The study of authoritarian leadership has undergone significant development, with researchers exploring its different dimensions and consequences. This leadership style, characterized by a top-down approach and centralized decision-making authority, has been extensively examined in psychology, organizational behavior, and management literature. Scholars have delved into the effects of authoritarian leadership on various aspects of organizations such as employee satisfaction, motivation levels, productivity rates, turnover rates, and team dynamics. The research landscape surrounding authoritarian leadership has witnessed a recent surge in interest as scholars strive to understand its intricate connections with different variables. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on authoritarian leadership, aiming to identify the key research areas, influential authors, prominent journals in the field, and citation patterns. To our knowledge, no bibliometric analysis on authoritarian leadership can be found in the Scopus database, highlighting the novelty of our research. Through a source-based examination of scholarly articles and their citations pertaining to authoritarian leadership, this analysis offers valuable insights into the current state of research in this domain. By focusing on publications from the past decade onwards, we aim to uncover trends and potential gaps within existing literature while also providing guidance for future research endeavors. Our research findings will provide valuable insights into the phenomenon of authoritarian leadership, contributing to a deeper understanding of its implications. By delving into this topic, we hope to pave the way for future studies and investigations in this field that can build upon our findings and expand knowledge even further.

1. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
2. Asim, M., Zhiying, L., Nadeem, M. A., et al. (2021). How Authoritarian Leadership Affects Employee’s Helping Behavior? The Mediating Role of Rumination and Moderating Role of Psychological Ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667348
3. Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Simon and Schuster.
4. Blakeman, K. (2018). Bibliometrics in a Digital Age: Help or Hindrance. Science Progress, 101(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018x15337564592469
5. Chen, X.-P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T.-J., et al. (2014). Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
6. Cheng, B., Chou, L., Wu, T., et al. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89–117. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2004.00137.x
7. Chiang, J. T.-J., Chen, X.-P., Liu, H., et al. (2021). We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance. Human Relations, 74(7), 1082–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720908649
8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., et al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
9. Du, J., Li, N. N., & Luo, Y. J. (2020). Authoritarian Leadership in Organizational Change and Employees’ Active Reactions: Have-to and Willing-to Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03076
10. Eissa, G., Lester, S. W., & Gupta, R. (2020). Interpersonal Deviance and Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Supervisor Negative Emotions and the Moderating Role of Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(3), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04130-x
11. Farahnak, L. R., Ehrhart, M. G., Torres, E. M., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Leader Attitudes on Subordinate Attitudes and Implementation Success. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818824529
12. Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2000). A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations. Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, 84–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511590_5
13. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
14. Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Impact of participative and authoritarian leadership on employee creativity: organizational citizenship behavior as a mediator. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 26(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-08-2022-0165
15. Harms, P. D., Wood, D., Landay, K., et al. (2018). Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.007
16. Huang, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). When Is Authoritarian Leadership Less Detrimental? The Role of Leader Capability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010707
17. Kirkpatick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274679
18. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates.” The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
19. Li, R., Chen, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, J. (2021). How Do Authoritarian Leadership and Abusive Supervision Jointly Thwart Follower Proactivity? A Social Control Perspective. Journal of Management, 47(4), 930–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319878261
20. Liu, Y., Fuller, B., Hester, K., & Chen, H. (2023). Authentic leadership and employees’ job performance: mediation effect of positive employee health. Journal of Management Analytics, 10(3), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2023.2219993
21. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
22. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
23. Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 841–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y
24. Shaw, M. E. (1955). A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041129
25. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
26. Wang, A.-C., Chiang, J. T.-J., Tsai, C.-Y., et al. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.001
27. Wang, H., & Guan, B. (2018). The Positive Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Power Distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00357
28. Yuker, H. E. (1955). Group atmosphere and memory. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046464
29. Zakaria, R., Ahmi, A., Ahmad, A. H., et al. (2021). Visualising and mapping a decade of literature on honey research: a bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Journal of Apicultural Research, 60(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1898789