Purpose: The level of the environment is gradually declining, especially with regard to the serious problem of solid waste. Solid waste segregation-at-source is seen as the most essential approach to helping the natural environment minimize the amount of waste generated before being transferred to waste disposal sites and landfills in many rapidly growing towns and cities in developing countries. However, a number of previous environmental-based research have focused only on the general scope of recycling, sustainable development, and the purchase intention for sustainable food products. This situation has led to useful and relevant information on the research scope of households’ intention to segregate solid waste at source, which remains largely unanswered. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to provide a literature review to develop a novel theoretical framework in understanding the determinants of households’ intention to practise solid waste segregation-at-source. Theoretical framework: The study provides a detailed explanation of the application of the Theory of Reasoned Action, the Fietkau-Kessel Model, the Focus Theory of Normative Conduct, and the Value-Basis Theory to predict the relationship between attitude, subjective norms, environmental concerns, and environmental knowledge of households on intention to practise solid waste segregation-at-source. Design/methodology/approach: This research is descriptive in nature. Findings: A better understanding of the potential mediator and moderator is needed to contribute to the body of knowledge on the causal relationship between the studied variables. In conclusion, the researchers discuss how the framework can be used to address future research implications as more evidence emerges. Research, practical and social implications: The current study is expected to broaden previous research in order to improve general understanding of attitudes and subjective norms towards the specific research scope of solid waste segregation-at-source.

1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin 82(2): 261–277. doi: 10.1037/h0076477
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Pearson.
3. Albarracin D, Shavitt S (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 69(1): 299–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
4. Alzahrani K, Hall-Phillips A, Zeng AZ (2018). Applying the theory of reasoned action to understanding consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles in Saudi Arabia. Transportation 46(1): 199–215. doi: 10.1007/s11116-017-9801-3
5. Anwar MR, Oganda FP, Santoso NPL, Fabio M (2022). Artificial Intelligence that Exists in the Human Mind. International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence 1(1): 28–42. doi: 10.33050/italic.v1i1.87
6. Arisal İ, Atalar T (2016). The exploring relationships between environmental concern, collectivism and ecological purchase intention. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 235: 514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.063
7. Arunrat N, Wang C, Pumijumnong N, et al. (2017). Farmers’ intention and decision to adapt to climate change: A case study in the Yom and Nan basins, Phichit province of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 672–685. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.058
8. Asch MJ (1951). Nondirective teaching in psychology: An experimental study. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 65(4): 1–24. doi: 10.1037/h0093595
9. Baawain MS, Mamun AA, Omidvarborna H, et al. (2019). Residents’ concerns and attitudes towards municipal solid waste management: Opportunities for improved management. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management 24(1): 93. doi: 10.1504/ijewm.2019.100663
10. Bissing-Olson MJ, Fielding KS, Iyer A (2016). Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive. Journal of Environmental Psychology 45: 145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.001
11. Bloemen-Bekx M, Lambrechts F, Van Gils A (2023). An exploration of the role of intuitive forms of planning in the succession process: the explanatory power of effectuation theory. Journal of Family Business Management 13(2): 486–502. doi: 10.1108/jfbm-07-2021-0066
12. Chaudhary AH, Polonsky MJ, McClaren N (2023). Social norms and littering—The role of personal responsibility and place attachment at a Pakistani beach. Global Environmental Change 82: 102725. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102725
13. Chen SC, Hung CW (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 112: 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.022
14. Cheng KW, Osman S (2019). The role of environmental education in waste segregation-at-source behaviour among households in Putrajaya. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics 22: 114–136.
15. Cheng KW, Osman S, Jusoh ZM, Lau JL (2019). Instrument development on measuring Malaysian households’ intention to practise solid waste segregation-at-source. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 8(5c): 1390–1400. doi: 10.35940/ijeat.e1198.0585c19
16. Cheng KW, Osman S, Jusoh ZM, Lau JL (2020). The determinants of intention to practise solid waste segregation-at-source among Selangor households. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics 25(S1): 67–90.
17. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(6): 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
18. Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In: Cialdini RB, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (editors). The Handbook of Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill.
19. Cislaghi B, Heise L (2020). Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health & Illness 42(2): 407–422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13008
20. Constantino SM, Sparkman G, Kraft-Todd GT, et al. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 23(2): 50–97. doi: 10.1177/15291006221105279
21. Demarque C, Charalambides L, Hilton DJ, Waroquier L (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 43: 166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008
22. Dembkowski S, Hanmer-Lloyd S (1994). The environmental value-attitude-system model: A framework to guide the understanding of environmentally-conscious consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management 10(7): 593–603. doi: 10.1080/0267257x.1994.9964307
23. Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3): 629–636. doi: 10.1037/h0046408
24. do Paco A, Shiel C, Alves H (2019). A new model for testing green consumer behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production 207: 998–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.105
25. Dorigoni A, Bonini N (2023). Water bottles or tap water? A descriptive-social-norm based intervention to increase a pro-environmental behavior in a restaurant. Journal of Environmental Psychology 86: 101971. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101971
26. du Toit J, Wagner C, Fletcher L (2017). Socio-spatial factors affecting household recycling in townhouses in Pretoria, South Africa. Sustainability 9(11): 2033. doi: 10.3390/su9112033
27. Economic Planning Unit (2015). Eleventh Malaysia Plan, 2016–2020: Anchoring Growth on People. Malaysian Prime Minister’s Department.
28. Elster J (1989). The Cement of Society: A Survey of Social Order. Cambridge University Press.
29. Eriksson K, Strimling P, Coultas JC (2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 129: 59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.011
30. Essiz O, Yurteri S, Mandrik C, Senyuz A (2023). Exploring the Value-Action gap in green consumption: Roles of risk aversion, subjective knowledge, and gender differences. Journal of Global Marketing 36(1): 67–92. doi: 10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376
31. Fietkau HJ, Kessel H (1981). Environmental Learning: Possibilities for Changing Environmental Awareness; Model Experiences (German). Koenigstein, Hain.
32. Haefner G, Schobin J (2019). A new climate externalities food knowledge test validated by item response theory and behavioural data prediction. PsyEcology 14(3): 297–337. doi: 10.1080/21711976.2023.2239046
33. Hamann KRS, Reese G, Seewald D, Loeschinger DC (2015). Affixing the theory of normative conduct (to your mailbox): Injunctive and descriptive norms as predictors of anti-ads sticker use. Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.003
34. Han H (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 29(7): 1021–1042. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019
35. Heinicke F, König-Kersting C, Schmidt R (2022). Injunctive vs. descriptive social norms and reference group dependence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 195:199–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.008
36. Helferich M, Thøgersen J, Bergquist M (2023). Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change 80: 102680. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680
37. Huang HL (2023). Challenges for contactless online food delivery services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: Moderating effects of perceived government response. Evaluation and Program Planning 97: 102249. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102249
38. Irvine PJ, Kravitz B, Lawrence MG, et al. (2017). Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering. Earth’s Future 5(1): 93–106. doi: 10.1002/2016ef000389
39. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
40. Karpudewan M (2019). The relationships between values, belief, personal norms, and climate conserving behaviors of Malaysian primary school students. Journal of Cleaner Production 237: 117748. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117748
41. Khan AN, Khan NA (2022). The nexuses between transformational leadership and employee green organisational citizenship behaviour: Role of environmental attitude and green dedication. Business Strategy and the Environment 31(3): 921–933. doi: 10.1002/bse.2926
42. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3): 239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
43. Kormos C, Gifford R, Brown E (2015). The influence of descriptive social norm information on sustainable transportation behavior: A field experiment. Environment and Behavior 47(5): 479–501. doi: 10.1177/0013916513520416
44. Kumar S, Gupta K, Kumar A, et al. (2023). Applying the theory of reasoned action to examine consumers’ attitude and willingness to purchase organic foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies 47(1): 118–135. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12812
45. Mahajan S, Gera R (2023). Determinant factors influencing green purchase intention of millennials in Delhi/NCR and green consumer needs. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 12(3): 402–422. doi: 10.1504/ijpspm.2023.133586
46. Mallick D, Tsang EPK, Lee JCK, Cheang CC (2023). Marine environmental knowledge and attitudes among university students in Hong Kong: An application of the ocean literacy framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(6): 4785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064785
47. Martins Gonçalves H, Viegas A (2015). Explaining consumer use of renewable energy: Determinants and gender and age moderator effects. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 25(3): 198–215. doi: 10.1080/21639159.2015.1041780
48. Masud MM, Al-Amin AQ, Junsheng H, et al. (2016). Climate change issue and theory of planned behaviour: Relationship by empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production 113: 613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.080
49. SWM Environment (2023). Separation At Source (SAS). Available online: https://kitarecycle.com/separation-at-source/ (accessed on 30 July 2023).
