Deriving macroeconomic benefits from public–private partnerships in developing Asia

Minsoo Lee, Xuehui Han, Raymond Gaspar, Emmanuel Alano

Article ID: 1082
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2019

VIEWS - 9044 (Abstract)

Abstract


The provision of infrastructure and related services in developing Asia via public–private partnership (PPP) increased rapidly during the late 1990s. Theoretical arguments support the potential economic benefits of PPPs, but empirical evidence is thin. This paper develops a framework identifying channels through which economic gains can be derived from PPP arrangement. The framework helps derive an empirically tractable specification that examines how PPPs affect the aggregate economy. Empirical results suggest that increasing the ratio of PPP investment to GDP improves access to and quality of infrastructure services, and economic growth will potentially be higher. But this optimism is conditional, especially on the region’s efforts to further upgrade its technical and institutional capacity to handle complex PPP contracts.


Keywords


developing Asia; growth model; infrastructure; poverty reduction; public-private partnership

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abiad A and Teipelke R (2017). Infrastructure provision in developing Asia’s giants: A comparative perspective on
  2. China, India, and Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development; 1(1): 24-43. Available from
  3. http://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v1i1.7.
  4. Andreas K and Nemoz M (2010). Public Private Partnerships in Europe before and During the Recent Financial
  5. Crisis. Economic and Financial Report 2010/04. European Investment Bank. Available from: http://www.eib.
  6. org/attachments/efs/efr_2010_v04_en.pdf.
  7. Andrew W (2014). Public Investment as an Engine of Growth. IMF Working Paper No. WP/14/148. http://dx.doi.
  8. org/10.5089/9781498378277.001.
  9. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2017). Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
  10. https://doi.org/10.22617/FLS168388-2.
  11. Bettignies D, Etienne J and Ross TW (2004). The economics of public private partnerships. Canadian Public Policy,
  12. (2): 135-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552389.
  13. Calderón C and Servén L (2010). Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of
  14. African Economies, 19(1): 13-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejp022.
  15. Calderón C and Servén L (2014). Infrastructure, Growth, and Inequality: An Overview. Washington, DC: World
  16. Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7034. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7034.
  17. Catalina G, Orecchia C, Paci P and Serneels P (2007). Does employment generation really matter for poverty
  18. reduction? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4432. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4432.
  19. César C and Chong A (2004). Volume and quality of infrastructure and the distribution of income: An empirical investigation.
  20. The Review of Income and Wealth, 50(1): 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00113.x.
  21. César C and Servén L (2004). The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution.
  22. World Bank Working Paper No. WPS3400. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3400.
  23. César C, Moral-Benito E and Servén L (2015). Is infrastructure capital productive? A dynamic heterogenous
  24. approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(2): 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2373.
  25. Chang-Yong R and Lee H (2007). Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure and Macroeconomy: The Experience
  26. of Korea. In: Performance Evaluation and Best Practice of Public Private Partnerships. Kim JH, editor.
  27. Sejong: Korea Development Institute.
  28. Christine W (2002). Soft Hearts and Hard Heads: The Private Sector’s Centrality to Poverty Reduction. In: Edmonds
  29. C and Medina S, editors. Defining an Agenda for Poverty Reduction: Proceedings of the First Asia and Pacific
  30. Forum on Poverty. Vol. 1. Manila: ADB.
  31. Clio D, Ruiz-Nuñez F and Wei Z (2015). The Economic Impact of Infrastructure and Public Private Partnerships:
  32. Literature Review. Available from: https://www.library.pppknowledgelab.org/World%20Bank%20Group/
  33. documents/2384.[Last accessed on June 2017].
  34. David AA (1989). Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2): 177-200. https://doi.
  35. org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0.
  36. David C and Pedroni P (2008). Infrastructure, long-run economic growth and causality tests for cointegrated panels.
  37. Manchester School, 76(5): 504-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01073.x.
  38. Eduardo E (2016). Public Private Partnerships: Economic Theory and Public Policy. Presentation at the World Bank Development Economics vice Presidency (DEC) Lecture Series. Washington DC: World Bank Group.
  39. Elisabetta I and Martimort D (2015). The simple microeconomics of public private partnerships. Journal of Public
  40. Economic Theory, 17(1): 4-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12114.
  41. Eunkyung K (2005). Infrastructure, Growth and Poverty Reduction in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
  42. Manila: Paper presented at the Asian Development Bank Institute Workshop on Transport Infrastructure and
  43. Poverty Reduction.
  44. European PPP Expertise Centre (2015). PPP Motivations and Challenges for the Public Sector: Why (Not) and
  45. How? Available from: http://www.eib.org/attachments/epec/epec_ppp_motivations_and_challenges_en.pdf.
  46. [Last accessed on June 2017].
  47. Jay-Hyung K, Kim J, Shin S and Lee SY (2011). Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies from the
  48. Republic of Korea. Vol. 1. Institutional Arrangements and Performance. Manila: Asian Development Bank. [Last
  49. accessed on June 2017].
  50. Kalpana S, Bramati MC and Veredas D (2008). How Relevant is Infrastructure to Growth in East Asia? World Bank
