The policy to accelerate the design of the Detailed Spatial Plan regulation document (RDTR) is a strategic step to enhance ease of doing business and promote sustainable development in Indonesia. Targeting 2036 RDTR sites nationwide, the initiative relies on various policy interventions and technical approaches. However, as of 8 January 2024, only 399 RDTRs (19.59%) were enacted after four years of implementation. This underperformance suggests the need to examine factors influencing the process, including issues at each stage of the RDTR design business process. While often overlooked due to its perceived irrelevance to the core substance of planning, analyzing the process is crucial to addressing operational and procedural challenges. This research identifies critical issues arising from the preparation to the enactment stage of RDTR regulations and proposes necessary policy changes. Using an explanatory approach, the study employs methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), post-review analysis, stakeholder analysis, business process evaluation, and scenario planning. Results show several impediments, including challenges related to commitment, technical and substantive issues, managerial coordination, policy frameworks, ICT support, and data availability. These findings serve as inputs for the development of business process improvement scenarios and reengineering schemes based on Business Process Management principles.

Acheampong, R.A. (2019). The Concept of Spatial Planning and the Planning System, in: Spatial Planning in Ghana, The Urban Book Series. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 11–27. https://doi.org/10,1007/978-3030-02011-8_2

Alfasi, N., Portugali, J. (2007). Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory 6, 164–182. https://doi.org/10,1177/1473095207077587

Allmendinger, P. (2002). Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory 1, 77–99. https://doi.org/10,1177/147309520200100105

Amer, M., ,Daim, T.U., Jetter, A. (2013). A Review Of Scenario Planning. Futures Volume 46, February 2013, Pages 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003

Bagheri, M., Zaiton Ibrahim, Z., Mansor, S., et al. (2021). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Expert Choice Software for Coastal City Vulnerability Evaluation. Urban Science, 5(4), 84.

Bennett, R.M., Hutabarat, I.R., Unger, E.-M., et al. (2023). Digital Transformation in Indonesian Land Administration. Geospatial Science for Smart Land Management:43-67.

Bouhalleb, A., Smida, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and strategic flexibility and complexity. European Journal of International Management, ff10.1504/EJIM.2019.10016812ff. ffhal-03845924f

Bui, Q.-T., Pham, L.-T., Nguyen, H.,-D., et al. (2023). Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Land Cover Classification. Geospatial Science for Smart Land Management:119-131.

Byiringiro, S., Lacanienta, C., Clark, R., et al. (2022). Digital and virtual strategies to advance community stakeholder engagement in research during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Aug 30;6(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.457. PMID: 36285018; PMCID: PMC9549580.

Byrne, D. (2003). Complexity theory and planning theory: A necessary encounter. Planning Theory, 2(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520323002

Chang, J. F., (2006). Business process management systems: strategy and implementation. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.

Cordova-Pozo, K., Rouwette, E., 2023. Types of scenario planning and their effective : a review of reviews. Journal of Future. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103153

de Vries, W.T. (2021). Trends in The Adoption of New Geospatial Technologies for Spatial Planning and Land Management in 2021. GeoPlanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning. DOI: 10.14710/geoplanning.8.2.85-98

de Vries, W.T., Rudiarto, I. (2023). Testing and Enhancing the 8R Framework of Responsible Land Management with Documented Strategies and Effects of Land Reclamation Projects in Indonesia. Land 2023, 12, 208. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/land12010208

Dean, M. (2019). Scenario Planning: A Literature Review. Multi-modal Optimisation for Road-space in Europe, University College London. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.12629.24802

Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang. (2021). Percepatan Penyelesaian RDTR Kabupaten/Kota. Jakarta: Sekretaris Jenderal Tata Ruang

Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang. (2023). Kajian Rekomendasi dan Rencana Aksi: Percepatan Penyediaan Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR). Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang, Kementerian ATR/BPN, Jakarta.

Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., (2013). Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10,1007/978-3-642-33143-5

Elbakidze, M., Dawson, L., Andersson, K., et al. (2015). Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a rural–urban gradient in Sweden. Land Use Policy, 48, 270-285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10,1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.001

Enemark, S. (2006). Understanding the Land Management Paradigm. In P. van der Molen, & C. Lemmen (Eds.), Proceedings: Innovative technology for land administration 17–27.

Erkan, T. E., Elsharida, W. M. (2020). Combining AHP and ROC with GIS for airport site selection: a case study in Libya. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(5), 312.

Faludi, A., (1973). A Reader in Planning Theory. Pergamon, Oxford.

Forman, E. H., Selly, M.A. (2001). Decision By Objectives How To Convince Others That You Are Right. World Scientific.

Harrington, H. J., (1991). Business process improvement: The breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness.

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan Education UK. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xkxdDwAAQBAJ

Holden, M. (2008). The Tough Minded and the Tender Minded: A Pragmatic Turn for Sustainable Development Planning and Policy. Planning Theory & Practice 9, 475–496. https://doi.org/10,1080/14649350802481371

Holgersen, S., Haarstad, H., (2009). Class, Community and Communicative Planning: Urban Redevelopment at King’s Cross, London. Antipode 41, 348–370, https://doi.org/10,1111/j.1467-8330,2009.00676.x

Hudalah, D., Woltjer, J. (2007). Spatial Planning System in Transitional Indonesia. International Planning Studies, 12, 29 - 303.

Ishizaka, A., Labib, A. (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.10.

Jia, M.; Liu, A.; Narahara, T. The Integration of Dual Evaluation and MinimumSpanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103928

Kasim, T., Haračić, M., Haračić, M.. (2018). The Improvement of Business Efficiency Through Business Process Management. Journal of Economics and Business.

