Potential control measures for Fusarium wilt in tomato for sustainable agriculture–impacts of nitrogen compounds and culture media on Fusarium

Hina Akram, Shoaib Hussain, Talib E. Butt

Article ID: 10380
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2025


Abstract


Fusarium oxysporum is one of the most common soil-dwelling pathogens that causes wilt on tomato crops. There is a plethora of literature on Fusarium, but comparatively fewer studies exist when it comes down to Fusarium and tomato together. Different experimental models on tomato infestation with Fusarium were tried. Three nitrogen compounds: KNO3, (NH4)2 SO4 and Urea, and three media: Malt Extract Agar, Potato Dextrose Agar and V8 were used in this study. Concentrations of each of the three nitrogen compounds were varied by preparing solutions of 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L and 1.5 g/L of each compound. Radial growth is measured in mm while mass is determined in mg. V8 medium was found to be the best medium for the growth as compared to tested media. The best nitrogen source for the growth of the isolate was potassium nitrate. The optimum temperature for the growth of the fungus was found to be in the range of 25–30.

Keywords


Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL); inorganic compounds; culture media; nitrogen compounds

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Kumari A, Sharma V, Sharma AK. Role of Biotechnology in Advancing Agriculture. In: Molecular Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices. M/s AGROBIOS; 2024. p. 27.

2. Fróna D, Szenderák J, Harangi-Rákos M. The challenge of feeding the world. Sustainability. 2019; 11(20): 5816.

3. Galanakis CM. The future of food. Foods. 2024; 13(4): 506.

4. Hossain MM, Sultana F, Mostafa M, et al. Plant disease dynamics in a changing climate: Impacts, molecular mechanisms, and climate-informed strategies for sustainable management. Discover Agriculture. 2024; 2(1).

5. Ma M, Taylor PWJ, Chen D, et al. Major soilborne pathogens of field processing tomatoes and management strategies. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2): 263.

6. Amoroso CG, Panthee DR, Andolfo G, et al. Genomic tools for improving tomato to biotic stress resistance. In: Genomic Designing for Biotic Stress Resistant Vegetable Crops. Springer; 2022. pp. 1–35.

7. Shawky A, Hatawsh A, Al-Saadi N, et al. Revolutionizing Tomato Cultivation: CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Biotic Stress Resistance. Plants. 2024; 13(16): 2269.

8. Méndez-Carmona JY, Ramírez-Guzmán N, Sandoval-Cortes J, et al. Valorization of Tomato Fruit Processing Residues. In: Agricultural Waste: Environmental Impact, Useful Metabolites and Energy Production. Springer; 2023. pp. 215–243.

9. Panno S, Davino S, Caruso AG, et al. A review of the most common and economically important diseases that undermine the cultivation of tomato crop in the mediterranean basin. Agronomy. 2021; 11(11): 2188.

10. Gatahi DM. Challenges and opportunities in tomato production chain and sustainable standards. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 2020; 7(3): 235–262.

11. Pandey AK, Dinesh K, Nirmala NS, Dutta P. Fusarium Wilt of Tomato: Past, Present, and Future. In: Plant Pathogen Interaction. Springer; 2024. pp. 55–87.

12. Ekwomadu TI, Mwanza M. Fusarium fungi pathogens, identification, adverse effects, disease management, and global food security: A review of the latest research. Agriculture. 2023; 13(9): 1810.

13. Rudramurthy SM, Kaur H. Taxonomy and Classification of Fungi. In: Textbook of Fungal Zoonoses and Sapronoses. Springer; 2024. pp. 3–19.

14. Khan NF, Zehra U, Reshi ZA, et al. Seasonal Dynamics of Bacterial and Fungal Lineages in Extreme Environments. In: Climate Change and Microbial Diversity. Apple Academic Press; 2022. pp. 63–107.

15. Moore D, Robson GD, Trinci APJ. 21st century guidebook to fungi. Cambridge University Press; 2020.

16. Stavridou E, Giannakis I, Karamichali I, et al. Biosolid-amended soil enhances defense responses in tomato based on metagenomic profile and expression of pathogenesis-related genes. Plants. 2021; 10(12): 2789.

