Potential biological effects on living tissues of biodiversity subsequent to exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields

Adel Razek

Article ID: 11750
Vol 8, Issue 2, 2025

VIEWS - 17 (Abstract)

Abstract


Exposure to high-frequency (HF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) has various effects on living tissues involved in biodiversity. Interactions between fields and exposed tissues are correlated with the characteristics of the exposure, tissue behavior, and field intensity and frequency. These interactions can produce mainly adverse thermal and possibly non-thermal effects. In fact, the most expected type of outcome is a thermal biological effect (BE), where tissues are materially heated by the dissipated electromagnetic energy due to HF-EMF exposure. In case of exposure at a disproportionate intensity and duration, HF-EMF can induce a potentially harmful non-thermal BE on living tissues contained within biodiversity. This paper aims to analyze the thermal BE on biodiversity living tissues and the associated EMF and bio-heat (BH) governing equations.


Keywords


HF-EMF; exposure adverse effects; living tissues; biodiversity

Full Text:

PDF


References


1.       Zhang Y, Pandiselvam R, Zhu H, et al. Impact of radio frequency treatment on textural properties of food products: An updated review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2022; 124: 154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.014

2.       Muangrat R, Lertbuaban P. Comparation of roasting and vacuum microwave drying treatments on physicochemical properties of supercritical CO2-extracted oil from black sesame seeds. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2025; 19: 101583. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101583

3.       Redr J, Pokorny T, Drizdal T, et al. Microwave Hyperthermia of Brain Tumors: A 2D Assessment Parametric Numerical Study. Sensors. 2022; 22(16): 6115. doi: 10.3390/s22166115

4.       Wang X, Xi Z, Ye K, et al. Improvement of Phased Antenna Array Applied in Focused Microwave Breast Hyperthermia. Sensors. 2024; 24(9): 2682. doi: 10.3390/s24092682

5.       Razek A. Assessment of EMF Troubles of Biological and Instrumental Medical Questions and Analysis of Their Compliance with Standards. Standards. 2023; 3(2): 227-239. doi: 10.3390/standards3020018

6.       Razek A. Analysis and control of ornamental plant responses to exposure to electromagnetic fields. Ornamental Plant Research. 2024; 4(1): 0-0. doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0007

7.       Razek A. Analysis of the Interaction Effects of Electromagnetic Fields with Major Living Tissues—One Health Concept Numerical Evaluation Strategy. Digital Technologies Research and Applications. 2024; 3(2): 41-57. doi: 10.54963/dtra.v3i2.243

8.       Sahaya Glingston R, Yadav J, Rajpoot J, et al. Contribution of yeast models to virus research. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021; 105(12): 4855-4878. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11331-w

9.       Bunse C, Bertos-Fortis M, Sassenhagen I, et al. Spatio-Temporal Interdependence of Bacteria and Phytoplankton during a Baltic Sea Spring Bloom. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016; 7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00517

10.     Maurice K, Bourceret A, Robin-Soriano A, et al. Simulated precipitation in a desert ecosystem reveals specific response of rhizosphere to water and a symbiont response in freshly emitted roots. Applied Soil Ecology. 2024; 199: 105412. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105412

11.     Razek A. Biological and Medical Disturbances Due to Exposure to Fields Emitted by Electromagnetic Energy Devices—A Review. Energies. 2022; 15(12): 4455. doi: 10.3390/en15124455

12.     Razek A. Thermal effects of electromagnetic origin from heating processes to biological disturbances due to field exposure—A review. Thermal Science and Engineering. 2023; 6(1): 20. doi: 10.24294/tse.v6i1.1950

13.     Nunes AS, Daniel L, Hage-Hassan M, et al. Modeling of the magnetic behavior of permanent magnets including ageing effects. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2020; 512: 166930. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166930

14.     Wang SJ, Zhao Q. A Lowest-Order Mixed Mortar-Element Method for 3-D Maxwell’s Eigenvalue Problems With the Absorbing Boundary Condition. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2024; 72(7): 3970-3979. doi: 10.1109/tmtt.2023.3342030

