Performance of cauliflower cultivars under different phytosanitary management in summer/autumn crops, under no-till in Santa Catarina
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022
VIEWS - 231 (Abstract) 189 (PDF)
Abstract
The performance of five cauliflower cultivars in conventional and alternative phytosanitary management—without the use of synthetic pesticides—was evaluated. Two experiments were conducted at Epagri, Ituporanga Experimental Station in February 2018 and 2019. A randomized block design with four repetitions was adopted, with twenty plants of each cultivar as plots. The seedlings were transplanted on millet and mucuna straw at a spacing of 0.5 m × 0.8 m. We evaluated agronomic yield, inflorescence quality, pest damage and plant diseases, especially bacterial and fungal rots. The cauliflower hybrids Vera, Verona and Serena stood out in productivity and quality, being the most indicated for sowing in off-season crops, in the Alto Vale do Itajaí region. The most productive cultivars were less damaged by bacterial diseases and defoliating caterpillars and without interference of whitefly infestation on yield. The results also reveal that it is possible to control pests and diseases with phytosanitary products of lower toxicity, i.e., with lower residues of synthetic pesticides.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Morais Júnior OP, Cardoso AF, Leão EF, et al. Performance of summer cauliflower cultivars in Ipameri. Ciência Rural 2012 42(11): 1923–1928.
2. Silva, LFL, Maluf WR, Gonçalves WM, et al. Seasonal variation of supply and prices of cauliflower in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Ceres 2014; 61(3): 323–331.
3. Peruch MAL, da Silva ACF. Evaluation of hybrids of cabbagecauliflower and broccolis under organic cultivation in two seasons on coastal areas of Santa Catarina. Agropecuaria Catarinense 2006; 19(3).
4. Holtz AM, Rondelli VM, Celestino FN, et al. Pragas das brássicas (Portuguese) [Brassica pests]. Colatina: IFES; 2015. p. 230.
5. Lopes CVA, Albuquerque GSC. Agrochemicals and their impacts on human and environmental health: A systematic review. Saúde em Debate 2018; 42(117): 518–534.
6. Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuariae Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n. 27, de 31 de agosto de 2010 (Portuguese) [Normative Instruction n. 27, of August 31, 2010.] [Internet]. Brazil: Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuariae Abastecimento; 2010. Available from: http://sistemasweb.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis/action/detalhaAto.do?method=visualizarAtoPortalMapa&chave=446244074.
7. Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n. 46, de 06 de outubro de 2011 (Portuguese) [Normative Instruction n. 46, of October 6, 2011]. Brazil: Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento; 2011.
8. Gonçalves PAS, Boff P, Rowe E. Referenciais tecnológicos para a produção de cebola em sistemas orgânicos [Internet]. Florianópolis: Epagri; 2008. p. 21. Available from:
9. http://intranetdoc.epagri.sc.gov.br/producao_tecnico_cientifica/DOC_8047.pdf.
10. Vieira Neto J, Menezes Júnior FOG, Gonçalves PAS. Production and growth curve of pickling cucumber plants in conventional and alternative pest control. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 2013; 12(3): 229–237.
11. Vieira Neto J, Menezes Júnior FOG, Gonçalves PAS. Productivity of pickling cucumbers cultivars in conventional and alternative management. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia 2016; 11(3): 272–277.
12. AGROFIT: Sistema de agrotóxicos fitossanitários: Consulta aberta [Internet]. Brazil: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento; 2016. Available from: http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons.
13. ComissÃo QuÍmica de Fertilidade Do Solo. Manual de calagem e adubação para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina (Portuguese) [Liming and fertilization manual for the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina]. 11th ed. Santa Maria: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciências do Solo; 2016. p. 376.
14. Melo RAC, Madeira NR, Peixoto JR. Single head broccoli cultivars production in summer underno-tillage. Horticultura Brasileira 2010; 28(1): 23–28.
15. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna (Austria): R CORE TEAM; 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
16. Seabra Junior S, Neves JF, Dias LDE, et al. Performance of single-head broccoli cultivars cultivated under high temperature conditions. Horticultura Brasileira 2014; 32(4): 497–503.
17. Monteiro BCBA, Charlo, HCO, Braz LT. Performance of hybrids of cauliflower for summer season, in Jaboticabal, Brazil. Horticultura Brasileira 2010; 28(1): 115–119.
18. Maluf WR, Corte RD. Produção de sementes de couve-flor (Portuguese) [Production of cauliflower seeds]. Jaboticabal (Brazil): FCAV; 1990. p. 77–93.
19. Hernández AG, Mendes MAS. Rabanete, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. Carotovorum [Internet]. Brazil: ATENÇÃO; 2019. Available from: http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons.
20. Santos CEN, Mendes MAS. Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons.
21. Silva AMF, Mariano RLR, Michereff SJ, et al. Survey of the intensity of soft rot on lettuce and chinese cabbage in pernambuco. Revista Caatinga 2007; 20(2): 84–93.
22. Chagas Filho NR, Boiça Júnior AL, Alonso TF. Biology of plutella xylostella l. (Lepidoptera: plutellidae) reared on cauliflower genotypes. Neotropical Entomology 2010; 39(2): 253–259.
23. Boiça Júnior AL, Chagas Filho NR. Feeding nonpreference of diamondback in cauliflower genotypes. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico São Paulo 2009; 76(3): 373–379.
24. De Bortoli SA, Vacari AM, Goulart RM, et al. Reproductive capacity and preference of the diamondbackmoth feeding on different brassicacea. Horticultura Brasileira 2011; 29(2): 187–192.
25. Boiça Júnior AL, Chagas Filho NR, Souza JR. Diamondback moth oviposition nonpreference in cauliflower genotypes. Revista Caatinga 2010; 23(1): 28–33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v5i2.1825
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.