17. Sulaiman MA, Bello SK. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens in arid lands: A review. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2024; 131(2): 293–313.

18. Jackson E, Li J, Weerasinghe T, Li X. The Ubiquitous Wilt-Inducing Pathogen Fusarium oxysporum—A Review of Genes Studied with Mutant Analysis. Pathogens. 2024; 13(10): 823.

19. Nikitin DA, Ivanova EA, Semenov MV, et al. Diversity, ecological characteristics and identification of some problematic phytopathogenic Fusarium in soil: A review. Diversity. 2023; 15(1): 49.

20. Sanna M, Martino I, Guarnaccia V, et al. Characterization of Fusarium species diversity causing crown and stalk rot on maize in northern Italy. Plants. 2023; 105: 1309.

21. Kinge RT, Zemenjuh LM, Bi EM, et al. Molecular phylogeny and pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. elaeidis isolates from oil palm plantations in Cameroon. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2023; 63(1): 122–136.

22. Collins EJ, Bowyer C, Tsouza A, Chopra M. Tomatoes: An extensive review of the associated health impacts of tomatoes and factors that can affect their cultivation. Biology. 2022; 11(2): 239.

23. Kong M, Xu H, Ali Q, et al. Nitrate Reductase Drives Nutrition Control and Disease Resistance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2024; 24(1): 818–830.

24. Peritore-Galve FC, Tancos MA, Smart CD. Bacterial canker of tomato: Revisiting a global and economically damaging seedborne pathogen. Plant Disease. 2021; 105(6): 1581–1595.

25. Duhan L, Pasrija R. Unveiling exogenous potential of phytohormones as sustainable arsenals against plant pathogens: Molecular signaling and crosstalk insights. Molecular biology reports. 2025; 52(1): 98.

26. Hoffland E, Jeger MJ, van Beusichem ML. Effect of nitrogen supply rate on disease resistance in tomato depends on the pathogen. Plant and Soil. 2000; 218(1): 239–247.

27. Aljarjary NH, Saeed HA, Al-Dulaimi FK. Detection of gold particales in Fusarium oxysprum and Leaves, Stems of Brassica. NTU Journal of Pure Sciences. 2023; 2(3).

28. Ibrahim NF, Mohd MH, Nor NMIM, Zakaria L. First report of Fusarium oxysporum and F. solani associated with pineapple rot in Peninsular Malaysia. Plant disease. 2015; 99(11): 1650.

29. Jamil A, Musheer N, Kumar M. Evaluation of biocontrol agents for management of wilt disease of tomato incited by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2021; 54(19–20): 1722–1737.

30. Patel P. Influence of Carbon-Nitrogen Supplements and pH on Growth of Sugarcane Stem rot Pathogen Fusarium Solani Nvs671. Journal of Fungal Diversity. 2020; 1(1): 27–32.

31. Vinchira-Villarraga DM, Castellanos L, Moreno-Sarmiento N, et al. Antifungal activity of marine-derived Paenibacillus sp. PNM200 against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, the causal agent of tomato vascular wilt. Biological Control. 2021; 154: 104501.

32. Sharma G, Pandey RR. Influence of culture media on growth, colony character and sporulation of fungi isolated from decaying vegetable wastes. Journal of yeast and fungal research. 2010; 1(8): 157–164.

33. Patra JK, Das G, Das SK, Thatoi H. Isolation, Culture, and Biochemical Characterization of Microbes. In: A Practical Guide to Environmental Biotechnology. Springer; 2020. pp. 83–133.

34. Meena AK, Godara SL, Meena PN. Detection and Diagnosis of Plant Diseases. Scientific Publishers; 2020.

35. Estoppey A, Weisskopf L, Di Francesco E, et al. Improved methods to assess the effect of bacteria on germination of fungal spores. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2022; 369(1): fnac034.

36. Palmieri D, Segorbe D, López-Berges MS, et al. Alkaline pH, low iron availability, poor nitrogen sources and CWI MAPK signaling are associated with increased fusaric acid production in Fusarium oxysporum. Toxins. 2023; 15(1): 50.

