The development of the maize agribusiness system is highly dependent on the role of social capital in facilitating interaction among actors in the chain of activities ranging from the provision of farm supplies to marketing. Therefore, this research aimed to characterize the key elements of social capital specifically bonding, bridging, and linking, as well as to demonstrate their respective roles. Data were collected from farmers and non-farmers actors engaged in various activities in the maize agribusiness system. The data obtained were processed using ATLAS Ti, applying open, axial, and selective coding techniques. The results showed the roles played by bonding, bridging, and linking social capital in the interaction between farmers and multiple actors in activities such as providing farm supplies, farming production, harvesting, post-harvest, and marketing. The combination of these social capital forms acted as the glue and wires that facilitated access to resources, collective decision-making, and reduced transaction costs. These results have theoretical implications, suggesting that bonding, bridging, and linking should be combined with the appropriate role composition for each activity in the agribusiness system.

1. Acclassato Houensou D, Goudjo GG, Senou MM (2021). Access to finance and difference in family farm productivity in Benin: Evidence from small farms. Scientific African 13: e00940. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00940
2. Alemayehu BZ, Steffens P, Gordon SR (2023). The formation and role of religious social capital in driving entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing Insights 20: e00426. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00426
3. Austin JE, Seitanidi MM (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41: 726–758. doi: 10.1177/0899764012450777
4. Azad MJ, Pritchard B (2023). Bonding, bridging, linking social capital as mutually reinforcing elements in adaptive capacity development to flood hazard: Insights from rural Bangladesh. Climate Risk Management 40: 100498. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100498
5. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Ö, et al. (2016). “By slapping their laps, the patient will know that you truly care for her”: A qualitative study on social norms and acceptability of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria. SSM—Population Health 2: 640–655. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.003
6. Bourdieu P (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6): 645–668. doi: 10.1177/053901847701600601
7. Central Bureau of Statistics (2023a). Harvest area and maize production in Indonesia 2023 (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2023/10/16/2049/luas-panen-dan-produksi-jagung-di-indonesia-2023--angka-sementara-.html (accessed on 20 November 2023).
8. Central Bureau of Statistics (2023b). Maros regency in numbers (Indonesian). Available online: https://maroskab.bps.go.id (accessed on 20 November 2023).
9. Chamola D, Dey AK, Sahay A, Singh R (2022). Building members’ trust in a producer company through social capital. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies 12(5): 809–823. doi: 10.1108/JADEE-11-2020-0276
10. Chekole FC, Mohammed Ahmed A (2023). Future climate implication on maize (Zea mays) productivity with adaptive options at Harbu district, Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 11: 100480. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100480
11. Claridge T (2018). Functions of social capital—Bonding, bridging, linking. Available online: https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Functions-of-Social-Capital.pdf
12. Cofré-Bravo G, Klerkx L, Engler A (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies 69: 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
13. Coleman JS (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943
14. Coronado Y (2023). Agriculture systems dataset in rural communities of Hidalgo state, Mexico. Data in Brief 47: 108918. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.108918
15. Craig A, Hutton C, Musa FB, Sheffield J (2023). Bonding, bridging and linking social capital combinations for food access; A gendered case study exploring temporal differences in southern Malawi. Journal of Rural Studies 101: 103039. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103039
16. Davis, J. H., & Goldberg, R. A. (1957). A concept of agribusiness. Division of Research, Graduate Scholl of Business Administration, Harvard University.
17. Fine, B (2010). Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly. Pluto Press.
18. Fukuyama F (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs 74(5): 89. doi: 10.2307/20047302
19. Hanifan LJ (1916). The annals of the American academy of political and social science. The Rural School Community Center 67(1): 130–138.
20. Hernandez V, Phélinas P (2012). Debates and Controversies Over the Future of Smallholder Agriculture. Sciences Po Press" Somewhere else.
21. Karim I, Wulandari E, Arsal A, Mandasari NF (2021). The causality model of maize farmers’ income: Integrating social capital, supply chain, and competitive advantage. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(1): 252–258. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.8275
22. Keeley, B (2007). Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life. OECD Publishing.
23. Kos D, Lensink R, Meuwissen M (2023). The role of social capital in adoption of risky versus less risky subsidized input supplies: An empirical study of cocoa farmers in Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies 97: 140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.027
24. Leknoi U, Likitlersuang S (2020). Good practice and lesson learned in promoting vetiver as solution for slope stabilisation and erosion control in Thailand. Land Use Policy 99: 105008. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105008
25. Leknoi U, Rosset P, Likitlersuang S (2023). Multi-criteria social sustainability assessment of highland maize monoculture in Northern Thailand using the SAFA tool. Resources, Environment and Sustainability 13: 100115. doi: 10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100115