  51. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4597. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4597.
  52. Koichi F, Morita Y and Shibata A (1993). Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital.
  53. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(4): 607-625. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440914.
  54. Lant P and Summers L (2014). Asiaphoria Meets Regression to the Mean. NBER Working Paper No. 20573. https://
  55. doi.org/10.3386/w20573.
  56. Lourdes T, Martin N, Estache A and Campos J (2002). Macroeconomics Effects of Private Sector Participation
  57. in Latin America’s Infrastructure. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2906. https://doi.
  58. org/10.1596/1813-9450-2906.
  59. Luis S (2010). Infrastructure and Growth. A World Bank Research Brief. Available from: http://
  60. w w w. e c o n . w o r l d b a n k . o rg /WB S I T E / E X T E R N A L / E X T D E C / E X T R E S E A R C H / 0 , c o n t e n t
  61. MDK:22629797~pagePK:64165401~piPK:64165026~theSitePK:469382~isCURL: Y,00.html. [Last
  62. accessed on June 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg101058x.
  63. Mona H, Ruhashyankiko JF and Yehoue EB (2006). Determinants of Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure.
  64. IMF Working Paper No. WP/06/99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781451863598.001.
  65. Octasiano M, Miguel V (2017). Infrastructure Development, Income Inequality, and Urban Sustainability in the
  66. People’s Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 713. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/7057.
  67. Odongo K and Ojah K (2016). Does infrastructure really explain economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa? Review
  68. of Development Finance, 6(2): 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.12.001.
  69. Paul D and Eustice K (2005). Delivering the PPP Promise: A Review of PPP Issues and Activity. Price Water House
  70. Coopers. Available from: http://www.globalclearinghouse.org/Infra Dev/assets/10/documents/PW C%20
  71. -%20 Delivering %20 the %20 PPP %20 Promise_A%20 Revie w%20 of %20 PPP %20 Issues%20 and %20
  72. Activities% 20(2005).pdf. [Last accessed on June 2017].
  73. Prachitha J, Mahalingam A, Deep A and Thillairajan A (2015). Impact of private sector participation on access and
  74. quality of services: Systematic review of evidence from the electricity, telecommunications and water supply
  75. sectors. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 7(1): 64-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2014.955519.
  76. Rabah A, Bolton P, Peters S, Samama F and Stiglitz J (2016). From Global Savings Glut to Financing
  77. Infrastructure: The Advent of Investment Platforms. IMF Working Paper No. WP/16/18. http://dx.doi.
  78. org/10.5089/9781475591835.001.
  79. Rahel S (2014). Institutional quality and private sector participation: Theory and empirical findings. European
  80. Journal of Government and Economics, 3(2): 104-117. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2014.3.2.4300.
  81. Richard S, Abouchakra R, Hammami M and Najjar MR (2008). Public Private Partnerships: A New Catalyst for
  82. Economic Growth. New York: Booz and Company.
  83. Robert JB (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy,
  84. (5): 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726.
  85. Robert JB and Sala-i-Martin X (2004). Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  86. Stéphane S and Terada-Hagiwara A (2010). Infrastructure and Growth in Developing Asia. ADB Economics
  87. Working Paper Series No. 231.
  88. Sununtar S (2010). Transport Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction. ADBI Research Policy Brief No. 21.
  89. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2014). The 2014 Infrascope Index and Report. London: The Economist Intelligence
  90. Unit. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/158409/2014-infrascope.pdf.
  91. Timo H and McKibbin W (2010). The Economics of Infrastructure in a Globalized World: Issues, Lessons and
  92. Future Challenges. Washington, DC: Brookings.
  93. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2014). 5P Approach:
  94. Partnerships for a Resilient Energy Future. Available from: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/5P_
  95. Brochure.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Jun 14].
  96. Valerie C, Cuevas A, Goes C, Karpowicz L, Matheson T, Zamake I and Vtyurina S (2016). Highways to Heaven:
  97. Infrastructure Determinants and Trends in Latin America and the Caribbean. IMF Working Paper No.
  98. WP/16/185. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781475536744.001.
  99. Wana IN and Mahyideen JM (2015). The Impact of Infrastructure on Trade and Economic Growth in Selected
  100. Economies in Asia. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 553. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145401.
  101. Ward R and de Haan J (2005). Public Capital and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey. In: Riess A and Välilä T,
  102. editors. Conference in Economics and Finance Innovative Financing of Infrastructure the Role of Public
  103. Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Economic Growth, and the Economics of PPPs. http://hdl.handle.
  104. net/10419/44846.
  105. World Bank (2016). Benchmarking Public Private Partnerships Procurements. Washington, DC. World Bank.
  106. https://doi.org/10.1596/25089.
  107. World Bank (2018). Private Participation in Infrastructure Database. Available from: https://www.ppi.worldbank.
  108. org/data. [Last accessed on 14 Jun 2017].
  109. Xuehui H and Wei S (2017). Reexamining the middle-income trap hypothesis (MITH): What to reject and what
  110. to revive? Journal of International Money and Finance, 73(Part A): 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  111. jimonfin.2017.01.004.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1082

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Minsoo Lee, Xuehui Han, Raymond Gaspar and Emmanuel Alano

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.