The Sipongi System is essential in dealing with forest and land fires because this system provides real-time data that empowers stakeholders and communities to proactively overcome fire dangers. Its advantages are seen in its ability to provide detailed information regarding weather conditions, wind patterns, water levels in peatlands, air quality, and responsible work units. This data facilitates efficient decision-making and resource allocation for fire prevention and control. As an embodiment of Collaborative Governance, the Sipongi System actively involves various stakeholders, including government institutions, local communities, environmental organizations and the private sector. This cooperative approach fosters collective responsibility and accountability, improving fire management efforts. The Sipongi approach is critical in reducing forest and land fires in Indonesia by providing real-time data and a collaborative governance model. This results in faster response times, more effective fire prevention and better resource allocation. Although initially designed for Indonesia, the adaptable nature of the system makes it a blueprint for addressing similar challenges in other countries and regions, tailored to specific needs and environmental conditions. Qualitative research methods underlie this study, including interviews with key stakeholders and analysis of credible sources. Government officials, community leaders, environmental experts and organizational representatives were interviewed to comprehensively examine the mechanisms of the Sipongi System and its impact on forest and land fire management in Indonesia. Future research should explore the application of Sipongi Systems and collaborative governance in various contexts by conducting comparative studies across countries and ecosystems. Additionally, assessing the long-term impact and sustainability of the Sipongi System is critical to evaluating its effectiveness over time.

1. Achyar, E., Schmidt-Vogt, D., Shivakoti, G. P. (2015). Dynamics of the multi-stakeholder forum and its effectiveness in promoting sustainable forest fire management practices in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Environmental Development, 13, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.002
2. Administrator. (2019). SiPongi KLHK. News Article. Available online: https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/kependudukan/748/sipongi-klhk (accessed on 15 September 2023).
3. Al Fathon, A. (2015). Sipongi, Forest Fire Early Detection Application (Indonesian). News Article. Available online: https://tekno.tempo.co/read/649465/sipongi-aplikasi-pendeteksi-dini-kebakaran-hutan (accessed on 20 April 2023).
4. Allawiyah, M. (2019). Alert Karhutla with Sipongi (Indonesian). Available online: https://siagabencana.com/post/sigap-karhutla-dengan-sipongi (accessed on 20 April 2023).
5. Allen, M., Tanaka, K., Macey, A., et al. (2021). Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 16(7), 074009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfcf9
6. Andriany, C., Wijayanti, N., Miletresia, M., et al. (2020). Two Eyes Looking at Karhutla (Framing Analysis of Karhutla News in the Star and Kompas.Com Robert N. Entman Model) (Indonesian). SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2), 153–165.
7. Arora, N. K., Mishra, I. (2021). COP26: more challenges than achievements. Environmental Sustainability, 4(4), 585–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00212-7
8. Astuti, R. (2020). Fixing flammable Forest: The scalar politics of peatland governance and restoration in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 61(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12267
9. Bowen, M. R., Bompard, J. M., Anderson, I. P., et al. (2001). Anthropogenic fires in Indonesia: A view from Sumatra. Available online: http://www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/946.html (accessed on 20 April 2023).
10. Budiman, I., Bastoni, Sari, E. N., et al. (2020). Progress of paludiculture projects in supporting peatland ecosystem restoration in Indonesia. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01084
11. Cahyono, S. A., Warsito, S. P., Andayani, W., et al. (2015). Factors Affecting Forest Fires in Indonesia and Their Policy Implications (Indonesian). Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 3(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl13103-112
12. Canadas, M. J., Novais, A., Marques, M. (2016). Wildfires, forest management and landowners collective action: A comparative approach at the local level. Land Use Policy, 56, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.035
13. Daulay, D. N. O., Hidayat, J. W. (2018). Carbon Value Analysis of Batang Gadis National Park, Mandailing Natal Regency, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 08010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183108010
14. Deng, H., Su, Y., Liao, Z., et al. (2022). Proposal of Implementation Framework of Cooperative Approaches and Sustainable Development Mechanism. Sustainability, 14(2), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020655
15. Duncan, B. N., Bey, I., Chin, M., et al. (2003). Indonesian wildfires of 1997: Impact on tropospheric chemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D15). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003195
16. Edwards, R. B., Naylor, R. L., Higgins, M. M., & Falcon, W. P. (2020). Causes of Indonesia’s forest fires. World Development, 127, 104717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104717
17. Edwards, S. A., & Heiduk, F. (2015). Hazy Days: Forest Fires and the Politics of Environmental Security in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 34(3), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341503400303
18. Ervayenri, E., Sadjati, E., & Insusanty, E. (2016). Critical Factors for Increasing Penyengat Village Community Support and Participation in Carbon Trading Activities KPHP Tasik Besar Serkap (Indonesian). Wahana Forestra: Jurnal Kehutanan, 11(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.31849/forestra.v11i2.146
19. Fithriyyah, M. U., Suwitri, S., Warella, Y., et al. (2020). Action-Collaborative Networks of The Regional Government on Land and Forest Fire Restraint in Pelalawan District, Riau Province. Sted Journal, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.7251/sted2002064u
20. Gebara, M. F., Gallo, P., Brites, A., et al. (2020). The pluriversality of efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil over the past decade: An analysis of policy actors’ perceptions. Forests, 11(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101061
21. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182
22. Greenpeace Indonesia. (2021). Restoration Lost in the Haze: Defeat in peat protection (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-indonesia-stateless/2021/03/959a96b8-restorasi-hilang-dalam-kabut-asap_id.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023).