Khaw, K.W., Alnoor, A., AL‑Abrrow, H., et al. (2022). Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Curr Psychol 42, 19137–19160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6

Kitchen, T. (2006). Skills for Planning Practice. Macmillan Education UK. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0Du0HQAACAAJ

Klein, L.L., De Pádua, S.I.D., Gera, R., et al. (2023). Business process management effectiveness and maturity through lean management practices: the Brazilian federal police experience. IJLSS 14, 368–396. https://doi.org/10,1108/IJLSS-07-2021-0125

KPPOD, (2016). Reformasi Kemudahan Berusaha: Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Paket Kebijakan Ekonomi di Daerah. https://www.kppod.org/backend/files/laporan_penelitian/eodb-reformasi-kemudahan-berusaha.pdf.

Ksenofontov, A. A., Ksenofontov, A. S., Kirpicheva, M. A., Trifonov, P. V. (2019). The use of modern management technology to improve business efficiency. In IOP conference series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 483, No. 1, p. 012114). IOP Publishing.

Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 10, 369–391. https://doi.org/10,1080/14649350903229810

Legacy, C. (2012). Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 13, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.649947

Lindgren, M., Bandhold, H. (2003). Scenario planning: The Link between Future and Strategy. Springer.

Mahendrawathi, E.R. (2018). Business Process Management, I. ed. ANDI OFFSET, Yogyakarta.

Märker, O., Voß, A., Roeder, S. (2003). Optimizing Cooperation in Spatial Planning for eGovernment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2645:239-249. DOI:10.1007/3-540-44836-5_25

Mastrocinque, E., Ramírez, F. J., Honrubia-Escribano, A., Pham, D. T. (2020). An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Systems with Applications, 150, 113321.

Matli, W., Wamba, S.F. 2023. Work from anywhere: inequalities in technology infrastructure distribution for digit workers. Digital Transformation and Society Vol. 2 No. 2, 2023 pp. 149-162. DOI 10.1108/DTS-08-2022-0042

Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., Fernandez-Maldonado, A.M. Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: Trends across Europe. Reg. Stud. 2021, 55, 791–803.

Norton, R. K. (2005). Local Commitment to State-Mandated Planning in Coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 149–171. doi:10,1177/0739456x05278984

Oliver, J. J. (2023). Scenario planning: Reflecting on cases of actionable knowledge. Futures & Foresight Science, 5, e164. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.164

Osobajo, O.A., Okeb, A., Ajimmyc, M., et al. (2023). The role of culture in stakeholder engagement: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of open innovation: technology, market and complexity [online], 9(2), article 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100058

Persson, C. (2013). Deliberation or doctrine? Land use and spatial planning for sustainable development in Sweden. Land Use Policy, 34, 301–313.

Pinto, N.N., Lancrenon, D., Berchtold, M. New ICT in Planning Practice: a permanent need to innovate in practice.

Rachmawati, R., Ghiffari, R.A., Widjani, A.F., et al. (2024). Optimizing GISTARU: Evaluating a GIS-Based Platform’s Contribution to Indonesian Spatial Planning for Smart City Development. GeoPlanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning. DOI: 10.14710/geoplanning.11.1.57-70.

Ratih, Putera, R. E., Koeswara, H. (2023). Analysis of Implementation of OSS-RBA Policy in Padang City. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 5(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.22487/jpag.v5i2.1006

Ringland, G. 1998. Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Rustiadi, E., Indraprahasta, G.S., Mulya, S.P. (2021). Teori Perencanaan: Mazhab dan Praktik Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology 15(3): 234-281.

Saaty, Thomas L. (2008). Decision Making With Analytical Hierarchy Process. International journal service science. Vol. 1, No 1, page 83-98.

Şahin, S.Z. (2019). The urbanization policy of Turkey: an uneasy symbiosis of unimplemented policy with centralized pragmatic interventions. Turkish Studies 20, 599–618. https://doi.org/10,1080/14683849.2019.1602826

Santo, D., Achsani, N.A., Rustiadi, E., Buono, A. (2024a). Factors influencing the acceleration of detailed spatial plan (RDTR) preparation in Indonesia, Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, Vol 20, No.3, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v20i3. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/64229/pdf.

Santo, D., Achsani, N. A., Rustiadi, E., Buono, A. (2024b). Optimization of Participatory and Collaborative Planning Methods for Accelerating the Preparation of Detailed Spatial Plans. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 9(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v9i1.767. https://jurnalbhumi.stpn.ac.id/index.php/JB/article/view/767/411.

Sari, R. K., Despa, D., Sukmana, I., (2022). Keterpaduan Infrastruktur Antar Sektor untuk Mendukung Pengembangan Wilayah. Jurnal Rekayasa Lampung, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.23960/jrl.v1i3.15.

Stephany, S. (2021). Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Space Utilization Control in Indonesia. University of Groningen and Institute Technology of Bandung.

Taufiq, M., Suhirman, Kombaitan, B. (2021). A Reflection on Transactive Planning: Transfer of Planning Knowledge in Local Community-Level Deliberation. SAGE Open 11, 215824402110227. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211022739

UN Habitat. (2023). Enabling Meaningful Public Participation in Spatial Planning Processes. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

UNDP. (2022). Integrated Spatial Planning Workbook. United Nations Development Programme: New York.

Villanueva, G., Gonzalez, C., Son, M., et al. (2017). Ringing local voices into community revitalization: engaged communication research in Urban planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research 45, 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382711

Wen, R., Li, S. (2023). Spatial Decision Support Systems with Automated Machine Learning: A Review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijgi12010012

Weske, M. (2007). Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. Springer, Berlin; New York.

World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019951789.

World Bank. (2024). Business Ready 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report: How countries are performing on the road to recovery, Special Edition 2020, ed.