Examination of emergency assembly areas based on planning criteria after the two major earthquakes on 6 February, 2023: A case study from Turkey

Yasin Bektaş, Gamze Doğan

Article ID: 3917
Vol 8, Issue 7, 2024

VIEWS - 192 (Abstract) 94 (PDF)

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the compliance of post-disaster emergency assembly areas with their planning criteria in the Battalgazi district of Malatya province. This district is one of the settlements that was most affected by the two big earthquakes that occurred in Türkiye on 6 February 2023. The emergency assembly areas were evaluated qualitatively based on the criterion of “appropriateness”, with the sub-variables of “usability”, “accessibility”, and “safety”. They were also evaluated quantitatively based on the criterion of “adequacy” with the sub-variable “per capita m2”. There are a total of 103 neighborhoods in the district. However, there are only eight emergency assembly areas in total within its boundaries. According to the results of this study, only 7.5% of the current population of the district resides within 500 m of the emergency assembly areas. The fact that four emergency assembly areas (Hürriyet Park, Şehit Kemal Özalper High School, the Community Garden, Battalgazi Municipality) are situated next to each other and there are emergency assembly areas in only six of the 103 neighborhoods within the municipal boundaries shows that were significant problems in the decisions made regarding their locations. In addition, it was determined that there were disadvantages in terms of accessibility and usability within the criterion of appropriateness, while there were some positive aspects in terms of safety. When examined with regard to the criterion of adequacy, it was determined that the emergency assembly areas at Mişmiş Park, the Community Garden, Battalgazi Municipality, and Şehit Kemal Özalper High School were most adequate, while the emergency assembly areas at Hürriyet Park, Fırat Neighborhood Mukhtar, Nevzat Er Park, and 100 Yıl İmam Hatip Secondary School were least adequate.


Keywords


earthquake risk; emergency assembly area; planning criteria; urban planning; Türkiye

Full Text:

PDF


References


Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. (2020). Overview of 2019 in the Scope of Disaster Management and Natural Incident Statistics (Turkish). Available online: https://afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/Kurumsal-Raporlar/2019yilidogakaynakliolayistatistikleri.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Akdur, R. (2001). Disaster preparedness and disaster management (Turkish). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Coordinatorship of Health Project, Health Services Management in Disasters, Ankara.

Aksoy, Y., Turan, AÇ, Atalay, H. (2009). Investigation of green space adequacy in Fatih district of Istanbul using values before and after the Marmara earthquake (Turkish). Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2):137–150.

Aman, D., D. (2019). Determination of site selection criteria for gathering areas in a possible Marmara earthquake: The case of Istanbul Bağcılar (Turkish) [Phd thesis]. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Anhorn, J., & Khazai, B. (2015). Open space suitability analysis for emergency shelter after an earthquake. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(4), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-789-2015

Balamir, M. (2007). Disaster policy, risk and planning (Turkish). TMMOB Afet Sempozyumu, 5–7 Aralık İMO Kongre ve Kültür Merkezi, Ankara, Türkiye.

Bektaş, Y., & Sakarya, A. (2020). An Evaluation of an Integrated Disaster Management and an Emergency Assembly Area: The Case of Kadıköy, Istanbul. Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning, 8(2), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.15320/iconarp.2020.135

Buldurur, M. A., Kurucu, H. (2015). Assessment of disaster management and emergency transportation routes in Istanbul. Journal of Planning, 25(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5505/planlama.2015.47965

Bureau of Urban Development of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government (T.Y.B). (2016). Urban Design Guides (Turkish). Available online: http://www.toshiseibi.metro.tokyo.jp/eng/pdf/index_05.pdf?1503 (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Çavuş, G. (2013). Examining the principles and standards of open-green space system in earthquake zones with the example of Bolu province (Turkish) [Phd thesis]. Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Çelik, A., Erduran, F. (2011). Determination of earthquake park facilities in Kocaeli. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(24), 5558–5566.

Cheng, H., & Yang, X. K. (2012). A Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Earthquake Emergency Shelter. Sustainable Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412299.0050

Chu, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The Application of TOPSIS Method in Selecting Fixed Seismic Shelter for Evacuation in Cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061

Çiçekdağı, H. İ., Kırış, Ş. (2012). Site selection for disaster station and gathering center and an application (Turkish). Journal of Science and Technology of Dumlupınar University, (028), 67–76.

Çınar, A. K. (2018). Analysing The Planning Criterias of Emergency Assembly Points and Temporary Shelter Areas: Case of İzmir-Karşıyaka. Journal of Planning. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2018.07088

Coburn, A., & Spence, R. (2002). Earthquake Protection. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470855185

Cooperation Agency & IMM (The Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality). (2002). Republic of Turkey Istanbul Province Disaster Prevention/Mitigation Basic Plan including Seismic Microzonation (Turkish). Final Rapor No: 5. Pacific Consultants International OYO Corporation.

Erdin, H. E., Zengin Çelik, H., Aydın, M. B. S, et al. (2019). Establishing a method for determining and evaluating the criteria for public gathering areas after disasters and emergencies, Izmir City Example (Turkish). AFAD-UDAP Çalışması, Project No: UDAP-G-16-08, Ankara, Türkiye.