15.     Gürbüz IT, Martin F, Rasilo P, et al. A new methodology for incorporating the cutting deterioration of electrical sheets into electromagnetic finite-element simulation. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2024; 593: 171843. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.171843

16.     da Silva IPC, de Miranda RA, Sadowski N. et al. Modeling of Electrical Machines Hysteresis Losses Under Mechanical Stresses. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications. 2024; 23(3). doi: 10.1590/2179-10742024v23i3283838

17.     Antunes OJ, Bastos JPA, Sadowski N, et al. Using hierarchic interpolation with mortar element method for electrical machines analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2005; 41(5): 1472-1475. doi: 10.1109/tmag.2005.844561

18.     Pohlmann A, Lessmann M, Finocchiaro T, et al. Numerical Computation Can Save Life: FEM Simulations for the Development of Artificial Hearts. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2011; 47(5): 1166-1169. doi: 10.1109/tmag.2010.2082508

19.     Tang F, Giaccone L, Hao J, et al. Exposure of Infants to Gradient Fields in a Baby MRI Scanner. Bioelectromagnetics. 2022; 43(2): 69-80. doi: 10.1002/bem.22387

20.     Urdaneta-Calzadilla A, Chadebec O, Galopin N, et al. Modeling of Magnetoelectric Effects in Composite Structures by FEM–BEM Coupling. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2023; 59(5): 1-4. doi: 10.1109/tmag.2023.3235211

21.     Kim JH, Lee JK, Kim HG, et al. Possible Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Central Nerve System. Biomolecules & Therapeutics. 2019; 27(3): 265-275. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152

22.     Wust P, Kortüm B, Strauss U, et al. Non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69561-3

23.     Weller S, McCredden JE. Understanding the public voices and researchers speaking into the 5G narrative. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024; 11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1339513

24.     Meyer F, Bitsch A, Forman HJ, et al. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on biomarkers of oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro: A systematic review of experimental studies. Environment International. 2024; 194: 108940. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108940

25.     Zang Z, Guo Z, Fan X, et al. Assessing the performance of the pilot national parks in China. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 145: 109699. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109699

26.     Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science. 2019; 366(6471). doi: 10.1126/science.aax3100

27.     Coad A, Nightingale P, Stilgoe J, et al. Editorial: the dark side of innovation. Industry and Innovation. 2020; 28(1): 102-112. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1818555

28.     One Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/initiatives/one-health (accessed on 13 May 2025).

29.     Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1996; 41(11): 2251-2269. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002

30.     Sivani S, Sudarsanam D. Impacts of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) from cell phone towers and wireless devices on biosystem and ecosystem – a review. Biology and Medicine. 2012; 4: 202−216.

31.     Ozel HB, Cetin M, Sevik H, et al. The effects of base station as an electromagnetic radiation source on flower and cone yield and germination percentage in Pinus brutia Ten. Biologia Futura. 2021; 72(3): 359-365. doi: 10.1007/s42977-021-00085-1

32.     Khan MD, Ali S, Azizullah A, et al. Use of various biomarkers to explore the effects of GSM and GSM-like radiations on flowering plants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018; 25(25): 24611-24628. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2734-3

33.     Tran NT, Jokic L, Keller J, et al. Impacts of Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)—Evidence for RF-EMF Interference with Plant Stress Responses. Plants. 2023; 12(5): 1082. doi: 10.3390/plants12051082

34.     Ayesha S, Abideen Z, Haider G, et al. Enhancing sustainable plant production and food security: Understanding the mechanisms and impacts of electromagnetic fields. Plant Stress. 2023; 9: 100198. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100198

35.     Batool S, Bibi A, Frezza F, Mangini F. Benefits and hazards of electromagnetic waves, telecommunication, physical and biomedical: a review. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2019; 23: 3121−3128. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17596




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse11750

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.