Effect of different organic nutrient solutions and day of harvest on growth, biomass yield and chemical composition of hydroponically grown sorghum

Samson Adeoye, Victoria Ojo, Olumuyiwa Ogunbote, Temidayo Adeyemi, Amisu Ahmed, Oluwaseun Idowu, Adebayo Adetona, Motunrayo Okunlola

Article ID: 4063
Vol 7, Issue 2, 2024

VIEWS - 91 (Abstract) 40 (PDF)

Abstract


An experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of different organic nutrient solutions and day of harvest on growth parameters, biomass and chemical composition of hydroponically grown sorghum red fodder. The experiment was a 3 × 2 factorial design comprising of 3 nutrient solutions (cattle, poultry and rabbit) and 2 harvesting regimes (8th and 10th day). Cattle, poultry and rabbit dungs were collected fresh and processed into nutrient solutions. Sorghum red seeds were treated, planted on trays, and irrigated twice per day with organic nutrient solution according to the treatments. Growth parameters which were investigated included fodder mat thickness, seedling height, leaf length and width, number of leaves, fresh and dry matter yield; and proximate composition. The results showed that sorghum red fodder irrigated with cattle manure nutrient solution (NS) harvested at 10 days was higher in all, except one (fodder mat thickness) of the growth parameters considered. The crude protein (CP) was highest and similar (P > 0.05) for Poultry NS harvested at 8 and 10 days, and Cattle NS at 10 days (13.13%, 12.67%, and 12.69% respectively). The ash content also favored Cattle NS at 10 days. Cattle NS at 10 days harvest was significantly (P < 0.05) the highest (7.00%), but comparable (P > 0.05) with Rabbit NS at 10 days for NDF. Fresh and DM yields were highest for Cattle harvested at 10 and 8 days respectively. The study recommends Cattle NS as hydroponic organic NS for sorghum red as it enhances fresh and dry matter yields, and nutritive values.


Keywords


hydroponic fodder; organic nutrient solution; cattle; poultry; rabbit

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Masud T, Bhowmik S. Green energy and technology. In: Feasbility of solar-powered hydroponic fodder machine in Bangladesh: Local Development and Techno-Economic Aspect. Springer; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-3-319-89809-4_6

2. Ojo VOA, Olufemi SJ, Adetokunbo GA, et al. Growth components and chemical composition of some improved dual-purpose cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) varieties as influenced by manure application. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 2020; 44(2): 299-310. doi: 10.51791/njap.v44i2.1122

3. Adeyemi TA, Adeoye SA, Ogunyemi TJ, et al. Comparisons of nutrient solutions from organic and chemical fertilizer sources on herbage yield and quality of hydroponically produced maize fodder. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2020; 44(9): 1258-1267. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1845382

4. Gouws I, Botha K. The potential of sorghum as a forage crop: A review. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 2004; 21(4): 289-295. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2004.10635075

5. Meraz-Murillo FJ, Avendaño-Reyes L, Pérez-Linares C, et al. Feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Zebu heifers supplemented with two β-adrenergic agonists. Animal Production Science. 2017; 57(10): 2125. doi: 10.1071/an15369

6. Sriagtula R, Martaguri I, Sowmen S, et al. Evaluation of nutrient solution dose and harvest time on forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in hydroponic fodder system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 888(1): 012068. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/888/1/012068

7. Chrisdiana R. Quality and Quantity of Sorghum Hydroponic Fodder from Different Varieties and Harvest Time. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018; 119: 012014. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/119/1/012014

8. AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. AOAC International; 1995.

9. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 1991; 74(10): 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(91)78551-2

10. SAS. Statistical Analysis System, Computer Software, SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 9. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, North Carolina; 2002.

11. Ayoola O, Adeniyan NO. Influence of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on yield component of crops under different cropping system in south-west Nigeria. African journal of biotechnology. 2008; 5(15): 1386-1392.

12. Zelalem G, Kassahun G. Evaluation of hydroponic fodder performance of different varieties of sorghum. International Journal of Research -Granthaalayah. 2021; 9(2): 1-10. doi: 10.29121/granthaa layah.v9.i2.2021.2854

13. Lamidi AA, Ingweye JN, Mene L. Influence of seed varieties and harvesting regimes on growth indices, yields and nutritional values of hydroponics maize fodder. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2022; 24(2): 221-230.

14. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th ed. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 2001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v7i2.4063

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.