Calculation of ecological compensation standard in a small watershed—Based on the ecological service function value method
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2021
VIEWS - 1165 (Abstract) 308 (PDF)
Abstract
Small watershed ecological compensation is an important economic means to solve the contradiction between protecting the ecological environment and developing the economy. Taking the Changtian small watershed in the Xixiu District of Anshun City as an example, this paper uses the ecological service function value method to roughly calculate the ecological service function value of the small watershed ecosystem: the ecological service function value of the Changtian small watershed is 913.586 million yuan, and the total amount of ecological compensation is 11.6245 million yuan, of which the farmland system compensation is 1.3194 million yuan, the forest system compensation is 7.5336 million yuan, and the water system compensation is 256,000 yuan, The compensation for the fruit forest system is 2,515,500 yuan. Based on the value of ecosystem service function, the compensated and non-compensated ecosystem service functions are distinguished, and the equivalent factors that different ecosystems can provide compensated ecosystem functions are expressed, so that the determination of ecological compensation amount is scientific and more accurate, and then provides a basis for the determination of ecological compensation standard of the small watershed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Zhao L, Zhang S, Wang H. Ecosystem restoration study on watershed based on the method of ecosystem function evaluation. Forward Forum 2012; (2): 24–28.
2. Zhao C. Theoretical foundations of valley ecological compensation system. Legal Forum 2008; (4): 90–96.
3. Li We, Li S, Li F, et al. Discussions on several issues of forest eco-compensation mechanism. China Population, Resources and Environment 2007; (2): 13–18.
4. Zhang L, Rong H. Application of conditional value method and opportunity-cost method to determining ecological compensation standard—A case study of Qiupuhe River. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 2012; (4): 158–163.
5. Li Xi, Miao H, Zheng H, et al. Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and their applications. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2009; (8): 4431–4440.
6. Zhang Y, Cai Y. Using contingent valuation method to value environmental resources: A review. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis 2005; 41(2): 317–328.
7. Huang L, Zhao C. Non-market valuation of forest resources in Guiyang City of Guizhou Province based on comparative analysis of WTP and WTA. Chinese Journal of Ecology 2011; (2): 327–334.
8. Zheng H, Zhang L. Research on the standardization of compensation for the service of the ecosystem in River Valley. Environmental Protection 2006; (1): 42–46.
9. Xie G, Zhang C Zhang L, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources 2015; (8): 1243–1254.
10. Liu X, Pu C, Liu Z, et al. Quantitatively study on ecological value compensation of regional cultivated land—Taking Xinjiang as an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning 2018; (5): 84–90.
11. Ouyang Z, Zhao T, Wang X, et al. Ecosystem services analysis and valuation of China terrestrial surface water system. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2004; (10): 2091–2099.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v4i2.1612
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Guoyong Wu, Rui Dong, Fawen Yu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.