The study focused on investigating the effects of varying levels of HA (HA₁ = 0, HA₂ = 25, HA₃ = 50, HA₄ = 75, and HA₅ = 100) on Red Dragon, Red Prince, and Red Meat varieties of red radish. This analysis aimed to unravel the relationship between different levels of HA and their impact on the growth and productivity of red radish genotypes. The findings revealed that the Red Prince genotype attained the utmost plant height of 24.00 cm, an average of 7.50 leaves per plant, a leaf area of 23.11 cm², a canopy cover of 26.76%, a leaf chlorophyll content of 54.60%, a leaf fresh weight of 41.16 g, a leaf dry weight of 8.20 g, a root length measuring 9.73 cm, a root diameter of 3.19 mm, a root fresh weight of 27.60 g, a root dry weight of 6.75 g, and a remarkable total yield of 17.93 tons per hectare. The implications of this study are poised to benefit farmers within the Dera Ismail Khan Region, specifically in the plain areas of Pakistan, by promoting the cultivation of the Red Prince variety.

1. Tao J, Li S, Wang Q, et al. Construction of a high-density genetic map based on specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing and identification of loci controlling anthocyanin pigmentation in Yunnan red radish. Horticulture Research 2022; 9: uhab031. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab031.

2. Huang Y, Ge L, Lai H, et al. Seasonal alteration of environmental condition-driven shift in microbiota composition, physicochemical attributes and organic compound profiles in aged Paocai brine during intermittent back-slopping fermentation. Food Bioscience 2022; 50: 102111. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102111.

3. Forsberg S, Olsson V, Bredie WLP, Wendin K. Vegetable finger foods—Preferences among older adults with motoric eating difficulties. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 2022; 28: 100528. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100528.

4. Jamil M, Lee CC, Rehman SU, et al. Salinity (NaCl) tolerance of Brassica species at germination and early seedling growth. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2005; 4(4): 970–976.

5. El-Beltagi HS, Maraei RW, Shalaby TA, Aly AA. Metabolites, nutritional quality and antioxidant activity of red radish roots affected by gamma rays. Agronomy 2022; 12(8): 1916. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081916.

6. Gamba M, Asllanaj E, Raguindin PF, et al. Nutritional and phytochemical characterization of radish (Raphanus sativus): A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2021; 113: 205–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.045.

7. Mitra S, Emran TB, Chandran D, et al. Cruciferous vegetables as a treasure of functional foods bioactive compounds: Targeting p53 family in gastrointestinal tract and associated cancers. Frontiers in Nutrition 2022; 9: 951935. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.951935.

8. Rosés C, Garcia-Ibañez P, Agudelo A, et al. Effects of glucosinolate-enriched red radish (Raphanus sativus) on in vitro models of intestinal microbiota and metabolic syndrome-related functionalities. Acs Omega 2023; 8(26): 23373–23388. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c08128.

9. Wang Z, Bao J, Wang T, et al. Hazardous heavy metals accumulation and health risk assessment of different vegetable species in contaminated soils from a typical mining city, central China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18(5): 2617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052617.

10. Zhang J, Zhao J, Tan Q, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals key genes associated with pigmentation in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) skin and flesh. Scientific Reports 2021; 11(1): 11434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90633-5.

11. Park CH, Park SY, Park YJ, et al. Metabolite profiling and comparative analysis of secondary metabolites in Chinese cabbage, radish, and hybrid xBrassicoraphanus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2020; 68(47): 13711–13719. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04897.

12. Singh BK. Radish (Raphanus sativus L.): Breeding for higher yield, better quality and wider adaptability. In: Al-Khayri JM, Jain SM, Johnson DV (editors). Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Vegetable Crops. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 275–304.

13. Younis A, Ahsan M, Akram A, et al. Use of organic substrates in sustainable horticulture. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Hawrylak-Nowak B, Islam T, Fujita M (editors). Biostimulants for crop production and sustainable agriculture. Cambridge: CABI Publishing; 2022. p. 122–138. doi: 10.1079/9781789248098.0009.

