Genetic divergence and character significance in sweet potato genotypes for silage production
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2019
VIEWS - 616 (Abstract) 569 (PDF)
Abstract
Considering the need to adopt more sustainable agricultural systems, it is important that sweet potato breeding programs seek to increase not only root productivity, but also the productivity and quality of branches for silage production. The objective was to evaluate the genetic divergence and the importance of traits associated with the production and quality of branch silage in sweet potato genotypes. The experiment was conducted on the JK Campus of the Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys in a randomized block design with 12 treatments and four repetitions. Twelve characteristics of branches and silage were evaluated. There was genetic variability between the genotypes, making it possible to select parents divergent for future breeding programs for silage production. The genotypes BD-54 and BD-31TO were the most divergent in relation to the others, being indicated its use in crossbreeding aiming the improvement of the culture for silage, once the high performance per se of all genotypes evaluated has already been verified in previous works. The characteristics Na, TDN and NDF were those that most contributed to the divergence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. de Andrade Júnior VC, Viana DJS, Pinto NAVD, et al. Productive and qualitative characteristics of the vines and roots of sweet potato. Horticultura brasileira 2012; 30: 584–589.
2. Cardoso AD, Viana AES, Matsumoto SN, et al. Physical and sensorial characteristics of sweetpotato clones. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2007; 31: 1760–1765.
3. Gonçalves Neto ÁC, Maluf WR, Gomes LAA, et al. Correlation between traits and estimate of population parameters for sweetpotato. Horticultura brasileira 2012; 30: 713–719.
4. Gonçalves Neto ÁC, Maluf WR, Gomes LAA, et al. Aptitudes of sweet potato genotypes for fresh consumption, ethanol production and animal feed. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2011; 46: 1513–1520.
5. Viana DJS, Andrade Júnior VC, Ribeiro KG, et al. Potential of silages of sweet-potato foliages for animal feeding. Ciência Rural 2011; 41: 1466–1471.
6. Figueiredo JA, de Andrade Júnior VC, Pereira RC, et al. Evaluation of silages of sweet potato vine. Horticultura Brasileira 2012; 30: 708–712.
7. Monteiro AB, Massaroto JA, Gasparino CF, et al. Silagens de cultivares e clones de batata doce para alimentação animal visando sustentabilidade da produção agrícola familiar (Portuguese) [Silage of sweet potato cultivars and clones for animal feed aiming at the sustainability of family agricultural production]. Cadernos de Agroecologia 2007; 2(2): 978–981.
8. Veasey EA, Silva JRQ, Rosa MS, et al. Phenology and morphological diversity of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) landraces of the Vale do Ribeira. Scientia Agricola 2007; 64: 416–427.
9. Cavalcante M, Ferreira PV, Paixão SL, et al. Agronomic performance, genetic dissimilarity and parental selection of sweet potato for hybridization. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 2010; 5(4): 485–490.
10. Neiva IP, de Andrade Júnior VC, Viana DJS, et al. Morphologic characterization of sweet potato accesses from the germplasm bank of the Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Brazil. Horticultura Brasileira 2011; 29: 537–541.
11. Moulin MM, Rodrigues R, Gonçalves LSA, et al. A comparison of RAPD and ISSR markers reveals genetic diversity among sweet potato landraces (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 2012; 34: 139–147.
12. Silva GC, de Oliveira FJ, da Anunciação Filho CJ, et al. Genetic divergence between sugarcane genotypes. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 2011; 6(1): 52–58.
13. Azevedo AM, de Andrade Júnior VC, de Oliveira CM, et al. Selection of lettuce genotypes for protected cultivation: Genetic divergence and importance of characters. Horticultura Brasileira 2013; 31: 260–265.
14. Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético (Portuguese) [Biometric models applied to genetic improvement]. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2012. p. 514.
15. Andrade Júnior VC, Viana DJS, Figueiredo JA, et al. Coleta de clones e formação de banco de germoplasma de batata-doce no Vale do Jequitinhonha-MG (Portuguese) [Collection of clones and creation of a sweet potato germplasm bank in the Jequitinhonha Valley-MG]. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura, 46, 2006, Goiânia-GO. Annals. Goiânia: Brazilian Association of Horticulture; 2006.
16. Filgueira FAR. Novo manual de olericultura: Agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliças (Portuguese) [New horticulture manual: Agrotechnology in the production and commercialization of vegetables]. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2008. p. 402.
17. Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos (Portuguese) [Food analysis: methods chemical and biological]. Viçosa: UFV; 2002. p. 235.
18. Sniffen CJ, O’connor JD, Van Soest PJ, et al. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of animal science 1992; 70(11): 3562–3577.
19. Association Of Official Analytical Chemists—AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association. Washington: AOAC; 1990. p. 1140.
20. Sarruge JR, Haag HP. Análise química em plantas (Portuguese) [Chemical analysis in plants]. Piracicaba: ESALQ; 1974. p. 55.
21. Benitez LC, Rodrigues ICS, Arge LWP, et al. Multivariate analysis of genetic divergence of genotypes of rice under salt stress during the vegetative phase. Revista Ciência Agronômica 2011; 42: 409–416.
22. Andrade Júnior VC, Pereira RC, Dornas MFS, et al. Silage production, chemical composition and fermentative capacity of wilted sweet potato vines. Horticultura Brasileira 2014; 32: 91–97.
23. Azevedo AM, Andrade Júnior VC, Viana DJS, et al. Influence of harvest time and cultivation sites on the productivity and quality of sweet potato. Horticultura Brasileira 2014; 32: 21–27.
24. Ivoglo MG, Fazuoli LC, Oliveira ACB, et al. Genetic divergence among robusta coffe progenies. Bragantia 2008; 67: 823–831.
25. Singh D. The relative importance of characters affecting genetic divergence. Indian Journal of Genetic and Plant Breeding 1981; 41(2): 237–245.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v2i1.1774
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.