The young Muslim generation’s embracing digital platforms for Zakat payments represents a dynamic fusion of enduring religious values with the modern digital landscape, heralding a new era in Islamic charitable practices. This trend illustrates a profound transformation within the Islamic world, where the pillars of faith are being reimagined and revitalized through the lens of technological advancement. The present study delved into the factors influencing the young Muslim generation’s preference for digital platforms in Zakat transactions across Indonesia and Malaysia. We examined variables such as Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Trust, Zakat Literacy, and Digital Infrastructure, aiming to discern their impact on the propensity for digital Zakat contributions with the extension of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The research encompassed a diverse sample of 382 participants and utilized advanced methodologies, specifically Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and PLS Multi Group Analysis (PLS-MGA), for rigorous data analysis. The results indicated that Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Digital Infrastructure, and Zakat Literacy notably influenced the use of digital platforms for Zakat. Furthermore, PLS-MGA uncovered significant cross-country differences where Digital Infrastructure showed a more pronounced positive impact in Malaysian context, whereas Social Influence had a greater effect in Indonesia. These findings offer critical insights into the young Muslim community’s digital engagement for religious financial obligations, underscoring the need for tailored digital Zakat solutions that cater to the unique preferences of this demographic. This research not only enriches the understanding of digital adoption in religious practices but also challenges the notion of a universal approach, advocating for context-specific strategies in the realm of digital religious financial services. Future researchers are suggested to consider longitudinal investigations as well as examining cross-regional contexts in this realm of research.

1. Al Athar, M. D., Al Arif, M. N. R. (2021). The Intention of Millennial Generation in Paying Zakat through Digital Payments. International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (IJIBEC), 5(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.28918/ijibec.v5i1.3675
2. Al-Bawwab, R. A. (2023). Zakat: changing the framework of giving. Islamic Economic Studies, 30(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-08-2021-0026
3. Al-Jauziyyah, I. Q. (2004). The Key to Happiness (Indonesian), 1st ed. Akbar Media Eka Sarana.
4. Al-Saedi, K., Al-Emran, M., Ramayah, T., et al. (2020). Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption. Technology in Society, 62, 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293
5. Alam, A. (2018). Permasalahan dan solusi pengelolaan zakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 9(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v9i2.1533
6. Anam, K. (2021). Technology Equality is the Key to National Awakening. CNBC Indonesia (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20211214145048-37-299179/pemerataan-teknologi-jadi-kunci-kebangkitan-nasional (accessed on 28 April 2023).
7. Annur, C. M. (2023). This is the number of Muslim population in the ASEAN region, Indonesia is the largest. Databoks (Indonesian). Avaialble online: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/03/28/ini-jumlah-populasi-muslim-di-kawasan-asean-indonesia-terbanyak#:~:text=Malaysia menempati peringkat kedua negara,dari total populasi Negeri Jiran (accessed on 4 March 2023).
8. Atsarina, A. (2018). Analysis of the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance in Zakat Management Organizations (Case Study at the National Amil Zakat Agency and Dompet Dhuafa) (Indonesian). Jurnal Menara Ekonomi: Penelitian Dan Kajian Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi, 4(2).
9. Aysan, A. F., Unal, I. M. (2023). Challenges in Islamic Fintech and Digitalization: An Extensive Literature Review. World Scientific Annual Review of Islamic Finance, 01, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2811023423500028
10. Azzam. (2022). Fund Receipt Report Infak.ID (Indonesian). Rumah Zakat.
11. Barata, A. (2019). Strengthening national economic growth and equitable income through sharia digital economy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(1), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i1.1053
12. Barns, S., Cosgrave, E., Acuto, M., et al. (2016). Digital Infrastructures and Urban Governance. Urban Policy and Research, 35(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2016.1235032
13. BAZNAS. (2021a). Zakat. Available online: https://baznas.go.id/zakat (accessed on 18 March 2023).
14. BAZNAS. (2021b). Zakat Penghasilan. Available online: https://baznas.go.id/zakatpenghasilan (accessed on 18 Mar 2023).
