Green credit policy and ESG performance for promoting sustainable economic system

Lifeng Chen, Wenwen Yu, Limin Qian

Article ID: 3392
Vol 8, Issue 4, 2024

VIEWS - 542 (Abstract) 362 (PDF)


Environmental, social and governance (ESG) goes beyond its function as a business to maximize profits for the shareholders to work for societal purposes. Meanwhile, the green credit policy in China is still in its infancy, and the impact of green loans on the efficiency of commercial banks is significantly different. In this context, this paper details the company’s performance in crucial aspects such as low-carbon operations, eco-friendly financial innovation, a sustainable economic system, data security and the development of organizational capabilities to provide a sustainable development paradigm for supply chain finance technology peers. Based on ESG portfolio, we found that adding ESG holdings to a company affects its compliance with delivery or environmental rules, and anode and cathode of ESG combined Dual Carbon (DC) are presented in terms of emission levels. Our further research indicates the implementation of Green Credit Guideline has a positive impact on ESG performance of both green and polluting firms in comparison with others. The result was fully supported by different methods and models including PSM-DID (Propensity Score Matching-Differences-in-Differences), QDID (Quantiles Differences-in-Differences), and Kernel approaches, which can provide more implications and references for policy makers. Investors, politicians, and other essential stakeholders perceive ESG as a strategy to protect enterprises from future risks.


green credit policy; ESG portfolio; sustainable economic system; dual carbon

Full Text:



Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., Roni, N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 2021, 8(1), 1900500.

Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models. Econometrica, 74(2), 431–497.

Chang, K., Cheng, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). The impacts of ESG performance and digital finance on corporate financing efficiency in China. Applied Economics Letters, 30(4), 516–523.

Chen, L., Khurram, M. U., Gao, Y., et al. (2023). ESG disclosure and technological innovation capabilities of the Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101974.

Chen, L.F., Wang, Y.W., & Jin, S.Y. (2022). How green credit guidelines policy affect the green innovation in China, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 21(3), 469-481.

Chen, S., & Liu, N. (2022). Research on Citizen Participation in Government Ecological Environment Governance Based on the Research Perspective of “Dual Carbon Target.” Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022, 1–11.

Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2022). Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, 132061.

Czech, R., & Roberts-Sklar, M. (2017). Investor behaviour and reaching for yield: Evidence from the sterling corporate bond market. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 28(5), 347–379. Portico.

De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe. Sustainability, 12(13), 5317.

Dessau, R. B., van Dam, A. P., Fingerle, V., et al. (2018). To test or not to test? Laboratory support for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a position paper of ESGBOR, the ESCMID study group for Lyme borreliosis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 24(2), 118–124.

Di Tullio, P., Valentinetti, D., Nielsen, C., & Rea, M. A. (2019). In search of legitimacy: a semiotic analysis of business model disclosure practices. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5), 863–887.

Dimic, N., Orlov, V., & Äijö, J. (2019). Bond–Equity Yield Ratio Market Timing in Emerging Markets. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 18(1), 52–79.

Esgandari, M., Barzinjy, A. A., Rostami, A., et al. (2022). Solar cells efficiency enhancement using multilevel selective energy contacts (SECs). Optical and Quantum Electronics, 54(2).

Fuss, M., Vergara-Araya, M., Barros, R. T. V., & Poganietz, W. R. (2020). Implementing mechanical biological treatment in an emerging waste management system predominated by waste pickers: A Brazilian case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105031.

Gallas, H., Mseddi, A., Ballois, S., et al. (2020). Modeling and Control of 1.5 MW HESG-Based Wind Conversion System: Advanced Aerodynamic Modeling. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 22(2), 119–128.

Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272. Portico.

Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. (2002). Being Good Versus Looking Good: Business School Rankings and the Circean Transformation from Substance to Image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 107–120.

Guilhot, L. (2022). An analysis of China’s energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system. Energy Policy, 162, 112806.

Hassan, N., Zakaria, Z., Hisham Ahmad, B., et al. (2018). Number of Iteration Analysis for Complex FSS Shape Using GA for Efficient ESG. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 7(4), 505–513.

Hsu, A., Yeo, Z. Y., & Weinfurter, A. (2020). Emerging digital environmental governance in China: the case of black and smelly waters in China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(1), 14–31.

Jin, S., Gao, Y., & Xiao, S. (Simon). (2021). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance in the Tourism Industry in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study of Chinese Listed Companies in China. Sustainability, 13(21), 11722.

Kang, Y., Zhang, F., Gao, S., et al. (2020). A review of urban physical environment sensing using street view imagery in public health studies. Annals of GIS, 26(3), 261–275.

Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2020). The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1317–1330. Portico.

Lagasio, V., & Cucari, N. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701-711. Portico.

Latorre, M. C., Yonezawa, H., & Zhou, J. (2018). A general equilibrium analysis of FDI growth in Chinese services sectors. China Economic Review, 47, 172–188.

Lee, H., Campbell, N., & Lee, J. (2018). Direct observation of a two-dimensional hole gas at oxide interfaces. Nature Materials, 17(3), 231-236.

Lee, J. W. (2020). Green finance and sustainable development goals: The case of China. Lee, Jung Wan (2020). Green Finance and Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of China. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7(7), 577-586.