50. Mohan R, Kinslin D (2022). The theory of planned behaviour and examining consumer purchase behaviours of energy-efficient lighting products. International Journal of Professional Business Review 7(2): e0422. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i2.422
51. Mokhlis S, Nik Hussin NS, Nizam NZ, et al. (2022). Predicting Malaysian university students’ intent to pursue retailing career: Applicability of theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Professional Business Review 7(1): e0277. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.277
52. Nguyen QA, Hens L, MacAlister C, et al. (2018). Theory of reasoned action as a framework for communicating climate risk: A case study of schoolchildren in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Sustainability 10(6): 2019. doi: 10.3390/su10062019
53. Nguyen T, Nguyen H, Lobo A, Dao T (2017). Encouraging Vietnamese household recycling behavior: Insights and implications. Sustainability 9(2): 179. doi: 10.3390/su9020179
54. Nguyen TN, Lobo A, Greenland S (2017). The influence of Vietnamese consumers’ altruistic values on their purchase of energy efficient appliances. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 29(4): 759–777. doi: 10.1108/apjml-08-2016-0151
55. Nguyen TN, Lobo A, Nguyen HL, et al. (2016). Determinants influencing conservation behaviour: Perceptions of Vietnamese consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 15(6): 560–570. doi: 10.1002/cb.1594
56. Noe EE, Stolte O (2023). Dwelling in the city: A qualitative exploration of the human-nature relationship in three types of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning 230: 104633. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104633
57. Pan SL, Chou J, Morrison A, et al. (2018). Will the future be greener? The environmental behavioral intentions of university tourism students. Sustainability 10(3): 634. doi: 10.3390/su10030634
58. Pirmoradi AH, Rostami F, Papzan AH (2021). A critical review of sustainable pro-environmental behavior theories. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development 11(1): 117–135. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.335150
59. Qalati SA, Qureshi NA, Ostic D, Sulaiman MABA (2022). An extension of the theory of planned behavior to understand factors influencing Pakistani households’ energy-saving intentions and behavior: A mediated—Moderated model. Energy Efficiency 15(6): 40. doi: 10.1007/s12053-022-10050-z
60. Reese G, Loew K, Steffgen G (2014). A towel less: Social norms enhance pro-environmental behavior in hotels. The Journal of Social Psychology 154(2): 97–100. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.855623
61. Reinholdsson T, Hedesström M, Ejelöv E, et al. (2023). Nudging green food: The effects of a hedonic cue, menu position, a warm-glow cue, and a descriptive norm. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 22(3): 557–568. doi: 10.1002/cb.2129
62. Ribeiro MA, Seyfi S, Elhoushy S, et al. (2023). Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: The moderating role of green consumption values. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. doi :10.1080/09669582.2023.2230389
63. Rousta K, Bolton K, Dahlén L (2016). A procedure to transform recycling behavior for source separation of household waste. Recycling 1(1): 147–165. doi: 10.3390/recycling1010147
64. Santos JAC, Fernández-Gámez MÁ, Guevara-Plaza A, et al. (2023). The sustainable transformation of business events: Sociodemographic variables as determinants of attitudes towards sustainable academic conferences. International Journal of Event and Festival Management 14(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1108/ijefm-05-2022-0041
65. Schneider CR, van der Linden S (2023). Social norms as a powerful lever for motivating pro-climate actions. One Earth 6(4): 346–351. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.014
66. Schultz PW (2000). Empathising with nature: The effects of perspective taken on concerns for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 391–-406. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00174
67. Schultz PW, Shriver C, Tabanico JJ, Khazian AM (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(1): 31–42. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
68. Schultz PW, Zelezny L (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19(3): 255–265. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
69. Schwartz SH (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10(1): 221–279. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