23. Guion, L. A. (1969). Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies. EDIS, 2002(6). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fy394-2002
24. Herawati, H., Santoso, H. (2011). Tropical forest susceptibility to and risk of fire under changing climate: A review of fire nature, policy and institutions in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.006
25. Humas KLHK. (2020). Sipongi is the main reference for forest and land fire information in Indonesia (Indonesian). Available online: http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/5586/sipongi-jadi-rujukan-utama-informasi-karhutla-di-indonesia (accessed on 20 April 2023).
26. Hussein, A. (2009). The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 4(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v4i1.48
27. Leech, N. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
28. Levine, J. S. (1999). The 1997 fires in Kalimantan and Sumatra, Indonesia: Gaseous and particulate emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(7), 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl900067
29. Lohberger, S., Stängel, M., Atwood, E. C., et al. (2017). Spatial evaluation of Indonesia’s 2015 fire‐affected area and estimated carbon emissions using Sentinel‐1. Global Change Biology, 24(2), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13841
30. Maryani, S. (2020). The Effect of Deforestation and Forest Fire Levels on Greenhouse Gas Emission Levels (Indonesian). Publikasi Penelitian Terapan Dan Kebijakan, 3(2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.46774/pptk.v3i2.106
31. Mead, M. I., Castruccio, S., Latif, M. T., et al. (2018). Impact of the 2015 wildfires on Malaysian air quality and exposure: A comparative study of observed and modeled data. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 044023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab325
32. Meyer, C. B. (2001). A Case in Case Study Methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300402
33. Ministry of Forestry. (2009). Forestry Strategic Data Executive (Indonesian).
34. Negara, B. S., Kurniawan, R., Nazri, M. Z. A., et al. (2020). Riau Forest Fire Prediction using Supervised Machine Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1566(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012002
35. Nemtinova, Y., Nemtinov, K., Nemtinov, V., et al. (2022). The market for greenhouse gas emissions quotas as an incentive on the way to a low-carbon economy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 979(1), 012122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/979/1/012122
36. Oppermann, M. (2000). Triangulation? A methodological discussion. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1522-1970(200003/04)2:2<141::aid-jtr217>3.0.co;2-u
37. Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Shantiko, B., et al. (2019). Forest and land fires, toxic haze and local politics in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 21(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827906799
38. Purnomo, H., Shantiko, B., Sitorus, S., et al. (2017). Fire economy and actor network of forest and land fires in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.001
39. Puspitaloka, D., Kim, Y., Purnomo, H., et al. (2020). Defining ecological restoration of peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Restoration Ecology, 28(2), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13097
40. Rachmaniar, A., Supriyadi, A. P., Pradana, H., et al. (2021). Carbon trading system as a climate mitigation scheme: Why Indonesia should adopt it? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012015
41. Rasyid, F. (2014). Problems and Impacts of Forest Fires (Indonesian). Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara, 1(4), 47–59.
42. Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., Badger, T. A. (2018). Two Strategies for Qualitative Content Analysis: An Intramethod Approach to Triangulation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(5), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586
43. Runkle, B., Kutzbach, L. (2014). Towards climate-responsible peatlands management. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4029e.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023).
44. Saharjo, B. H., Syaufina, L., Nurhayati, A. D., et al. (2018). Controlling Forest and Land Fires in Smoke Affected Communities (Indonesian). IPB Press.
45. Saharjo, B. H., Yungan, A. (2014). The effect of policies to control forest and land fires on reducing greenhouse gas emissions (Indonesian). Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 5(2), 124–130.
46. Tacconi, L. (2003). Forest fires in Indonesia: causes, costs and policy implications (Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001200
47. Tacconi, L., Vayda, A. P. (2006). Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: A comment. Ecological Economics, 56(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.034
48. Khee-Jin Tan, A. (1999). Forest Fires of Indonesia: State Responsibility and International Liability. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48(4), 826–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589300063703
49. Taufik, M., Veldhuizen, A. A., Wösten, J. H. M., et al. (2019). Exploration of the importance of physical properties of Indonesian peatlands to assess critical groundwater table depths, associated drought and fire hazard. Geoderma, 347, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.001
50. Tuhulele, P. T. (2014). Forest Fires in Indonesia and the Law Enforcement Process as a Commitment to Address Climate Change Impacts (Indonesian). Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v3i2.1973
51. VanWynsberghe, R., Khan, S. (2007). Redefining Case Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600208
52. Varma, A. (2003). The economics of slash and burn: A case study of the 1997–1998 Indonesian forest fires. Ecological Economics, 46(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00139-3
53. Wardoyo, W. (2019). Climate Change and Carbon Trading from Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GRK) (Indonesian). JMB: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v5i1.1993
54. Wibowo, A., Gintings, A. N. (2010). Forest Degradation and Conservation Efforts (Indonesian). Membalik Kecenderungan Degradasi Sumber Daya Lahan Dan Air, 67–87.
55. Wicaksono, A., Hadna, A. H. (2018). Peatland Restoration in Indonesia: Looking Deeper through the Eyes of Governance (Indonesian) [Master’s thesis]. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
56. Wicaksono, A. (2019). Multi-actor Collaboration in Peatland Restoration Program in Riau Province (Indonesian). Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 4(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.25077/jakp.4.2.111-125.2019
57. Wicaksono, A., Zainal. (2022). Peatlands Restoration Policies in Indonesia: Success or Failure? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 995(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/995/1/012068
58. Woodside, A. G., Wilson, E. J. (2003). Case study research methods for theory building. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(6/7), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620310492374
59. Yim, C. Y. (1999). The Forest Fires in Indonesia 1997–1998. Geography, 84(3), 251–260.
60. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods), 5th ed. Sage.
61. Zainal, M., Suwaro, U., Mariana, D., et al. (2017). Governance of Forest and Peatland Fire Prevention in Riau Province. Proceedings of the International Conference on Democracy, Accountability and Governance (ICODAG 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icodag-17.2017.23