In the current competitive global marketplace, innovation is key for high-tech firms to thrive. Open innovation offers a promising approach, but its effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, this research explored the connection between open innovation, knowledge management capability, and innovation performance within high-tech firms. We used a mediation approach to highlight the central role of knowledge management capability in the relationship between open innovation and innovation performance. We used a survey questionnaire approach to collect data from the 462 employees of high-tech firms on open innovation, knowledge management capability, and innovation performance using a convenient sampling technique. We used partial least square structural equations modeling through PLS-SEM statistics. Results indicated that open innovation has a direct, positive and significant connection with innovation performance. Similarly, the current research serves as a pioneering exploration into mediation analysis, highlighting the mediating role of knowledge management capability that influences the relationship between open innovation and innovation performance. Empirical studies offer valuable insights for leaders of high-tech firms, guiding them to identify effective knowledge management practices and determine the ideal extent of open innovation to boost innovation performance. The current study reveals novel insights into the benefits of knowledge management capability in enhancing open innovation efforts within firms. This research provides valuable implications and future research directions.

1. Abbas, J., & Khan, S. M. (2022). Green knowledge management and organizational green culture: an interaction for organizational green innovation and green performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1852–1870. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2022-0156
2. Akram, M., Goraya, M., Malik, A., et al. (2018). Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities. Sustainability, 10(10), 3816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103816
3. Anand, V., Glick, W. H., & Manz, C. C. (2002). Thriving on the knowledge of outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640198
4. Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge‐intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179343
5. Bagherzadeh, M., Markovic, S., Cheng, J., et al. (2019). How Does Outside-In Open Innovation Influence Innovation Performance? Analyzing the Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Strategy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2018.2889538
6. Bashir, M., Alfalih, A., & Pradhan, S. (2022). Sustainable business model innovation: Scale development, validation and proof of performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100243
7. Bock, A. J., Opsahl, T., George, G., et al. (2011). The Effects of Culture and Structure on Strategic Flexibility during Business Model Innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 49(2), 279–305. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01030.x
8. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., et al. (2019). Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619885150
9. Borodako, K., Berbeka, J., Rudnicki, M., et al. (2023). The impact of innovation orientation and knowledge management on business services performance moderated by technological readiness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2022-0523
10. Carrasco-Carvajal, O., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2023). Impact of innovation strategy, absorptive capacity, and open innovation on SME performance: A Chilean case study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100065
11. Che, Z., Wu, C., Qu, W., et al. (2023). How does multidimensional interaction of knowledge transfer affects digital innovation capability? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2261892
12. Chen, C.-J., & Huang, J.-W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.016
13. Chen, H., & Taylor, R. (2009). Exploring the impact of lean management on innovation capability. PICMET ‘09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2009.5262042
14. Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2016). Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.07.002
15. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The Logic of Open Innovation. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301
16. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation. Open Innovation, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199290727.003.0001
17. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
18. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press.
19. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
20. Díaz-Díaz, N. L., & de Saá Pérez, P. (2014). The interaction between external and internal knowledge sources: an open innovation view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2013-0257
21. Ehls, D., Polier, S., & Herstatt, C. (2020). Reviewing the Field of External Knowledge Search for Innovation: Theoretical Underpinnings and Future (Re‐)search Directions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(5), 405–430. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12549
22. Feng, L., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2022). The Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation Performance from Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Moderating the Role of Environmental Dynamism. Sustainability, 14(8), 4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084577
23. Ferreira, J., Mueller, J., & Papa, A. (2018). Strategic knowledge management: Theory, practice and future challenges. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2018-0461
24. Francis, D., & Bessant, J. (2005). Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation, 25(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.004
25. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
26. González-Mohíno, M., Donate, M. J., Guadamillas, F., et al. (2024). Knowledge-oriented leadership for improved coordination as a solution to relationship conflict: effects on innovation capabilities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2306338
27. Guo, H., Wang, C., Su, Z., et al. (2020). Technology Push or Market Pull? Strategic Orientation in Business Model Design and Digital Start‐up Performance*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 352–372. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12526
28. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., et al. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
29. Huang, F., Rice, J., & Martin, N. (2015). Does open innovation apply to China? Exploring the contingent role of external knowledge sources and internal absorptive capacity in Chinese large firms and SMEs. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(5), 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.79
30. Hung, C., Zhou, Y., Pinkner, J. S., et al. (2013). Escherichia coli biofilms have an organized and complex extracellular matrix structure. MBio, 4(5).
31. Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen, P. (2011). Enabling collaborative innovation – knowledge protection for knowledge sharing. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111148816
32. Hwang, B.-N., Lai, Y.-P., & Wang, C. (2021). Open innovation and organizational ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-06-2021-0303
33. Idrees, H., Hynek, J., Xu, J., et al. (2022). Impact of knowledge management capabilities on new product development performance through mediating role of organizational agility and moderating role of business model innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950054
34. Inauen, M., & Schenker‐Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934
35. Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Asghar, A., et al. (2022). Impact of entrepreneurial curriculum on entrepreneurial competencies among students: The mediating role of the campus learning environment in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950440
36. Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Ashraf, M. A., et al. (2022). Social Media Networking Sites Usage and Depression Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Roles of Social Anxiety and Loneliness. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 205630512211076. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221107633
37. Iqbal, S., Rasheed, M., Khan, H., et al. (2021). Human resource practices and organizational innovation capability: role of knowledge management. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(5), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-02-2020-0033
38. Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310492967
39. Kuo, S.-Y. (2023). Improving innovation performance through learning capability and adaptive capability: The moderating role of big data analytics. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2212182
40. Lai, Y.-L., Hsu, M.-S., Lin, F.-J., et al. (2014). The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.036
41. Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., et al. (2021). The Relation among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Management, and Innovation Capability: Its Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066
42. Lee, L., & Wong, P. K. (2009). Firms’ innovative performance: The mediating role of innovative collaborations.
43. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A Capability‐Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x
44. Lin, H. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
45. Lopes, C. M., Scavarda, A., Hofmeister, L. F., et al. (2017). An analysis of the interplay between organizational sustainability, knowledge management, and open innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.083
46. Lu, C., Qi, Y., & Hao, S. (2023). Enhancing innovation performance of SMEs through open innovation and absorptive capacity: the moderating effect of business model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2177827
47. Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., et al. (2016). Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks.
48. Ma, S., Li, D., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). How does IT capability affect knowledge acquisition in the presence of a dominant supplier? Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2090–2112. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2022-0525
49. McCann, J. E., & Buckner, M. (2004). Strategically integrating knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410523907
50. Mo, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, C., et al. (2024). Influences of industrial internet platform firms’ ESG performance and digital leadership on user firms’ innovation performance: The mediating role of inter-firm trust. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2024.01.002
51. Mokhtar, S. S. M., & Don, M. S. (2014). How innovation capability can be a mediate between knowledge management and innovation performance? International Business Management, 8(2), 118-125.
52. Munawar, S., Yousaf, D. H. Q., Ahmed, M., et al. (2022). Effects of green human resource management on green innovation through green human capital, environmental knowledge, and managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.06.009
53. Mura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., et al. (2013). Promoting professionals’ innovative behaviour through knowledge sharing: the moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2013-0105
54. Murunga, V. I., Oronje, R. N., Bates, I., et al. (2020). Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0524-0
55. Ovuakporie, O. D., Pillai, K. G., Wang, C., et al. (2021). Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance. Research Policy, 50(1), 104146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104146
56. Owiyo, V., Mulwa, J. M., & Thuo, J. K. (2023). Mediating Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on the Relationship between Strategic Firm Resources and Competitiveness of MICE Destinations. East Africa Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(2), 1-15.
57. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2012.00354.x
58. Paroutis, S., & Al Saleh, A. (2009). Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910971824
59. Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
60. Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., et al. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.034
61. Schäper, T., Jung, C., Foege, J. N., et al. (2023). The S-shaped relationship between open innovation and financial performance: A longitudinal perspective using a novel text-based measure. Research Policy, 52(6), 104764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104764
62. Seidler‐de Alwis, R., & Hartmann, E. (2008). The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852449
63. Simba, A., Tajeddin, M., Farashahi, M., et al. (2024). Internationalising high–tech SMEs: Advancing a new perspective of open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123145
64. Srisathan, W. A., Ketkaew, C., & Naruetharadhol, P. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of open innovation implementation strategies in the promotion of ambidextrous innovation in Thai small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100418
65. Tamirat, S., & Amentie, C. (2023). Advances in knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: A systematic review of foundations and determinants in recent literature. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2257866
66. Tanriverdi. (2005). Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148681
67. Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: the role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Elsevier.
68. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Emerging Technologies: Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/dwyqm
69. Tong, X., & Han, X. (2021). Knowledge network capability and organizational innovation: Network position transition and ambidextrous innovative behaviors as mediators. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10246
70. van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
71. Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. New fron-tiers in open innovation, 281, 287-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0015
72. Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2022). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Knowledge search and innovation performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Operations Management Research, 15(3–4), 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00279-3
73. Wang, N., Yin, J., Ma, Z., et al. (2022). The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530
74. Wang, X., & Xu, M. (2018). Examining the linkage among open innovation, customer knowledge management and radical innovation. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-04-2017-0108
75. Wang, X., Han, X., & Li, H. (2023). The impact of innovation openness on innovation performance of manufacturing corporates –Moderating effect based on knowledge reorganization. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103917
76. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
77. Wu, I.-L., & Hu, Y.-P. (2018). Open innovation based knowledge management implementation: a mediating role of knowledge management design. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1736–1756. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2016-0238
78. Wu, L., Sun, L., Chang, Q., et al. (2022). How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? A multiple case study based on resource integration perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122019
79. Wu, S., & Gao, H. (2022). How Internal IT Capability Affects Open Innovation Performance: From Dynamic Capability Perspective. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402110693. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211069389
80. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
81. Yan, W., Xiong, Y., Gu, A., et al. (2023). Digital technology and enterprise knowledge management: literature review and theoretical framework construction. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(4), 931–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2023.2197394
82. Zack, M., McKeen, J., & Singh, S. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997088
83. Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A., & Wilemon, D. (2004). Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge‐Sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 15–29. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00290.x
84. Zámborský, P., Ingršt, I., & Bhandari, K. R. (2023). Knowledge creation capability under different innovation-investment motives abroad: The knowledge-based view of international innovation management. Technovation, 127, 102829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102829
85. Zhang, H., Wang, X., & Akhtar, M. W. (2024). Digital transformation, supplier concentration, and CEO financial experience: Unveiling the dynamics of innovation performance in Chinese firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 140825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140825
86. Zhang, J., & Jiang, J. (2024). Investment deregulation and innovation performance of Chinese private firms. Journal of Financial Stability, 70, 101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101207
87. Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., Peng, X., et al. (2021). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2019-0244
88. Zhao, S., Sun, Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Research on open innovation performance: a review. Information Technology and Management, 17(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0231-7
89. Zhao, Y., & Fang, W. (2023). How does digital transformation affect green innovation performance? Evidence from China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2282077
90. Zhou, H., Yao, Y., & Chen, H. (2018). How does open innovation affect firms’ innovative performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(4), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-05-2017-0137
91. Zhou, X., & Yang, L. (2024). The mechanism of TMT network characteristics on enterprises’ open innovation: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 90, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.008
92. Zilber, T. B., Amis, J. M., & Mair, J. (2019). The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory. Emerald Publishing Limited.
93. Hsu, H.-Y., Liu, F.-H., Tsou, H.-T., et al. (2019). Openness of technology adoption, top management support and service innovation: a social innovation perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(3), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-03-2017-0068
94. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
95. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
96. Wang, C., & Hsu, M. K. (2010). The Relationships of Destination Image, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions: An Integrated Model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(8), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2010.527249
97. Kasl, S. V., & Jones, B. A. (2003). An epidemiological perspective on research design, measurement, and surveillance strategies. Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology., 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/10474-018
98. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007