15. Beik, I. S., Swandaru, R., Rizkiningsih, P. (2021). Utilization of Digital Technology for Zakat Development. Islamic FinTech, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45827-0_13
16. Berakon, I., Wibowo, M. G., Nurdany, A., et al. (2021). An expansion of the technology acceptance model applied to the halal tourism sector. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(1), 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2021-0064
17. Bonang, D., Baihaqi, M. (2022). The effect of trust, brand awareness, and social piety in donation decisions through digital platforms. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 23(2), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v23i2.17596
18. Brockhaus, J., Buhmann, A., Zerfass, A. (2022). Digitalization in corporate communications: Understanding the emergence and consequences of CommTech and digital infrastructure. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-03-2022-0035
19. Cahyani, U. E., Sari, D. P., Afandi, A. (2022). Determinant of Behavioral Intention to Use Digital Zakat Payment: The Moderating Role of Knowledge of Zakat. Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i1.13330
20. Canggih, C., Indrarini, R. (2021). Does Literacy Affect Zakat Revenue? (Indonesian). JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia), 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21927/jesi.2021.11(1).1–11
21. Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/4adffb24-en
22. Datareportal. (2023). Digital 2023: Global Overview Report. Available online: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report (accessed on 7 July 2023).
23. Dayan, M. T. (2020). The Effect of Consumer Perceptions, Lifestyle and Trust on the Use of Digital Payment Applications (Indonesian). Jurnal Transaksi, 12(1).
24. Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1–7.
25. Suryani, S. (2020). Zakat Management Paradigm: Comparison of Indonesia, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. INFERENSI: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 14(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v14i2.267-282
26. Fedorko, I., Bačik, R., & Gavurova, B. (2021). Effort expectancy and social influence factors as main determinants of performance expectancy using electronic banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.03
27. Ferdana, A. D., Ridlwan, A. A., Canggih, C., et al. (2022). Z Generation’s Intention to Use Zakat Digital Payment: The Mediating Effect of Trust. Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 9(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i2.18466
28. Firdaus, F. A., Zaki, I., & Herianingrum, S. (2023). The role of generation z through online platform in optimizing of Zakat literacy and fundraising. AZKA International Journal of Zakat & Social Finance, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.51377/azjaf.vol4no1.118
29. Friemel, T. N. (2014). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
30. Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66–70.
31. Ghalandari, K. (2012). The effect of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on acceptance of e-banking services in Iran: The moderating role of age and gender. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(6), 801–807.
32. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., et al. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
33. Handayani, M., Rianto, M. R. (2021). The Effect of Financial Knowledge, Income and Social influence on Interest in Using Digital Payment Applications on Islamic Millennials in Bekasi City (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(3), 1858–1865.
34. Hernowo Anggie. (2023). Influencer promotions are starting to be distrusted by young consumers, they are considered to be starting to lose influence (Indonesian). Liputan6. Available online: https://www.liputan6.com/showbiz/read/5292581/promosi-influencer-mulai-tak-dipercaya-konsumen-muda-dinilai-mulai-kehilangan-pengaruh?page=2 (accessed on 14 July 2023).
35. Htay, S. N. N., Salman, S. A. (2014). Proposed best practices of financial information disclosure for zakat institutions: A case study of Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30(30), 288–294. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.37
36. Huda, N. (2014). Solution of zakat problem in Indonesia with modification action research. Human Falah: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 1(1), 40–62.
37. Hussain, Z., Sultan, R., Asadullah, A., et al. (2022). The Impact of Zakat Literacy, Trust, and the Accessibility of Digital Payments on Generation Z and Y’s Intention to Pay Zakat to Central Zakat Fund, the State Bank of Pakistan. International Journal of Zakat, 7(2), 105–114.
38. Indah, M., Agustin, H. (2019). Application of the Utaut Model (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) to Understand the Intention and Actual Behavior of Go-Pay Users in Padang City (Indonesian). Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(4), 1949–1967. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i4.188
39. Irawan, D., Puspitasari, A. A., Astuti, S. W. W., et al. (2022). Perceptions of Security, Trust, and Corporate Accountability on the Intention to Donate Through Fintech Crowdfunding (Indonesian). ISOQUANT : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 6(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.24269/iso.v6i1.1035
40. Jamaludin, N., Abd Wahab, N., Hamed, A. B. (2017). Muslim perception on online zakat usage in Kuala Lumpur. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 55–71.