37. Cao X, Wang C, Luo X, et al. Elemental sulfur nanoparticles enhance disease resistance in tomatoes. ACS nano. 2021; 15(7): 11817–11827.

38. Qu H, Dai L, Guo Z, et al. Antifungal activity of dimethyl trisulfide and potential biocontrol against Alternaria alternata on postharvest Lycium barbarum. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2024; 1–16.

39. Nowembabazi A, Taulya G, Tinzaara W, Karamura E. Effect of integrated potassium nutrition on Fusarium wilt tolerance in apple bananas. African Journal of Plant Science. 2021; 15(9): 257–265.

40. Tyagi S, Lee KJ, Shukla P, Chae JC. Dimethyl disulfide exerts antifungal activity against Sclerotinia minor by damaging its membrane and induces systemic resistance in host plants. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1): 6547.

41. Garuba T, Mustapha OT, Oyeyiola GP. Effects of Different Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on the Biomass of Molecularly Identified Fungi Associated with Fruit Rot of Tomato. Journal of the University of Ruhuna. 2022; 10(1): 4–16.

42. Garcia E, Paiva D, Costa J, et al. First report of Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. passiflorae on Passion Fruit in Portugal. Plant disease. 2019; 103(10): 2680.

43. Mezzomo R, Rolim JM, Poletto T, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium spp. pathogenic to Ilex Paraguariensis. CERNE. 2018; 24(3): 209–218.

44. Friis C, Nielsen JØ. Land-use change in a telecoupled world: The relevance and applicability of the telecoupling framework in the case of banana plantation expansion in Laos. Ecology and Society. 2017; 22(4).

45. Fovo JD, Dostaler D, Bernier L. Influence of culture media and temperature on growth and sporulation of Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Pestalotiopsis microspora and Fusarium oxysporum Isolated from Ricinodendron heudelotii in Cameroon. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6(6): 3098–3112.

46. Jia LJ, Wang WQ, Tang WH. Wheat coleoptile inoculation by Fusarium graminearum for large-scale phenotypic analysis. Bio-protocol. 2017; 7(15): e2439.

47. Porter LD, Pasche JS, Chen W, Harveson RM. Isolation, identification, storage, pathogenicity tests, hosts, and geographic range of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi causing Fusarium root rot of pea. Plant Health Progress. 2015; 16(3): 136–145.

48. Juber KS, Al-Juboory HH, Al-Juboory SB. Fusarium wilt disease of strawberry caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Fragariae in Iraq and its control. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2014; 2(4): 419–427.

49. Nakano A, Uehara Y, Yamauchi A. Effect of organic and inorganic fertigation on yields, δ15N values, and δ13C values of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Cv. Saturn). In: Roots: The Dynamic Interface between Plants and the Earth. Springer; 2003. pp. 343–349.

50. Prasanna R, Chaudhary V, Gupta V, et al. Cyanobacteria mediated plant growth promotion and bioprotection against Fusarium wilt in tomato. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2013; 136(2): 337–353.

51. Sundaramoorthy S, Balabaskar P. Biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma spp. against wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology. 2013; 1(3): 36–40.

52. Pradeep FS, Begam MS, Palaniswamy M, Pradeep BV. Influence of culture media on growth and pigment production by Fusarium moniliforme KUMBF1201 isolated from paddy field soil. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013; 22(1): 70–77.

53. Rajmane SD, Korekar SL. Impact of carbon and nitrogen sources on pectinase production of post-harvest fungi. Current Botany. 2012; 3(3): 1–3.

54. Ignjatov M, Milosevic D, Nikolic Z, et al. Fusarium oxysporum as causal agent of tomato wilt and fruit rot. Pesticidi i fitomedicina. 2012; 27(1): 25–31.

55. Sharma BK, Singh RP, Saha S, et al. Effect of temperature, pH and media on the growth and sporulation of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causing wilt of tomato. Progressive horticulture. 2011; 43(2): 186–192.

56. McCallum BD, Tekauz A, Gilbert J. Barrage zone formation between vegetatively incompatible Fusarium graminearum (Gibberella zeae) isolates. Phytopathology. 2004; 94(5): 432–437.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th10380

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.