This study aims to quantitatively analyze the equity of social service space in urban parks in China, in order to explore the equity issues faced by different social groups in accessing urban park services. The research background focuses on the importance of urban parks as social service spaces, particularly in improving residents’ quality of life and well-being. Through a comprehensive literature review, the study examines the social service functions of urban parks, the relationship between parks and social psychology, and the theoretical framework of equity. The study employs quantitative research methods, collects data on urban park usage and resident satisfaction, and defines relevant analysis variables. The data analysis section reveals the basic characteristics of park service space usage and resident well-being index through descriptive statistical methods. Subsequently, quantitative analysis is conducted to evaluate the current status of equity in urban park service space and explore the key factors influencing equity. The study reveals a significant correlation between social psychological factors, resident well-being index, and equity in park service space. Finally, the research conclusion emphasizes the importance of improving equity in social service space in urban parks and provides specific policy recommendations. At the same time, the study acknowledges its limitations and suggests future research directions. This study provides insights for urban planners and policymakers on how to enhance equity in urban park services and offers important strategic guidance for improving overall well-being of urban residents.

1. Cheng, L., & Xu, J. (2021). Benefit-sharing and residents’ subjective well-being in rural tourism: An asymmetric approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 21, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100631
2. Corburn, J., Curl, S., Arredondo, G., & Malagon, J. (2014). Health in all urban policy: city services through the prism of health. Journal of urban health, 91, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9886-3
3. Dai, W., Yuan, S., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1022666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666
4. Dat, L. T., Wu, H. C., Li, T. N., et al. (2024). The effects of landscape fascination on subjective well‐being and revisit intention: Evidence from agritourism destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(1), e2621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2621
5. Declet-Barreto, J., Knowlton, K., Jenerette, G. D., & Buyantuev, A. (2016). Effects of urban vegetation on mitigating exposure of vulnerable populations to excessive heat in Cleveland, Ohio. Weather, Climate, and Society, 8(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-15-0026.1
6. Guo, J. K., Qiu, Y. K., Bai, J. Y., & Wang, L. (2019). Spatial differentiation and equalization of medical service based on accessibility of urban public transport: A case study of Dalian. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 13(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/jhtrcq.0000682
7. Jiao, H., Li, C., Yu, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Urban public green space equity against the context of high-speed urbanization in Wuhan, central China. Sustainability, 12(22), 9394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229394
8. Jung, M., & Jung, T. (2020). Qualitative equity of neighborhood Parks in Daegu according to socioeconomic status. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 48(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2020.48.2.045
9. Lamb, C. (2022). Rural Social Differentiation in Early Classic Chunhuayum, Yucatan, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica, 33(1), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956536121000547
10. Li, J., Sun, S., & Li, J. (2021). The dawn of vulnerable groups: The inclusive reconstruction mode and strategies for urban villages in China. Habitat International, 110, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102347
11. Li, X., Ma, X., Hu, Z., & Li, S. (2021). Investigation of urban green space equity at the city level and relevant strategies for improving the provisioning in China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105144
12. Li, Z., Bai, X., Xu, Z., et al. (2023). The optimal spatial delineation method for the service level of urban park green space from the perspective of opportunity equity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(36), 85520–85533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28467-z
13. Liang, Z., Luo, H., & Hui, T. (2023). Moving for a good life: Tourism mobility and subjective well-being of Chinese retirement migrants. Tourism Geographies, 25(2-3), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2021.1990385
14. Liu, N., Andrew, N. E., Cadilhac, D. A., et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life among elderly individuals living alone in an urban area of Shaanxi Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(4), 0300060520913146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520913146
15. Málovics, G., Creţan, R., Méreiné Berki, B., & Tóth, J. (2018). Urban Roma, segregation and place attachment in Szeged, Hungary. Area, 51(1), 72–83. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12426
16. McCabe, S., Joldersma, T., & Li, C. (2010). Understanding the benefits of social tourism: Linking participation to subjective well‐being and quality of life. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(6), 761–773. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.791
17. Mehta, V., & Mahato, B. (2020). Designing urban parks for inclusion, equity, and diversity. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 14(4), 457–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1816563
18. Mereine Berki, B., Málovics, G., Tóth, J., & Creţan, R. (2017). The role of social capital and interpersonal relations in the alleviation of extreme poverty and spatial segregation of Romani people in Szeged. Journal of Urban & Regional Analysis, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.37043/jura.2017.9.1.2
19. Moore, G., Fardghassemi, S., & Joffe, H. (2023). Wellbeing in the city: Young adults' sense of loneliness and social connection in deprived urban neighbourhoods. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 5, 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2023.100172
20. Penco, L., Ivaldi, E., & Ciacci, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and well-being in European smart cities: a comparative perspective. The TQM Journal, 33(7), 318–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-04-2021-0097
21. Sadeghi, A. R., Ebadi, M., Shams, F., & Jangjoo, S. (2022). Human-built environment interactions: the relationship between subjective well-being and perceived neighborhood environment characteristics. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 21844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25414-9
22. Shamsuddin, S. (2020). Resilience resistance: The challenges and implications of urban resilience implementation. Cities, 103, 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
23. Su, M., & Cheng, D. (2023). The Practice Path of Social Work in Supporting the Construction of Harmonious and Beautiful Countryside. Journal of Social Science Humanities and Literature, 6(6), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2023.06(06).07
24. Vicerra, P. M. M. (2022). Mental stress and well-being among low-income older adults during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, 5(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.4103/shb.shb_110_22
25. Xu, T., & Liu, H. (2023). Reversing the question: does subjective well-being affect family tourism expenditure?. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(17), 2812–2828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2100746
26. Yang, J., Ma, X., Zhao, X., & Li, W. (2022). Spatiotemporal of the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912535
27. Yang, Y., He, R., Tian, G., et al. (2022). Equity Study on Urban Park Accessibility Based on Improved 2SFCA Method in Zhengzhou, China. Land, 11(11), 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112045
28. Yao, S. J., Ma, Q. S., Liu, C., et al. (2023). The relationship between physical exercise and subjective well-being among Chinese junior high school students: A chain mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1053252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053252
29. Yuzhen, Z., Jie, W., Yang, C., & Jianping, Y. (2021). An assessment of urban parks distribution from multiple dimensions at the community level: A case study of Beijing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106663
30. Zhang, J., & Xu, E. (2023). Investigating the spatial distribution of urban parks from the perspective of equity-efficiency: Evidence from Chengdu, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 86, 128019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128019
31. Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., Wen, T., & Yang, M. (2022). The impact of built environment on physical activity and subjective well-being of urban residents: A study of core cities in the Yangtze River Delta survey. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1050486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050486
32. Zhang, M., Chen, W., Cai, K., et al. (2019). Analysis of the spatial distribution characteristics of urban resilience and its influencing factors: a case study of 56 cities in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224442
33. Zhang, R., Sun, F., Shen, Y., et al. (2021). Accessibility of urban park benefits with different spatial coverage: Spatial and social inequity. Applied Geography, 135, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102555