41. Jiménez-Castillo, D., Sánchez-Fernández, R. (2019). The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.009
42. Ghobakhloo, M., Asadi, S., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2023). Intelligent automation implementation and corporate sustainability performance: The enabling role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Technology in Society, 74, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102301
43. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarik, M. S., et al. (2024). Blockchain technology as an enabler for sustainable business ecosystems: A comprehensive roadmap for socioenvironmental and economic sustainability. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.319
44. Kasri, R. A., Yuniar, A. M. (2021). Determinants of digital zakat payments: lessons from Indonesian experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-08-2020-0258
45. Khairrani, A., Nikensari, S. I., Iranto, D. (2022). Factors that influence social–economic motives through the decision of zakat to use digital services (case study of laz al azhar). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 1(6), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v1i6.63
46. Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta‐analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 33(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1381
47. Knoll, L. J., Magis-Weinberg, L., Speekenbrink, M., Blakemore, S. J. (2015). Social Influence on Risk Perception During Adolescence. Psychological Science, 26(5), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569578
48. Kusi-Sarpong, S., Mubarik, M. S., Khan, S. A., et al. (2022). Intellectual capital, blockchain-driven supply chain and sustainable production: Role of supply chain mapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121331
49. Latonero, M., Kift, P. (2018). On Digital Passages and Borders: Refugees and the New Infrastructure for Movement and Control. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876443. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764432
50. Leong, T. K., Chiek, A. N., Lim, C. W. (2021). A modified utaut in the context of M-payment usage intention in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.5(1)05
51. Lesmana, R. A., Ashfath, F. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy on Interest in Using the Jago Application Owned by PT. Bank Jago Tbk (Indonesian). Seminar Nasional Akuntansi Dan Manajemen PNJ.
52. Li, Y. Z., He, T. L., Song, Y. R., et al. (2017). Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in China: A UTAUT-based model. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1282530
53. Limilia, P., Gelgel, R. A., Rahmiaji, L. R. (2022). Digital Literacy Among Z Generation in Indonesia. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2022.01.02.1
54. Mahad, M., Mohtar, S., Othman, A. A. (2015). Disposition to Trust, Interpersonal Trust and Institutional Trust of Mobile Banking in Malaysia. Journal of Management Info, 2(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v8i1.45
55. Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: An empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6629–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8
56. Mangini, E. R., Silva, N. G., de Carvalho, J. R. C. (2020). Virtual banks and the evaluation of perceived risk and expectations of performance and effort in behavioral intention (Portuguese). Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 19(4), 838–861. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v19i4.16283
57. Ahmad, W. M. W., Sapir, A. S. B. M. (2020). Zakat on Banking Deposits Among Urbanite Malaysian Muslims. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 2(1), 97–104.
58. Maulida, S., Amruzi, F. A., Hakim, B. R., Beik, I. S. (2022). Problems and solutions in zakat digitalization: Evidence from South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art7
59. Mazlan, M. F., Shahimi, S. (2022). The influence of religious obligation and zakat literacy on the trend of continuous payment of zakat on savings through Islamic banking (Indonesian). The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 136–154. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v19i2.468
60. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., et al. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.4(2)01
61. Mubarak, M. F., Petraite, M. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120332
62. Mubarak, M. F., Shaikh, F. A., Mubarik, M., et al. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on business performance: A study of Pakistani SMEs. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 9(6), 5056–5061. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3201
63. MYEG. (2023). Types of Zakat in Malaysia that You Need to Know. Available online: https://www.myeg.com.my/articles/detail/types-of-zakat-in-malaysia (accessed on 22 March 2023).
64. Nasir, M. (2013). Evaluation of student information technology acceptance in Palembang using the UTAUT model (Indonesian). Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI).
