Assessing the impact of education system reforms on student learning outcomes: A longitudinal study

Aayesha Sagir Khan, Alba Maria Gallo, Ubaldo Comite, E. Seda KOÇ, Amira Ali Alkholi, M Prabavathy, Dhruv Pande

Article ID: 10468
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2025

VIEWS - 78 (Abstract)

Abstract


This longitudinal study is dedicated to the evaluation of the comprehensive impact of educational reforms through a mixed research methodology which is a combination of the quantitative- and qualitative-oriented research methods to check the students’ outcomes. Data was collected in the span of [mention the time frame] from various data sources for instance standardized test scores, school performance statistics, and through open-ended qualitative evaluation from both students and teachers. Data analysis carried on after the reforms had been put in place revealed that there was a considerable rise in mean test scores and success graduation rates. Therefore, formative evaluation demonstrates the need for implementing reforms that will eventually help the students in boosting academic performance. Besides, there is no difference among investor opinions on teachers, administrators, and students who are involved with the implementation of the reforms. Stakeholders manifest this new assistance as an outcome of lasting improvements in curriculum quality, methods of teaching, and student participation. The study approaches two main challenges that are confronted with education reform that is resourcelessness and to society the change of the educational system can be more suitable for the students to excel academically and it can have an impact on the whole community. Even though this study makes important advancements toward the realization of the complex education implementation process and its effect on student academics, there are elements in which it can be criticized. Both quantitative and qualitative performance improvement is important as well as all the important stakeholder participation. This way the transformation process becomes layered. In other words, these results point to the necessity of planning interventions for longer periods that target the challenges and the forces that maintain the low levels of education performance by the counties.


Keywords


education system reforms; student learning outcomes; longitudinal study; standardized test scores; graduation rates; mixed-methods approach; stakeholder perceptions

Full Text:

PDF


References


Baker, B. D., and Farrie, D. (2016). The Stealth Inequities of School Funding: How State and Local School Finance Systems Perpetuate Inequitable Student Spending. Center for American Progress Report. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2016/08/29/143878/the-stealth-inequities-of-school-funding/

Carnoy, M., and Rothstein, R. (2013). What Do International Tests Show About U.S. Student Performance? Economic Policy Institute Report. https://www.epi.org/publication/international-tests-show-us-student-performance/

Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., and Ivanova, A. (2015). Using TIMSS and PISA results to inform educational policy: a study of Russia and its neighbors. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 248–271.

Chetty, R., et al. (2011). How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project STAR. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1593–1660.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1–1.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers college press.

Glewwe, P., and Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. NBER Working Paper No. 8403. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8403

Goldhaber, D. (2010). Teacher Pay Reforms: The Political Economy of Teacher Compensation. Education Finance and Policy, 5(3), 316–348.

Grimm, M., and Pelli, M. (2017). The impact of educational reforms on student learning outcomes: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Education Economics, 25(3), 257–276.

Hanushek, E. A., and Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.

Hanushek, E. A., and Woessmann, L. (2012). Schooling, educational achievement, and the Latin American growth puzzle. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 497–512.

Harris, D. N., and Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Levin, H. M. (2012). Global Education Reform: How Privatization and Public Investment Influence Education Outcomes. Routledge.

Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. Knopf.

Reeves, D. B. (2018). Learning in the Fast Lane: The Past, Present, and Future of Advanced Placement. Teachers College Press.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

Sinuany-Stern, Z., and Hirsh, A. (2021). The relative efficiencies of higher education in OECD countries. Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science in Higher Education, 481–512.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10468

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aayesha Sagir Khan, Alba Maria Gallo, Ubaldo Comite, E. Seda KOÇ, Amira Ali Alkholi, M Prabavathy, Dhruv Pande

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.