Lee, S. P., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices and Performance in Shariah Firms: Agency or Stakeholder Theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(1), 1–34.

Lehner, M. S., & Mizubuti, E. S. G. (2017). Are Sclerotinia sclerotiorum populations from the tropics more variable than those from subtropical and temperate zones? Tropical Plant Pathology, 42(2), 61–69.

Li, W., Yi, P., Zhang, D., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Assessment of coordinated development between social economy and ecological environment: Case study of resource-based cities in Northeastern China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102208.

Liu, Y., Zhu, J., Li, E. Y., et al. (2020). Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119993.

Lokuwaduge, C., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. Portico.

Menounos, G., Alexiou, C., & Vogiazas, S. (2019). Investigating the relationship between high‐yield bonds and equities and its implications for strategic asset allocation during the Great Recession. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(3), 1193–1209. Portico.

Naimy, V., El Khoury, R., & Iskandar, S. (2021). ESG Versus Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from East Asian Firms in the Industrials Sector. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(3).

Niu, Z., Huang, Z., Wang, S., et al. (2022). Characteristics and source apportionment of particulate carbon in precipitation based on dual-carbon isotopes (13C and 14C) in Xi’an, China. Environmental Pollution, 299, 118908.

Ochi, N. (2021). Comprehensive research on corporate disclosure theory. Impact, 2021(2), 65–67.

Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar‐Diez, E. (2017). Is Corporate Reputation Associated with Quality of CSR Reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121–132. Portico.

Oh, S. K. (2021). Study on Ways to Improve the Disclosure System of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Information. Northeast Asian Law Journal, 14(3), 101–143.

Ouni, Z., Ben Mansour, J., & Arfaoui, S. (2020). Board/Executive Gender Diversity and Firm Financial Performance in Canada: The Mediating Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Orientation. Sustainability, 12(20), 8386.

Sergeant, E., Happold, J., & Langstaff, I. (2017). Evaluation of Australian surveillance for freedom from bovine tuberculosis. Australian Veterinary Journal, 95(12), 474–479. Portico.

Serwecińska, L. (2020). Antimicrobials and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: A Risk to the Environment and to Public Health. Water, 12(12), 3313.

Shao, Z., Ding, L., Li, D., et al. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Urbanization and Ecological Environment Using Remote Sensing Images and Statistical Data: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Sustainability, 12(14), 5620.

Song, L., Lieu, J., Nikas, A., et al. (2020). Contested energy futures, conflicted rewards? Examining low-carbon transition risks and governance dynamics in China’s built environment. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101306.

Song, Q., Qin, M., Wang, R., & Qi, Y. (2020). How does the nested structure affect policy innovation?: Empirical research on China’s low carbon pilot cities. Energy Policy, 144, 111695.

Su, C., Cui, Y., Liu, D., et al. (2020). Endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the aquatic environment of China: Which chemicals are the prioritized ones? Science of The Total Environment, 720, 137652.

Villa, J. M. (2016). Diff: Simplifying the Estimation of Difference-in-differences Treatment Effects. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 16(1), 52–71.

Wang, H., Chen, Z., Wu, X., & Nie, X. (2019). Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? —Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energy Policy, 129, 930–938.

Wang, J., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. M. (2020). How to balance China’s sustainable development goals through industrial restructuring: a multi-regional input–output optimization of the employment–energy–water–emissions nexus. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 034018.

Wu, D., Zhang, D., Liu, S., et al. (2020). Prediction of polycarbonate degradation in natural atmospheric environment of China based on BP-ANN model with screened environmental factors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 399, 125878.

Wu, H., Li, Y., Hao, Y., et al. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 708, 135085.

Wu, W., Zhang, M., & Ding, Y. (2020). Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2.5 concentration: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110703.

Xiang, X., Liu, C., Yang, M., & Zhao, X. (2020). Confession or justification: The effects of environmental disclosure on corporate green innovation in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2735–2750. Portico.

Xu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121574.

Yang, M., & Shaqfeh, E. S. G. (2018). Mechanism of shear thickening in suspensions of rigid spheres in Boger fluids. Part II: Suspensions at finite concentration. Journal of Rheology, 62(6), 1379–1396.

Yuan, X., Li, Z., Xu, J., & Shang, L. (2022). ESG disclosure and corporate financial irregularities – Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129992.

Zhang, J., Zhang, K., & Zhao, F. (2020). Research on the regional spatial effects of green development and environmental governance in China based on a spatial autocorrelation model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55, 1–11.

Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Qu, L. (2021). Do green policies catalyze green investment? Evidence from ESG investing developments in China. Economics Letters, 207, 110028.

Zhang, Z., & Lis, M. (2020). Modeling Green Energy Development Based on Sustainable Economic Growth in China. Sustainability, 12(4), 1368.

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., et al. (2018). ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Power Generation Companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607.

Zhuravlev, V. F., Landau, B. E., & Plotnikov, P. K. (2019). An ESG-based Sensor for Measuring Three Angles of a Moving Object Rotation: Some Issues of the Theory and Mathematical Simulation of its Operation. Gyroscopy and Navigation, 10(4), 268–274.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Lifeng Chen, Wenwen Yu, Limin Qian

License URL:

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.