European Centre on Prevention and Forecasting of Earthquakes (ECPFE) & Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization (OASP). (2002). Emergency Evacuation of The Population in Case of an Earthquake. Handbook No:3. Athens, Greece.

Forouzandeh, A. J., Hosseini, M., Sadeghzadeh, M. (2008). Guidelines for design of temporary shelters after earthquakes based on community participation. In: Proceedings of the 14th World conference on earthquake engineering; October; Beijing, China. pp. 12–17.

General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSİ). (2023). Landslide and flood situations. 9th Regional Directorate.

Grand National Assembly of Türkiye. (2023). Earthquake research commission (Turkish). Available online: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/Haber/Detay?Id=88d724f8-49a8-4811-a500-0186ff77519bJICA (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Kadıoğlu, M., Özdamar, E. (2005). Basic Principles of Disaster Management (Turkish). Available online: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/4710_TR01MH406-Pu.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2023).

Kılcı, F., Kara, B. Y., & Bozkaya, B. (2015). Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.035

Kırçın, P. N., Çabuk, S. N., Aksoy, K, et al. (2017). A research on increasing the possibilities of using green areas as post-disaster gathering areas in Turkey, 4 (Turkish). Uluslararası Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Ekim 11–13, 2017, Eskişehir, Türkiye.

León, J., & March, A. (2014). Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat International, 43, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006

Liu, Q., Ruan, X., & Shi, P. (2011). Selection of emergency shelter sites for seismic disasters in mountainous regions: Lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan Ms 8.0 Earthquake, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 40(4), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.07.014

Maral, H., Akgün, Y., Çınar, A. K., et al. (2015). An evaluation on post-disaster gathering and emergency shelter areas in Izmir. 3 (Turkish). Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.

MASKİ (Malatya Water and Sewerage Administration). (2017). Drinking Water Master Plan Report (Turkish). İçme suyu Daire Başkanlığı.

Mengi, O., Erdin, H. E. (2018). Afet ve Management of Emergency Gathering Areas Design and Systematic Approaches (Turkish). In 2nd International Symposium on Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, Sakarya University Culture and Congress Center, Sakarya-Turkey 04-06 May 2018.

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Meteorology. (2021). An evaluation of Meteorological Disasters in 2020. Available online: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/FILES/genel/raporlar/2020MeteorolojikAfetlerDegerlendirmesi.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Precidency (AFAD). (2023). 6 February 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.7 Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.6 Earthquakes Preliminary Assessment Report (Turkish). Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmaras%20%20Depremleri_%20On%20Degerlendirme%20Raporu.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2023).

Özdemir, H. (2004). Determination of temporary settlement areas in disaster preparedness activities (Turkish). Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 9(12), 237 – 256.

Quarantelli, E. L. (1995). Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569510088069

Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. (2019). “Learn the Assembly Point to Stay Safe — Press Release.” Available online: https://www.afad.gov.tr/ (accessed on 13 November 2023).

Şenol Balaban, M. (2011). A study on the accessibility and adequacy analysis of the existing open space stock of Istanbul Fatih district in case of emergency evacuation and temporary shelter areas (Turkish). Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Yayını, 44–53.

Soltani, A., Ardalan, A., Darvishi Boloorani, A., et al. (2014). Site Selection Criteria for Sheltering after Earthquakes: A Systematic Review. PLoS Currents. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.17ad1f98fb85be80785d0a81ced6a7a6 (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Sphere Project. (2000). Humanitarian charter and minimum standarts in disaster response. CH–1211 Geneva 19, Switzerland.

Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2020). Tokyo metropolitan government disaster prevention guide book. Retrieved from: https://www.bousai.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/content/book/guidbook_pocketguide/ 2020guid_e.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2023).

TRT Haber. (2023). TOKI President Bulut: Houses will be built at least 500 meters away from the fault line (Turkish). Available online: https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/toki-baskani-bulut-konutlar-fay-hattina-en-az-500-metre-uzaga-yapilacak-748198.html#:~:text=TOK%C4%B0%20Ba%C5%9Fkan%C4%B1%20%C3%96mer%20Bulut%2C%20depremden,500%20metre%20uza%C4%9Fa%20yap%C4%B1laca%C4%9F%C4%B1n%C4%B1%20s%C3%B6yledi (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Turkish Statistical Institute (Turkstat). (2019). Address Based Population Registration System (Turkish). Available online: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr Ünen (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Ünen, C. H, Şahin, M. (2011). Identification of Interdependencies between Infrastructure Networks for Post-Earthquake Damage and Performance Prediction (Turkish). Tmmob Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, Ankara.

United Nations-UN. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects, The 2018 Revision. Available online: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2023).

Wei, L., Li, W., Li, K., et al. (2012). Decision Support for Urban Shelter Locations Based on Covering Model. Procedia Engineering, 43, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.011

Xia, J. (2006). In the research on the planning and design of urban prevention park. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 77–90.

Zengin Çelik, H. (2019). Evaluation of Different Urban Textures in Terms of Gathering Area Possibility: ISM (Turkish).. Çukurova Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(9), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.18560/cukurova.1138

Zengin Çelik, H., Özcan, N. S., Erdin, E. H. (2017). Criteria determining the availability of public assembly areas in disasters and emergencies (Turkish). Uluslararası Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, 11–13 Ekim 2017, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, Türkiye.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.3917

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yasin Bektaş, Gamze Doğan

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.