Creating products and services that satisfy individual and community needs is impossible without raw materials. This study takes a novel approach by integrating the economic dynamics and raw material consumption indicators of the European Union (EU). The study uses different econometric methods to analyze the relationship between GDP (gross domestic product) and the EU’s raw material consumption (RMC) from 2014–2023. Among the results, the panel data analysis model shows that the resource productivity of the EU improved during the period under review, whereas the material intensity decreased significantly. These trends significantly contributed to the relative decoupling of material consumption from GDP in the last decade. The results of the K-means cluster analysis highlight the regional economic differences within the EU. According to the results of the correlation analysis, EU member countries differ significantly in the efficiency of raw material use. Nevertheless, five member countries are robustly vulnerable to large-scale raw material use. The divergence calculation results show that while some countries use raw materials extremely efficiently to produce GDP, others achieve low efficiency. This unique approach and the resulting findings provide a new perspective on the complex relationship between economic growth and raw material use in the EU.

Almodóvar-González, M. Fernández-Portillo, A. & Díaz-Casero, J.C. (2020). Entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. A multi-country analysis, European Research on Management and Business Economics, Vol. 26. Núm. 1., DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.12.004

Ashby, F. Michael (2012). Materials for low-carbon power. Materials and the Environment, (Second Edition), 349–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385971-6.00012-9

Bánhidi, Z.& Dobos, I. (2023). Measurement of digital development with partial orders, Tiered DEA, and cluster analysis for the European Union, Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng, Volume 14: Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2023.00612

Bányai, O. (2013). The European Union regulation concerning the energy consumption of buildings — an ecological point of view, Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng, Volume 4: Issue 2, https://doi.org/10.1556/irase.4.2013.2.3

Bithas, K. & Kalimeris, P. (2018). Unmasking decoupling: Redefining the Resource Intensity of the Economy, Science of The Total Environment, Volumes 619–620, Pages 338-351., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.061

Bolboacâ, S.D. & Jäntschi, L. (2006). Pearson versus Spearman, Kendall’s Tau Correlation Analysis on

Bringezu, S. (2015). Possible Target Corridor for Sustainable Use of Global Material Resources. Resources, 4, 25–54., https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4010025

Cautisanu, C. & Hatmanu, M. (2023). A Study of the Decoupling of Economic Growth from CO2 and HFCs Emissions in the EU27 Countries. Energies 2023, 5546. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145546

Chen, L., Yang X., Li L. et al. (2021). The Natural and Socioeconomic Influences on Land-Use Intensity: Evidence from China. Land, 10, 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111254

Destek, M.A., Ulucak, R. & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4

Dogan, E. & Shah S. F. (2022). Analyzing the Role of Renewable Energy and Energy Intensity in the Ecological Footprint of the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability, 14, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010227

Domaracka, L., Matuskova S. Tausova, M., et al. (2022). Efficient Use of Critical Raw Materials for Optimal Resource Management in EU Countries. Sustainability, 14, 6554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116554

Du, J., Zhang J. & Li X. (2020). What Is the Mechanism of Resource Dependence and High-Quality Economic Development? An Empirical Test from China. Sustainability, 12, 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198144

Dziechciarz, M. (2024). Panel Data Analysis of Subjective Well-Being in European Countries in the Years 2013–2022. Sustainability, 16, 2124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052124

Eurostat (2024a). GDP and main components (output, expenditure and income), Current prices, million euro, (2014-2023), Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10_gdp/default/table?lang=en (accessed 15 Sept 2024)

Eurostat (2024b). Material flow accounts, Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/env_ac_mfa/default/table?lang=%3Cfont%20style%3D%22vertical-align:%20inherit;%22%3E%3Cfont%20style%3D%22vertical-align:%20inherit;%22%3Ehu%3C%2Ffont%3E%3C%2Ffont%3E, (accessed 15 Sept 2024).

