Agronomic characteristics and chemical composition of hydroponic maize fodder as influenced by animal waste solutions

Victoria Ojo, Samson Adeoye, Temidayo Adeyemi, Damilola Oyaniran, Edward Bode-Thomas, Victor Hassan, Motunrayo Okunlola, Oluwasanmi Arigbede

Article ID: 4062
Vol 7, Issue 1, 2024

VIEWS - 89 (Abstract) 46 (PDF)

Abstract


The growing of plants hydroponically is a soilless form of growing in modern day agriculture. It helps to make feed available for animals throughout the season since it is not affected by what is faced by field grown crops. The use of animal waste, that is, their faeces, in the growth of forage was compared with commercial hydroponics solutions as a way of looking for a reduction in the cost incurred in the purchase of commercial hydroponics solutions. The study evaluated the use of organic nutrient solutions (ONS) alongside a standard/commercial nutrient solution in growing crops hydroponically on the growth, dry matter yield, water use efficiency, and chemical composition of hydroponic maize fodder. The ONS used were formulated from the dried faeces of cattle, poultry, rabbits, and swine. The prepared organic nutrient solutions with the control were used in growing the maize seeds for 10 days, and growth, yield, and chemical composition were determined. Results show the highest (196 g) dry matter yield for maize hydroponic fodder irrigated with poultry ONS. Similarly, maize irrigated with poultry ONS was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in CP content, while it was not significantly different from maize irrigated with cattle, swine, and commercial solutions. A lower water use efficiency value (0.19 kg DM/m3) was recorded for maize irrigated with cattle ONS. According to the study, irrigating maize with different organic nutrient solutions produced maize fodder with a higher yield and a similar chemical composition as the commercial nutrient solution. 


Keywords


dry season feeding; feed scarcity; hydroponics; maize; organic nutrient solutions

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Adisa RS, Adekunle OA. Farmer-Herdsmen Conflicts: A Factor Analysis of Socio-economic Conflict Variables among Arable Crop Farmers in North Central Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology. 2010; 30(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1080/09709274.2010.11906266

2. Gunasekaran SC, Bandeswaran, Valli C. Low-cost hydroponic fodder production technology for sustainable livestock farming during fodder scarcity. Current Science. 2019; 116(4): 526-528.

3. Adeyemi TA, Adeoye SA, Ogunyemi TJ, et al. Comparisons of nutrient solutions from organic and chemical fertilizer sources on herbage yield and quality of hydroponically produced maize fodder. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2020; 44(9): 1258-1267. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1845382

4. Mohsenzadeh S, Farrashbandi MP, Eshghi S, et al. Enhancing strawberry fruit growth in hydroponic greenhouse: Synergistic effects of biochar and humic acid. Trends in Horticulture. 2023; 6(2): 2632. doi: 10.24294/th.v6i2.2632

5. Al-Karaki GN, Al-Momani N. Evaluation of some barley cultivars for green fodder production and water use efficiency under hydroponic conditions. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011; 7(3): 448-457.

6. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA; 2000.

7. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal Dairy Science. 1991; 74(10): 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

8. Wolfe K. Animal Manure. Available online: https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/2073/2020/11/Animal-Manure-in-the-Garden.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2023).

9. Nilahyane A, Islam M, Mesbah A, et al. Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies on Silage Corn Grown in Semi-Arid Conditions. Agronomy. 2018; 8(10): 208. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8100208

10. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th ed. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 2001.

11. Ergon Å, Kirwan L, Fystro G, et al. Species interactions in a grassland mixture under low nitrogen fertilization and two cutting frequencies. II. Nutritional quality. Grass and Forage Science. 2016; 72(2): 333-342. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12257

12. Lamidi AA, Ingweye JN, Mene L. Influence of seed varieties and harvesting regimes on growth indices, yields and nutritional values of hydroponics maize fodder. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2022; 24(2): 221-230.

13. Eastridge ML. Major advances in applied dairy cattle nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 2006; 89(4): 1311-1323. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72199-3




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v7i1.4062

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.