018). Evaluation of research projects using multi-criteria decision-making methods (Spanish). VIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería de Proyectos, 1–14.
Rodríguez, Y. (2020). Methodologies for strengthening lines of research in academic or business research groups (Spanish). Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 16(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v16n2a12
Ruiz, A. (2004). Text, testimony and metatext (Spanish). La Practica Investigativa En Ciencias Sociales.
Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Schoberova, M. (2015). Job Crafting and Personal Development in the Workplace: Employees and managers co-creating meaningful and productive work in personal development. Master of Applied Positive Psychology (MAPP) Capstone Projects, 87, 1–56.
Shury, J., Vivian, D., Spreadbury, K., et al. (2014). Employer Perspectives Survey 2014: UK Results. Available online: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:66175 (accessed on 15 May 2021)
Seidler-de Alwis, R., & Hartmann, E. (2008). The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: Knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852449
Sharir, K., Lai, G., Simon, N., et al. (2022). Assessment of flood susceptibility analysis using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Kota Belud area, Sabah, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1103(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1103/1/012005
Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (1996). Toward a Typological Theory of Project Management. Research Policy, 25, 607–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2
Silvius, G., & Schipper, R. (2015). A Conceptual Model for Exploring the Relationship between Sustainability and Project Success. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.497
Silvius, G. (2017). Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121
Soam, S., N, S., BS, Y., et al. (2023). Ahp analyser: a decision-making tool for prioritizing climate change mitigation options and forest management. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1099996
Soderlund, J. (2004). Building Theories of Project Management: Past Research, Questions for the Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00070-X
Sposito, L. (2023). Influence of the project managers’ expertise and experience in the success of projects: the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-06-2023-0129
Storey, M., Killian, S., & O’Regan, P. (2017). Responsible management education: Mapping the field in the context of the SDGs. International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.009
Tegegne, D., Abera, M., & Alemayehu, E. (2023). Selection of sustainable building material using multicriteria decision-making model: a case of masonry work in Lideta sub city, Addis Ababa. Advances in Civil Engineering, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9729169
Thomas, J., & Mengel, T. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity - Advanced project management education. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.001
Turner, J., Anbari, F., & Bredillet, C. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: the nine schools. Global Business Perspectives, 1, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196-012-0001-4
Van Raan, A. (1998). Assessment of social sciences: the use of. Research Evaluation, 7, 2–6.
Vendrell, F., & Ángel, P. (2008). Otri: Research Agenda (Spanish). Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de La Empresa, 14(3), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60067-7
Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P., & Cicmil, S. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.009
Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 (3), 338–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.4627
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jorge Anibal Restrepo-Morales, Jacobo Echavarria, Carlos Durango-Yepes
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.