26. Lin N (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. Social Capital: Theory and Research. Routledge.
27. Lin N, Erickson B (2008). Social Capital: An International Research Program. OUP Oxford.
28. Mahaarcha D, Sirisunhirun S (2023). Social capital and farmers participation in multi level irrigation governance in Thailand. Heliyon 9(8): e18793. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18793
29. Ministry of Agriculture Indonesian (2020). Maize Outlook: Agricultural Commodities of Food Crop Subsector. In Data and Information Center, Ministry of Agriculture. http://epublikasi.setjen.pertanian.go.id
30. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242. doi: 10.2307/259373
31. Owot GM, Okello DM, Olido K, Odongo W (2023). Trust, but what trust? Investigating the influence of trust dimensions on supply chain performance in smallholder agribusinesses in Uganda. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. doi: 10.1108/JADEE-09-2022-0196
32. Page-Tan C (2021). Bonding, bridging, and linking social capital and social media use: How hyperlocal social media platforms serve as a conduit to access and activate bridging and linking ties in a time of crisis. Natural Hazards 105(2): 2219–2240. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04397-8
33. Putnam RD (2000a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In: Crothers L, Lockhart C (editors). Culture and Politics: A Reader. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 223–234.
34. Putnam RD (2000b). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
35. Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Model Italy. Princeton University Press.
36. Pylypenko HM, Pylypenko YI, Dubiei YV, et al. (2023). Social capital as a factor of innovative development. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 9(3): 100118. doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100118
37. Ros-Tonen MA, Bitzer V, Laven A, et al. (2019). Conceptualizing inclusiveness of smallholder value chain integration. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 41: 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.08.006
38. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. SAGE Publications.
39. Rustinsyah (2015). Social capital and implementation of subsidized fertilizer programme for small farmers: A case study in Rural Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Rural Management 11(1): 25–39. doi: 10.1177/0973005215572730
40. Rustinsyah R, Prasetyo RA, Adib M (2021). Social capital for flood disaster management: Case study of flooding in a village of Bengawan Solo Riverbank, Tuban, East Java Province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 52: 101963. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101963
41. Salman D, Kasim K, Ahmad A, Sirimorok N (2021). Combination of bonding, bridging and linking social capital in a livelihood system: Nomadic duck herders amid the covid-19 pandemic in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forest and Society 5(1): 136–158. doi: 10.24259/fs.v5i1.11813
42. Saptutyningsih E, Diswandi D, Jaung W (2020). Does social capital matter in climate change adaptation? A lesson from agricultural sector in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Land Use Policy 95: 104189. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104189
43. Schoneveld GC (2022). Transforming food systems through inclusive agribusiness. World Development 158: 105970. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105970
44. Serageldin I (1996). Sustainability as opportunity and the problem of social capital. The Brown Journal of World Affairs 3(2): 187–203.
45. Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J, Bänziger M (2011). Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security 3(3): 307–327. doi: 10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5
46. Shimada BS, Simon MV, da Silva VB, et al. (2021). The importance of Nitrogen in corn culture. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 43(8): 37–45. doi: 10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i830724
47. Slijper T, Urquhart J, Poortvliet PM, et al. (2022). Exploring how social capital and learning are related to the resilience of Dutch arable farmers. Agricultural Systems 198: 103385. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103385
48. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.
49. Szreter S (2002). The state of social capital: Bringing back in power, politics, and history. Theory and Society 31(5): 573–621. doi: 10.1023/A:1021300217590
50. Tamburaka IP, Tajuddin, Apoda (2020). The role of institution on corn-based food diversification in Konawe District, Southeast Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 454(1): 012022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012022
51. Tolinggi WK, Salman D, Rahmadanih, Iswoyo H (2023). Farmer regeneration and knowledge co-creation in the sustainability of coconut agribusiness in Gorontalo, Indonesia. Open Agriculture 8(1): 20220162. doi: 10.1515/opag-2022-0162.
52. Viswanathan M, Echambadi R, Venugopal S, Sridharan S (2014). Subsistence entrepreneurship, value creation, and community exchange systems: A social capital explanation. Journal of Macromarketing 34(2): 213–226. doi: 10.1177/0276146714521635
53. Williams D (2006). On and off the ’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2): 593–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
54. Woodhill J (2016). Inclusive Agribusiness: The State of Play Background Working Paper. Global Donor Platform for Rural Development.
55. Woolcock M (2002). Social capital in theory and practice: Where do we stand. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247562656_Social_Capital_in_Theory_and_Practice_Where_Do_We_Stand (accessed on 21 November 2023).
56. Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 225–249. doi: 10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
57. Xie Y, Sarkar A, Hossain S, et al. (2021). Determinants of farmers’ confidence in agricultural production recovery during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Agriculture 11(11): 1075. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11111075
58. Yu L, Nilsson J, Zhan F, Cheng S (2023). Social capital in cooperative memberships and farmers’ access to bank credit—Evidence from Fujian, China. Agriculture 13(2): 418. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020418
59. Zeleke BD, Geleto AK, Asefa S, Komicha HH (2023). The role of social capital in addressing seed access constraints and adoption intensity: Evidence from Arsi Highland, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Heliyon 9(2): e13553. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13553
60. Zhang W (2022). Social capital, income and subjective well-being: Evidence in rural China. Heliyon 8(1): e08705. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08705
61. Zylbersztajn D (2017). Agribusiness systems analysis: Origin, evolution and research perspectives. Revista de Administração 52(1): 114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.10.004