70. Shahid MS, Hossain M, Shahid S, Anwar T (2023). Frugal innovation as a source of sustainable entrepreneurship to tackle social and environmental challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 406: 137050. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137050
71. Sherif M (1935). An experimental study of stereotypes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 29(4): 371–375. doi: 10.1037/h0060783
72. Stern PC, Dietz T (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50(3): 65–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
73. Stern PC, Kalof L, Dietz T, Guagnano GA (1995). Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(18): 1611–1636. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
74. Tarfaoui D, Zkim S (2015). Moroccan human ecological behavior: Grounded theory approach. Academic Research International 6(5): 9–20.
75. Tennant C, Neels C, Parkhurst G, et al. (2021). Code, culture, and concrete: Self-driving vehicles and the rules of the road. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3: 710478. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.710478
76. Tian H, Liu X (2022). Pro-environmental behavior research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(11): 6721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116721
77. Trang HLT, Lee JS, Han H (2019). How do green attributes elicit pro-environmental behaviours in guests? The case of green hotels in Vietnam. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 36(1): 14–28. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1486782
78. Tsaur SH, Yen HH (2023). Leisure crafting and pro-environmental behavior: the potential mediating role of engagement. Leisure Sciences. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2023.2253232
79. Udawatta N, Zuo J, Chiveralls K, Zillante G (2015). Attitudinal and behavioural approaches to improving waste management on construction projects in Australia: Benefits and limitations. International Journal of Construction Management 15(2): 137–147. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2015.1033815
80. Uddin MN, Chi HL, Wei HH, et al. (2022). Influence of interior layouts on occupant energy-saving behaviour in buildings: An integrated approach using agent-based modelling, system dynamics and building information modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 161: 112382. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112382
81. Whitburn J, Linklater W, Abrahamse W (2019). Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and pro-environmental behavior. Conservation Biology 34(1): 180–193. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13381
82. Williams DM (2023). A meta-theoretical framework for organizing and integrating theory and research on motivation for health-related behavior. Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1130813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130813
83. Wilson CDH, Williams ID (2007). Kerbside collection: A case study from the north-west of England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(2): 381–394. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.006
84. Xiao M (2020). Factors influencing eSports viewership: An approach based on the theory of reasoned action. Communication and Sport 8(1): 92–122. doi: 10.1177/2167479518819482
85. Xu Y, Du J, Khan MAS, et al. (2022). Effects of subjective norms and environmental mechanism on green purchase behavior: An extended model of theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 779629. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.779629
86. Yadav SS, Kar SK, Rai PK (2022). Why do consumers buy recycled shoes? An amalgamation of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 1007959. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1007959
87. Yang CC, Yang SY, Chang YC (2023). Predicting older adults’ mobile payment adoption: An extended TAM model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(2): 1391. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021391
88. Zhang B, Wang Z, Lai K hung (2015). Mediating effect of managers’ environmental concern: Bridge between external pressures and firms’ practices of energy conservation in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology 43: 203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.07.002
89. Zhang J, Cherian J, Abbas Sandhu Y, et al. (2022). Presumption of green electronic appliances purchase intention: The mediating role of personal moral norms. Sustainability 14(8): 4572. doi: 10.3390/su14084572