Forchini, G. & Peng, B. (2012). A Conditional Approach to Panel Data Models with Common Shocks. Econometrics, 4, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics4010004

Ghita, S. I., Saseanu, A. S., Gogonea, R. -M., & Huidumac-Petrescu, C. -E. (2018). Perspectives of Ecological Footprint in European Context under the Impact of Information Society and Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 10(9), 3224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093224

Glawe, L. & Wagner, H. (2021). Divergence Tendencies in the European Integration Process: A Danger for the Sustainability of the E(M)U? J. Risk Financial Manag., 14, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030104

Golam, K. (2023). Ecological footprint in Bangladesh: Identifying the intensity of economic complexity and natural resources, Heliyon, Volume 9, Issue 4, E14747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14747

Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D. et al. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use, and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 065003., DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a

Herman, E., Zsido K-E. & Fenyves, V. (2022). Cluster Analysis with K-Mean versus K-Medoid in Financial Performance, Evaluation. Appl. Sci., 12, 7985. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12167985

Huong, T-T., Dong, L. & Shah, I-H. (2021). Exploring the Sustainability of Resource Flow and Productivity Transition in Vietnam from 1978 to 2017: MFA and DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach. Sustainability, 13, 11761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111761

Ikerd, J. (2024). Business Management for Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(9), 3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093714

Kalantaripor, M. & Najafi A-H. (2020). Spatial Effects of Energy Consumption and Green GDP in Regional Agreements. Sustainability, 13(18), 10078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810078

Kassouri, Y., Alola, A-A. & Savaş S. (2021). The dynamics of material consumption in phases of the economic cycle for selected emerging countries. Resources Policy, 70, 101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101918

Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas J-A, Shirazi, M. et al., (2023). Does economic complexity increase energy intensity? Energy Efficiency, 16, 29, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10104-w

Kinnaman, T-C. (2023). A New Perspective on the Natural Resource Curse. World, 4, 670–683. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4040042

Koskela, S., Mattila, T., Antikainen, R. & Mäenpää, I. (2013). Identifying Key Sectors and Measures for a Transition toward a Low Resource Economy. Resources, 2, 151-166. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2030151

Kuemmerle, T., Erb, K., Meyfroidt, P. et al., (2013). Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 484-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002

Kuziboev, B., Saidmamatov, O., Khodjaniyazov, E. et al. (2024) .CO2 Emissions, Remittances, Energy Intensity and Economic Development: The Evidence from Central Asia. Economies, 12, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040095

Li, Z., Lu Z., Xu L. et al. (2023). Examining the Decoupling of Economic Growth with Land Expansion and Carbon Emissions in Zhejiang Province, China. Land, 12, 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081618

Liang, S., Song, Y., Li X. et al. (2023). The Impact of Resource Endowment on Provincial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis from China. Energies, 16, 4661. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124661

Mahmood, A., Farooq, A., Akbar, H. et al. (2023). An Integrated Approach to Analyze the Progress of Developing Economies in Asia toward the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 15, 13645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813645

Mahmood, H. (2023). The Determinants of Carbon Intensities of Different Sources of Carbon Emissions in Saudi Arabia: The Asymmetric Role of Natural Resource Rent. Economies, 11, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11110276

Malatesta, T. & Breadsell, J. K. (2022). Identifying Home System of Practices for Energy Use with K-Means Clustering Techniques. Sustainability, 14, 9017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159017

Martins, F. F., Castro, H., Smitková, M. et al. (2024). Energy and Circular Economy: Nexus beyond Concepts. Sustainability, 16, 1728., https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051728

Min, X., Wang Y. & Chen, J. (2022). Resource Carrying Capacity Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Evaluation: Validation Using Karst Landscape Region in Southwest China. Sustainability, 14, 16548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416548

Mostert, C. & Bringezu, S. (2019). Measuring Product Material Footprint as New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method: Indicators and Abiotic Characterization Factors. Resources, 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020061

Pepłowska, M. & Olczak, P. (2024). Review of Research on the Impact of Changes Resulting from the Hard Coal Mining Sector in Poland on the GDP Value. Energies 17, 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061477

Platon, V., Pavelescu, F. Surugiu, M. et al. (2023). Influence of Eco-Innovation and Recycling on Raw Material Consumption; Econometric Approach in the Case of the European Union. Sustainability, 15, 3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053996,