65. Nasution, E. Y. (2017). The Effect of Education, Income and Awareness on Public Interest in Paying Zakat at the National Amil Zakat Agency (BAZNAS): Case Study of Medan City (Indonesian). Ekonomikawan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 17(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.30596/ekonomikawan.v17i2.1797
66. Nikou, S., Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital Technology in Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10451-0
67. Nilawati, N., Rijal, K. (2020). The Potential of Online and Offline Zakat Payments and the Realization of Indonesian Zakat Funds (Indonesian). I-Economics: A Research Journal on Islamic Economics, 5(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.19109/ieconomics.v5i2.3535
68. Nurhadi, N. (2019). The Importance of Maqashid Sharia as a Theory in Islamic Economic Business Operations. International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (IJIBEC), 3(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.28918/ijibec.v3i2.1635
69. Nurlita, E., Ekawaty, M. (2018). The effect of zakat on mustahik household consumption (study on zakat recipients from baznas probolinggo city) (Indonesian). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 3(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v3i2.6329
70. Nuryahya, E., Mahri, A. J. W., Nurasyiah, A. (2019). Influencing Factors of Muzaki Use and Receive Zakat Payment Platform. International Conference of Zakat, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2019.176
71. Øverby, H., Audestad, J. A. (2021). Introduction to Digital Economics. In Classroom Companion: Business. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78237-5
72. Paizin, M. N., Sarif, S. (2021). Strategies for Managing Zakat Citation Semasa: Optimumkah Kutipan Zakat Di Malaysia? (Indonesian). Jurnal Sains Insani.
73. Pangestu, M. G. (2022). Behavior Intention to Use QRIS Digital Payment Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model (Study on MSMEs in the Food & Beverage Industry Sector in Jambi City) (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan (JUMANAGE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33998/jumanage.2022.1.1.23
74. Panner, T., Lysander Manohar, H. (2021). How a doer persuade a donor? Investigating the moderating effects of behavioral biases in donor acceptance of donation crowdfunding. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-06-2019-0097
75. Parida, V. (2018). Digitalization. In: Ericson, E. J. F. Å. (editor). Addressing Societal Challenges. Luleå University of Technology. pp. 23–38.
76. Permana, T., & Puspitaningsih, A. (2021). Study of the Digital Economy in Indonesia (Indonesian). Jurnal Simki Economic, 4(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.29407/jse.v4i2.111
77. Pertiwi, I. S. M. (2020). The effect of income level, zakat literacy and trust on public interest in paying zakat to Baznas Lampung province (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 8(1), 1–9.
78. Pimentel, J. (2019). Some Biases in Likert Scaling Usage and its Correction. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 45, 183–191.
79. Purwanto, A. (2021). Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research.
80. Purwatiningsih, A. P. (2020). Why Do Indonesia Zakat Collection Not as Effective as Malaysia’s? HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 6(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v6i1.2100
81. Qardawi, Y. (2006). Zakat Law (Indonesian). Pustaka Litera AntarNusa.
82. Ramlee, S. F., Muchlis Gazali, H., Amboala, T. (2023). Factors influencing the intention to pay zakat online. I-Iecons E-Proceedings, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.33102/iiecons.v10i1.103
83. Rekabder, M., Miraz, M., Hasan, M. T., et al. (2021). Trust, transaction transparency, volatility, facilitating condition performance expectancy towards cryptocurrency adoption through intention to use. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences. 25(15): 1–20.
84. Rinaldi, A., Devi, Y. (2022). The Effect of Sharia Financial Literacy on Muzaki Trust in Zakat Management Institutions with Accountability and Transparency as Intervening Variables (Study on Muslim Communities in Lampung Province) (Indonesian). Al-Mal: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Islam, 3(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.24042/al-mal.v3i1.11428
85. Rosana, F. C. (2022). Baznas: Zakat Potential in Indonesia Reaches Rp 327 Trillion (Indonesian). Tempo.Co.
86. Saad, A. Y. Q., Al Foori, A. M. (2020). Zakat and tax: A comparative study in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(12), 140–151.