14. Afonso S, Oliveira I, Meyer AS, Gonçalves B. Biostimulants to improved tree physiology and fruit quality: A review with special focus on sweet cherry. Agronomy 2022; 12(3): 659. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030659.

15. Ukalska-Jaruga A, Bejger R, Debaene G, Smreczak B. Characterization of soil organic matter individual fractions (fulvic acids, humic acids, and humins) by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques in agricultural soils. Agronomy 2021; 11(6): 1067. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11061067.

16. Vikram N, Sagar A, Gangwar C, et al. Properties of humic acid substances and their effect in soil quality and plant health. In: Makan A (editor). Humus and humic substances-recent advances. London: IntechOpen; 2022.

17. Michalska J, Turek-Szytow J, Dudło A, Surmacz-Górska J. Characterization of humic substances recovered from the sewage sludge and validity of their removal from this waste. Efb Bioeconomy Journal 2022; 2: 100026. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeco.2022.100026.

18. Zhang X, Wang H, Pushparaj RI, et al. Coal-derived graphene foam and micron-sized silicon composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2022; 434: 141329. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141329.

19. Dong Y, Lin H, Zhao Y, Menzembere ERGY. Remediation of vanadium-contaminated soils by the combination of natural clay mineral and humic acid. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 279: 123874. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123874.

20. Hu A, Ai J, Zheng Y, et al. Synchronous biostimulants recovery and dewaterability enhancement of anaerobic digestion sludge through post-hydrothermal treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023; 460: 141881. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141881.

21. Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2002; 34(11): 1527–1536. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.

22. Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Llaven MAO, Nazar PM, et al. Optimization of vermicompost and worm-bed leachate for the organic cultivation of radish. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2011; 34(11): 1642–1653. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2011.592561.

23. Rose MT, Patti AF, Little KR, et al. Chapter two—A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 2014; 124: 37–89. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4.

24. Shehata SA, Abdel-Wahab A. Influence of compost, humic acid and amino acids on sweet pepper growth, productivity and storage-ability. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences 2018; 8(3): 922–927.

25. Ahmad I, Saquib RU, Qasim M, et al. Humic acid and cultivar effects on growth, yield, vase life, and corm characteristics of gladiolus. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 2013; 73: 339–344. doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392013000400002.

26. Dongarwar L, Kashiwar SR, Ghawade SM, Dongarwar UR. Varietal performance of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) varieties in black soils of vidharbha-maharashtra, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018; 7(1): 491–501. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.058.

27. Aisha HA, Shafeek MR, Mahmoud RA, El-Desuki M. Effect of various levels of organic fertilizer and humic acid on the growth and roots quality of turnip plants (Brassica rapa). Current Science International 2014; 3(1): 7–14.

28. Rashid EM. Student research project list, College of Agriculture Engineering Sciences, 2021–2022 [Internet]. Erbil: Salahaddin University-Erbil; 2022. Available from: www.pg.su.edu.krd/sites/default/files/2022-08/Agriculture.pdf.

29. Albayrak S, Camas N. Effects of different levels and application times of humic acid on root and leaf yield and yield components of forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Journal of Agronomy 2005; 4(20): 130–133. doi: 10.3923/ja.2005.130.133.

30. Sahu J, Sharma SP, Singh J, et al. Effect of seaweed extract and humic acid on yield parameters of red radish. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2022; 11(6): 1–5.

31. Kazemi M. Vegetative and reproductive growth of tomato plants affected by calcium and humic acid. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 2013; 2(11): 24–29.

32. Peterson KL. Effects of humic acids and soil symbionts on growth, physiology, and productivity of two crop species [Master’s thesis]. Oxford: Miami University; 2017.

33. Karakurt Y, Unlu H, Unlu H, Padem H. The influence of foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid on yield and quality of pepper. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B—Soil and Plant Science 2009; 59(3): 233–237. doi: 10.1080/09064710802022952.