Rybak, A., Rybak A., Joostberens, J. & Kolev, S. D. (2022). Cluster Analysis of the EU-27 Countries in Light of the Guiding Principles of the European Green Deal, with Particular Emphasis on Poland. Energies, 15, 5082. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145082

Salas-Velasco, M. (2023). Panel Data Models for School Evaluation: The Case of High Schools’ Results in University Entrance Examinations. Stats, 6, 312-321. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats6010019

Stoenoiu, C. E., & Jäntschi, L. (2024). Connecting the Computer Skills with General Performance of Companies—An Eastern European Study. Sustainability, 16(22), 10024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210024

Structure-Activity Relationships of Biologic Active Compounds, Leonardo Journal of Sciences, Available online: http://ljs.academicdirect.org/A09/179_200.pdf, (accessed 26 November 2024)

Suad, A., Maalee, A., Ghassan, A. et al. (2024). Statistical Inference of Normal Distribution Based on Several Divergence Measures: A Comparative Study. Symmetry, 16, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16020212

Szustak, G., Dąbrowski, P., Gradoń, W. & Szewczyk, Ł. (2022). The Relationship between Energy Production and GDP: Evidence from Selected European Economies. Energies, 15, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010050

Taguchi, H. & Ganbayar, J. (2022). Natural Resource Funds: Their Objectives and Effectiveness. Sustainability, 14, 10986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710986

Taušová, M., Čulková, K., Tauš, P. (2021). Evaluation of the Effective Material Use from the View of EU Environmental Policy Goals. Energies, 14, 4759. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164759

Török, L. (2022). The importance of digitalization and robotization in vehicle production in the European Union, Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng., Volume 14: Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2022.00481

Török, L. (2023). Ambivalent changes in the correlation of energy consumption and economic growth in the member states of the European Union (2010–2019), Heliyon, Volume 9, Issue 3, E14550, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145546

Török, L. (2024). The Trend in Environmental Load in the European Union during the Period of 2012–2022. Energies, 17, 3473. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143473

UNEP. (2013). Recent Trends in Material Flows and Resources Productivity in Asia and the Pacific DEW/1579/BA United Nations Environment Programme Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/recent-trends-material-flows-and-resource-productivity-asia-and-pacific. (accessed 1 Nov 2024).

Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Schulz, N. B. et al., (2004). Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges, Land Use Policy, Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 271-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.006

Wandebori, H. & Murtyastanto. (2023). The Implication of Steel-Intensity-of-Use on Economic Development. Sustainability, 15, 12297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612297

Wang, Y., Qamruzzaman, Md. & Kor, S. (2022). Greening the Future: Harnessing ICT, Innovation, Eco-Taxes, and Clean Energy for Sustainable Ecology—Insights from Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Regression, Continuously Updated Fully Modified, and Continuously Updated Bias-Corrected Models. Sustainability, 15(23), 16417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316417

Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G. et al., (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: Bibliometric and conceptual mapping. Environ. Res. Lett., 15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429

Xu, Y., Xu X., & Tang, Q. (2016). Human activity intensity of land surface: Concept, methods and application in China. J. Geogr. Sci., 26, 1349–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1331-y

Yoder Clark, A., Blumenfeld, N., Lal, E. et al., (2021). Using K-Means Cluster Analysis and Decision Trees to Highlight Significant Factors Leading to Homelessness. Mathematics, 9, 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172045

Zhang, X., Shi, X., Khan, Y., et al. (2023). The Impact of Energy Intensity, Energy Productivity and Natural Resource Rents on Carbon Emissions in Morocco. Sustainability, 15, 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086720

Zhang, Z., Xue, B., Pang, J. & Chen, X. (2016). The Decoupling of Resource Consumption and Environmental Impact from Economic Growth in China: Spatial Pattern and Temporal Trend. Sustainability, 8, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030222

Ziolo, M., Jednak, S., Savić, G.& Kragulj, D. (2020). Link between Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Economic and Financial Development in OECD Countries. Energies, 13, 5898. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225898

Zschieschang, E., Denz, N., Lambrecht, H. &Viere, T. (2013). Resource Efficiency-oriented Optimization of Material Flow Networks in Chemical Process Engineering. Procedia CIRP, 2013, 15, 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.066