Novel procedures to choose the management of PPPs

Bruno S. Frey

doi:10.24294/jipd.v3i2.1149

Novel procedures to choose the management of PPPs

Bruno S. Frey

Article ID: 1149
Vol 3, Issue 2, 2019

VIEWS - 477 (Abstract) 274 (PDF)

Abstract

There is a large literature on public-private-partnership, covering many different areas and aspects. This article deals with a specific but important aspect: the decision-making mechanisms to choose the management of PPP enterprises. In this sector, a suitable choice of managers is of particular importance because the persons chosen must balance the public and private interests. This is often difficult to achieve. Two new procedures are discussed, “Directed Random Choice” and “Rotating CEOs”. In each case, the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure of choosing the managers of PPP enterprises are discussed and evaluated. It is concluded that the two novel mechanisms should be seriously considered when choosing the managers of PPP enterprises.

Keywords

PPP enterprises; Directed Random Choice; Rotating CEOs; selection risk; diversity; burn-out; succession problem

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aasland MS, Skogstad A, Notelaers G, MB and Einarsen S (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2): 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x.

Alvarez JL and Svejenova S (2005). Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488504.

Alvarez JL, Svejenova S and Vives L (2007). Leading in pairs. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(4).

Arena MP, Ferris SP and Unlu E (2011). It takes two: The incidence and effectiveness of co-CEOs. Financial Review, 46(3): 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2011.00305.x.

Arnone M and Stumpf SA (2010). Shared leadership: From rivals to co‐CEOs, Strategy and Leadership, 38(2): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571011029019.

Bennett N, Wise C, Woods PA and Harvey JA (2003). Distributed Leadership: A Review of Literature. Cambridge, UK: Open University, National College for School Leadership.

Bertrand M (2009). CEOs. Annual Review of Economics, 1: 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143301.

Björnberg Å and Feser C (2015). CEO succession starts with developing your leaders. McKinsey Quarterly. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/leadership/ceo-succession-starts-with-developing-your-leaders.

Bolden R (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3): 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x.

Buchstein H (2010). Reviving randomness for political rationality: Elements of a theory of aleatory democracy. Constellations, 17(3): 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00604.x.

de Bettignies J-E and Ross TW (2004). The economics of public-private partnerships. Canadian Public Policy, 30(2): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552389.

Eichenberger R and Frey BS (2019). Rotating CEOs. Forthcoming.

Elster J (1989). Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitation of Rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Favaro K, Karlsson P-O and Neilson GL (2011). CEO succession 2010: The four types of CEOs. Strategy + Business, Summer 2011(63).

Frey BS (1969). Wahrscheinlichkeiten als gesellschaftliche Entscheidungsregel [Probabilities as a social decision rule]. Wirtschaft und Recht, 21: 14–26.

Frey BS and Osterloh M (2016a). Aleatorische Demokratie [Aleatoric democracy]. Oekonomenstimme, December. Available from http://www.oekonomenstimme.org/artikel/2016/12/aleatorische-demokratie/.

_____ (2016b). Aleatoric democracy. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6229.

Frey BS and Steiner L (2014). Zufall als gesellschaftliches Entscheidungsverfahren [Random Mechanism as a social decision-making process]. In: Kaal WA, Schmidt M and Schwartze A (eds), Festschrift zu Ehren von Christian Kirchner. Recht im ökonomischen Kontext. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck; 749–761.

Hayward MLA, Rindova VP and Pollock TG (2004). Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7): 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.405.

Henderson AD, Miller D and Hambrick DC (2006). How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.524.

Hodge GA and Greve C (2005). Introduction. In: Hodge GA and Greve C (eds.), The Challenge of Public-Private Partnerships: Learning from International Experience. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428082.

_____ (2017). On public–private partnership performance: A contemporary review. Public Works Management & Policy, 22(1): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X16657830.

Intriligator MD (1973). A probabilistic model of social choice. Review of Economic Studies, 40(4): 553–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296588.

Kellerman B (2004). Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Liu J, Love PED, Smith J, Regan M and Sutrisna M (2014). Public-private partnerships: A review of theory and practice of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(4): 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2013-0154.

Malmendier U and Tate G (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6): 2661–2700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x.

Marcec D, Benelli K and Schulhofer A (2018). CEO tenure drops to just five years. Retrieved March 07, 2019. Available from: https://www.equilar.com/blogs/351-ceo-tenure-drops-to-five-years.html.

Osterloh M and Frey BS (2016). Chef per Zufall [Boss by lot]. WirtschaftsWoche, 47 (11 November): 111–113.

Quigley TJ and Hambrick DC (2015). Has the “CEO Effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6): 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2258.

Pearce CL (2007). The future of leadership development: The importance of identity, multi-level approaches, self-leadership, physical fitness, shared leadership, networking, creativity, emotions, spirituality and on-boarding processes. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4): 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.006.

Sally D (2002). Co-leadership: Lessons from republican Rome. California Management Review, 44(4): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166144.

Schyns B and Schilling J (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1): 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001.

Sintomer Y (2011). Petite Histoire de l’Expérimentation Démocratique. Tirage au Sort et Politique d'Athènes à nos Jours [Between Radical and Deliberative Democracy. Random Selection in Politics from Athens to Contemporary Experiments]. Paris, France: Éditions La Découverte.

Sui J and Humphreys GW (2015). More of me! Distinguishing self and reward bias using redundancy gains. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8): 2549–2561. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0970-x.

Vancil RF (1987). Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Van Reybrouck D (2016). Against Elections. The Case for Democracy. London, UK: Penguin Random House.

Zeitoun H, Osterloh M and Frey BS (2014). Learning from ancient Athens: Demarchy and corporate governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0105.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i2.1149