Situation report (SITREP) visualization for effective management of disaster incidents in Sri Lanka

H. I. Tillekaratne, P. Wickramagamage, Induka Werellagama, Upaka Rathnayake, Chandana Siriwardana, Asela Bandara, C. M. Madduma-Bandara, T. W. M. T. W. Bandara, Amila Abeynayaka

Article ID: 2206
Vol 7, Issue 3, 2023

VIEWS - 302 (Abstract) 240 (PDF)


During and after any disaster, a situation report (SITREP) is prepared, based on the Daily Incident Updates (DIU), as an initial decision support information base. It is observed that the decision support system and best practices are not optimized through the available formal reporting on disaster incidents. The rapidly evolving situation, misunderstood terms, inaccurate data and delivery delays of DIU are challenges to the daily SITREP. Multiple stakeholders stipulated with different tasks should be properly understood for the SITREP to initiate relevant response tasks. To fill this research gap, this paper identifies the weaknesses of the current practice and discusses the upgrading of the incident-reporting process using a freely available software tool, enabling further visualization, and producing a comprehensive timely output to share among the stakeholders. In this case, “Power-BI” (a data visualization software) is used as a 360-degree view of useful metrics—in a single place, with real-time updates while being available on all devices for operational decision-making. When a dataset is transformed into several analytical reports and dashboards, it can be easily shared with the target users and action groups. This article analyzed two sources of data, namely the Disaster Management Center (DMC) and the National Disaster Relief Service Center (NDRSC) of Sri Lanka. Senior managers of disaster emergencies were interviewed and explored social media to develop a scheme of best practices for disaster reporting, starting from just before the occurrence, and following the unfolding sequence of the disasters. Using a variety of remotely acquired imageries, rapid mapping, grading, and delineating impacts of natural disasters, were made available to concerned users.


Daily Incident Updates (DIU); disasters; Power-BI; situation report (SITREP)

Full Text:



Abedin B, Babar A (2018). Institutional vs. non-institutional use of social media during emergency response: A case of Twitter in 2014 Australian bush fire. Information Systems Frontiers 20: 729–740. doi: 10.1007/s10796-017-9789-4

Arun G, Sharma SK, Tirkey G, Lohani AK (2020). Integrated flood assessment studies using real time satellite precipitation data and flood inundation mapping in Assam––A novel approach. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering; 26–27 June 2020; Guwahati, India.

Beaven S, Wilson T, Johnston L, et al. (2016). Research engagement after disasters: Research coordination before, during, and after the 2011–2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. Earthquake Spectra 32(2): 713–735. doi: 10.1193/082714eqs134m

Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1281–1299. doi: 10.2307/3069401

CARE International (2011). Emergency toolkit. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Desinventar (2021). Disaster information management system in Sri Lanka. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Desinventar (2023). Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Disaster Management Centre (2016). Floods in Sri Lanka Situation Report No. 2. Disaster Management Center.

Disaster Management Centre (2017). NEOP—National emergency operation plan. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Hapsari RI, Zenurianto M (2016). View of flood disaster management in Indonesia and the key solutions. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 5: 140–151.

Hasleton K, Stevens G, Hegner R, et al. (2013). Mental health deployment to the 2011 Queensland floods: Lessons learned. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 28(3): 35–40. doi: 10.3316/agispt.20132330

Hlavac J, Stefanovic J (2020). Machine learning and business intelligence or from descriptive analytics to predictive analytics. In: Proceedings of 2020 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I); 29 January–1 February 2020; Velke Karlovice, Czech Republic. doi: 10.1109/KI48306.2020.9039874

Houston JB, Hawthorne J, Perreault MF, et al. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters 39(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/disa.12092

Jain T, Agarwal M, Kumar A, et al. (2022). Building machine learning application using oracle analytics cloud. In: Nanda P, Verma VK, Srivastava S, et al. (editors). Data Engineering for Smart Systems, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart IoT Systems: Innovations and Computing (SSIC 2021); 22–23 January 2021; Jaipur, India. Springer Singapore.

Jensen J (2020). The current NIMS implementation behavior of United States counties. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 8(1): 0000102202154773551815. doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1815

Kundzewicz ZW (2016). Extreme weather events and their consequences. Papers on Global Change IGBP 23(1): 59–69. doi: 10.1515/igbp-2016-0005.