34. Türkmen Ö, Dursun A, Turan M, Erdinç Ç. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth, and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science 2004; 54(3): 168–174. doi: 10.1080/09064710310022014.

35. Makhlouf BSI, Khalil SRAE, Saudy HS. Efficacy of humic acids and chitosan for enhancing yield and sugar quality of sugar beet under moderate and severe drought. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2022; 22(2): 1676–1691. doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-00762-7.

36. El-Bassiony AM, Fawzy ZF, El-Baky MMHA, Mahmoud AR. Response of snap bean plants to mineral fertilizers and humic acid application. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 2010; 6(2): 169–175.

37. Cho EH, Choi AR, Choi SJ, et al. α-Amylase activity of radish and stability in processing. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2009; 38(6): 812–815. doi: 10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.6.812.

38. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Lee S, Byrne R. Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth. European Journal of Soil Biology 2006; 42: S65–S69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004.

39. Motaghi S, Nejad TS. The effect of different levels of humic acid and potassium fertilizer on physiological indices of growth. International Journal of Biosciences 2014; 5(2): 99–105.

40. El-Sayed SAA, Hellal FA, Mohamed KAS. Effect of humic acid and phosphate sources on nutrient composition and yield of Radish grown in calcareous soil. European International Journal of Science and Technology 2014; 3(9): 168–177.

41. Canellas LP, Teixeira LRL, Dobbss LB, et al. Humic acids crossinteractions with root and organic acids. Annals of Applied Biology 2008; 153(2): 157–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00249.x.

42. Hartwigsen JA, Evans MR. Humic acid seed and substrate treatments promote seedling root development. HortScience 2000; 35(7): 1231–1233. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.7.1231.

43. Jindo K, Martim SA, Navarro EC, et al. Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant and Soil 2012; 353: 209–220. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1024-3.

44. Chen X, Kou M, Tang Z, et al. Responses of root physiological characteristics and yield of sweet potato to humic acid urea fertilizer. PLOS One 2017; 12(12): e0189715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189715.

45. Zhang L, Sun X, Tian Y, Gong X. Biochar and humic acid amendments improve the quality of composted green waste as a growth medium for the ornamental plant Calathea insignis. Scientia Horticulturae 2014; 176: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.021.

46. Cordeiro FC, Santa-Catarina C, Silveira V, de Souza SR. Humic acid effect on catalase activity and the generation of reactive oxygen species in corn (Zea mays). Bioscience Biotechnology Biochemistry 2011; 75(1): 70–74. doi: 10.1271/bbb.100553.

47. Gulser F, Sonmez F, Boysan S. Effects of calcium nitrate and humic acid on pepper seedling growth under saline condition. Journal of Environmental Biology 2010; 31(5): 873–876.

48. Dursun A, Güvenç I, Turan M. Effects of different levels of humic acid on seedling growth and macro and micronutrient contents of tomato and eggplant. Acta Agrobotanica 2013; 55(2): 81–88.

49. Arancon NQ, Lee S, Edwards CA, Atiyeh R. Effects of humic acids derived from cattle, food and paper-waste vermicomposts on growth of greenhouse plants: The 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology·Cardiff·Wales·2002. Pedobiologia 2003; 47(5–6): 741–744. doi: 10.1078/0031-4056-00253.

50. Daur I, Bakhashwain AA. Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2013; 45(S1): 21–25.

51. Khaled H, Fawy HA. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Research 2011; 6(1): 21–29. doi: 10.17221/4/2010-SWR.

52. Salman SR, Abouhussein S, Abdel-Mawgoud AMR. El-Nemr MA. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon as affected by hybrids and humic acid application. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2005; 1(1): 51–58.

53. Shehata SA, Gharib S, El-Mogy MM, et al. Influence of compost, amino and humic acids on the growth, yield and chemical parameters of strawberries. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2011; 5(11): 2304–2308.

54. Jan JA, Nabi G, Khan M, et al. Foliar application of humic acid improves growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) varieties. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 2020; 33(3): 461–472. doi: 10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.3.461.472.