Analysis of settlement parameters of architecture faculties on university campus
Vol 8, Issue 2, 2024
VIEWS - 147 (Abstract) 77 (PDF)
Abstract
The selection of a suitable place for an activity is an important decision made for a project, which requires assessing it from different points of view. Educational use is one of the most complicated and substantial uses in urban space that requires precise and logical attention to its location and neighborhood with similar and consistent uses. Faculties of universities are educational spaces that should be protected against physical and moral damage to create a healthy educational environment. To do this, it is necessary to find and assess the factors affecting the location of educational spaces. The extant study aimed at finding and assessing the factors affecting the location of educational spaces to locate art and architecture schools or faculties in 4 important universities. The present study is applied developmental research in terms of nature and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. This study used the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) weighing and controlled the prioritization through the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity) technique in the methodology phase. Since there was no criterion and metric for these centers, six were chosen as the primary metrics after reviewing the relevant theoretical foundations, early investigations, and collecting effective data. Finally, the results indicated the most important factors of vehicular or roadway access, pedestrian access, slope, parking, adjacency, neighborhood, and area. Among the mentioned factors, pedestrian access (w: 0.4231) had the highest weight and was the priority in the location of architecture faculty in studied campuses and areas inside the universities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhya A (2009). Evaluating the Campus-Downtown Relationship the Spatial Configuration of Four College Towns in Small Metropolitan Regions in the United States. In: Proceeding of the Seventh International Space Syntax Symposium, Edited by Daniel Koch, Lars Marcus and Jesper Steen Stockholm: KTH, Sweden.
Alaghemand S, Teimouri S, Joodaki H (2013). Factors affecting the location of educational spaces; Case Study: Architecture School in Arak (Persian). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Urban Development, Tahran, Iran.
Alsubaie M A (2015). Hidden curriculum as one of current issue of curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 125-128.
Araste M, Azizi M M (2012). Locating sustainable residential complex in the central zone of Yazd City using the ANP Method. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development 5(9): 333–347.
Aydın D, Uysal M (2009). Determination of Architectural Program Data by Evaluation of Space Performance: Example of Faculty of Education (Turkish). Erciyes University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal 25(1): 1–23.
Blatchford P (2012). Social Life in School: Pupils’ Experiences of Breaktime and Recess from 7 to 16. Routledge.
Brown M, Long P (2006). Trends in Learning Space Design, In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning Spaces (pp.116-126). Washington, DC: Educause. Available online: http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/learning-spaces (accessed on 2 June 2023).
Büyükşahin Sıramkaya S (2015). Syntactic Analysis of the Effect of Space Configuration on Social Interaction in Faculty Buildings [Phd Thesis]. Selçuk University.
Can I (2012). In-between Space and Social Interaction: A Case Study of Three Neighbourhoods in İzmir [Phd Thesis]. The University of Nottingham.
Creswell J W (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Donald, J. G., & Denison, D. B. (2001). Quality Assessment of University Students: Student Perceptions of Quality Criteria. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(4), 478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672892
Filova, L., Vojar, J., Svobodova, K., & Sklenicka, P. (2014). The effect of landscape type and landscape elements on public visual preferences: ways to use knowledge in the context of landscape planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 2037–2055. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.973481
İsmailoğlu S, Kulak Torun F (2022). Spatial Organization of Interior Design Studios in the Normalization Process (Turkish). Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 12 (2): 497–514.
Karakaş B, Aybike Türk S (2017). METU and KTU architecture departments study on space organizations (1950–1970) (Turkish). Social Sciences, 12 (4): 199–211.
Kulak Torun, F., & İsmailoğlu, S. (2022). Spatial Analysis of Ottoman Hammams in Erzurum. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 53(3), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.20556
Miller K N (2011). The relation of school and campus violence to students perceptions of safety and precautionary behaviors. Doctoral Dissertation, Auburn University, Alabama.
Peker E (2010). Campus as an integrated learning environment: Learning in campus open spaces. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Taherdoost H (2017). Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); A Step-by-Step Approach, International. Journal of Economics and Management Systems, Volum (2), ISSN: 2367-8925
Teas, R. K. (1993). Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700402
Lu Y, Peponis J, Zimring C (2009). Targeted visibility analysis in buildings. Correlating targeted visibility analysis with distribution of people and their interactions within an intensive care unit. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium; Stockholm: KTH.
Hajirasouli A, Kumarasuriyar A (2016). The social dimention of sustainability: Towards some definitions and analysis. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications 4(2): 23–34.
Saeedikhah A (2004). Examining Urban Installations and Equipment (Post, Telecommunication, Firefighting), and Locating Them in the Old and New Texture of Mashhad City [Master’s thesis]. Sistan and Baluchistan University.
Sanoff H, Pasalar C, Hashas M (2001). School building assessment methods School of Architecture, College of Design, North Carolina State University with support from the National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Available online: http://www.ncef.org/pubs/sanoffassess.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2023).
Saremi H R, Bakhshkandi H H, Sarmast M M S (2014). Locating educational spaces using fuzzy logic and GIS (Case Study: Elementary Schools located in district 4 of Urmia) (Persian). İn: Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Structure, Architecture and Development; Tahran.
Sarıberberoğlu M T (2020). Spatial approaches in education building design; Law School example (Turkish), Artium Journal, 8(2): 88–94.
Soyupak İ (2021). Analysis of The Educational Spaces and Universal Design: The Case Study of Duzce University Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture Campus. Journal of Accessibility and Design, 11(1): 86-114.
Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040
Wyatt GS (2003). Academic buildings and professional schools. In: Building Type Basics for College and University Facilities. John Wiley & Sons.
Yollu D (2006). Examining the Concepts of Space Organization and Form in the Example of the Historical Peninsula [Master Thesis]. Yıldız Technical University.
Zavaraqi R, Saleki Maleki M A, Ghasemi Khoei M, Saleki Maleki F (2014). Application of the Fuzzy TOPSIS technique for the selection of the location of public libraries: A Case Study of Tabriz. Research on Information Science & Public Libraries, 20 (2): 254–275.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i2.2168
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Parisa Doraj, Havva Özyılmaz, Ümit Akar
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.