Lam FS, Chow BY (2022). Disaster response network analysis in rural Temerloh, Pahang communities during the Malaysia 2020–2021 flood. In: E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil and Environment Engineering (ICCEE 2022); 4–5 August 2022; Bali, Indonesia. EDP Sciences. Volume 347. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202234705003

Lillestøl CS, Rykkja LH (2016). Dealing with natural disasters: Managing floods in Norway. Working Paper 4–2016. Uni Research Rokkan Centre.

Microsoft (2017). Power-BI learning overview. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Nagy A, Tick J (2017). Review of predictive analytics vendors for transport management systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Intelligent System and Informatics (SISY); 14–16 September 2017; Subotica, Serbia. doi: 10.1109/SISY.2017.8080557

Neubaum G, Rösner L, Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC (2014). Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: A multi-methodological approach. Computers in Human Behavior 34: 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.021

Officials’ Committee for Domestic and External Security Coordination (2019). Coordinated incident management system (CIMS). Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Paul SH, Sharif HO, Crawford AM (2018). Fatalities caused by hydrometeorological disasters in Texas. Geosciences 8(5): 186. doi: 10.3390/geosciences8050186

SafetyCulture (2021). Incident report guide: All you need to know. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Sallam RL, Howson C, Idoine CJ, et al. (2017). Magic quadrant for business intelligence and analytics platforms. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Sobhaninejad G, Hori M, Kabeyasawa T (2011). Enhancing integrated earthquake simulation with high performance computing. Advances in Engineering Software 42(5): 286–292. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.10.009

Sodjinou VD, Talisuna A, Braka F, et al. (2022). The 2021 cholera outbreak in West Africa: Epidemiology and public health implications. Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research 6(2): 296–307. doi: 10.26502/acbr.50170245

Sreedharan C, Thorsen E, Sharma N (2019). Disaster Journalism: Building Media Resilience in Nepal. Bournemouth University.

Survey Department of Sri Lanka (2016). Flooding area around Kelani River Basin (part of)—May 2016. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Tanzi TJ, Sebastien O, Harivelo F (2014). Towards a collaborative approach for disaster management using radio science technologies. URSI Radio Science Bulletin 2014(348): 25–36. doi: 10.23919/URSIRSB.2014.7909941.

Tillekaratne HI, Werellagama DRIB, Prasanna R (2021). Command and control mechanism for effective disaster incident response operations in Sri Lanka. In: Amaratunga S, Haigh R, Dias N (editors). Multi-Hazard Early Warning and Disaster Risks. Springer Cham. pp. 615–631. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73003-1_42

Tillekaratne HI, Werellagama I, Madduma-Bandara CM, et al. (2021). Hydro-meteorological incident and disaster response in Sri Lanka. Case study: 2016 May rain events. Earth 3(1): 1–17. doi: 10.3390/earth3010001

Tillekaratne HI, Subasinghe SIS, Bandara TWMTW, et al. (2021). Sub-basin as tropical flood risk management unit: Case study of Kelani River Basin. In: Proceeding of the 7th National Geographic Conference (NGC-2021); 17–18 June 2021; Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Tomaszewski B, Dickens K, Sawant AA, et al. (2014). Visually contextualizing social media within spatial, temporal and thematic constraints for disaster situation awareness. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).

Wiederhold BK (2013). In a disaster, social media has the power to save lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(11): 781–782. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.1532

Yang Y, Lu W, Domack J, et al. (2012). MADIS: A multimedia-aided disaster information integration system for emergency management. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom); 14–17 October 2012; Pittsburgh, PA, USA. doi: 10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2012.250525

Young CE, Kuligowski ED, Pradhan A (2020). A Review of Social Media Use During Disaster Response and Recovery Phases. National Institute of Standards and Technology. doi: 10.6028/NIST.TN.2086

Zheng JG (2017). Data visualization for business intelligence. In: Munoz JM (editor). Global Business Intelligence. Routledge. pp. 67–82.

Zubair L, Ralapanawe V, Yahiya Z, et al. (2011). Fine scale natural hazard risk and vulnerability identification informed by climate in Sri Lanka. Available online: (accessed on 24 August 2023).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 H. I. Tillekaratne, P. Wickramagamage, Induka Werellagama, Upaka Rathnayake, Chandana Siriwardana, Asela Bandara, C. M. Madduma-Bandara, T. W. M. T. W. Bandara, Amila Abeynayaka

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.