87. Saad, R. A. J., Farouk, A. U., Abdul Kadir, D. (2020). Business zakat compliance behavioral intention in a developing country. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(2), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-03-2018-0036
88. Saal, M., Starnes, S., Rehermann, T. (2017). Digital Financial Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Market Banks. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/30368
89. Sabiq, S. (2009). Fikih Sunnah (Sunnah Jurisprudence, Indonesian). Cakrawala Publishing.
90. Sahayaselvi, S. (2017). An overview on digital payments. International Journal of Research, 4, 2101–2111.
91. Salimudin, M., Sidik, M. F., Putra, R. H., et al. (2022). Fiqh rules of Sharia Economics (Indonesian). Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Persis Bandung.
92. Salsabila, N., Hasbi, I. (2021). The Influence of Brand Image and Trust on Online Donation Decisions on the Crowdfunding Platform Kitabisa. Com (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 5(2), 162–176.
93. Sareen, M., Jain, A. (2014). The Role of Social Influence and consumer’s effort expectancy on online shopping: An empirical study of India. International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy, 3(1), 138–158.
94. Sari, Y. P., Mayasari, M. (2022). Pengaruh Perceived of Risk, Enjoyment, Social Influence, Trust, Quality of Website, dan Online Advertisment Terhadap Perilaku Belanja Online Mahasiswa. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 7(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v7i1.3419
95. Siraj, A. S., Ibrahim, M. F., Mohd Dali, N. R. S. (2022). Conceptual framework: Determinant factors for paying zakat fitrah via FinTech. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 102–124. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v19i1.465
96. Soemitra, A., Nasution, J. (2021). The Influence of Zakat Literacy, Trust, and Ease of Digital Payments on Generation Z and Y Intention in Paying Zakat to Amil Zakat Organizations. Indonesian Conference of Zakat-Proceedings, 323–334.
97. Sofiyawati, N., Halimah, S. N. (2022). Muzakki's Behavior in Distributing Zakat in the Digital Era. Anida (Aktualisasi Nuansa Ilmu Dakwah), 22(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.15575/anida.v22i1.18479
98. Soleimani, M. (2021). Buyers’ trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: A synthesizing literature review. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 20(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0
99. Strusani, D., Houngbonon, G. V. (2020). What COVID-19 Means for Digital Infrastructure in Emerging Markets. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/34306
100. Suhaedi, W. G., Shin, J., Watanabe, W., et al. (2015). Session 2: Finance to SMEs through Banks, Capital Markets, and Other Financial Methods. Financial System Stability, Regulation, and Financial Inclusion, 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55254-3_4
101. Suprayitno, E. (2013). The Impact of Zakat on Aggregate Consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics , Banking and Finance, 9(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.12816/0001592
102. Taha, R., Adam, F., Ali, N. N. M., Ariff, A. M. (2017). Religiosity and Transparency in the Management of Zakat Institutions. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, 20(1), 1–9.
103. Tapscott, D. (1996). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
104. Tarantang, J., Awwaliyah, A., Astuti, M., et al. (2019). Development of Digital Payment Systems in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Indonesia (Indonesian). Jurnal Al-Qardh, 4(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v4i1.1442
105. Taslaud, G. (2023). Influencer Marketing in Malaysia in 2023—The Complete Guide. 414 Media Pte Ltd, DataReportal, AnyMind, Shopee, HypeAuditor, Sushivid.
106. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., et al. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
107. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
108. Verdianti, V., Puja, P. (2023). The Effect of the Use of Zakat Digitalization on the Effectiveness of Zakat Collection at Baznas Kalbar (Indonesian). AKTIVA: Journal of Accountancy and Management, 1(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.24260/aktiva.v1i1.992
109. Wadi, D. A., Nurzaman, M. S. (2020). Millennials Behaviour towards Digital Waqf Innovation. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.3232
110. Witten, D., James, G. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer Publication.
111. Yahaya, M. H., Ahmad, K. (2019). Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Financial Technology among Asnaf for the Distribution of Zakat in Selangor—A Study Using UTAUT. Journal of Islamic Finance, 8, 35–46.
112. Yuniar, A. M., Kasri, R. A. (2020). Zakat literacy and digital zakat payment: Evidence from Indonesia. Research on Firm Financial Performance and Consumer Behavior.
113. Zubaidah, S., Afifah, A. (2020). Development of Zakat Management Digitalization in Indonesia. International Conference of Zakat, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2020.227