A preliminary study on the regional distribution of consumption competitiveness and carrying capacity

Guoxu Wei, Xin Lv, Yang Li

Article ID: 11644
Vol 9, Issue 3, 2025

VIEWS - 40 (Abstract)

Abstract


This study examines the spatial distribution of consumption competitiveness and carrying capacity across regions, exploring their interrelationship and implications for sustainable regional development. An evaluation index system is constructed for both consumption competitiveness and carrying capacity using a range of economic, social, and environmental indicators. We apply this framework to regional data in China and analyze the resultant spatial patterns. The findings reveal significant regional disparities: areas with strong consumption competitiveness are often concentrated in economically developed regions, while high carrying capacity is notable in less populated or resource-rich areas. Notably, a mismatch emerges in some regions—high consumer demand is not always supported by adequate carrying capacity, and vice versa. These disparities highlight potential sustainability challenges and opportunities. In the discussion, we address reasons behind the spatial mismatch and propose policy implications to better align consumer market growth with regional resource and environmental capacity. The paper concludes that integrating consumption-driven growth strategies with carrying capacity considerations is essential for balanced and sustainable regional development.


Keywords


consumption competitiveness; carrying capacity; regional distribution; sustainable development; regional planning

Full Text:

PDF


References


Chan, K. W. (2014). China’s urbanization 2020: a new blueprint and direction. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2014.925410

Deng, X., Liang, L., Wu, F., et al. (2022). A review of the balance of regional development in China from the perspective of development geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1930-0

Dobbs, R., Manyika, J., & Woetzel, J. (2012). Urban world: Cities and the rise of the consuming class. McKinsey Global Institute.

Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.

Gao, Q., Fang, C., Liu, H., et al. (2021). Conjugate evaluation of sustainable carrying capacity of urban agglomeration and multi-scenario policy regulation. Science of The Total Environment, 785, 147373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147373

Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.27

Hu, H., & Han, L. (2023). Evaluation of Land Carrying Capacity of 31 Provinces in China Based on a Natural–Societal-Supply–Demand Framework. Sustainability, 15(2), 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021037

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2023). China’s Path to Sustainable and Balanced Growth. Washington, DC: IMF.

Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. (2005). Fifty Years of Regional Inequality in China: a Journey Through Central Planning, Reform, and Openness. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00265.x

Lin, J. Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Dual circulation: a new structural economics view of development. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 19(4), 1–18.

National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS). (2021). China Statistical Yearbook 2021. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212

SolAbility. (2023). The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Report 2023. Zurich: SolAbility.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. New York: United Nations.

Wei, D., Yin, J., & Xia, R. (2024). Study on the coordinated development of urban competitiveness and energy-carbon emission reduction in China. Environmental Research, 251, 118689.

World Bank. (2021). Ecological Compensation in China: Trends and Opportunities for Incentive-based Policies towards a Greener China. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zhang, S., Su, X., & Qi, Y. (2022). Internet development, consumption upgrading, and carbon emissions: regional evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 83726–83742.

Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., & Yu, X. (2018). Index system of urban resource and environment carrying capacity based on ecological civilization. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 68, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.002

Zhang, Z., Ou, G., Elshkaki, A., & Liu, R. (2022). Evaluation of regional carrying capacity under an economic-social-resource-environment complex system: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Sustainability, 14(12), 7269. ps://doi.org/10.3390/su14127117

Zhou, D., & Dai, H. (2025). Provincial sustainable development in China from a multidimensional perspective: regional differences, dynamic evolution, spatial effects, and convergence. Sustainability, 17(1), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010215




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd11644

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.