The rise of digital communication technologies has significantly changed how people participate in social protests. Digital platforms—such as social media—have enabled individuals to organize and mobilize protests on a global scale. As a result, there has been a growing interest in understanding the role of digital communication in social protests. This manuscript provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the evolution of research on digital communication and social protests from 2008 to 2022. The study employs bibliometric methodology to analyze a sample of 260 research articles extracted from the SCOPUS core collection. The findings indicate a significant increase in scholarly investigations about digital communication and its role in social protest movements during the past decade. The number of publications on this topic has increased significantly since 2012—peaking in 2022—indicating a heightened interest following COVID-19. The United States, United Kingdom, and Spain are the leading countries in publication output on this topic. The analysis underlines scholars employing a range of theoretical perspectives—including social movement theory, network theory, and media studies—to identify the relationship between digital communication and social protests. Social media platforms—X (Twitter), Facebook, and YouTube—are the most frequently studied and utilized digital communication tools engaged in social protests. The study concludes by identifying emerging topics relating to social movements, political communication, and protest, thereby suggesting gaps and opportunities for future research.

1. Allsop, B. (2016). Social Media and Activism: A Literature Review. Social Psychological Review, 18(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2016.18.2.35
2. Al-Kassimi, K. (2021). A “New Middle East” Following 9/11 and the “Arab Spring” of 2011?—(Neo)-Orientalist Imaginaries Rejuvenate the (Temporal) Inclusive Exclusion Character of Jus Gentium. Laws, 10(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10020029
3. Al-Kassimi, K. (2022). International Law, Necropolitics, and Arab Lives: The Legalization of Creative Chaos in Arabia, 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003306375
4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007
5. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2020). Biblioshiny: Bibliometrix for no Coders. Available online: https://www.bibliometrix.org/biblioshiny/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0 (accessed on 2 March 2024).
6. Bhatia, K. V., & Gajjala, R. (2020). Examining Anti-CAA Protests at Shaheen Bagh: Muslim Women and Politics of the Hindu India. International Journal of Communication, 14, 6286–6303. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16015/3300
7. Cable, J. (2017). Communication Sciences and the Study of Social Movements. In: Roggeband C, Klandermans B (editors). Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, 1st ed. Springer, Cham. pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_7
8. Camus, C. (2019). Dissecting the #MeToo Movement: A Powerful Call to Action or a Futile Fuss? Women Leading Change: Case Studies on Women, Gender, and Feminism, 4(1), 93-107. https://journals.tulane.edu/ncs/article/view/2417
9. Carty, V. (2010). New Information Communication Technologies and Grassroots Mobilization. Information, Communication & Society, 13(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902915658
10. Carty, V., & Barron, F. G. R. (2018). Social Movements and New Technology: The Dynamics of Cyberactivism in the Digital Age. In: Berberoglu B (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation. Springer International Publishing. pp. 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92354-3_16
11. Dolata, U. (2018). Social Movements: The Sociotechnical Constitution of Collective Action. In: Dolata U, Schrape JF (eds). Collectivity and Power on the Internet. Springer, Cham. pp. 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78414-4_3
12. Earl, J., & Garrett, R. K. (2017). The New Information Frontier: Toward a more Nuanced View of Social Movement Communication. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1192028
13. Edwards, L. (2015). Interrogating the Complexities of Digital Communication for Young People Engaged in Social Action. Available online: http://www.communitiesandculture.org/ (accessed on 2 March 2024).
14. Fuchs, C. (2015). Social Media and the Public Sphere. In: Fuchs C (editor). Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media, 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 315–372. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315733517-12
15. Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an Information Society: A Literature Review on Social Movements and New ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630773
16. Gautney, H. (2013). Occupy Wall Street Movement. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.WBESPM478
17. Gaviria-Marín, M. (2021). Bibliometrics and Business. A Challenge for Researchers. Inquietud Empresarial, 21(1), I–III. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.12931
18. González-Bailón, S. (2015). Social Protest and New Media. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95076-1
19. Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2018). Media and Protest Logics in the Digital Era: The Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. In: Media and Protest Logics in the Digital Era: The Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190856779.001.0001
20. Marcinkowski, C. (2012). Whither ‘Arab Spring? ICR Journal, 3(3), 532–537. https://doi.org/10.52282/ICR.V3I3.537
21. Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2014). Visions of Protest. A Media-Historic Perspective on Images in Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/SOC4.12173
22. Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/COMT.12038
23. Mutsvairo, B. (2016). Dovetailing Desires for Democracy with new ICTs’ Potentiality as a Platform for Activism. In: Mutsvairo B (eds). Digital Activism in the Social Media Era: Critical Reflections on Emerging Trends in Sub-Saharan Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. pp. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40949-8_1
24. Oliveira, W. J. F. de. (2021). Digital Social Media, Political Participation, and Anti-corruption Protests. Estudos de Sociologia, 26(50), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.52780/RES.14759
25. Owen, S. (2017). Monitoring Social Media and Protest Movements: Ensuring Political Order through Surveillance and Surveillance Discourse. Social Identities, 23(6), 688–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1291092
26. Ozkaya, I. (2019). Interact, Collaborate, Debate. IEEE Software, 36(6), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2019.2936955
27. Peker, A., & Yalçın, R. U. (2022). Mapping Global Research on Cyber Bullying in the Context of Cross-Cultural Collaborations: A Bibliometric and Network Analysis. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 768494. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMM.2022.768494
28. Wasserstrom, J. (2021). Repression in Xi’s China. Dissent, 68(1), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1353/DSS.2021.0021
29. Yaqoub, M., Gao, Z., Ye, X., et al. (2023). Three Decades of Glocalization research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2245239
30. Yu, Y., & Huang, J. (2021). Poverty Reduction of Sustainable Development Goals in the 21st Century: A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 754181. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMM.2021.754181
31. Yuen, S., Tang, G., Lee, F. L. F., & Cheng, E. W. (2022). Surveying Spontaneous Mass Protests: Mixed-mode Sampling and Field Methods. Sociological Methodology, 52(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750211071130